GET THE APP

Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics

Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Open Access

ISSN: 0974-276X

+44 1223 790975

Commentry - (2021)Volume 14, Issue 11

Overview on Different Methods of Protein Quantification

George Oche Ambrose*
 
*Correspondence: George Oche Ambrose, Department of Biochemistry, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria, Email:

Author info »

Description

Protein quantitation and protein measures are basic for precisely deciding the protein content. For instance, to comprehend the overall protein content in a sample or a designed product, protein quantification is required. A variety of other vital experiments require precise total protein content values in order to create data, hence accurate protein quantification is crucial. To achieve reliable data, careful selection of the protein quantification method is essential. Colorimetric assays, for example, rely on the use of an external reference standard, and differences in absorbance qualities between the product and the reference standard might lead to errors. Quantitative amino acid analysis can also be used to determine protein concentration, but a thorough understanding of how various proteins hydrolyse under similar conditions, as well as the amino acid stability during hydrolysis, is required.

Colorimetric measures are subject to the utilization of an outer reference standard and the distinctive absorbance properties among item and the reference standard might prompt errors. There are an assortment of protein quantitation techniques including UV absorbance examines, reagent-based tests, and immunoassay innovations. Quantitative amino corrosive examination can likewise be utilized for protein content assurance however a comprehension of how various proteins hydrolyse under comparative conditions and the dependability of amino acids during hydrolysis is basic.

Spectrophotometric protein quantitation is a technique that utilizes UV and apparent spectroscopy to quickly decide the grouping of protein, comparative with a norm, or utilizing an appointed annihilation coefficient. Ultra-Violet (UV) absorbance to quantify protein focus is a moderately basic protein quantitation measure. Amino acids with sweet-smelling side chains furnish proteins with their unmistakable UV absorbance at 280 nm. Since these amino acids retain UV light at 280 nm, the absorbance at this specific frequency can be gotten through a spectrophotometer and used to appraise protein fixations in examples. This somewhat speedy measure is every now and again utilized in research centre and the Warburg-Christian technique is ordinarily performed for the protein fixation assessment.

Utilizing UV absorbance for protein focus might have high changeability on the grounds that non-protein parts might meddle with absorbance estimations. Also, combinations with various proteins could make changing absorbance readings due the distinction in amino corrosive syntheses.

Absolute proteome quantification with isotopic peptides includes injecting known amounts of synthetic, heavy isotopologues of target peptides into an experimental sample, followed by LC-MS/MS analysis. Peptides of equal chemistry coelute and are examined by MS concurrently, similar to relative quantification utilising isotopic labelling. In contrast to relative quantification, absolute quantification compares the abundance of the target peptide in the experimental sample to that of the heavy peptide and calculates back to the initial concentration of the standard using a pre-determined standard curve. Labeling the samples with stable isotope labels allows the mass spectrometer to distinguish between identical proteins in distinct samples, which are more expensive and time-consuming than label-free quantification but less sensitive to experimental bias than label-free quantification. Isotopic tags, for example, are made up of stable isotopes integrated into protein cross linkers that generate a known mass shift in the mass spectrum of the labelled protein or peptide. Differentially labelled samples are pooled and analysed simultaneously, and discrepancies in isotope pair peak intensities precisely reflect differences in protein abundance. Normal methods utilized in protein measurement incorporate the Bradford, Folin-Lowry, and Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) tests, each with its own benefits and hindrances.

Conclusion

Quantitative proteomics has different applications in biomedical fields including drug and biomarker disclosure. The procedures in the field have begun to override ELISA and western blot techniques. Techniques utilize fluorescent colours to help with recognizable proof. Every one of these protein quantitation advances has extraordinary advantages and the appropriateness of the test relies upon the type or potentially volume that is accessible for investigation.

Author Info

George Oche Ambrose*
 
Department of Biochemistry, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
 

Citation: Ambrose GO (2021) Overview on Different Methods of Protein Quantification. J Proteomics Bioinform.14:559.

Received: 03-Nov-2021 Accepted: 17-Nov-2021 Published: 24-Nov-2021

Copyright: © 2021 Ambrose GO. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top