Cell & Developmental Biology

Cell & Developmental Biology
Open Access

ISSN: 2168-9296

+44 1478 350008

Short Communication - (2017) Volume 6, Issue 1

"Obesity Paradox" in Heart Failure: The Possible Role of Progenitor Endothelial Cell Dysfunction

Alexander E Berezin*
Therapeutic Unit, Private Hospital “Vita-Center”, Zaporozhye, Ukraine
*Corresponding Author: Alexander E Berezin, Therapeutic Unit, Private Hospital “Vita-Center”, Zaporozhye, Ukraine, Tel: +380612894585 Email: ,

Abstract

The “obesity paradox” phenomenon is referred to as a U-shaped curve between long-term prognosis and body mass index in heart failure patients. There is a large body of evidence regarding the regulatory role of visceral adipose tissue-related adipocytokines in activity of endogenous repair system. The reparation of myocardium and endothelium may strongly enhance by differentiation and mobbing of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). They improve angiogenesis and collateral vessel growth, as well as counteract vascular injury. It has suggested that several metabolic factors frequently associated with HF may increase the number of circulating EPCs, which mediate repair processes and collaborate with obese. In contrast, decreased number and/or weak functionality of EPCs relate with altered endogenous repair system and may negatively contribute in HF development. Finally, moving across recently received evidence “obesity paradox” could be elucidated as a result of interplaying of trigging repair systems and ability of EPCs to response on challenges enhancing reparative potency in target organs, i.e. myocardium, vascular wall and endothelium.

<

Keywords: Heart failure, Obesity, Progenitor cells, Reparation

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of the death and inability amongst patient with known cardiovascular (CV) disease [1]. It is well known that some metabolic diseases, i.e. overweight, abdominal obesity and diabetes mellitus, may lead to increased risk of newly diagnosed HF [2]. Although overweight and obese patients have a higher risk of CV events and disease in general population, in case of chronic HF and acutely decompensated chronic HF they also exhibit more favorable clinical outcomes in long-term perspective in comparison to normal body weight individuals [3,4]. This phenomenon is now referred to as the “obesity paradox” [5] and it depicts a U-shaped curve between long-term prognosis and body mass index (BMI) in HF patients [6]. Interestingly, this paradox has established in several populations of the HF patients corresponding to CV risk factors in abundant [7]. Nevertheless, numerous studies and meta-analysis have strongly documented an obesity paradox, in which overweight and obese patients, defined by body mass index, percent body fat, or central obesity, demonstrate that the risk for total mortality and CV mortality and admission rate was highest in chronic HF patients who were underweight as defined by low BMI, whereas risk for CV mortality and hospitalization was lowest in overweight and obese subjects [7-10].

The molecular mechanisms developing of “obesity paradox” in HF population are still uncertain, while adipocytokine dysfunction is reported as key factor, which contributes in pathogenesis of both settings, i.e. obesity and HF. However, the proinflammatory effect of overexpression of adipocitokines and their receptors in peripheral tissues in HF individual do not completely explain the favorable impact of obese on survival.

It has suggested that some adipocytokines produced by white adipose tissue (WAT) especially allocated around heart and blood vessels might mediate controversial effects on CV system [11,12]. The broad spectrum of VAT-related cytokines, which exhibit an exaggerated merge in obese (i.e., leptin, apelin, progranulin, chemerin, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, visfatin and vaspin), may depress the intracellular free calcium input, suppress myocardial systolic function and induce weak endothelial progenitor cells through increasing oxidative stress and inhibiting autophagy ability [13-17]. In contrast, in obesity relatively deficiency of adiponectin and omentin, which are able to attenuate reparative effects of peripheral tissues including myocardium and endothelium, was found [18]. As a result, the activity of progenitor cells involving in regeneration of damaged myocardium and impaired endothelium, improvement of metabolism of target cells, angioneogenesis and neovascularization, is dramatically increased [19,20]. By now, endothelial progenitor cells are considered as a much more promised factor coordinating proinflammatory VAT dysfunction in obese and cardiac/vascular remodeling in HF as well as interplaying in other mechanisms of HF progression, i.e., neurohumoral activation, metabolomics impairment and altered reparative capability.

Although numerous preclinical and clinical trials have already established the important role of impaired obesity-related metabolomics in HF patients in predicting myocardial contractile dysfunction, mediating apoptosis and fibrosis in the heart and vessels, as well as antiinflammatory and anti-atheromatous effects in peripheral tissues [21], the causative role of progenitor cells dysfunction in “obesity paradox” in HF is now under intensive investigation [22,23].

By now, EPCs have defined as cells, which are positively labeled with both hematopoietic stem cells (CD34) and endothelial cell markers, i.e., predominantly vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, CD31 cumulatively [24]. There are at least two phenotypes of progenitors, i.e., early outgrowth and late outgrowth cells exhibiting different effects on target cells and distinguishing one another in functionality, i.e., endothelial colony forming ability. Late outgrowth EPCs as a subpopulation of progenitors exhibit a protective impact on the endothelium mediating proliferation and having the ability to promote angiogenesis and collateral vessel growth [25]. These processes are under closely autocrine/paracrine and epigenetic regulation affected in particularly migration, proliferation, and mobilization of EPCs from bone marrow and peripheral tissues [26].

Increased adipocyte size is hypothesized to signal the recruitment of late outgrowth EPCs. In metabolically healthy obese individuals with HF the number of EPCs in the circulation is frequently increased or near normal. In contrast, development of metabolically non-healthy obese associates with HF there is a reduced ability of EPCs to realize their potency in proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, migration, incorporation into tubular structures, and survival is now defined as EPC dysfunction [27]. The weak EPCs functionality may associate with lowering EPCs’ count in the peripheral blood that is considered an initiation of endothelial dysfunction, which is independent factor contributing in CV events and disease [28]. In contrast, some metabolomics components in obese are able to stimulate differentiation and mobbing of EPCS, as well as support their functionality to restore structure and function of damaged endothelium.

Consequently, “obesity paradox” in HF individuals might relate to EPCs dysfunction, the final integrative effect of which depends on CV risk factor presentation, imbalanced number of circulating level of early/ late outgrowth EPCs contributing in reparative processes, and weak functionality of EPCs. Shaping impaired pattern of circulating EPCs with lower functionality may predict mortality rate in HF population. In contrast, increased circulating number of EPCs at early stages of HF development in obese patients may create advantages in survival due to well controlled repair ability of endothelium and probably impaired myocardium.

Conclusion

In conclusion, “obesity paradox” is probably result of interplaying of trigging repair systems and ability of EPCs to response on challenges enhancing reparative potency in target organs, i.e., myocardium, VAT, vascular wall and endothelium. More clinical studies are required to pretty accurately evaluate the link between obesity and HF and help us to understand more fully this multiple complex relationships.

References

  1. Thavendiranathan P, Nolan MT (2017) An emerging epidemic: Cancer and heart failure. Clin Sci (Lond) 131: 113-121.
  2. Halldin AK, Schaufelberger M, Lernfelt B, Björck L, Rosengren A, et al. (2016) Obesity in middle age increases risk of later heart failure in women - Results from the prospective population study of women and H70 studies in Gothenburg, Sweden. J Card Fail.
  3. Nagarajan V, Cauthen CA, Starling RC, Tang WH (2013) Prognosis of morbid obesity patients with advanced heart failure. Congest Heart Fail 19: 160-164.
  4. Alpert MA (2016) Severe obesity and acute decompensated heart failure: New insights into prevalence and prognosis. JACC Heart Fail 4: 932-934.
  5. Schwartzenberg S, Benderly M, Malnick S, George J, Goland S (2012) The "obesity paradox": Does it persist among Israeli patients with decompensated heart failure? A sub analysis of the Heart Failure Survey in Israel (HFSIS). J Card Fail 18: 62-67.
  6. Joyce E, Lala A, Stevens SR, Cooper LB, AbouEzzeddine OF, et al. (2016) Heart failure apprentice network. Prevalence, profile and prognosis of severe obesity in contemporary hospitalized heart failure trial populations. JACC Heart Fail 4: 923-931.
  7. Lavie CJ, De Schutter A, Parto P, Jahangir E, Kokkinos P, et al. (2016) Obesity and prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and prognosis-The obesity paradox updated. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 58: 537-547.
  8. Lavie CJ, Alpert MA, Arena R, Mehra MR, Milani RV, et al. (2013) Impact of obesity and the obesity paradox on prevalence and prognosis in heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 1: 93-102.
  9. Sharma A, Lavie CJ, Borer JS, Vallakati A, Goel S, et al. (2015) Meta-analysis of the relation of body mass index to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 115: 1428-1434.
  10. Oreopoulos A, Padwal R, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Fonarow GC, Norris CM (2008) Body mass index and mortality in heart failure: A meta-analysis. Am Heart J 156: 13-22.
  11. Sawicka M, Janowska J, Chudek J (2016) Potential beneficial effect of some adipokines positively correlated with the adipose tissue content on the cardiovascular system. Int J Cardiol 222: 581-589.
  12. Berezin A (2016) Endothelial progenitor cells dysfunction and impaired tissue reparation: The missed link in diabetes mellitus development. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews.
  13. Luo LJ, Liu YP, Yuan X, Zhang GP, Hou N, et al. (2016) Leptin attenuates the contractile function of adult rat cardiomyocytes involved in oxidative stress and autophagy. Acta Cardiol Sin 32: 723-730.
  14. Gustafsson AB, Gottlieb RA (2009) Autophagy in ischemic heart disease. Circ Res 104: 150–158
  15. Bouloumie A, Marumo T, Lafontan M, Busse R (1999) Leptin induces oxidative stress in human endothelial cells. FASEB J 13: 1231–1238.
  16. Berezin A (2016) Cardiac biomarkers in diabetes mellitus: New dawn for risk stratification? Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews.
  17. Eckel RH, Barouch WW, Ershow AG (2002) Report of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute - National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Working Group on the pathophysiology of obesity–associated cardiovascular disease. Circulation 105: 2923–2928
  18. Berezin A (2016) Progenitor endothelial cell dysfunction in obese patients: Possibilities for cardiovascular risk prediction. J Clin Exp Cardiolog 7: 148-150.
  19. Berry DC, Jiang Y, Arpke RW, Close EL, Uchida A, et al. (2017) Cellular aging contributes to failure of cold-induced beige adipocyte formation in old mice and humans. Cell Metab 25: 166-181.
  20. Berezin A (2016) Metabolomics in heart failure patients: Hype and hope. Biomarkers J 2: e21-e23.
  21. Nagarajan V, Kohan L, Holland E, Keeley EC, Mazimba S (2016) Obesity paradox in heart failure: A heavy matter. ESC Heart Fail 3: 227-234.
  22. Berezin A (2016) Endothelial repair in diabetes: The causative role of progenitor cells dysfunction? J Clin Epigenet 2: 22-24.
  23. Berezin A (2016) Biomarkers for cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients. Heart 102: 1939-1941.
  24. Asahara T (2007) Endothelial progenitor cells for vascular medicine. Yakugaku Zasshi 127: 841-845.
  25. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, et al. (1997) Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 275:964–967
  26. Hur J, Yoon CH, Kim HS, Choi JH, Kang HJ et al. (2004) Characterization of two types of endothelial progenitor cells and their different contributions to neovasculogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24: 288–293
  27. Berezin A (2016) Epigenetic mechanisms of endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction. J Clin Epigenet 2: 24-26.
  28. Fadini GP, de Kreutzenberg SV, Coracina A, Baesso I, Agostini C, et al. (2006) Circulating CD34+ cells, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 27: 2247–2255.
Citation: Berezin AE (2017) “Obesity Paradox” in Heart Failure: The Possible Role of Progenitor Endothelial Cell Dysfunction. Cell Dev Biol 6:179.

Copyright: © 2017 Berezin AE. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top