Journal of Tumor Research

Journal of Tumor Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2684-1258

Review Article - (2018) Volume 4, Issue 1

Ovarian Cancer - The Silent Killer

Dutta Debashis* and Nath LK
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh, India
*Corresponding Author: Dutta Debashis, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh, India, Tel: 917980794930 Email:

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is heterogeneous, multigenetic and epigenetic abnormalities and lethal among all other gynecological women malignancies amongst women. Moreover, ovarian cancer has a distinct biology and behavior at cellular and molecular level. According to National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result Program Report in 2017 the new case of ovarian cancer exacerbated to 22.4% from 11.7% in 2014. The Therapeutics use of cancer therapies has been restricted due to its nonspecific and dose limiting cellular toxicity and development of multidrug resistance. To overcome the restriction various biotechnological therapies and drug delivery system have been described in this review.

Keywords: Ovarian cancer; Angiogenesis; Polymer drug conjugates

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal among all other gynecological malignancy amongst the women. 2,50,000 diagnosed with ovarian cancer globally each year with more than 1,40,000 cancer specific death [1]. Only 20% of the ovarian cancer is diagnosed at first stage when the disease is limited to the ovary, 90% of the patient responds well with existing therapy, Metastasized staged divided in to 3 more categories, i.e., (Stage 2). When the disease metastasized to the pelvic region, after the disease has metastasized to the abdomen region (stage 3) or beyond the peritoneal region (Stage 4) cure rate decrease substantially [2]. Ovarian cancer is heterogeneous; multiple genetic and epigenetic abnormalities have been seen in different individuals. Mutation and loss of TP53 function is one of the most frequent genetic abnormalities in ovarian cancer and is observed in 60-80% of both sporadic and familial cases. Inheritance of DNA repair defects contributes to as many as 10- 15% of ovarian cancers. Platinum–paclitaxel combination regimen is considered a first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer [3]. Although, the result of treatment with combination therapy and surgery have shown marked improved in advance stages, but death result due to drug resistant during or after complete treatment. Most Ovarian cancer is sporadic and occurs in general population. Risk factors such as use of oral contraceptives, hysterectomy and hereditary syndromes are associated with ovarian cancer. Hereditary syndromes account 5-10% of ovarian cancer mutation arising in BRCA1, BRCA2 and MMR gene [3]. On the basis of screening treatment and genetic stability, ovarian cancer is classified under two categories. Type 1 (Tumor confined to the ovary), these tumors are characterized by specific mutations including KRAS, BRAF, ERBB2, CTNNB1, PTEN and PIK3CA genes but rarely by TP53 [4]. These tumors are relatively genetically stable. Type-2 (metastasized in the fallopian tube) is genetically unstable and is the one of the most advance stage of ovarian carcinoma which is indicated by high frequency of TP53 mutation. Maximal surgical cyto-reduction followed by taxene and platinum based chemotherapy is the primary treatment for ovarian cancer [4]. The therapeutic use of cancer chemotherapy has been restricted due to its non-specific or dose limiting cellular toxicity and development of multidrug resistance. To overcome this restriction various drug delivery system are being studied. In the last few decades polymer drug delivery systems have enormous impact in cancer therapy [5]. Multidrug resistance is a major bottleneck limitation in cancer therapy. After introduction of PDCs (Polymer Drug Conjugates) the limitation has been over come to a large extent. Moreover, PDCs improves selectivity and the therapeutics index of anticancer agents by enabling tumor specific targeting and as a result, there is a vast improvement in toxicity profiling. Polymer Delivery System has become a new domain for research of various existing anticancer drugs. Novel polymer drug conjugates can be designed with multifunctional properties which can be potential to overcome all the limitations related to non-specific and dose related cellular toxicity. In general, targeted delivery of Polymer drug conjugates to cancer cell can be achieved by active or passive mechanism [5]. Passive tumor targeting can be achieved either by enhance permeability and retention effect or by hyperthermia effect. Active tumor targeting of polymer conjugates to cancer cell or tumors can be done by covalent conjugation of cell specific ligands to drug which results in cellular internalization via receptor mediated endocytosis mechanism. In last few decades Polymeric nanoparticles have been developed for experimental and clinical delivery of therapeutic agents for improving toxicity profiling and tumor targeting. The idea of novel drug delivery utilizing stimulus responsive polymer is solely based on the fact of certain abnormalities in the tumor microenvironment and its cells such as an acidic pH, altered redox potential or salt concentration, unregulated proteins and hyperthermia and others [6]. These behaviors are utilized for the preparation of so-called smart drug delivery system, which mimics biological response behavior to a certain level [7].

Ovarian Cancer - Statistics at a Glance

Ovarian cancer has a distinctive biology and behavior at cellular and molecular level. Over the past two decades, treatment with empirical optimized combination of cytotoxic drugs and surgery has substantially improved the 5 years survival rates of ovarian cancer patients. According to National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result Program Report (SEER) [8] the number of cases of ovarian cancer is 11.7 per 100,000 women per year during the period from 2010 to 2014. Approx. 1.3% women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer at some point during their lifetime, based on 2012- 2014 report. There was an estimation of 2,22,060 women living with ovarian cancer in United States in 2014. In 2017, estimated new cases of ovarian cancer exacerbated to 22.4% from 11.7% in 2014 (Table 1). Estimated death cases in 2017 due to ovarian cancer are 14,080.

Estimated new ovarian cancer cases in 2017 % of All new cancer cases Estimated Death of ovarian cancer patients in 2017 % of Death of all Cancer % of Survival in 5 years (2007-2013)
 22,440  1.3%  14,080  2.3% 46.5%

Table 1: SEER report of data based on ovarian cancer.

Survival Statistics

Survival Statistics are based on large group of people; these cannot be used to predict what will happen on individual patient as because no two patients are entirely alike and treatment and response to treatment can vary greatly (Figure 1). Diagnosis of stages of cancer, indicate the extent of cancer in the body which determine treatment option and length of survival (Figures 2-4). According to the SEER percentage surviving in 5 years (2007-2013) is 46.5 (Table 1). In general, cancer is categorized under four different stages based on their localization and metastases. Early diagnosis of ovarian cancer has better chance for survival up to 92.5%. Ovarian cancer the percentage of diagnosed cases by stage is depicted in Figure 2.

Figure

Figure 1: Number of new cases and death per 100,000 people (All races, females, age adjusted).

Figure

Figure 2: Percent of diagnosed cases by stage according to SEER.

Figure

Figure 3: Percent of cases and 5 year relative survival by stage at diagnosis: Ovarian cancer.

Figure

Figure 4: Percent of death by age group of ovarian cancer patient.

Biotechnological Therapies in Ovarian Cancer

There is enormous research going on for identification and development of targeted therapies to disrupt various cancer signaling pathways. Mostly the traditional anticancer drugs have been found to interfere with mitosis, DNA synthesis and the DNA repair system. The new class of agents acts by catastasis (tumor growth retardation) and apoptosis by exploiting the tumor vasculature and cell signaling mechanism [9]. Role of monoclonal antibodies, small molecular protein kinase inhibitor and epidermal growth factor receptor have been explored extensively in the management of ovarian cancer. The major target of these agents includes angiogenesis, epigenetic modulators, ripamycin signaling pathway, ubiquitin proteasome pathways, human epidermal growth factor receptor family and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Bevacizumab sold under the trade name of Avastin, considered as the most effective anti-angiogenic agent in management of advance ovarian cancer [10]. PARP inhibitor was approved by FDA in 2016 for the management of patience with BRCA positive advance ovarian cancer, rucaparib was the second PARP inhibitor approved in the field. MTORserine/threonine kinase plays a key role in cell growth and proliferation. Preclinical investigation have suggested mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2 are frequently activated in epithelial ovarian cancer [11]. mTOR inhibitors are also attractive treatment strategies, either alone or combination with chemotherapy, for ovarian cancer.

Targeting angiogenesis

Angiogenesis describe the formation of new blood vessels (neovascularization) from existing vasculature that is vital for normal physiological function. Angiogenesis is the normal and vital process in growth and wound healing as well as formation of granulation tissue. One of the major pathways involved in tumor angiogenesis is VEGF (Vascular endothelial growth factor) family and its receptor. Over expression of VEGF is often observed in many solid tumors and have been found to be associated in varieties of malignancies including ovarian cancer [12-14]. Moreover, expression of VEGF and VEGFR2 has been recently been found in both ovarian cancer cell [15].

VEGF inhibitors:

Bevacizumab: It is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody. Immunoglobin- G (IgG1) antibody targets VEGF-A and is considered as the most effective antiangiogenic drug against advance management of ovarian cancer. Avastin suppress the tumor growth and metastatic disease by binding and neutralizing all biological active forms of VEGF-A receptors [16,17].

Cediranib: It is a highly potent oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR1, VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 effective in preventing tumor progression not only by inhibiting VEGFR3 activity but also by inhibiting VEGFR 2 activity [18].

VEGF Trap: Aflibercept binds to VGEFs acts by inhibiting the activity of vascular endothelial growth factor subtypes VEGFA, VEGFB and placental growth factor (PGF), which inhibits the growth of new blood vessel in tumor [19].

PDGF inhibitors: Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) and PDGF receptor stimulates growth, survival and mortality of mesenchymal cells and certain other cell types [20]. Over activity of PDGF receptor signaling may drive tumor cell growth. PDGF receptors modulate angiogenesis by regulating endothelial cell survival and vascular smooth muscle recruitment [21]. Moreover, PDG receptors enhance the proliferation of human ovarian surface epithelial cells and ovarian cancer cells. Expression of PDGF was found in malignant ovarian tumor but not in normal ovaries or benign tumors [22] (Table 2).

Drug Name Class Brand Name Clinical Trials Uses References
Bevacizumab VEGF Inhibitor Avastin Phase II /III Ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer and Fallopian tube cancer. [23,24]
Cediranib VEGF Inhibitor Recentin Phase II /III Used orally in recurrent ovarian cancer in Phase II clinical trials. [25]
VEGF Trap VEGF Inhibitor Aflibercept Randomized Phase II Ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer and Fallopian tube cancer. [26]
Imatinibmesy-late PDGF inhibitor Gleevec Phase II Platinum resistant ovarian cancer [27]

Table 2: List of antiangiogesis inhibitors used in ovarian cancer.

Targeting signaling

Numerous studies have shown that targeting specific signaling pathways could be promising in cancer therapy in terms of inhibition of cell migrations, invasion and tumor growth [23-25]. It is well known now that ovarian cancer is genetically complex malignancy in which numerous genes are altered or mutated which give rise to tumor genesis. In this review an attempt is made to discuss the most important signaling pathways involved in ovarian cancer along the specific therapeutic agent targeting the signaling pathways [26,27].

Notch signaling pathway: Notch signaling pathways functions through cell to cell interaction and involved in regulation, proliferation and cell apoptosis. There are four different Notch cellular membrane receptors called Notch1-4 and five ligands found in mammals. Three of these ligands belong to Delta-like family (DII 1, 2 and 3) and two ligands are Jagged1 and Jagged2 are serrate like [28]. Delta like 1, 3 and 4 and Jagged 1 and 2 are the main ligands in human [29]. Notch 3 receptor is found to be up regulated in ovarian cancer. Notch 3 proteins play a significant role in development and survival of the tumor [30]. It was found the interaction between Notch 3 and Jagged 1 proteins promotes cell proliferation [31]. Gamma-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) are the most widely studied Notch pathway targeting agents. GSIs have shown reduction and induction of apoptosis in A2780 and OVCR3 ovarian cancer cell line. In case of Platinum resistant tumor, combination therapy of GSIs with Paclitxel led to a great reduction of tumor size [32].

Wnt/β-catenin pathway: Wnt signaling plays a significant role in cellular communication such as differentiation, proliferation regulation of cell cycle and cellular adhesion. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is one of the major signaling pathways thought to be involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition [33]. Abnormal activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling Pathways led to the development of multiple diseases like congenital malformation and Cancer. In Ovarian carcinomas especially β-catenin mutation along with over expression of Wnt target genes, Auxin 2 and Fibroblast growth factor 9 is reported [34]. Sinomenine (SIN), an isoquinoline extracted from the Chinese medicinal plant Sinomenium acutum, Qingfengteng (Caulis Sinomenii), is well known for anti-rheumatic and anti-arthritic disease [35]. SIN gradually reduced the growth capacity of tumor in dose dependent manner and might play anti proliferation and anti-metastasis function via regulating MCM2 gene thereby regulating or controlling Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway: PI3K pathway is a complex signaling network composed of a p110 catalytic and p85 regulatory subunit, p110 subunit phosphorylates PPI2 to active secondary messenger to PIP3, after phosphorylation PIP3 recruits AKT [36]. AKT is a serine threonine which phosphorylates proteins involved in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis thus controlling cell cycle progression and survival. Phosphate and Tensin homology (PTEN) encoded by PTEN gene, have both protein and lipid phosphate activity, plays a key role in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and cell migration. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a component of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) cell survival pathway, composed of two components, the mTORC1-Raptor complex (coordinator of translation control) and the mTORC2-Rictor complex (regulates late cell proliferation and survival). mTORC1 is sensitive to rapamycin whereas mTORC2 is not sensitive to ripamycin [37] (Figure 3 and Table 3).

Drug Name  Class  Target Cell Line/Uses Clinical trials Reference
 DAPT  γ-Secretase Inhibitor Notch Signaling Pathways Ovarian cancer Cells (A2780 and OV2008)  Preclinical Studies  [38]
Sinomenine  Anti-proliferation and Anti Metastasis MCM2 gene/Wnt/β-catenin signaling Ovarian Cancer Cells (IGROV1, HeyA8 and SKVO3 cells)   Preclinical  Studies  [35]
 XL147 Induce Apoptosis in tumor cells  Inhibits PI3 Kinase Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Endometrial Carcinoma Ovarian Carcinoma  Phase 1  [39]
Perifosine  Anti-proliferation AKT inhibitor  OVCA cells   Preclinical  Studies  [40]
Temsirolimus Arrest cell cycle, Antiangiogenic  mTOR inhibitor Epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal malignancies  Phase II  [41]

DAPT=(N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester)

Table 3: List of ongoing clinical studies and Pre clinical studies of cell signaling specific agents.

Receptor mediated targeting

Agent targeting EGFR family: Some of the EGFR inhibitors on which clinical studies are going on is tabulated in Table 3. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family is the key factor in epithelial malignancies, plays essential roles in regulating cell proliferations, survival, differentiation and migration [38,39]. EGFR is a member of ErbB family of tyrosine kinase receptors, transmit signal which promote cell growth [40,41]. The epidermal growth factor consists of four members: ErbB1 (HER1), ErbB2 (HER2) and ErbB3 (HER3) and ErbB4 (HER4) [42]. In normal cell EGFR ligands (TGFα) maintain the cell proliferation according to the tissue requirement for homeostasis. However, in cancerous cell it is abnormally stimulated in tumor microenvironment due to mutation and as a result there is a continual activation of the receptor [43].

Trastuzumab/herceptin is approved for the treatment of early stage breast cancer in both the cases where the Human Epidermal Growth factor Receptor 2 positive (HER 2+) which spread in to the lymph nodes, and also which is not spread in to the lymph node. Herceptin, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody binds to the extracellular domain of the HER 2 receptor and block activation of intracellular signal transduction pathways [44] (Table 4).

Drug Name  Class Brand Name Clinical Trials Uses References
 Gefitinib EGFR Inhibitors Iressa Phase II Relapsed/Persistent ovarian carcinoma  [45]
 Erlotinib  EGFR Inhibitors Tarceva Phase II Ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer  [46]
 Cetuximab EGFR Inhibitors  Erbitux Phase II/III/IV Recurrent ovarian cancer  [47]
Trastuzumab EGFR Inhibitors Herceptin Phase II Recurrent ovarian carcinoma  [48]
Pertuzumab EGFR Inhibitors Omnitarg Phase II Platinum resistance ovarian carcinoma  [49]

Table 4: List of ongoing clinical studies of EGFR inhibitors.

Targeted polymeric drug delivery system

Multi drug resistance and toxicity of the anticancer drugs have made the idea of novel drug delivery system in to existence [45-49]. The novel drug delivery has been linked to three major categories:

1. Lipids based drug delivery system

2. Nano based drug delivery system

3. Polymeric drug delivery system

Advance in polymer drug delivery have resulted in the synthesis and design of polymers with unique properties. To optimize the novel drug delivery system as successful drug carrier, they should be bio-compatible, non-immunogenic and bio-degradable. They should maintain low variability in particle size distribution to ensure the homogeneity of polymer drug conjugates [50]. Polymer Drug conjugates improves the cell specificity of low molecular weight drugs [51].

Synthetic polymers are widely used over the natural polymers for Drug delivery. Natural polymers include polysaccharides such as polypeptide, polynucleotide, dextran and chitosan [52]. Most synthetic polymers are widely used in cell culture and preclinical trials. Synthetic polymer includes HMPA copolymer Poly (ethylene glycol), Poly (L-glutamic acid) Poly (L-lysine) Poly (vinyl pyrrolidon), etc. Among them, some synthetic polymers such as HMPA copolymer and PEG contain multifunctional group which have been used successfully used in the field of polymer drug conjugates [53,54]. In Addition to low molecular weight chemotherapy regimens, Polymer Drug Delivery system can deliver several drugs simultaneously, e.g. N-(2- hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMA) co polymer conjugates containing both doxorubicin and Mesochlorin c6 (Photoactivable compound) showed better cytotoxicity activity than HMPA Doxorubicin used alone. This concept provides new opportunity in multiple drug resistant carcinomas. Although cancer chemotherapeutics have strong potential on tumor inhibition; they are associated with serious toxicity and adverse effect. This is the area where polymer drug delivery excel, by direct the maximum concentration of drug to the tumor, without exploiting the surrounding environment, as a result it decrease the systemic toxicity. Nevertheless the progress of polymer therapeutics is almost unseen. There are still enormous challenges to overcome to ensure the safety and rapid translation/metabolism of polymer therapeutics in to routine clinical use.

HMPA copolymer for designing of anticancer conjugates: HMPA copolymer conjugates have been investigated with several anticancer agents such as DOX (Doxorubicin) Conjugates, Camptothecin conjugates and Paclitaxel conjugates, entered in the Phase I/II clinical trials [55-57]. Doxorubicin covalently conjugated to HMPA co polymer via hydrolytically labile pH sensitive hydrazine bond which increase the stability and release rate at pH 7.4 and pH 5 respectively. HPMA copolymer-bound doxorubicin has showed greater potency than free doxorubicin in the treatment of ovarian cancer. HMPA bound doxorubicin induce apoptosis in ovarian cancer by simultaneously activation of both the caspase dependent and caspase independent pathways of DNA damage.

PEGylation to improve anticancer drug delivery: PEGylation involve the direct conjugation of one or more PEG molecules to various therapeutics including drug or protein. The Biomedical application of PEG polymer has been increased due to its nontoxicity, non-immunogenicity, non-antigenicity biodegradability and biocompatibility. PEG drug conjugates are used to enhance passive tumor accumulation of therapeutic in combination with EPR effect (Table 5).

Conjugates Cell-line References
Folic acid CHP conjugates Ovarian cancer cell line A2780 [58]
Polycurcumin Human ovarian cancer cells C-13, SKOV-3, OVCAR-3 ovarian cancers, MCF-7 breast cancer cell line [59]
HA paclitaxel conjugates Breast, colon and ovarian cancer cells and CD44 (+) human ovarian carcinoma cell lines such as SKOV-3ip [60]

Table 5: Example of pre -clinically developed polymer-anticancer drug conjugates.

Conclusion

The therapeutic use of cancer chemotherapy has been restricted due to its non-specific or dose limiting cellular toxicity and development of multidrug resistance. To overcome this restriction various drug delivery system are being studied. In last few decades polymer drug delivery system have an enormous impact in cancer therapy, multidrug resistance is a major bottleneck limitation in cancer therapy, after introduction of PDCs limitation has been over come to a large extent? Moreover PDCs improves selectivity and the therapeutics index of anticancer agents by enabling tumor specific targeting as a result there is a vast improvement in toxicity profiling. Polymer Delivery System has become a new domain for research of various existing anticancer drugs. Novel polymer drug conjugates can be designed with multifunctional properties which can be potential to overcome all the limitations related to non-specific and dose related cellular toxicity. Nevertheless the progress of polymer therapeutics is almost unseen. There are still enormous challenges to overcome to ensure the safety and rapid translation/metabolism of polymer therapeutics in to routine clinical use.

References

  1. Rao MS, Galliford CV, Low PS (2015) Principles in the design of ligand-targeted cancer therapeutics and imaging agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14: 203-219.
  2. Robert CB, Hennessy B, Mills GB (2009) The biology of ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 415-428.
  3. Jelovac D, Armstrong DK (2011) Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 183-203.
  4. Kim A, Ueda Y, Naka T, Enomoto T (2012) Therapeutics strategies in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 31: 14.
  5. Singh AV, Raichur A, Dyawanapelly S (2016) Conjugates, polymer drug: Targeted cancer treatment. Encyclopedia of Biomedical polymer & Polymeric Biomedical.
  6. Zhu L, Torchilin VP (2013) Stimulus responsive nano preparation for tumor targeting. Integr Biol (Camb) 5: 96-107.
  7. Schmaljohann D (2006) Thermo & pH responsible polymer in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58: 1655-1670.
  8. National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result Program Report (SEER) (2017) Cancer stat facts: Ovarian cancer
  9. Ma WW, Adjei AA (2009) Novel agents on the horizon for cancer therapy. CA Cancer J Clin 59: 111-137.
  10. Itamochi (2010) New agent on the horizon of cancer therapy. CA Cancer J Clin 60: 62.
  11. Cristina AM, Paulino E, Garces AHI (2017) A review of mTOR pathway inhibitors in gynecologic cancer. Oxid Med Cellul Longev
  12. Ishigami SI, Arii S, Furutani M, Niwano M, Harada T, et al. (1998) Predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in metastasis and prognosis of human colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 78: 1379-1384.
  13. Ohta Y, Tomita Y, Oda M, Watanabe S, Murakami S, et al (1999) Tumor angiogenesis and recurrence in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 1034-1038
  14. Sato S, Shimogai R, Kigawa J, Itamochi H, Iba T, et al. (2008) Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha gene affects the outcome in Patients with ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18: 499-505.
  15. Hiroaki Itamochi (2010) Targeted therapies in epithelial ovarian cancer: Molecular mechanisms of action. World J Biol chem 26: 209-220.
  16. Kim KJ, Li B, Houck K, Winer J, Ferrara N, et al. (1992) The vascular endothelial growth factor proteins: identification of biologically relevant regions by neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. Growth Factors 7: 53-64
  17. Kim KJ, Li B, Winer J, Armanini M, Gillett N, et al. (1993) Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis suppresses tumour growth in vivo. Nature 842-844.
  18. Heckman CA, Holopainen T, Wirzenius M, Keskitalo S, Jeltsch M, et al. (2008) The tyrosine kinase inhibitor cediranib blocks ligand-induced vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 activity and lymph angiogenesis. Cancer Res 4754-4762.
  19. Chustecka Z (2013) Aflibercept approved for colorectal cancer in Europe. Medscape.
  20. Hedin CH, Westermarck B (1999) Mechanism of action and in vivo role of platelet-derived growth factor. Physiol Rev 79: 1283-1316.
  21. Hellstrom M, Kalén M, Lindahl P, Abramsson A, Betsholtz C, et al. (1999) Role of PDGF-B and PDGFR-beta in recruitment of vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes during embryonic blood vessel formation in the mouse. Development 126: 3047-3055.
  22. Henriksen R, Funa K, Wilander E, Bäckström T, Ridderheim M, et al. Expression and prognostic significance of platelet-derived growth factor and its receptors in epithelial ovarian neoplasm. Cancer Res 53: 4550-4554.
  23. Burger RA, Sill MW, Monk BJ, Greer BE, Sorosky JI (2007) Phase II trial of bevacizumab in persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 25: 5165-5171.
  24. Cannistra SA, Matulonis UA, Penson RT, Hambleton J, Dupont J, et al. (2007) Phase II study of bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or peritoneal serous cancer. J Clin Oncol 5180-5186.
  25. Hirte H, Lheureux S, Fleming GF, Sugimoto A, Morgan R, et al. (2015) A phase 2 study of cediranib in recurrent or persistent ovarian, peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer: A trial of the Princess Margaret, Chicago and California Phase II Consortia. Gynecol Oncol 138: 55-61.
  26. Moroney JW, Sood AK, Colemanet RL (2009) Aflibercept in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Future Oncol 5: 591-600.
  27. Coleman RL, Broaddus RR, Bodurka DC, Wolf JK, Burke TW, et al. (2006) Phase II trial of imatinibmesylate in patients with recurrent platinum-and taxane-resistant epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers. Gynecol oncol 101: 126-131.
  28. Lindsell CE, Shawber CJ, Boulter J, Weinmaster G (1995) Jagged: A mammalian ligand that activates Notch1. Cell 80: 909-917.
  29. Kotsopoulos IC, Papanikolaou A, Lambropoulos AF, Papazisis KT, Tsolakidis D, et al. (2014) Serous ovarian cancer signaling pathways. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24: 410-417
  30. Brown GW, Brodsky AS, Freiman RN (2015) Notch3 overexpression promotes anoikis resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer via upregulation of COL4A2. Mol Cancer Res 13: 78-85
  31. Zhaoxia L, Yun R, Yu X, Hu H, Huang G, et al. (2016) Overexpression of Notch3 and pS6 is associated with poor prognosis in human ovarian epithelial cancer. Mediators of Inflammation.
  32. Groeneweg W, Foster R, Growdon WB, Verheijen RHM, Rueda BR (2014) Notch signaling in serous ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res 7: 95.
  33. Arend RC, Londoño-Joshi AI, Straughn JM Jr, Buchsbaum DJ (2013) The Wnt/β-catenin pathway in ovarian cancer: A review. Gynecol Oncol 131: 772-779.
  34. Strandmann EPV, Reinartz S, Wager U, Müller R (2017) Tumor-host cell interactions in ovarian cancer: Pathways to therapy failure. Trends in Cancer 137-148.
  35. Li H, Lin Z, Bai Y, Chi X, Fu H, et al. (2017) Sinomenine inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth and metastasis by mediating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway via targeting MCM2. 50017-50026.
  36. Cheaib B, Auguste A, Leary A (2015) The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in ovarian cancer: Therapeutic opportunities and challenges. Chin J Cancer 34: 4-16.
  37. Zarogoulidis P, Lampaki S, Turner JF, Huang H, Kakolyris S (2014) mTOR pathway: A current, up-to-date mini-review (Review). Oncol Lett 8: 2367-2370.
  38. M Wang, Ma X, Wang J, Wang L, Wang W (2014) Pretreatment with the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT sensitizes drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin by downregulation of Notch signaling. Int J Oncol 44: 1401-1409.
  39. US National Library of Medicines (2013) Safety study of XL147 (SAR245408), in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in adults with solid tumors.
  40. Al Sawah E, Chen X, Marchion DC, Xiong Y, Ramirez IJ, et al. (2013) Perifosine, an AKT inhibitor, modulates ovarian cancer cell line sensitivity to cisplatin-induced growth arrest. Gynecol Oncol 131: 207-212
  41. Behbakht K, Sill MW, Darcy KM, Rubin SC, Mannel RS, et al. (2011) Phase II trial of the mTOR inhibitor, temsirolimus and evaluation of circulating tumor cells and tumor biomarkers in persistent and recurrent epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal malignancies: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 123: 19-26.
  42. Wieduwilt MJ, Moasser MM (2008) The epidermal growth factor receptor family: Biology driving targeted therapeutics. Cell Mol Life Sci 65: 1566-1584.
  43. Wong AJ, Rupert JM, Bigner SH, Grzeschik CH, Humphreyet PA, et al. (1992) Structural alterations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in human gliomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2965-2969.
  44. Hudis CA (2007) Trastuzumab-mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. Engl J Med 357: 39-51.
  45. Pautier P, Joly F, Kerbrat P, Bougnoux P, Fumoleau P, et al. (2010) Phase II study of gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) as second-line therapy for ovarian, tubal or peritoneal adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 116: 157-162.
  46. Vaser PA, Gore M, Wilson R, Rustin G, Gabra H, et al. (2008) A phase Ib trial of docetaxel, carboplatin and erlotinib in ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers. Br J cancer 98: 1774-1780
  47. Malugin A, Kopecková P, Kopecek J (2006) HPMA copolymer-bound doxorubicin induces apoptosis in ovarian carcinoma cells by the disruption of mitochondrial function. Mol Pharm 3: 351-61.
  48. Jason W, Webster KT, Maihle NJ (2010) Trastuzumab sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to EGFR-targeted therapeutics. J Ovarian Res 3: 7.
  49. Makhija S, Amler LC, Glenn D, Ueland FR, Gold MA, et al. (2010) Clinical active Pertuzumab in platinum resistance ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 28: 1251-1223.
  50. Nicolas B, Wu J, Xu X, Kamaly N, Farokhzad OC (2014) Cancer nanotechnology: The impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 66: 2-25.
  51. Duncan R (2003) The dawning era of polymer therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2: 347-60.
  52. Ichinose K, Tomiyama N, Nakashima M, Ohya Y, Ichikawa M, et al. (2000) Antitumor activity of dextran derivatives immobilizing platinum complex (II). Anticancer Drugs 11: 33-38.
  53. Pasut G, Veronese FM (2007) Polymer drug conjugation, recent achievements and general strategies. Prog Polym Sci 32: 933-961.
  54. Meerum T, Schellens JH, Schot M, Mandjes IA, Zurlo MG, et al. (2001) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of PNU166945, a novel water-soluble polymer-conjugated prodrug of paclitaxel. Anticancer Drugs 12: 315.
  55. Vasey PA, Kaye SB, Morrison R, Twelves C, Wilson P, et al. (1999) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of PKI (HPMA copolymer doxorubicin) first member of a new class of chemotherapeutics agents: Drug polymer conjugates. Clin Cancer Res 5: 83-94
  56. Dosio F, Arpicco S, Brusa P, Stella B, Cattel L (2001) Poly(ethylene glycol)-human serum albumin paclitaxel conjugates: Preparation, characterization and pharmacokinetics. J Control Release 76: 107-117.
  57. Zamai M, VandeVen M, Farao M, Gratton E, Ghiglieri A, et al. (2003) Camptothecin poly [N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide] copolymers in anti-topoisomerase-I tumor therapy: Intratumor release and antitumor efficacy. Mol Cancer Ther 2: 29-40.
  58. Lee E, Kim H,  Lee  IH,  Jon  S  (2009)  In  vivo antitumor  effects  of  chitosan-conjugated docetaxel after ora administration. J Control Release 140: 79-85.
  59. Shih LB, Goldenberg DM,  Xuan  H,  Lu  H,  Sharkey  RM  (1991)  Anthracycline immunoconjugates prepared by a site specific linkage via an aminodextran intermediate carrier. Cancer Res 51: 4192-04198.
  60. Auzenne E, Ghosh  SC, Khodadadian  M, Rivera  B,Farquhar  D,  et  al.  (2007) Hyaluronic Acid-Paclitaxel: Antitumor efficacy against CD44(+) Human ovarian carcinoma xenografts. Neoplasia 9: 479-486
Citation: Debashis D, Nath LK (2018) Ovarian Cancer - The Silent Killer. J Tumor Res 3: 134.

Copyright: © 2018 Debashis D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top