Mycobacterial Diseases

Mycobacterial Diseases
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-1068

+44 1478 350008

Editorial - (2014) Volume 4, Issue 2

New Evidences Strengthening the Need for Considering M. Tuberculosis Biofilms in Drug Development Pipelines

Perla Jazmín Vega-Domínguez1, César Pedroza-Roldán2 and Mario Alberto Flores-Valdez1*
1Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco, A.C.,Unidad de Biotecnología Médica y Farmacéutica, Mexico
2Universidad de Guadalajara. Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias. Departamento de Medicina Veterinaria, Mexico
*Corresponding Author: Mario Alberto Flores-Valdez, Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco, A.C.,Unidad de Biotecnología Médica y Farmacéutica, Mexico, Tel: (+52)33-33455200 Email: ,

Tuberculosis (TB) still remains a major health problem. Even in drug susceptible cases, the current chemotherapy may last up to nine months. This is thought to be the consequence of the arousal of a subpopulation of bacilli that replicates very slowly and thus might not be susceptible to drug treatment. So it is clear that new drugs are needed to shorten the present chemotherapy scheme, and Islam et al. [1] propose that this might be achieved by studying tuberculosis as a biofilm forming disease.

A biofilm is defined as a community of microorganisms that grow attached to a matrix composed of secreted polymers (such as lipids, polysaccharides, proteins or nucleic acids). Biofilm-forming pathogens cause recalcitrant infections that exhibit a drug tolerant phenotype, which are characteristics possessed by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) as well.

Although the formation of biofilms in vivo by M. tuberculosis remains controversial, Wang et al. have found that a molecule capable of inhibit biofilm in vitro has bactericidal effect, in both a chronic and an acute mouse infection model, even when rifampicin or isoniazidresistant strains were used for infection, so it is suggested that biofilm may be relevant for the disease [2].

Orme has recently proposed the presence of a biofilm-like structure present on the acellular rim surrounding primary lesions in infected Guinea pigs. He calls this structure NECs: Necrosisassociated Extracellular Clusters, and designate them as responsible of persistence and drug tolerance [3]. Also, Kerns et al. identified a set of M. tuberculosis H37Rv proteins that were recognized by sera obtained from experimentally-infected Guinea pigs, which were expressed during biofilm formation but not in shaken cultures [4]; this strongly suggests the presence of a biofilm-like structure in vivo or simply that conditions prevalent during biofilm life cycle resemble to some extent a stage found during infection.

In order to recreate what might be a more accurate environment for in vivo biofilm formation, Ackart et al. designed a model consisting on RPMI-1640 tissue culture media supplemented with lysed human peripheral blood leukocytes. They found that under this condition, communities of attached mycobacteria were formed and drug tolerance to isoniazid and rifampicine was observed, and this was reversed upon the addition of Tween-80, while DNAse I addition to aggregates already formed restored only susceptibility to INH [5].

On the other hand, Bacon et al. analyzed a model of non-replicating persistence (NRP) consisting on a batch culture with gradual depletion of nutrients, and found that NRP bacilli were surrounded by an extracellular matrix, somehow resembling a biofilm-like structure. Furthermore, transcriptome analysis showed up-regulation for some genes in NRP bacilli that were also up-regulated in bacilli present within granulomas [6].

All these evidences further support the notion that biofilm formation could provide an important condition to assess new antituberculosis drugs, in order to possibly eradicate persistent bacilli, and thus shorten the current chemotherapy period of time needed to cure drug susceptible tuberculosis. It is noteworthy that further investigation is needed, especially when choosing animal models whose pathogenesis resembles that observed in human beings.

References

  1. Islam MS1, Richards JP, Ojha AK (2012) Targeting drug tolerance in mycobacteria: a perspective from mycobacterial biofilms. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 10: 1055-1066.
  2. Wang F, Sambandan D, Halder R, Wang J, Batt SM, et al. (2013) Identification of a small molecule with activity against drug-resistant and persistent tuberculosis. ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 110: E2510-2517.
  3. Orme IM (2013) A new unifying theory of the pathogenesis of tuberculosis. (Translated from Eng) Tuberculosis (in Eng).
  4. Kerns PW1, Ackhart DF, Basaraba RJ, Leid J, Shirtliff ME (2014) Mycobacterium tuberculosis pellicles express unique proteins recognized by the host humoral response. Pathog Dis.
  5. Ackart DF1, Hascall-Dove L, Caceres SM, Kirk NM, Podell BK, et al. (2014) Expression of Antimicrobial Drug Tolerance by Attached Communities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Pathog Dis.
  6. Bacon J, Luke J. Alderwick, Jon A. Allnutt, EvelinaGabasova, Robert Watson, et al.  (2014) Non-Replicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis Elic its a Reduced Infectivity Profile with Corresponding Modifications to the Cell Wall and Extracellular Matrix. (Translated from eng) PLoS ONE 9(2):e87329.
Citation: Vega-Domínguez PJ, Pedroza-Roldán C, Flores-Valdez MA (2014) New Evidences Strengthening the Need for Considering M. Tuberculosis Biofilms in Drug Development Pipelines. J Mycobac Dis 4:e126.

Copyright: © 2014 Vega-Domínguez PJ, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top