Mycobacterial Diseases

Mycobacterial Diseases
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-1068

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2014) Volume 4, Issue 6

Mycobacterium kumamotonense, another Member of the Mycobacterium terrae Complex Unusually Carrying Two Copies of the Ribosomal RNA Operon

María Carmen Menéndez1, María Soledad Jiménez2, Jesús Yubero1 and María Jesús García1*
1Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health Microbiology, School of Medicine, University Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
2Mycobacterial Laboratory. Carlos III Health Institute, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
*Corresponding Author: María Jesús García, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, St / Archbishop Morcillo S/n, 28029 Madrid, Spain, Tel: +34914972753, Fax: +34914975353 Email:

Abstract

The novel slow-grower Mycobacterium kumamotonense was previously misidentified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using commercial probes. Similarly to other slow-growers that cross-react with the tubercle bacilli using commercial probes, M. kumamotonense is carrying two copies of the ribosomal RNA operon (rrn) per genome. Analysis of the corresponding rrn regions allowed the identification of sequences putatively involved in that cross-reactivity.

Keywords: Mycobacterium kumamotonense, Misidentification, ITS, rrn operons

Introduction

Different molecular probes, available to identify panels of mycobacterial species, have been developed and are widely applied in the diagnosis of the infections caused by these bacteria [1]. However, the misidentification could be found due to cross-reaction between probes and genomes of other species. Tortoli and co-workers described a frequent misidentification of commercial probes when less-frequently isolated species are present in the clinical sample. These authors found that some infrequent species were even not identified as members of the genus Mycobacterium by using one of the commercial probes tested [2].

The incorrect identification of an isolate as member of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) could carry main troubles in the diagnostic procedures, particularly when infrequently encountered species are involved as it could be the case if the aetiological agent was an emerging pathogen [2].

In a previous study, a clinical isolate, from a HIV positive patient diagnosed of lymphoid tuberculosis, was initially identified as member of MTBC by using AccuProbe (BioMérieux, Spain) and treated according to standard regimes. The un-complete recover of the patient prompted for a further characterization of the isolate by using standard microbiological procedures. These procedures allowed the identification of the isolate as Mycobacterium kumamotonense [3]. With the aim of clarify the previous result using AccuProbe, other two commercial probes were applied, however, one of them again misidentified the bacteria as MTBC. The three commercial probes applied have different genome regions as targets, all them belonging to the mycobacterial ribosomal RNA operon rrn [3].

In order to analyse these results more in deep, we focus on the study of the rrn operon including the corresponding internal transcribed spacer 1 sequences (ITS-1 corresponding to the 16S-23S ribosomal RNA intergenic region). We found that M. kumamotonense carried two copies of rrn per genome, which is unusual in slow grower mycobacteria. We were able to identify a sequence putatively involved in the cross-reactivity detected, within the ITS-1 region of several slow-growers.

Materials and Methods

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the 16S rDNA was performed following previously described procedures [4].

The ITS-1 sequence (Internal Transcribed Spacer-1) corresponding to 16S-23S ribosomal RNA intergenic region, was analysed following the procedure described by Roth and co-workers [5]. The PCR amplified ITS-1 product was cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega Corporation, USA). Up to ten different colonies were selected for plasmid isolation and sequencing of the cloned fragments. Plasmids were sequenced with T7 and SP6 universal primers and sequences were analysed using 4Peaks software (v1.7.2, 4Peaks by A. Griekspoor and Tom Groothuis). ITS-1 sequences were aligned using the Mega software (v5.05).

Results and Discussion

According to the 16S rDNA sequence, the emerging pathogen M. kumamotonense was closely related to members of the M. terrae complex [6]. Interestingly, M. terrae carry two copies of the rrn operon per genome, which is unusual among members of this group [7]. This result prompted us to determine the number of rrn operons per genome of the M. kumamotonense under study. The RFLP pattern of the 16S rDNA gene showed two bands after BamHI digestion, thus indicating that, similarly to M. celatum and M. terrae, M. kumamotonense carried two copies of the ribosomal RNA operon per genome (Figure 1).

mycobacterial-diseases-BamHI-digested

Figure 1: 16S rDNA RFLP using BamHI digested DNA from the following mycobacteria: A, rapidly grower Mycobacterium fortuitum ; B, slow grower M. kumamotonense . The probe used targets a conserved region of the 16S rDNA gene, and hybridizes with a single fragment of that gene after digestion with BamHI. Fragment sizes (in kbp) are indicated on the left.

Previous publications showed misidentification of M. terrae and M. celatum as M. tuberculosis complex by using different commercial probes [8-11]. To have insights into that cross-hybridization, we performed the characterization of the two main targets of the commercial probes found to cross-hybridize, namely 16S rDNA and ITS-1. Both targets are part of the ribosomal RNA operon (rrn).

We have compared the 16S rDNA hypervariable region of members of the M. terrae complex and M. celatum [12]. In that region, M. kumamotonense showed 100% of similarity with members of the M. terrae complex, such as M. terrae, M. senuense and M. algericum and less than 94.3% similarity when compared to that gene of other mycobacteria, including M. tuberculosis and M. celatum (Table 1) [13,14]. We could not identify any sequence putatively involved in the cross-hybridization detected by using the commercial probe that targets 16S rRNA.

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 M. kumamotonense 100%            
2 M. aurupense 89.8% 100%          
3 M. terrae 100% 89.9% 100%        
4 M. senuense 100% 89.8% 100% 100%      
5 M. algericum 100% 89.8% 100% 100% 100%    
6 M. celatum 91% 85.5% 91% 91% 91% 100%  
7 M. tuberculosis H37Rv 94.4% 89.8% 94.4% 94.4% 94.4% 95.45% 100%

Table 1: Percentage of sequence similarity of the hypervariable region A of the 16S rRNA. Percentages of similarity between slow grower mycobacteria members of the M. terrae complex, including M. kumamotonense . Percentage of similarity with M. tuberculosis is also showed. Accession number of the sequences for slow grower mycobacteria used for comparison: M. kumamotonense , AB239925; M. aurupense , AB239926; M. terrae , X52925; M. senuense , JN571174; M. algericum NR117529.1; M. celatum , EFL08170; M. tuberculosis , X52917.

Higher variability was expected comparing sequences of the ITS-1 genomic region. After cloning and sequencing the ITS-1 regions of M. kumamotonense, two different ITS fragments of the same size (311 bp) were identified. The two ITS were named ITS-A and ITS-1B (Accession Numbers: FN597646 and FN597647 respectively). The sequences of these two fragments showed 92% of similarity to each other (Table 2). High level of similarity (99.6%) was also found comparing each other the two copies of ITS-1 described in the genome of M. celatum (Table 2). On the other hand, the two ITS sequences of M. kumamotonense showed a range of similarity between 67%-89% compared to other ITS sequences identified in mycobacteria, such as M. tuberculosis, M. celatum, and other members of the M. terrae complex (Table 2).

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 ITS-1A M. kumamotonense 100%            
2 ITS-1B M. kumamotonense 92% 100%          
3 ITS M. aurupense 88.40% 77.40% 100%        
4 ITS M. terrae (Genotype I) 79% 71.30% 77.20% 100%      
5 ITS-1A M. celatum 77.90% 75.60% 72.70% 68.50% 100%    
6 ITS-1B M. celatum 76.50% 71.30% 73.10% 65.50% 99.60% 100%  
7 ITS M. tuberculosis H37Rv 67.80% 72.30% 69.50% 66.80% 69.40% 66.10% 100%

Table 2: Percentage of sequence similarity of the ITS-1 genomic region. Percentages of similarity between slow grower mycobacteria members of the M. terrae complex, including M. kumamotonense. Percentage of similarity with M. tuberculosis is also showed. The sequences of the two copies of M. celatum and M. kumamotonense are included (labelled as “A” and “B” respectively).Accession number of the sequences of slow grower mycobacteria used for comparison: M. kumamotonense, this work; M. aurupense, DQ523527; M. terrae (genotype I, 11), AJ314868; M. celatum, EF613281 (ITS-1A) and EF613282 (ITS1B); M. tuberculosis, NC000962.

With the aim of identify the sequences that could explain the detected cross-hybridization, we analysed the sequence alignments of the complete ITS-1 region of M. tuberculosis and other mycobacteria, including the two sequences of M. kumamotonense (this work). Two putative regions of similarity were identified (21 and 25 nt length respectively) that could explain the cross-reaction described (Figure 2). These regions were 100% identical comparing M. tuberculosis H37Rv with M. kumamotonense (both, ITS-1A and ITS-1B), M. celatum (both, ITS-1A and ITS-1B), and M. terrae ITS-I, the three mycobacteria known that cross-hybridize with MTBC by using commercial probes (Figure 2).

mycobacterial-diseases-cross-react

Figure 2: ITS-1 region of the M. tuberculosis H37Rv genome. The putative sequences that cross-react with M. tuberculosis are highlighted in cyan. The primers Sp1 and Sp2 are shown.

The RFLP pattern found together to the two different copies of ITS identified in M. kumamotonense, showed the presence of two copies of the rrn operon in the genome of this slow grower mycobacteria (Figure 1 and Table 2).

According to our data in M. kumamotonense, together to the previous data in M. terrae and M. celatum the presence of a supplementary copy of the rrn operon in slow grower mycobacteria could be related at some stage to the cross-reaction of these mycobacteria with probes developed to identify members of the MTBC. Out of the M. terrae complex and together to M. celatum, also the slow-grower mycobacteria M. riyadhense show cross-reaction with MTBC commercial probes [8-11,15]. Unfortunately, no data on the rrn content per genome is available of that mycobacterium thus far.

Rapid grower mycobacteria are by majority carrying two copies of the rrn operon per genome [16]. Contrary to slow growers, and with the exception of the rapid grower M. holsaticum, no cross-hybridization has been described at the moment between MTBC commercial probes and any other rapid grower mycobacteria [2]. This is surprising, taking into account the putative relationships of the number of rrn operons and cross-hybridization with MTBC, mainly considering the wide distribution of these bacteria and their frequent isolation from clinical samples.

The association of the second copy of the rrn operon in slow-growers with abnormal reaction to commercial probes was striking. More analyses are required to disclose the reason, if any, that links cross-hybridization with M. tuberculosis and number of copies of the rrn operon per genome in slow grower mycobacteria. Any suggested hypothesis is by now speculative.

Acknowledgements

We thank E. Palenque for providing the M. kumamotonense strain. The results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-HEALTH-2007) under grant agreement n° 200999 and supported by Centro de Estudios de América Latina (UAM-BSCH).

References

  1. Drake TA, Hindler JA, Berlin OG, Bruckner DA (1987) Rapid identification of Mycobacterium avium complex in culture using DNA probes. J ClinMicrobiol 25: 1442-1445.
  2. Tortoli E, Pecorari M, Fabio G, Messinò M, Fabio A (2010) Commercial DNA probes for mycobacteria incorrectly identify a number of less frequently encountered species. J ClinMicrobiol 48: 307-310.
  3. Rodríguez-Aranda A, Jimenez MS, Yubero J, Chaves F, Rubio-Garcia R, et al. (2010) Misindentification of Mycobacterium kumamotonense as M. tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis 16: 1178-1180.
  4. Domenech P, Menendez MC, Garcia MJ (1994) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms of 16S rRNA genes in the differentiation of fast-growing mycobacterial species. FEMS MicrobiolLett 116: 19-24.
  5. Roth A, Reischl U, Streubel A, Naumann L, Kroppenstedt RM, et al. (2000) Novel diagnostic algorithm for identification of mycobacteria using genus-specific amplification of the 16S-23S rRNA gene spacer and restriction endonucleases. J ClinMicrobiol 38: 1094-1104.
  6. Masaki T, Ohkusu K, Hata H, Fujiwara N, Iihara H, et al. (2006) Mycobacterium kumamotonense Sp. Nov. recovered from clinical specimen and the first isolation report of Mycobacterium arupense in Japan: Novel slowly growing, nonchromogenic clinical isolates related to Mycobacterium terrae complex. MicrobiolImmunol 50: 889-897.
  7. Stadthagen-Gomez G, Helguera-Repetto AC, Cerna-Cortés JF, Goldstein RA, Cox RA, et al. (2008) The organization of two rRNA (rrn) operons of the slow-growing pathogen Mycobacterium celatum provides key insights into mycobacterial evolution. FEMS MicrobiolLett 280: 102-112.
  8. Butler WR, O'Connor SP, Yakrus MA, Gross WM (1994) Cross-reactivity of genetic probe for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with newly described species Mycobacterium celatum. J ClinMicrobiol 32: 536-538.
  9. Christiansen DC, Roberts GD, Patel R (2004) Mycobacterium celatum, an emerging pathogen and cause of false positive amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test. DiagnMicrobiol Infect Dis 49: 19-24.
  10. Ford EG, Snead SJ, Todd J, Warren NG (1993) Strains of Mycobacterium terrae complex which react with DNA probes for M. tuberculosis complex. J ClinMicrobiol 31: 2805-2806.
  11. Somoskövi A, Hotaling JE, Fitzgerald M, Jonas V, Stasik D, et al. (2000) False-positive results for Mycobacterium celatum with the AccuProbe Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex assay. J ClinMicrobiol 38: 2743-2745.
  12. Rogall T, Flohr T, Böttger EC (1990) Differentiation of Mycobacterium species by direct sequencing of amplified DNA. J Gen Microbiol 136: 1915-1920.
  13. Mun HS, Park JH, Kim H, Yu HK, Park YG, et al. (2008) Mycobacterium senuense sp. nov., a slowly growing, non-chromogenic species closely related to the Mycobacterium terrae complex. Int J SystEvolMicrobiol 58: 641-646.
  14. Sahraoui N, Ballif M, Zelleg S, Yousfi N, Ritter C. et al. (2011) Mycobacterium algericum sp. nov., a novel rapidly growing species related to the Mycobacterium terrae complex and associated with goat lung lesions. Int J SystEvolMicrobiol 61: 1870-1874
  15. van Ingen J, Al-Hajoj SA, Boeree M, Al-Rabiah F, Enaimi M, et al. (2009) Mycobacterium riyadhense sp. nov., a non-tuberculous species identified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by a commercial line-probe assay. Int J SystEvolMicrobiol 59: 1049-1053.
  16. Menéndez MC, García MJ, Navarro MC, González-y-Merchand JA, Rivera-Gutiérrez S, et al. (2002) Characterization of a rRNA operon (rrnB) of Mycobacterium fortuitum and other mycobacterial species: implications for the classification of mycobacteria. J Bacteriol 184: 1078-1088.
Citation: Menéndez MC, Jiménez MS, Yubero J, García MJ (2014) Mycobacterium kumamotonense, another Member of the Mycobacterium terrae Complex Unusually Carrying Two Copies of the Ribosomal RNA Operon. Mycobac Dis 4: 176

Copyright: © 2014 Menendez MC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top