Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering
Open Access

Noise Reduction Strategies through Airfoil Design Modifications

Cetin Erol^{* *}Correspondence: Cetin Erol, Department of Aircraft Electrics and Electronics, Cappadocia University, Nevsehir, Turkey, Email:

Author info »

About the Study

In the area of aviation and aerodynamics, noise reduction plays an important role in improving both environmental sustainability and passenger comfort. Aircraft noise, generated primarily by engines and aerodynamic forces interacting with the airframe, poses significant challenges to communities near airports and affects the overall perception of air travel. One key area of focus in minimizing this issue lies in the design of airfoils, the fundamental components responsible for generating lift. By optimizing airfoil shapes and structures, engineers can effectively reduce noise levels without compromising on performance.

Understanding aircraft noise

Aircraft noise originates from multiple sources during flight, primarily from engine exhaust and aerodynamic forces. These sources include:

Engine noise: Generated by the combustion process and the high-speed exhaust gases emitted from jet engines.

Aerodynamic noise: Produced by turbulent airflow around the aircraft, especially at high speeds and during maneuvers.

Airframe noise: Caused by airflow over structural elements like wings, landing gear, and control surfaces.

Among these, aerodynamic noise, which includes airframe noise, is particularly significant during takeoff, landing, and low-speed flight phases [1-3]. It stems from the interaction of airflow with the aircraft's surfaces, especially the wings and control surfaces, known as airfoils.

Airfoil design and noise reduction

Airfoils are designed to optimize lift while minimizing drag, but their shape and surface features also influence aerodynamic noise generation. Engineers employ several strategies to minimize noise through airfoil design modifications:

Smooth surface finishes: Irregularities on an airfoil's surface can cause airflow separation and turbulence, leading to increased noise. Smoothing out surface imperfections through advanced manufacturing techniques, such as precision machining and composite materials, reduces aerodynamic noise significantly [4].

Blended winglets and wingtip devices: By adding winglets or modifying wingtips, engineers can alter the vortex patterns at the wingtips. This modification reduces the intensity of wingtip vortices, which are a significant source of aerodynamic noise during takeoff and landing.

Trailing edge modifications: The shape and profile of the trailing edge of an airfoil impact noise generation. By employing serrated or sawtooth trailing edges, engineers can disrupt airflow in a controlled manner, reducing the noise produced as turbulent air separates from the surface [5].

Boundary layer control: Managing the boundary layer, a thin layer of air adjacent to the airfoil's surface is necessary for noise reduction. Techniques like active flow control and passive flow control (using porous materials or surface modifications) help maintain smooth airflow over the airfoil, reducing noise caused by turbulence and separation.

Noise-optimized profiles: Advances in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) allow for the development of airfoil profiles specifically optimized for noise reduction. These profiles consider not only aerodynamic performance but also the acoustic characteristics of the airfoil's interaction with airflow [6].

Industry applications

Several aircraft manufacturers and have implemented these noise reduction strategies with notable success:

Boeing 787 dreamliner: Incorporates advanced airfoil designs and winglet technology to minimize aerodynamic noise during takeoff and landing, improving both fuel efficiency and passenger comfort.

Airbus A350 XWB: Features innovative wing design with curved wingtips and optimized airfoil sections to reduce drag and noise levels, setting new standards in aircraft efficiency and noise reduction [7].

NASA's X-59 queSST: A experimental aircraft designed to fly at supersonic speeds with reduced sonic boom levels, achieved through advanced airfoil and wing shaping technologies that minimize aerodynamic disturbances and resulting noise.

Environmental and social impact

Reducing aircraft noise through airfoil design modifications offers significant environmental and social benefits:

Community relations: Noise reduction efforts improve relationships between airports and neighboring communities by lowering the impact of aircraft noise pollution, enhancing the overall quality of life for residents.

Regulatory compliance: Airports and airlines are subject to increasingly stringent noise regulations. Noise-reducing airfoil designs help meet these regulatory requirements while supporting sustainable aviation practices [8].

Operational efficiency: Quieter aircraft operations can lead to expanded airport operating hours and reduced curfews, optimizing airspace utilization and enhancing economic benefits for airlines and airports.

Prospective pathways and advancements

Looking ahead to push the boundaries of airfoil design for noise reduction:

Bio-inspired designs: Drawing inspiration from natural phenomena, such as owl wings' serrated trailing edges, to further minimize turbulence and noise generation.

Active noise control: Integrating active noise control technologies within airfoil structures to dynamically manage airflow and reduce noise levels during various flight conditions.

Composite materials: Advancements in lightweight and durable composite materials offer new possibilities for shaping airfoil surfaces and structures to optimize both aerodynamics and noise characteristics [9,10].

Noise reduction strategies through airfoil design modifications is significant in aviation technology. By optimizing airfoil shapes, surface finishes, and aerodynamic features, engineers can effectively minimize aircraft noise without compromising performance. These advancements not only improve passenger comfort and environmental sustainability but also support the continued growth of the aviation industry in harmony with communities and regulatory requirements.

References

1. Liu LG, Du G, Sun M. Aerodynamic-force production mechanisms in hovering mosquitoes. J Fluid Mech. 2020;898:A19.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

2. McIntosh SH, Agrawal SK, Khan Z. Design of a mechanism for biaxial rotation of a wing for a hovering vehicle. ASME Trans Mechatron. 2006;11(2):145-153.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

3. Park JH, Yoon KJ. Designing a biomimetic ornithopter capable of sustained and controlled flight. J Bionic Eng. 2008;5(1):39-47.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

4. Miller LA. The aerodynamics buzz from mosquitoes. Nature. 2017;544(7648):40-41.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

5. Zhang JD, Huang WX. On the role of vortical structures in aerodynamic performance of a hovering mosquito. Phys Fluids. 2019;31(5):051906.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

6. Liu S, Ling J, Tian Y, Qian J. Assessment of aircraft landing gear cumulative stroke to develop a new runway roughness evaluation index. Int J Pavement Eng. 24;23(10):3609-3620.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

7. Loprencipe G, Zoccali P. Comparison of methods for evaluating airport pavement roughness. Int J  Pavement Eng. 2019;20(7):782-791.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

8. Kiureghian AD. A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of MDF systems. Earthq. Eng Struct Dyn. 1981;9(5):419-35.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

9. Lin JH, Zhang YH, Zhao Y. Pseudo excitation method and some recent developments. Procedia Eng. 2011;14:2453-2458.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

10. Hassanalian M, Abdelkefi A. Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2017;91:99-131.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]