Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences

Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9600

+32 25889658

Mini Review - (2016) Volume 6, Issue 4

Nutritional Aspects of Food Toxicology: Mercury Toxicity and Protective Effects of Olive Oil Hydroxytyrosol

Officioso A, Tortora F and Manna C*
Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and General Pathology, School of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
*Corresponding Author: Manna C, Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and General Pathology, School of Medicine, Second University of Naples, 80138, Naples, Italy, Tel: 390815667523, Fax: 390815667608

Abstract

Mercury represents one of the main environmental pollutants and human exposure to this heavy metal occurs primarily through nutritional sources, including contaminated fish. This highly toxic compound is known to pose serious threats to human health, including neurological alterations. Moreover, based on its effects on cardiovascular health, mercury exposure is now considered an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The possibility of reducing heavy metal toxicity through diet has attracted the interest of those responsible for the public health service. In this respect, the use of phytochemicals able to significantly counteract oxidative alterations as an attractive tool for the reduction of mercury toxicity has been proposed. Here we review recent evidence supporting the beneficial role of olive oil hydroxytyrosol in preventing mercury-induced alterations in both human erythrocytes and neuroblastoma cells. This novel biological effect exerted by hydroxytyrosol represents an additional mechanism responsible for the much-claimed health benefits of this dietary phenol. Taken together the reported findings encourage the use of virgin olive oil, characterized by a high hydroxytyrosol content, as an innovative approach in designing combined dietary and/or nutraceutical strategies to contrast mercury toxicity in humans.

Keywords: Food toxicology; Mercury toxicity; Olive oil; Cardiovascular diseases

Introduction

The primary role of nutrition is to provide sufficient quantities of nutrients in order to prevent syndromes of deficiency or excess [1]. Nevertheless, a healthy diet is a vital key in reducing morbidity and mortality from chronic diseases [2]. In recent years nutritional research has focused on studies of dietary components which are able to strengthen biological functions with the aim of preventing and/or reducing the risk of disease [3]. Among these compounds, several secondary plant metabolites are included endowed with important biological activities, in addition to their basic nutritional benefits. Fruit and vegetables, indeed, contain thousands of different biomolecules (phytochemicals), some of which have the potential to promote health and/or retard diseases [4]. In this respect, these bioactive dietary components are believed to play a major role in the positive correlation between adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and a low incidence of several pathologies, including cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and cancer [5]. Moreover, these phytochemicals have been proved to actively counteract the heavy metal-induced body burden and biochemical alterations [6-7].

Mercury Toxicity

Mercury (Hg) is a highly toxic volatile heavy metal, liquid at room temperature [8]. It can exist in three oxidation forms: elementary (Hg0), mercurous (Hg+) and mercuric (Hg2+), and it can form both inorganic and organic compounds. Among organic compounds, methylmercury (MeHg) is the most important biologically and ecologically [9]. Mercury is one of the main environmental pollutants. The natural sources of emission of metals are superficial waters, the soil, volcanic activity and the combustion of vegetation. Among anthropic sources we may consider combustion of fuel and those of incinerators [10]. The biogeochemical cycle of mercury (Figure 1) occurs both in air and in the soil [11]. However, mercury cycling in the aquatic system represents the critical point for human contamination [12-13]. In aquatic sediments, a small fraction of Hg2+ is converted to the organic forms. Methylation reaction is mediated by several kinds of bacteria including some strains of sulfate- and iron-reducing anaerobic bacteria [14]. The organic form penetrates inside the aquatic trophic network via plankton (phytoplankton and zooplankton) and invertebrates [15]. Once it is absorbed by living organisms it tends to bioaccumulate in the passage through the aquatic food chain, continuing through small fish and accumulating even further via the process of biomagnification, reaching its greatest concentration in carnivorous fish at the top of the food chain [16]. Thus, sources of Hg exposure to humans are air and water as well as dental amalgam and certain types of vaccines [13]; however, the dominant pathway is through eating contaminated food. In fact, diet plays an important role in exposure to Hg, given that certain foods, especially fish, can contain high concentrations of this contaminant [12,15]. Furthermore, even contaminated soil may represent a risk related to its potential transfer of this metal to crops. Finally, Hg can be transferred into human milk, causing severe damage to infants [17]. The molecular mechanisms underlying Hg toxicity are related to its binding capacity to thiol groups, potentially leading to severe alteration of enzymatic as well as structural proteins [18]. Hg is a well-known inhibitor of glycolytic enzymes; in particular, Ramírez-Bajo et al. report Hg inhibitory activity on both hexokinase and phosphofructokinase in mice, by reacting with crucial cysteine [19]. Furthermore, the human thioredoxin system is reported to be inhibited by Hg [20]. The impact of Hg on the cytoskeleton protein tubulin is well known [21-22]. The metal, binding to SH-groups of the protein, induces depolymerisation of microtubules therefore interfering with cellular processes, including cell survival, proliferation, migration and differentiation [23]. Besides, sulfur-containing low molecular weight molecules such as glutathione (GSH) can be inactivated, thus reducing the antioxidant endogenous defense system [24]. In this respect, disruption of cellular redox homeostasis, associated with increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), is considered to be one of the main Hg-related toxic mechanisms [25].

nutrition-food-sciences-Hg-biogeochemical-cycle

Figure 1: The Hg biogeochemical cycle. In aquatic sediments, a small fraction of Hg2+ is converted into organic forms. These latter penetrate inside the aquatic trophic network via plankton; once it is absorbed by living organisms it tends to bioaccumulate through the aquatic food chain, via the process of biomagnification.

Hg Exposure and Human Health

In the last decade, Hg exposure has increased considerably, especially in relation to anthropic sources, causing serious problems for public health [13]. Health risks for mankind following Hg exposure have been well documented by a long series of epidemiological and experimental studies. Pathologies correlated to mercury include renal damage [26] and neuronal disorders [27]. Hg has also been considered as a contributory factor in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease [28] and is able to induce genotoxicity in cultured mammalian cells [29]. A positive correlation between Hg exposure and CVD has also been proposed [30]. Recently, the negative effects of chronic Hg exposure on cardiovascular health have assumed even greater importance and Hg toxicity is now considered by some authors as a new independent cardiovascular risk factor [31]. An increasing number of studies have been undertaken to investigate the possible molecular mechanisms at the basis of Hg-induced damage to the cardiovascular system. Endothelial dysfunction plays a central role in Hg toxicity [32]. Exogenous substances once absorbed come inevitably into contact with endothelial vessels before reaching other organs and tissues, which puts the cardiovascular system at risk of a toxic insult on the part of xenobiotics. Potential mechanisms of the toxic action of Hg on the endothelial cells include a decrease in the bioavailability of nitric oxide, altering the property of dilation of the vessels [33-34]. Interestingly, in a human study aimed to investigate the link between Hg exposure and the metabolic syndrome, Tinkov et al. report a correlation between its concentration in the blood and blood pressure [35]. Moreover, smoking is positively associated with hair Hg accumulation, which in turn results in increased blood pressure [36]. Alteration of coagulation factors, such as Factor V, represents an additional potential molecular mechanism through which Hg exerts its cytotoxic effects [30]. Finally, Hg exposure enhances pro-coagulant activity of red blood cells (RBC), resulting in a contributing factor for Hg-related thrombotic events [37]. This metal, indeed, preferentially accumulates in RBC and induces morphological changes [38] which are associated with phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure [37]. Ps exposure enables the active participation of RBC to vasocclusion through directly enhancing adhesion PS-expressing RBC to endothelial cells and providing a site for the assembly of the prothrombinase and tenase complex, leading to thrombin generation and clotting (Figure 2).

nutrition-food-sciences-Hg-induced-procoagulant

Figure 2: Hg-induced procoagulant activity in RBC. Hg induces phospatidylserine (PS) exposure on RBC surface, providing a site for assembling prothrombinase complex, leading to thrombin generation and ultimately to clotting. Furthermore, PS-exposing enhances RBC adhesion on endhothelial cell (EC).

Hg and Nutrition

Although Hg toxic effects have been well known for a long time, the exposure of humans to this metal still presents a serious health problem, and it is one which is dramatically increasing in certain parts of the world [39]. As previously emphasized, diet represents one of the most important pathways of Hg exposure [40]. However, while there are foods which may favour human exposure to this metal, there are also foods which may reduce its toxicity. Naturally derived products capable of chelating heavy metals, in order to encourage their expulsion, are currently being used and this use is increasing [41,42]. In particular, current research has brought to light the ability of dietary fibers to perform Hg chelation during gastric-intestinal transit [43].

Metal chelation properties have also been found in several compounds of dietary origin including curcumin [44], which is present in the rhizome of Curcuma longa , a spice widely used in the Indian and Chinese cuisines. Apart from its chelating properties curcumin also exerts a protective action against lipid peroxidation, induced by heavy metals, due to its anti-oxidant activity [45]. In fact, since one mechanism at the basis of Hg toxicity is the deterioration of the antioxidant defence system, molecules with scavenger properties against free radicals have been proposed as potential protective agents [46-50]. Furthermore, there has been a notable increase in the utilization of organoselenium compounds, either for therapy and/or as treatment against Hg-induced toxic effects [51]. Due to the high content of these compounds in the herb garlic [52], it is a dietary component which has an important detoxifying action on heavy metals including Hg [53]. Depending on the conditions of its cultivation, garlic may contain at least 33 different organosulfur compounds, the most abundant being allicin [54]. Garlic is also rich in selenium, an important mineral which hinders Hg toxicity by strengthening the antioxidant defence system, being a co-factor of antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase and thioredoxin reductase [55], and directly binds to Hg. Finally, in recent years several studies have revealed the possible protective role of olive oil, against metal toxicity [56-57].

Olive Oil Hydroxytyrosol in the Prevention of Hg Toxicity

Olive oil, the typical lipidic source of the Mediterranean Diet, has been associated with a low incidence of several pathologies [58-59], including CVD [60] and neurological disorders [61]. Olive oil is an excellent source of oleic acid, vitamin E and nonessential nutrients. The olive flesh components are transferred to the oil, which consists of two major fractions, the saponifiable one, made of triglycerides, accounting for 98-99% of the total, and unsaponifiable fraction, containing several liposoluble molecules, including tocopherols, phytosterols, coloring pigments and squalene [25]. Part of the unsaponifiable fraction is several phenolic compounds, plant secondary metabolites. This class includes phenolic acids, phenolic alcohols, hydroxy-isocromans, flavonoids, lignans and secoiridoids such as oleuropein and ligstroside. There is general agreement that the health benefits of olive oil intake result from the combined properties of all its constituents. In particular, converging evidence indicates that the antioxidant fraction, including polyphenols, significantly contributes to its health promoting effect [62-63]. The phenol content is also important for the quality of virgin olive oil, and the contribution of these components to the shelf-life of this food is widely accepted [64].

Hydroxytyrosol (3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol; HT) is mainly responsible for the antioxidant properties of this food, due to an efficient scavenger activity [65]. This molecule, recalling the structure of the cathecol, is present either simple phenol or esterified with elenolic acid to form oleuropein aglycone (Figure 3). Experiments from our group demonstrated that HT, which effectively permeates cell membranes via passive diffusion [66], counteracts the cytotoxic effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in various human systems, including Caco-2 cells [67] and RBC [68-69]. The effects of HT on inflammation/ atherogenesis have also been thoroughly investigated. HT inhibits in vitro low-density lipoprotein oxidation and modulates the oxidative/ antioxidative balance in plasma [70]. Moreover, due to its strong antioxidant activity and presumably counteracting the oxidative stressinduced endothelial dysfunction, HT is able to modulate key mechanisms implicated in the development of atherosclerosis, including the expression of adhesion molecules [71]. In this respect, it has been demonstrated that this phenol inhibits the expression of adhesion molecules in a human endothelial cell line (HUVEC) exposed to pro-inflammatory cytokines [72]. Even though the majority of HT biological activities can be directly ascribed to its antioxidant activity, emerging evidence [73] supports the view that some effects of this molecule are independent of its scavenging properties. In this respect, several olive oil phenols are able to inhibit homocysteineinduced increased endothelial cell adhesion, regardless of their different antioxidant activity [74]. Additional biological effects include neuroprotection [75] and anti-cancer properties [76]. The interference of polyphenols in the apoptotic model of cell death in nucleated cells is well documented [77] and mainly involves protection against mitochondrial-mediated mechanisms by virtue of their antioxidant capacity. Finally, HT ameliorates acrolein-induced cytotoxicity in retinal pigment epithelial cells, showing a protection from oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction [78] and reduces acrylamideinduced cytotoxicity, preventing DNA damage and intracellular ROS formation in HepG2 cells [79]. In the last few years, several papers report data indicating that this dietary component is able to counteract the toxic effects linked to exposure of heavy metals, including Hg [80-82].

nutrition-food-sciences-HT-chemical-structure

Figure 3: HT chemical structure. HT derives from hydrolysis of oleuropein, naturally present in olives and olive leaf.

HT Prevents ROS Formation and Hg-induced Morphological Alterations in Human RBC

RBC are anucleated cells without organelle cells, thus representing a simplified cellular model of the metabolism. This is particularly advantageous for the study of oxidative stress caused by the high tension of oxygen and the highly toxic free radicals derived from it. In addition, RBC have been utilized as a model for pharmacological and toxicological studies which investigate heavy metal toxicity. Thus, intact human RBC, subjected in vitro to treatment with mercury chloride (HgCl2) were utilized to test the potential protective effects of HT. HT has the potential to modulate cytotoxicity and to counteract GSH decrease and the OS induced in RBC by Hg treatment [80]. In this experimental system, Hg-induced ROS generation is a late event (Figure 4) and probably occurs subsequently to a significant decrease of essential antioxidant thiols, which could render cells more susceptible to ROS-mediated OS. Also of great clinical importance is the finding that HT prevents Hg-induced RBC morphological alteration (echinocyte formation), which makes cells more atherogenic. As pointed out before, Hg exposure enhances procoagulant activity of these cells, resulting in a contributing factor for Hg-related thrombotic disease (Figure 5).

nutrition-food-sciences-Hg-induced-ROS

Figure 4: HT prevents Hg-induced ROS formation in human RBC. Cells were subjected in vitro to treatment with HgCl2. The 2′,7′- dichlorodihydrofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA) assay was performed to quantify ROS generation (Courteously granted by Tagliafierro et al. [80]).

nutrition-food-sciences-HT-prevents-morphological

Figure 5: HT prevents morphological alterations in human RBC. Cells were subjected in vitro to treatment with 20 μM HgCl2 for 4 hours. After incubation, cells were analyzed by microscopy electronic scan (SEM). (A) Untreated RBC. (B) Hg-treated RBC. (C) HT-pretreated RBC before adding HgCl2 (Courteously granted by by Tagliafierro et al. [80]).

HT Prevents Hg-induced Programmed Cell Death (eryptosis) in Human RBC

Hg-induced programmed cell death has been well documented in both nucleated and anucleated cells [83]. Similarly to apoptosis, RBC may encounter programmed cell death, also called eryptosis [84-85]. This process is characterized by an increase of intracellular calcium and by depletion of ATP and GSH. These biochemical alterations result in RBC morphological changes, associated with a reorganization of the cellular membrane, in which exposure of PS on the cell surface is the major event [37]. Experimental evidence of the efficacy of HT in preventing eryptosis in human RBC exposed in vitro to HgCl2 treatment has been recently published by our group [81]. Cell conditioning with HT micro-molar concentrations prior to exposure to Hg causes a decrease in PS-exposing RBC, along with the restoration of ATP and GSH cellular content (Figure 6). Conversely, HT pretreatment shows no effect against influx of extracellular calcium and thus does not interfere with Ca-mediated mechanisms in eryptosis. These data reveal that HT has the potential to modulate suicidal death induced by Hg treatment in anucleated cells, also devoid of mitochondria and thus lacking any mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathways. Furthermore, no increase in ROS production was observed in the mild experimental conditions utilized, indicating that HT biological activities, which are different from the scavenging potential, are involved in the protective process. In this respect, GSH enhancement may represent a key mechanism, as reported in different cellular systems. In particular, Mohan et al. [82] report that the ability of HT to promote the expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which in turn elevates GSH levels, is crucial in ameliorating the neurotoxic effect of MeHg, as discussed in the next paragraph.

nutrition-food-sciences-HT-prevents-PS-exposure

Figure 6: HT prevents PS exposure and GSH depletion in human RBC. Cells were subjected in vitro to treatment with HgCl2. After incubation, flow cytometry (FACS) analysis was utilized to determine PS exposure (annexin-V binding, panel A-B) and GSH level (5-chloromethylfluorescein binding, panel C-D) (Courteously granted by Officioso et al. [81]).

HT Prevents Hg-induced Genotoxicity and Apoptosis in Human Neuroblastoma Cells

A recent study highlights the efficacy of HT in preventing MeHginduced neurotoxicity, using IMR-32 human neuroblastoma cells as a surrogate model for studying the effects of heavy metal on neuronal dysfunction. In this study, Mohan et al. [82] report that cell preincubation with HT inhibits MeHg-induced cytotoxicity along with reduction of ROS formation and the maintenance of an efficient endogenous defence system, including GSH levels and superoxide dismutase and catalase activities. Furthermore, HT also prevents genotoxicity and apoptosis, causing downregulation of p53, bax, cytochrome c, and caspase 3 and upregulation of prosurvival proteins including Nrf2 and metallothionein. In particular, the ability of HT to promote the expression of Nrf2 and, in turn, to modulate GSH levels, appears crucial for the neuroprotective effect of HT. It is well known that ROS accumulation has been implicated as a relevant cofactor contributing to both DNA damage and the cascade of events leading to programmed cell death in nucleated cells. The lowering of oxidative stress, which may be endorsed by its anti-genotoxic and anti-apoptotic properties probably, represents the main molecular mechanism of the observed cytoprotective potential of HT against MeHg-induced toxicity.

Conclusion

Taken together, the data discussed in this review provide experimental evidence that HT, a component normally present in high concentrations in olive oil, has the potential to modulate Hg toxicity, therefore representing an ideal candidate for nutritional/nutraceutical strategies to counteract the adverse effects of Hg exposure in humans. The reported novel biological effect of HT reinforces the nutritional importance of the phenolic fraction which greatly contributes to the beneficial effects of the olive oil on human health. Finally, an interesting observation is that HT protective concentrations utilized in the experimental systems could be approached in vivo upon strict adherence to the Mediterranean dietary habit, in the context of a balanced diet. Furthermore, HT has been proved to be devoid of toxicity [86-87], is highly bioavailable [88-89] and potentially able to cross the blood-brain barrier [86].

References

  1. Elmadfa I, Meyer AL ( 2010) Importance of food composition data to nutrition and public health. Eur J ClinNutr 64: S4-S7.
  2. Bennett BJ, Hall KD, Hu FB, McCartney AL, Roberto C (2015) Nutrition and the science of disease prevention: a systems approach to support metabolic health. Ann N Y AcadSci 1352: 1-12.
  3. Das L, Bhaumik E, Raychaudhuri U, Chakraborty R (2012) Role of nutraceuticals in human health. J Food SciTechnol 49: 173-183.
  4. Ganann R, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, Peirson LJ, Warren RL, et al. (2014) Enhancing nutritional environments through access to fruit and vegetables in schools and homes among children and youth: a systematic review. BMC Res Notes 4: 422.
  5. Rangel-Huerta OD, Pastor-Villaescusa B, Aguilera CM, Gil A ( 2015) A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Bioactive Compounds in Cardiovascular Disease: Phenolic Compounds. Nutrients 7: 5177-5216.
  6. Flora SJ, Shrivastava R, Mittal M (2013) Chemistry and pharmacological properties of some natural and synthetic antioxidants for heavy metal toxicity. Curr Med Chem 20: 4540-4574.
  7. Flora SJ (2009) Structural, chemical and biological aspects of antioxidants for strategies against metal and metalloid exposure. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2:191-206.
  8. Clarkson TW (2002) The three modern faces of mercury. Environ Health Perspect 110: 11-23.
  9. Rice KM, Walker EMJr, Wu M, Gillette C, Blough ER (2014) Environmental mercury and its toxic effects. J Prev Med Public Healt 47: 74-83.
  10. Driscoll CT, Mason RP, Chan HM, Jacob DJ, Pirrone N (2013) Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects. Environ SciTechnol 47: 4967-4983.
  11. Barkay T, Poulain AJ (2007) Mercury (micro) biogeochemistry in polar environments. FEMS MicrobiolEcol 59: 232-241.
  12. Liu JL, Xu XR, Yu S, Cheng H, Peng JX, et al. (2014) Mercury contamination in fish and human hair from Hainan Island, South China Sea: Implication for human exposure. Environ Res 135: 42-47.
  13. Clifton JC (2007) Mercury exposure and public health. PediatrClin North Am 54: 237-269.
  14. Baldi F (1997) Microbial transformation of mercury species and their importance in the biogeochemical cycle of mercury. Met Ions BiolSyst 34: 213-257.
  15. Do A Kehrig H, Seixas TG, Palermo EA, Baêta AP, Castelo-Branco CW, et al. (2009) The relationships between mercury and selenium in plankton and fish from a tropical food web. Environ SciPollut Res Int 16: 10-24.
  16. Qiu YW, Wang WX (2016) Comparison of mercury bioaccumulation between wild and mariculture food chains from a subtropical bay of Southern China. Environ Geochem Health 38: 39-49.
  17. Miklavcic A, Cuderman P, Mazej D, SnojTratnik J, Krsnik M, et al. (2011) Biomarkers of low-level mercury exposure through fish consumption in pregnant and lactating Slovenian women. Environmental Research 111: 1201-1207.
  18. Velyka AI, Pshak VP, Lopushins’ka IV (2014) Activity of antioxidant enzymes of the rat kidneys under mercury dichloride effect. UkrBiokhimZh 86: 124-130.
  19. Ramírez-Bajo MJ, de Atauri P, Ortega F, Westerhoff HV, Gelpí JL, et al. (2014) Effects of cadmium and mercury on the upper part of skeletal muscle glycolysis in mice. PLoS One 9: e80018.
  20. Carvalho CM, Chew EH, Hashemy SI, Lu J, Holmgren A (2008) Inhibition of the human thioredoxin system. A molecular mechanism of mercury toxicity. J BiolChem 283: 11913-11923.
  21. Choi WS, Kim SJ, Kim JS (2011) Inorganic lead (Pb)- and mercury (Hg)-induced neuronal cell death involves cytoskeletal reorganization. Lab Anim Res 27: 219-225.
  22. Thier R, Bonacker D, Stoiber T, Bohm KJ, Wang M, et al. (2003) Interaction of metal salts with cytoskeletal motor protein systems. ToxicolLett 11: 75-81.
  23. Vogel DG, Margolis RL, Mottet NK (1985) The effects of methyl mercury binding to microtubules. ToxicolApplPharmacol 80: 473-486.
  24. Hernandez LE, Sobrino-Plata J, Montero-Palmero MB, Carrasco-Gil S, Flores- Caceres ML (2015) Contribution of glutathione to the control of cellular redox homeostasis under toxic metal and metalloid stress. J Exp Bot 66: 2901-2911.
  25. Wu X, Cobbina SJ, Mao G, Xu H, Zhang Z, et al. (2016) A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment. Environ SciPollut Res Int 23: 8244-8259.
  26. Miller S, Pallan S, Gangji AS, Lukic D, Clase CM (2013) Mercury-associated nephrotic syndrome: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Am J Kidney Dis 62: 135-138.
  27. Carocci A, Rovito N, Sinicropi MS, Genchi G (2014) Mercury toxicity and neurodegenerative effects. Rev Environ ContamToxicol 229: 1-18.
  28. Chin-Chan, M, Navarro-Yepes J, Quintanilla-Vega B (2015) Environmental pollutants as risk factors for neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. Front Cell Neurosci 10: 124-130.
  29. Crespo-Lopez ME, Macedo GL, Pereira SI, Arrifano GP, Picanco-Diniz DL, et al. (2009) Mercury and human genotoxicity: critical considerations and possible molecular mechanisms. Pharmacological Research 60: 212-220.
  30. Houston MC (2011) Role of mercury toxicity in hypertension, cardiovascular disease and stroke. J ClinHypertens 13: 621-627.
  31. Virtanen JK, Rissanen TH, Voutilainen S, Tuomainen TP (2007) Mercury as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. J NutrBiochem 18: 75-85.
  32. Omanwar S, Fahim M (2015) Mercury Exposure and Endothelial Dysfunction: An Interplay Between Nitric Oxide and Oxidative Stress. Int J Toxicol 34: 300-307.
  33. Lemos NB, Angeli JK, FariaTde O, Ribeiro Junior RF, Vassallo DV, et al. (2012) Low mercury concentration produces vasoconstriction, decreases nitric oxide bioavailability and increases oxidative stress in rat conductance artery. PLoS One 7: e49005.
  34. Rajaee M, Sánchez BN, Renne EP, Basu N (2015) An Investigation of Organic and Inorganic Mercury Exposure and Blood Pressure in a Small-Scale Gold Mining Community in Ghana. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12: 10020-10038.
  35. Tinkov AA, Ajsuvakova OP, Skalnaya MG, Popova EV, Sinitskii AI, et al. (2015) Mercury and metabolic syndrome: a review of experimental and clinical observations. Biometals 28: 231-254.
  36. Hong D, Cho SH, Park SJ, Kim SY, Park SB (2013) Hair mercury level in smokers and its influence on blood pressure and lipid metabolism. Environ ToxicolPharmacol 36: 103-107.
  37. Lim KM, Kim S, Noh JY, Kim K, Jang WH, et al. (2010) Low-level mercury can enhance procoagulant activity of erythrocytes: a new contributing factor for mercury-related thrombotic disease. Environ Health Perspect 118: 928-935.
  38. Pal M, Ghosh M (2012) Prophylactic effect of α-linolenic acid and α-eleostearic acid against MeHg induced oxidative stress, DNA damage and structural changes in RBC membrane. Food ChemToxicol 50: 2811-2818.
  39. Acosta-Saavedra LC, Moreno ME, Rodríguez-Kessler T, Luna A, Arias-Salvatierra D, et al. (2011) Environmental exposure to lead and mercury in Mexican children: a real health problem. ToxicolMech Methods 21: 656-666.
  40. Nunes E, Cavaco A, Carvalho C (2014) Exposure assessment of pregnant Portuguese women to methylmercury through the ingestion of fish: cross-sectional survey and biomarker validation. J Toxicol Environ Health A 77: 133-142.
  41. Pal R, Rai JPN (2010) Phytochelatins: peptides involved in heavy metal detoxification. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 160: 945-963.
  42. Manini P, Panzella L, Eidenberger T, Giarra A, Cerruti P, et al. (2016) Efficient Binding of Heavy Metals by Black Sesame Pigment: Toward Innovative Dietary Strategies To Prevent Bioaccumulation. J Agric Food Chem 64: 890-897.
  43. Rowland IR, Mallett AK, Flynn J, Hargreaves RJ (1986) The effect of various dietary fibres on tissue concentration of chemical form of mercury after methylmercury exposure in mice. Archives of Toxicology 59: 94-98.
  44. García-Niño WR, Pedraza-Chaverrí J (2014) Protective effect of curcumin against heavy metals-induced liver damage. Food ChemToxicol 69: 182-201.
  45. Badria FA, Ibrahim AS, Badria AF, Elmarakby AA (2015) Curcumin Attenuates Iron Accumulation and Oxidative Stress in the Liver and Spleen of Chronic Iron-Overloaded Rats. PLoS One 10: e0134156.
  46. Agarwal R, Goel SK, Behari JR (2010) Detoxification and antioxidant effects of curcumin in rats experimentally exposed to mercury. J ApplToxicol 30: 457-468.
  47. Harisa GI, Mariee AD, Abo-Salem OM, Attiaa SM (2014) Erythrocyte nitric oxide synthase as a surrogate marker for mercury-induced vascular damage: The modulatory effects of naringin. Environ Toxicol 29: 1314-1322.
  48. Elseady Y, Zahran E (2013) Ameliorating effect of β-carotene on antioxidant response and hematological parameters of mercuric chloride toxicity in Nile tilapia (Oreochromisniloticus). Fish PhysiolBiochem 39: 1031-1041.
  49. Deng Y, Xu Z, Liu W, Yang H, Xu B, et al. (2012) Effects of lycopene and proanthocyanidins on hepatotoxicity induced by mercuric chloride in rats. Biol Trace Elem Res 146: 213-223.
  50. Barcelos GR, Angeli JP, Serpeloni JM, Grotto D, Rocha BA, et al. (2011) Quercetin protects human-derived liver cells against mercury-induced DNA-damage and alterations of the redox status. Mutat Res 726: 109-115.
  51. Kalender S, Uzun FG, Demir F, Uzunhisarcikli M, Aslanturk A (2013) Mercuric chloride-induced testicular toxicity in rats and the protective role of sodium selenite and vitamin E. Food ChemToxicol 55: 456-462.
  52. Martins N, Petropoulos S, Ferreira IC (2016) Chemical composition and bioactive compounds of garlic (Allium sativum L.) as affected by pre- and post-harvest conditions: A review. Food Chem 211: 41-50.
  53. Mikaili P, Maadirad S, Moloudizargari M, Aghajanshakeri S, Sarahroodi S (2013) Therapeutic uses and pharmacological properties of garlic, shallot, and their biologically active compounds. Iran J Basic Med Sci 16: 1031-1048.
  54. Amagase H, Petesch BL, Matsuura H, Kasuga S, Itakura Y (2001) Intake of garlic and its bioactive components. J Nutr 131: 955S-962S.
  55. Ralston NV, Ralston CR, Raymond LJ (2016) Selenium Health Benefit Values: Updated Criteria for Mercury Risk Assessments. Biol Trace Elem Res 171: 262-269.
  56. Amamou F, Nemmiche S, Meziane RK, Didi A, Yazit SM, et al. (2015) Protective effect of olive oil and colocynth oil against cadmium-induced oxidative stress in the liver of Wistar rats. Food ChemToxicol 78: 177-184.
  57. Ghorbel I, Khemakhem M, Boudawara O, Marrekchi R, Jamoussi K (2015) Effects of dietary extra virgin olive oil and its fractions on antioxidant status and DNA damage in the heart of rats co-exposed to aluminum and acrylamide. Food Funct 6: 3098-3108.
  58. Martínez-González MA, Salas-Salvadó J, Estruch R, Corella D, Fitó M, et al. (2015) Benefits of the Mediterranean Diet: Insights From the PREDIMED Study. ProgCardiovasc Dis 58: 50-60.
  59. Gerber M, Hoffman R (2015) The Mediterranean diet: health, science and society. Br J Nutr 113: S4-S10.
  60. Ros E, Martínez-González MA, Estruch R, Salas-Salvadó J, Fitó M (2014) Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular health: Teachings of the PREDIMED study. AdvNutr 5: 330-336.
  61. Rodríguez-Morató J, Xicota L, Fitó M, Farré M, Dierssen M, et al. (2015) Potential role of olive oil phenolic compounds in the prevention of neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules 20: 4655-4680.
  62. Rigacci S, Stefani M (2016) Nutraceutical properties of Olive Oil Polyphenols. An Itinerary from Cultured Cells through Animal Models to Humans. Int J MolSci 17: 843.
  63. Martín-Peláez S, Covas MI, Fitó M, Kušar A, Pravst I (2013) Health effects of olive oil polyphenols: recent advances and possibilities for the use of health claims. MolNutr Food Res 57: 760-771.
  64. Vitaglione P, Savarese M, Paduano A, Scalfi L, Fogliano V, et al. (2015) Healthy virgin olive oil: a matter of bitterness. Crit Rev Food SciNutr 55: 1808-1818.
  65. Del Monaco G, Officioso A, D'Angelo S, La Cara F, Ionata E, et al. (2015) Characterization of extra virgin olive oils produced with typical Italian varieties by their phenolic profile. Food Chem 184: 220-228.
  66. Manna C, Galletti P, Maisto G, Cucciolla V, D’angelo S, et al. (2000) Transport mechanism and metabolism of olive oil hydroxytyrosol in Caco-2 cells. FEBS Letters 470: 341-344.
  67. Manna C, Galletti P, Cucciolla V, Moltedo O, Leone A, et al. (1997) The protective effect of the olive oil polyphenol (3,4-dihydroxyphenyl) ethanol counteracts reactive oxygen metabolites-induced cytotoxicity in Caco-2 cells. J Nutr 127: 286-292.
  68. Manna C, Galletti P, Cucciolla V, Montedoro GF, Zappia V (1999) Olive Oil Hydroxytyrosol protects human erythrocytes against oxidative damages. J NutrBiochem 10: 159-165.
  69. Manna C, D'Angelo S, Migliardi V, Loffredi E, Mazzoni O, et al. (2002) Protective effect of the phenolic fraction from virgin olive oil against oxidative stress in human cells. J Agric Food Chem 50: 6521-6526.
  70. Covas MI, de la Torre K, Farré-Albaladejo M, Kaikkonen J, Fitó M, et al. (2002) Postprandial LDL phenolic content and LDL oxidation are modulated by olive oil phenolic compounds in humans. J Agric Food Chem 50: 6521-6526.
  71. Carluccio MA, Siculella L, Ancora MA, Massaro M, Scoditti E, et al. (2003) Olive oil and red wine antioxidant polyphenols inhibit endothelial activation: antiatherogenic properties of Mediterranean diet phytochemicals. ArteriosclerThrombVascBiol 23: 622-629.
  72. Zhang X, Cao J, Zhong L (2009) Hydroxytyrosol inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines, iNOS, and COX-2 expression in human monocytic cells. NaunynSchmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 79: 581-586.
  73. Della Ragione F, Cucciolla V, Criniti V, Indaco S, Borriello A, et al. (2002) Antioxidants induce different phenotypes by a distinct modulation of signal transduction. FEBS Lett 532: 289-294.
  74. Manna C, Napoli D, Cacciapuoti G, Porcelli M, Zappia V (2009) Olive oil phenolic compounds inhibit homocysteine-induced endothelial cell adhesion regardless of their different antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem 57: 3478-3482.
  75. De La Cruz JP, Ruiz-Moreno MI, Guerrero A, Reyes JJ, Benitez-Guerrero A, et al. (2015) Differences in the Neuroprotective Effect of Orally Administered Virgin Olive Oil (Oleaeuropaea) Polyphenols Tyrosol and Hydroxytyrosol in Rats. J Agric Food Chem 63: 5957-5963.
  76. Bernini R, GilardiniMontani MS, Merendino N, Romani A, Velotti F (2015) Hydroxytyrosol-Derived Compounds: A Basis for the Creation of New Pharmacological Agents for Cancer Prevention and Therapy. J Med Chem 58: 9089-9107.
  77. Giovannini C, Masella R (2012) Role of polyphenols in cell death control. NutrNeurosci 15: 134-149.
  78. Liu Z, Sun L, Zhu L, Jia X, Li X, et al. (2007) Hydroxytyrosol protects retinal pigment epithelial cells from acrolein-induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. J Neurochem 103: 2690-2700.
  79. Zhang X, Cao J, Jiang L, Geng C, Zhong L (2009) Protective effect of hydroxytyrosol against acrylamide-induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage in HepG2 cells. Mutat Res 12: 64-68.
  80. Tagliafierro L, Officioso A, Sorbo S, Basile A, Manna C (2015) The protective role of olive oil hydroxytyrosol against oxidative alterations induced by mercury in human erythrocytes. Food ChemToxicol 82: 59-63.
  81. Officioso A, Alzoubi K, Lang F, Manna C (2016) Hydroxytyrosol inhibits phosphatidylserine exposure and suicidal death induced by mercury in human erythrocytes: Possible involvement of the glutathione pathway. Food ChemToxicol 89: 47-53.
  82. Mohan V, Das S, Rao SB (2015) Hydroxytyrosol, a dietary phenolic compound forestalls the toxic effects of methylmercury-induced toxicity in IMR-32 human neuroblastoma cells. Environ Toxicol.
  83. Eisele K, Lang PA, Kempe DS, Klarl BA, Niemöller O, et al. (2006) Stimulation of erythrocyte phosphatidylserine exposure by mercury ions. ToxicolApplPharmacol 210: 116-122.
  84. Lang E, Lang F (2015) Mechanisms and pathophysiological significance of eryptosis, the suicidal erythrocyte death. Semin Cell DevBiol 39: 35-42.
  85. Lang E, Qadri SM, Lang F (2012) Killing me softly-suicidal erythrocyte death. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 44: 1236-1243.
  86. D’angelo S, Manna C, Migliardi V, Mazzoni O, Morrica P, et al. (2001) Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of hydroxytyrosol, a natural antioxidant from olive oil. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 29: 1492-1498.
  87. Auñon-Calles D, Canut L, Visioli F (2013) Toxicological evaluation of pure hydroxytyrosol. Food ChemToxicol 55: 498-504.
  88. Pastor A, Rodríguez-Morató J, Olesti E, Pujadas M, Pérez-Mañá C, et al. (2016) Analysis of free hydroxytyrosol in human plasma following the administration of olive oil. J Chromatogr A 1437: 183-190.
  89. Serra A, Rubió L, Borràs X, Macià A, Romero MP, et al. (2012) Distribution of olive oil phenolic compounds in rat tissues after administration of a phenolic extract from olive cake. MolNutr Food Res 56: 486-496.
Citation: Officioso A, Tortora F, Manna C (2016) Nutritional Aspects of Food Toxicology: Mercury Toxicity and Protective Effects of Olive Oil Hydroxytyrosol. J Nutr Food Sci 6:539.

Copyright: © 2016 Officioso A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top