Journal of Horticulture

Journal of Horticulture
Open Access

ISSN: 2376-0354

+44-77-2385-9429

Research Article - (2017) Volume 4, Issue 4

Morphological Variation and Evaluation of Gladiolus (Gladiolus Hybridus hort.) Cultivars

Sweety Sharma1, Dastagiri MB1* and Narsi Reddy M2
1Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (NAARM), Hyderabad, India
2National Institute of Plant Health Management (NIPHM), Hyderabad, India
*Corresponding Author: Dastagiri MB, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (NAARM), Hyderabad, India, Tel: 09810619788 Email:

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the genetic variability in Gladiolus at Horticultural Research Centre (HRC) of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of agriculture and technology, Meerut, during Rabi season of 2014-2015. A total of 53 varieties were evaluated for 27 characters in genetic diversity on the basis of Mahalanobis D2 results of Cluster and D2 analysis indicated that the distribution patterns of Gladiolus genotypes into 8 clusters. Cluster IV contained a maximum number of genotypes (13). The grouping pattern of the genotypes suggested no parallelisms between genetic divergence and geographical distribution of genotypes.

The intra-cluster was maximum in cluster VII (D2=372.852) reveals maximum genetic diversity followed by cluster II (D2=343.392) and cluster V (D2=150.904) and maximum inter-cluster generalized distance (D2=1855.023) was between cluster VII and cluster VIII exhibited maximum divergence followed cluster II and VIII (D2=1568.477). It is suggested that the selection of genotypes based upon large cluster distance from all the clusters may lead to favorable broad spectrum genetic variability for corn yield improvement.

The Cluster VII had highest mean values number of corms per plant and genotypes in cluster VIII had highest mean values of the weight of corm, the weight of corms per plant indicating that by crossing between these clusters may be helpful in genetic improvement of Gladiolus germplasm.

<

Keywords: Gladiolus; Cluster and D2 analysis; Evaluation; Germplasm

Introduction

Gladiolus is one of the most important bulbous ornamentals for cut flower trade in India. It is also ideal both for garden display, floral arrangements for table and interior decoration as well as making high quality bouquet [1]. The main emphasis in Gladiolus improvement has been on the development of varieties having attractive color and large number of florets mainly for cut flower, viz long spikes, more number of well-spaced large sized florets and good corm multiplication ability. Gladiolus is very rich in varietal wealth and every year there is an addition of new varieties [2]. Multiplication of planting material of Gladiolus is most important because the cut flower trade is lagging behind over the recent years, owing to he unavailability of sufficient quality planting material at large scale [3]. Moreover, new varieties also come from other countries, and the performance of these varieties depends upon climatic conditions of the region under which they are grown. As a result, cultivars which perform well in one region may not perform same in other regions of varying climatic conditions [4]. It is also important to study the performance of existing cultivars for their superior desirable characters [5]. Hence, it becomes very much necessary to study the morphological variation and evaluation of genotypes and also to identify the suitable germplasm for further improvement programme in U.P. region.

Studies on genetic diversity for yield traits is important as the individual plant selection is slowly dependent on variability. More the diversity better are chances of improving the economic characters under consideration in the resulting offspring. Crop improvement in Gladiolus has so far been achieved by exploiting the available sources of the variability. Naturally the genetic variation or diversity for most of the yield attributes is considerably high in Gladiolus. Keeping in view the above facts there is an urgent need to seek improvement in complex quantitative trait such as flower and corm yield of Gladiolus. As a result of free exchange of Gladiolus germplasm and lot of introgression of characters has taken place in many local Gladiolus cultivars resulting in enhancement of variability and new genetic combinations. Mahalanobis D2 analysis helps in assessing the diversity among the genotypes and to select the divergent parents for future breeding programmes. Currently, such assessment is mainly based on a small number of phenotypic traits. However, environmental conditions may affect their expression and so assessing only morphological traits may not reflect the genetic diversity available.

Material and Methods

The present investigation was carried out with fifty-three varieties of Gladiolus obtained from different parts of India and selected on the basis of phenotypic variability in different quantitative and qualitative characters. The experiment was conducted at Horticultural Research centre (HRC) of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India during winter season 2014-2015. The collected genotypes of Gladiolus were planted in Randomized Block Design with three replications. In each replication corms were sown in a spacing 30 × 20 cm. The corms of different varieties were sown during second fortnight of October, 2014. At the time of final ploughing, well rotten FYM @ 20 tonnes per hectare was incorporated and thoroughly mixed in to field. A dose of NPK @ 180:150:150 kg per hectare was applied in a schedule i.e., full dose of phosphorus, potassium and half dose of nitrogen were given at the time of planting of corms and remaining dose of nitrogen were applied in two spilt doses i.e. 30 and 60 days after planting (DAP). After care and plant protection measures had been done during entire period of crop growth. The observations were recorded on the basis of growth, flowering and yield of spikes and its attributing parameters. The concept of Mahalanobis’s D2 statistic is based on the technique of utilising the measurements in respect of aggregate of characters. The D2 statistic as a measure of genetic divergence was used for the first time in the field of plant breeding by Nair and Mukherjee in the classification of natural and plantation teak.

Result And Discussion

For getting high heterosis or for recovering transgressive segregants, parents chosen for hybridization need to be genetically diverse or distant. The cultivars from widely separated localities with good yield have been usually included in the hybridisation programme, presuming the presence of genetic divergence and maximum likelihood of recovering promising segregants. As per expectations, in practice, this has not yielded very satisfactory and consistent results. Eco-geographical diversity has been regarded as a reasonable index of genetic diversity [6,7].

Mahalanobis D2 analysis

On the basis of Mahalanobis D2 values, all the 53 genotypes were grouped under study into 8 clusters. The distribution patterns of Gladiolus genotypes into 8 clusters are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. Cluster IV contained maximum number of genotypes (13). The grouping pattern of the genotypes suggested no parallelisms between genetic divergence and geographical distribution of genotypes. These results are in conformity with the findings of observations have been observed by Nimbalkar et al. [8]; Pal et al. [9] and Sheikh and Ahmad [10] in Gladiolus.

horticulture-Mahalanobis

Figure 1: Mahalanobis Euclidean2 Distance.

Cluster Number No. of genotypes Genotypes included
1 10 Shohangini,  Snow Princess,  Arka Naveen, Pusa Shuryana, Punjab Glade, Navaleen, Peater Pearl, Pricilla, Victor, Gester Gold
2 8 Friendship, Arka Amar, Punjab Pink Elegance, Sagar, Chandni, Arka Baran, Lagent Pink, Tilak
3 1 Arka Keshar
4 13 Hunting Song, Tiger Flame, White Prospirity, Nova Lux, Pusa Kiran, Darshan, Share Punjab, Flavor Sauvenir, Prince Margaret, Aarti, Mohini, Shobha, Poonam
5 8 Inter Pearl, Ocilla, Linoncella, Gold Field, Regency, Sylvia, Punjab Flame, Orange Ginger
6 1 Arka Gold
7 7 Forta Rosa, Yellow Stone, Sensire White, American Beauty, Prabha, Punjab Down, SVP-1
8 5 Arun, Punjab Glance, Pacific, Kum-Kum, Shagun

Table 1: Clustering pattern of 53 genotypes of Gladiolus on the basis of genetic divergence.

The inter-cluster distance was greater than intra-cluster distance as indicated in Figure 2 and Table 2 revealing considerable amount of genetic diversity among the genotypes studied. The intra-cluster was maximum in cluster VII (D2 =372.852) reveals maximum genetic diversity followed by cluster II (D2 = 343.392) and cluster V (D2 =150.904) and maximum inter-cluster generalized distance (D2 =1855.023) was between cluster VII and cluster VIII exhibited maximum divergence followed cluster II and VIII (D2 =1568.477).

horticulture-Distance

Figure 2: Euclidean2 Distance.

Cluster No. 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4 Cluster 5 Cluster 6 Cluster 7 Cluster 8 Cluster
1 Cluster 72.833 245.825 297.203 150.521 117.138 163.716 472.358 1191.271
2 Cluster - 343.392 522.66 319.561 265.618 336.969 582.890 1568.477
3 Cluster - - 0.00 465.616 448.404 388.297 839.536 964.232
4 Cluster - - - 125.006 140.393 186.062 475.774 1013.632
5 Cluster - - - - 85.266 158.752 321.347 1274.666
6 Cluster - - - - - 150.904 381.330 1115.994
7 Cluster - - - -   - 372.852 1855.023
8 Cluster - - - - - - - 0.000

Values in parenthesis are square root of D2 value

Table 2: Average of intra and inter cluster distance.

It is suggested that selection of genotypes based upon large cluster distance from all the clusters may lead to favorable broad spectrum genetic variability for corm yield improvement. Therefore, it is suggested that selection of genotypes based upon large cluster distance from all the clusters may lead to favorable broad spectrum genetic variability for corm yield improvement. Similar findings are reported earlier by of Sheikh and Khanday [11] and Patra and Mohanty [12]. The grouping pattern of the genotypes suggested no parallelisms between genetic divergence and geographical distribution of genotypes.

Cluster mean

Cluster means for 27 characters are present in Table 3. The existence of diversity among the genotypes was also assessed by the considerable amount of variation in cluster means for different characters. The Cluster VII had highest mean values number of corms per plant and genotypes in cluster VIII had highest mean values of weight of corm, weight of corms per plant indicating that by crossing between these clusters may be helpful in genetic improvement of Gladiolus germplasm. These results are in conformity with the findings of observations have been observed by Ranchana et al. [13].

Cluster
Number
Characters
DTS PH NLPP LLL WLL NSPC VSD OFFD NFPS DF SPC DS LS LR
1 Cluster 10.679 52.331 6.876 39.084 2.607 2.142 79.126 89.342 13.178 9.239 1.881 0.878 58.484 37.589
2 Cluster 15.457 50.437 7.100 39.497 2.450 2.243 79.583 90.123 13.187 8.603 1.953 0.847 58.690 39.073
3 Cluster 11.377 55.610 7.717 41.370 4.340 1.913 81.870 91.987 15.737 8.517 2.140 0.830 58.870 30.603
4 Cluster 11.143 50.640 6.753 38.807 2.253 2.913 81.380 91.177 11.697 8.443 1.797 0.737 55.280 41.233
5 Cluster 10.160 51.393 7.407 38.787 2.773 3.063 87.763 95.010 13.127 9.537 3.233 1.123 62.420 35.253
6 Cluster 11.723 52.907 6.257 39.450 2.663 2.003 86.770 96.187 14.277 8.617 1.770 0.980 86.137 59.723
7 Cluster 15.457 46.827 7.403 37.200 2.250 2.377 79.580 89.580 14.933 8.103 2.047 0.777 49.210 26.313
8 Cluster 10.520 50.753 7.357 38.967 2.427 1.937 80.463 90.943 21.457 10.987 1.647 0.887 80.283 56.180
Cluster
Number
Characters
LSD VLCFRT FLD NFOPS FOP WU WC WCPP DC NCPP CPP YCPH YCCPH
1 Cluster 23.175 9.966 5.946 7.999 63.465 45.614 50.821 106.103 6.603 2.079 14.150 127.285 132.373
2 Cluster 21.983 9.453 5.253 8.207 63.630 41.523 30.000 68.820 5.777 2.293 13.470 82.547 87.193
3 Cluster 23.197 11.280 6.760 9.257 60.410 49.570 33.187 62.500 6.880 1.900 14.480 74.950 80.447
4 Cluster 23.063 10.093 6.033 6.757 62.073 43.400 79.970 119.827 7.833 1.513 16.780 143.773 149.380
5 Cluster 31.817 9.907 5.710 8.490 67.167 45.080 48.397 67.420 6.367 1.413 14.267 80.873 86.970
6 Cluster 23.217 10.270 6.213 10.040 73.570 58.110 58.143 98.890 6.807 1.700 14.813 118.650 122.723
7 Cluster 22.503 8.197 4.210 6.957 48.187 28.193 49.697 128.710 6.870 2.583 17.733 154.423 158.797
8 Cluster 22.990 12.093 7.933 15.253 71.503 53.140 112.163 248.697 7.403 2.223 15.333 298.423 301.870

Table 3: Cluster wise mean values of 27 characters in gladiolus.

D2 analysis (Rank method)

The percentage contribution of different characters towards genetic divergence is presented in Table 4. Ranking character wise D2 values and adding the ranks for each character for all the entries identified the variables, which contributed towards the divergence. Characters such as days taken to sprouting contributing maximum (19.01%) towards total divergence and this was followed yield of corms per hectare (15.02%), weight of corm (11.39%) and length of spike (7.69%) these can be used for selecting parents from distinctly placed cluster to obtain higher production. The present findings were accordance with the findings of Desh Raj and Misra [14]; Nayak et al. [15]; Dhillon, [16] and Pal et al. [17].

Source Times Ranked 1st Contribution %
1  Days taken to sprouting 262 19.01
2  Plant height (cm) 2 0.15
3  Number of leaves per plant 4 0.29
4  Length of the longest leaf 32 2.32
5  Width of the longest leaf 33 2.39
6  Number of sprouts percorm 10 0.73
7  Days required for visibility of first spike 68 4.93
8  Days required for opening of first flower 0 0.00
9  Number of florets per spike 39 2.83
10  Diameter of flower (cm) 67 4.86
11  Number of spikes per corm 0 0.00
12  Diameter of spike (cm) 56 4.06
13  Length of spike (cm) 106 7.69
14  Length of rachis (cm) 68 4.93
15  Longevity of spike in days 50 3.63
16  Vase life of cut flower at room temperature  (days) 4 0.29
17  Floret longevity in days 2 0.15
18  Flowers open per spike 58 4.21
19 Floret Opening (%) 0 0.00
20  Water Uptake (ml) 112 8.13
21  Weight of Corm (gm) 157 11.39
22  Weight of Corms/ Plant (g) 5 0.36
23  Diameter of Corm (cm) 14 1.02
24  Number of corms per plant 14 1.02
25  Number of cormlets per plant 8 0.58
26  Yield of corms per hectare 207 15.02
27  Yield of corm and cormlets per hectare 0 0.00

Table 4: Contribution of various characters towards total genetic divergence.

Conclusion

• The grouping pattern of the genotypes suggested no parallelisms between genetic divergence and geographical distribution of genotypes.

• The selection of genotypes based upon large cluster distance from all the clusters may lead to favorable broad spectrum genetic variability for corm yield improvement.

• On the basis of Mahalanobis D2 analysis it could be concluded that the Gladiolus germplasm at SVPUAT can be used for future breeding programmes.

• Finally, these studies have given important clues in understanding genotypes relationship, which may further assist in developing and planning breeding strategies.

Acknowledgement

I am very thankful to Dr. Mukesh Kumar, Assistant Professor, Department of Horticulture, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, Modipuram, Meerut, for his kind help in analysis of data. I express my sincere regard and heartfelt gratitude to Dr. M. B. Dastagiri, Principal Scientist, Research Systems Management Division, NAARM and Dr. M. Narsi Reddy, Dr. M. Narsi Reddy, Assistant Scientific Officer (Entomology), NIPHM for their precious suggestions untiring help and moral support throughout the study.

References

  1. Lepcha B, Nautiyal MC, Rao VK (2007) Variability studies in gladiolus under mid hill conditions of Uttarakhand. J Orn Hort 10: 169-172.
  2. Kumar R, Yadav DS (2005) Evaluation of gladiolus cultivars under sub-tropical hills of Meghalaya. J Orn Hort 8: 86-90.
  3. Barman D, Rajni K, Upadhyaya RC (2005) Corm multiplication of gladiolus as influenced by application of potassium and spike removal. J Orn Hort 8: 104-107.
  4. Kamble BS, Reddy BS, Patil RT, Kulkarni BS (2004) Performance of gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.) cultivars for flowering and flower quality. J Orn Hort 7: 51-56.
  5. Archana B, Patil AA, Hunje R, Patil VS (2008) Study on genetic variability analysis in gladiolus hybrids (Gladiolus hybrida L.). J Orn Hort 11: 121-126.
  6. Vavilov NI (1926) Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. Bulletin of Applied Botany.
  7. Moll RH, Salhuana WS, Robinson HF (1962) Heterosis and genetic diversity in variety crosses of maize. Crop Sci 2: 197-198.
  8. Nimbalkar CA, Katwate SM, Singh BR, Kakade DS, Gurav (2006) Studies on genetic divergence in gladiolus genotypes (Gladiolus hybridus). J Orn Hort 10: 9-14.
  9. Pal A, Pal K, Singh R (2006) Estimates of genetic diversity in gladiolus. Prog Agric 6: 203-204.
  10. Sheikh MQ, Ahmad M (2006) Genetic divergence for certain economic traits of gladiolus (Gladiolus hybrida L.). Indian J Genet 66: 257-258.
  11. Sheikh MQ, Khanday BA (2008) Genetic diversity in gladiolus (Gladiolus hybrid L.) under two environments. J Orn Hort 11: 216-219.
  12. Patra SK, Mohanty CR (2015) Genetic Divergence Study in Gladiolus. J Recent Adv Agr 3: 356-360.
  13. Ranchana P, Kannan M, Jawaharlal M (2014) Genetic divergence analysis in double types of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa). Asian J Hort Vol 9: 507-509.
  14. Deshraj R, Misra L (1996) Genetic variability in gladiolus. J Orna Hort 4: 1-8.
  15. Nayak BH, Chauhan N, Patil AA, Patil VS, Patil BC (2004) Comparative performance of gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii Bolus ex Hooker F.) cultivars under naturally ventilated polyhouse. J Orn Hort 9: 202-207.
  16. Dhillon MK, Sharma HC, Folkertsma RT, Chandra S (2006) Genetic divergence and morphological characterization of sorghum hybrids and their parents for reaction to Atherigona soccata (Rondani). Euphytica 149: 199-210.
  17. Pal SL, Prasad A, Singh RA (2006) Analysis of genetic divergence in gladiolus. Indian J Hort 63: 70-72.
Citation: Sharma S, Dastagiri MB, Reddy MN (2017) Morphological Variation and Evaluation of Gladiolus (Gladiolus Hybridus hort.) Cultivars. J Hortic 4: 212.

Copyright: © 2017 Sharma S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top