Journal of Oceanography and Marine Research

Journal of Oceanography and Marine Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2572-3103

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2014) Volume 2, Issue 4

Parasitological and Comparative Pathological Studies on Monogenean Infestation of Cultured Sea Bream (Sparus aurata, Spariidae) in Egypt

Nisreen E. Mahmoud1*, Mahmoud AM2 and Fahmy MM1
1Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza 12211, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Nisreen E. Mahmoud, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt

Abstract

This investigation was realized between December 2012 to November 2013. A total of 400 Sea bream (Sparus aurata) were sampled from a private fish farm in Ezbet Elborg area, Domietta province, Egypt and were investigated in terms of monogenean parasites .The prevalence, seasonal dynamics, mean intensity as well as the histopathological influence of the detected monogeneans were estimated. The standard parasitological methods were used in the survey and yielded four monogenean species on the Sea bream gills: Furnestinia Echeneis (58.59% of invaded fish), Encotyllabe spari 32.81%, Sparicotyle chrysophrii 25.78% and Choriocotyle chrysophrii 17.19%. The total prevalence was 32% and the highest rate was recorded during summer. With the exception of Encotyllabe spari, the detected parasites are new records for the monogenean fauna of Egypt ( new geographical record) and also Sea bream (Sparus aurata) is a new host record for the monogenean Choriocotyle chrysophrii.

Histopathological examination revealed different pathological changes in the affected bronchial tissue. The lesions were depended on the type of the detected monogenea. Some parts of the brachial tissue showed hyperplasia of mucous secreting cells, hemorrhages and edema. Necrosis of the gill lamellar epithelium was a common finding at the sites of parasites attachment. In these sites, the necrotic tissue debris was noticed between gill lamellae. In the necrotic part, the secondary lamellae were fused, atrophied with mononuclear cells infiltration. The monogenean parasites were prominently noticed and attached to the gill filaments. The anterior part of the parasites in some cases appeared attached to the epithelial lining of the secondary lamellae with desquamated cells. In other cases, cross sections of the parasites were embedded in the bronchial tissue either gill filaments or gill rakers. Focal areas of denuded epithelium were noticed, in such cases, prominent mononuclear cells infiltration was common.

<

Keywords: Sea bream; Cultured; Monogenea; Histopathology; Egypt

Introduction

The intensification of aquaculture and globalization of the seafood trade have led to remarkable development in the aquaculture industry which play a role in the development of many national economics and in meeting demands for aquatic animal production [1]. The industry has been plagued with disease problems caused by bacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic pathogens which are associated with mortality causing substantial economic losses. Although it is well understood that parasites have a major impact on marine aquaculture, yet relatively few published reports about marine fish parasites in Egypt and are mostly restricted to wild fish [2-4]. Sea bream (Sparus aurata) is marine Fish with economic value and wide spread all over the world especially in the Mediterranean Sea. In Egypt, farming of Sea bream is at an early stage of development, it has started in late 1980`s and is still restricted to few farms and float cages in the Mediterranean Sea [5].

Among the most species rich classes of fish parasites, are monogenean trematodes which commonly inhabet fish gills and skin. There are two types of monogeneans based upon the opisthohaptor morphology: Monopisthocotylean monogeneans such as Furnestinia echeneis and Encotyllabe spari which are globally frequent in wild populations and can be pathogenic to cultured fish, [6,7] and Polyopisthocotyleans ones which are pathogenic to economically important fish around the world, [8,9] Amongst them, Choriocotyle chrysophrii and also Sparicotyle chrysophrii which was recorded as the most threatening ectoparasites for Sea bream (Sparus aurata) culture [10,11]. High infestation with monogeneans through their attachment and feeding, may lead to significant fish mortality as a consequence of respiratory distress, tissue damage and secondary bacterial and fungal infections. In addition, many traits such as monoxeny, rapid reproduction and hermaphroditism enable them to cause serious damage in both wild species and farmed stocks [12-14].

From pathological point of view, the induced lesions depend on the type of monogenea and Some of them induce closely similar tissue changes [15,16]. Monogeneans feed mainly on the superficial layers of the skin and gills, this feeding activity is irritating and thus often causes skin cloudiness or focal reddening resulting from excess mucus production [17] Several blood-feeding polyopisthocotylean monogeneans have been shown to induce gill damage and mortality [18,19].

In this paper, our goals were: a) to investigate the prevalence, seasonal dynamics of the monogenean fauna parasitic on cultured Sea bream, Sparus aurata from a private marine fish farm in Domietta province. b) To evaluate and compare the histopathological changes induced by each of the detected monogenea species.

Materials and Methods

Fish

During the period from December 2012 to January 2013, 400 fish specimens of cultured Sea bream, Sparus aurata (Sparidae) were obtained seasonally from a private fish farm in Ezbet Elborg area (in corresponding to Mediterranean sea ), Domietta province. Fish body weights and lengths were ranged from 50 up to 200 gm and 15 to 25 cm respectively. Samples were transported to the laboratory of parasitology department; Faculty of veterinary medicine, Cairo University in aerated tanks partially filled with its natural water and was kept alive until investigation.

Parasitological examination

Macroscopic examination: Skin surface, fins and gills were examined by naked eyes and with the help of dissecting microscope for any attached parasites, lesions or external changes.

Microscopic examinations: Four to sex mucous smears were immediately prepared from the skin and fins with the aid of microscopic slides and subsequently examined with the aid of a dissecting microscope. Fish were killed by severing the spinal cord behind the head. Once euthanized, gills were carefully removed and placed in separate petri dishes containing normal saline to remove any excess gill mucus, and they were examined for monogenean parasites under a stereomicroscope. Live parasites were slightly compressed between a slide and a cover slip prior to being examined under a light microscope. The collected monogeneans were fixed in 4% formalin for permanent whole mount preparation [20].

Measurements were taken on fixed specimens using ocular micrometer calibrated against a stage micrometer. Prevalence, mean intensity and measurements followed the guidelines of [21]. Microphotographs were taken. Identification of the parasites was made according to the works of [22,23].

Histopathological examination

Tissue specimens from gills were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for routine histopathological examinations. The fixed samples were washed in tap water overnight and exposed to ascending concentrations of ethanol (70, 80, 90 and 100%), cleared in xylene and embedded in paraffin. Tissue slides of 5 μm thick sections were prepared and stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The histopathological preparation was performed according to Bancroft [24].

Results

Results of parasitological examination

Morphological description of the detected monogenea species: Four species of monogenea belongded to four families were detected in gills of cultured Sea bream (Sparus aurata).

Encotyllabe spari [23] (Monopisthocotylea: Capsalidae) description: Body is cylindrical, measuring 1.06-2.02 mm in length (excluding the peduncle of the opisthaptor) and 0.23-0.30 mm as maximum width. Anteriorly, two oval anterior suckers are surrounded by membranous lobe with ventral infolded margens. Pharynx is 0.05- 0.07 mm in diameter and at its level, two pairs of eye spots are present. The caeca run posteriorly with many ramifying branches. Opisthaptor is the form of muscular disk connected to the body by muscular peduncle provided with a thin marginal membrane and armed with one pair of large stout anchors ( 0.08-0.13 mm long), one pair of simple anchors (0.01-0.02 mm long) and 14 marginal hooks (0.01-0.02 mm long). Two oval testes are situated pre-equatorial measuring 0.02-0.11 mm by 0.04-0.15 mm. Cerrus pouch is elliptical. Ovary is ovalm pretesticular measuring 0.03-0.05 by 0.02-0.03 mm. Vetelline follicles are extensive, filling lateral and post testicular region of the body (Figures 1-3).

oceanography-Encotyllabi-spari

Figure 1: Encotyllabi spari.

oceanography-desquamated-epithelium

Figure 2: Gills of sea bream (Sparus auratus) showing necrosis and desquamated epithelium with remnants of the parasite (arrow). H& E stain x 100.

oceanography-Higher-magnification

Figure 3: Higher magnification of the previous photo showing mononuclear cells infiltration in the necrotic tissue of secondary gill lamellae (arrow). H& E stain 400x.

Furnestinia Echeneis (Monopisthocotylea: Diplectanidae) description: The body is 0.5-0.8 mm in length and 0.1-0.2 mm in width in ovary level. One pair of tri-lobed head organs and two pairs of eye spots are present anteriorly. Pharynx is rounded (0.03-0.05 mm in diameter). Haptor is 0.1-0.2 mm in diameter with lamellar shaped dorsal and ventral squamodiscs having numerous concentric rows of paired lamellae and two pairs of anchors supported with one middle and two lateral bars. Testis is large, lying in the middle of the body, measuring 0.06-0.08 by 0.07-0.09 mm. Single prostatic reservoir and a sclerotized copulatory organ are clearly appeared. Ovary is pre-testicular, looping around the intestinal limb. The vitellaria are follicular extending from the pharynx level to the haptor (Figures 4-6).

oceanography-Furnestinia-echeneis

Figure 4: Furnestinia echeneis.

oceanography-secondary-gill-lamellae

Figure 5: Gills of sea bream (Sparus auratus) showing Furnestinia echeneis parasite attached to secondary gill lamellae (arrow). H&E stain 400x.

oceanography-sercum-scibed-area

Figure 6: Gills of sea bream (Sparus auratus) showing sercum- scibed area of detached epithelium (arrow). H&E stain 400x.

Choriocotyle chrysophrii (Family Diclidophoridae), description: Body is fusiform with attenuated anterior end. It measures 2.43-4.01 mm long and 0.52-0.73 wide. The prohaptor has one pair of suchers . Pharynx is large (0. 05-0.08 x 0.7-0.9 mm). Genital pore is median, lying on the level of oesophogial biforcation and armed with hooks of 0.1-0.2 mm long. The opisthaptor is terminal with four pairs of pedunculated clamps with a terminal lappet between the last one. The clamp has chitinious pieces and curved lateral bars. Testes are numerous (18-25 in number) and post ovarian. Vitelline follicle fills most of the body. Ovary is median and folded. Vagina is absent (Figures 7-10).

oceanography-Choriocotyle-chrysophrii

Figure 7: Choriocotyle chrysophrii.

oceanography-branchial-tissue

Figure 8: Gills of sea bream (Sparus auratus) showing eggs of the parasites embedded in the branchial tissue (arrow). H&E stain 400x.

oceanography-carilagenous-part

Figure 9: Gills of sea bream (Sparus auratus) showing larvae of the parasite in the gill raker near the carilagenous part of the gill arch (arrow). H&E stain 400x.

oceanography-secondary-gill-lamellae

Figure 10: Gills of sea bream (Sparus auratus) showing larvae of the parasite in the secondary gill lamellae (arrow). Note: Lamellar fusion and hyperplasia. H&E stain 400x.

Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Family Diclidophoridae; Polyopisthocotylea: Microcotylidae) description: Body is 4.3-5.5 mm in length, 0.5-0.7 mm in width in ovary level. Anterior there are two buccal suckes with septum and numbers of minute spines. Pharynx is 0.03-0.04 in diameter. Oesophagus has two lateral diverticula. Intestinal caeca extends posteriorly with inner and outer diverticula. Haptor is triangular in profile and bordered with numerous (60-70) pair of small clambs of uniform structure. Testes are ovoid in shape, vary in number (15-20) and each measuring 0.06-0.08 mm. Genital atrium is armed with 34-40 spines with curved tips. Ovary is inverted U shaped and lying pre-testicular. Vitellaria are follicular and coextensive (Figure 11).

oceanography-Spariocotyle-chrysophrii

Figure 11: Spariocotyle chrysophrii.

Prevalence and seasonal dynamics of monogenean species infestation: In the present study, out of the examined 400 Sparus auratus fish, 128 (32.0%) were found infested with monogenea. The highest rate of infestation was recorded during summer (49%) while the lowest was during winter (19%) (Table 1 and Chart 1).

Season No of fish No. of infested fish with
Encotyllabespari Furnestiniaecheneis Sparicotylechrysophrii Choriocotylechrysophrii
Examined Infested
(%)
Winter 100 19 4 10 5 2
Spring 100 33 9 16 8 4
Summer 100 48 20 34 13 11
Autumn 100 28 9 15 7 5
Total
(%)
400 128
(32)
42
(10.50)
75
(18.75)
33
(8.25)
22.0
(5.5)

Table 1: Prevalence and seasonal dynamics of the detected monogenean species.

oceanography-Seasonal-dynamics

Chart 1: Prevalence and Seasonal dynamics of the detected monogenean sp.

Monopisthocotylean species (Furnestinia echeneis and Encotyllabi spari) were the most abundant infesting 18.75% and 10.50% of the examined fish respectively. Mixed infestation was noticed between all detected species.

Results of Histological Examination

The histopathological examination revealed severe pathological lesions in some of the examined cases while in others, the changes were mild. The lesions ranged from mucous cells hyperplasia to complete necrosis of the branchial epithelium or even desquamation. Haemorrhage and oedema were also noticed.

The examined lamellar tissue infested with Encotyllabi spari showed marked branchitis characterized by mononuclear cells infiltrating the branchial epithelium. The affected parts appeared with necrosis and desquamated epithelium with remnants of the parasite (Figure 2). In such cases mononuclear cells infiltration was not uncommon (Figure 3).

In case of Furnestinia echeneis infestation, the lesions were relatively milder and focal. The parasites were easily detected in the affected gills (Figure 5). The sites of parasite attachment showed sircum-scribed area of detached epithelium (Figure 6), it seems to be resulted from feeding of the parasite on the lamellar tissue. However the inflammatory reactions and fusion of the secondary lamellae were scanty.

The infestation with Choriocotyle chrysophrii was characteristic. The eggs of the parasites were embedded in the bronchial tissue (Figure 8). In such cases there was no evidence of lamellar fusion or hyperplasia while lamellar edema was a common finding. Some of the examined cases revealed bronchitis and lamellar fusion, such lesions were accompanied with detection of larvae in the bronchial tissue either in secondary gill lamellae and/ or gill rakers (Figures 9 and 10).

The infestation with Spariocotyle chrysophrii induced severe pathological lesions in the bronchial epithelium. The lamellar tissue showed necrosis and desquamation of the epithelium together with lamellar fusion and hyperplasia (Figures 12 and 13). In such cases hemorrhage and edema were not uncommon.

oceanography-lamellar-fusion

Figure 12: Gills of sea bream (Sparus auratus) showing necrosis and desquamation of the epithelium together with lamellar fusion and hyperplasia (arrow). H&E stain 400x.

oceanography-Sparus-auratus

Figure 13: Gills of sea bream (Sparus auratus) showing advanced lamellar necrosis (arrow). H&E stain 400x.

Discussion

In the present study, four types of monogenean parasites were isolated from the gills of sea bream and identified as Encotyllabe spari, Furnestinia Echeneis, Choriocotyle chrysophrii and Sparicotyle chrisophrii depending on the morphological characteristics studied by light microscopy. The percentage of infected sea breams with monogenean parasites during the present survey is 32%. Previous parasitological surveys reported [25] were markedly different and were 4.44%, 32, 21% and 49, 80% respectively.

Encotyllabe spari was detected in 32.81% of the infested fish; this rate is much higher than that reported by Pellicer. In the Mediterranean Sea (2%) and by Kardousha [26], (8%) in Arabian Gulf. The detected Encotyllabe spari was morphologically similar to those described by Yamaguti et al [23,27]. This species is geographically widespread with a wide range of hosts; it was reported in the Atlantic Ocean by Khon [28], in the Persian Gulf [27]. This is the second record of this monogenean species in Egypt as the first one was by Mahmoud and Shaheed from Serranus fasciatus in Gulf of Suez.

Furnestinia echeneis in the present survey, showed the highest rate among the infested fish (58.59%) with the maximum rate during summer. In contrast, Revarsat [6] denoted that, rate of infestation with this parasite increase in spring, this is might be attributed to the difference in environmental condition and locality. Higher prevalence of F. echeneis (73.2%) in the wild sea bream population was recorded by Mladineo, among cage-reared sea bream in Mediterranean Sea. No cases of mortality were recorded among the infested fish in spite of the high intensity of F. echeneis their gills, the data which came in agreement with Quaglio [29]. On the other hand, F. echeneis caused high mortality due to sever necrosis on the gill and mass mucous secretion in Siganus auratus, [30] also in natural sea bream in Red Sea and Acabe Bay, [31].

Sparicotyle chrisophrii was recorded in relatively lower rate (8.25%) among the examined fish. This species was previously recorded by Adzici, with infection rate of 4,4% of sea bream gills and noticed the significant increase in number of infected individuals with the temperature increase. The recorded rate in this study is different from that presented by Mladineo which stated 32.21 [11,32] states that, Sparicotyle chrisophrii was found in studies conducted by 5 out of 48 laboratories in the Mediterranean countries that are doing researches on fish parasites. Other authors such as Reversat et al [6,33] detected this parasite on the sea bream gills.

The recovered Choriocotyle chrysophrii recorded the prevalence (5.5%), several other Choriocotyle species were previously recorded in wide range of hosts as mentioned by Bashirullah [34]. In the present work, sea bream is recorded as new host of this monogenea species. In the present survey, the record of mixed infection between all detected monogenea species supports the finding of Padrós and Caffara [35,36].

In present study, the pathological changes in the gills were different depend up on the type of the parasite which detected in the gills. The lesions were noticed in secondary gill lamellae and gill rakers in the area of gill arch, in this concern, Paperna [16] studied the pathogenesis and effect of some monogea infestation on the mortality of farmed fish and paid attention to the relation between the type of monogenea, site of attachment on the gills and mortality rate. He indicated that the sites of proliferation are dependent on the preferred sites of the monogenean species. Some prefers the tips of the gill filaments and causes mass mortality.

In this study, the detected lesions in case of Encotyllabi spari were severe and characterized by bronchitis, necrosis and desquamated epithelium. However, such lesions were nearly similar to those of Spariocotyle chrysophrii infestation. Molnar recorded similar pathological lesions caused by D. vastator and D. lamellatus, where severe hyperplasia of the epithelium of gill filaments was a common finding. Molnar added that, feeding on epithelial cells and anchorage (attachment) by the monogeneans cause severe destruction of the gills resulting in hemorrhage and metaplasia of the gill tissue.

The infestation with Choriocotyle chrysophrii showed characteristic eggs and/ or larvae embedded in the bronchial tissue, this result was in parallel with the finding of Whittington [37], who recorded that a few capsalids attach egg bundles to gill filaments.

No pathological signs are referred to F. echeneis infections, also with 50 specimens/gill arch infection intensity [29]. But in heavily infestation shows hyperplasia of gill epithelium with thickening of lamellae up to fusion. The gills show diffused degeneration and necrosis in the filament epithelial tissue [6].

S. chrysophrii shows a high pathogenicity at low infection intensity (8 parasites/gill arch) with gross lesions such as gill and systemic anemia already noticeable at necropsy. In this case histology shows severe hyperplasia of gill epithelium with thickening of lamellae up to fusion, and heavy sloughing off of the epithelial cells. Moreover the gills show diffused degeneration and necrosis in the residual epithelial tissue. The hematophagous attitude of S. chrysophrii is evident for the presence of several erythrocytes in the parasite gut [6,29].

References

  1. Haylor G, Bland S (2001) Integrating Aquaculture into Rural Development in Coastal and Inland Areas. FAO Corporate Document Repository 2-81.
  2. Mahmoud NE (1990) Some studies on the helminth parasites marine water fishes in Suez Canal Area. M.V.Sc. Thesis (Parasitology).Fac. of Vet. Med. Suez Canal.
  3. Bayoumy EM, Osman HAM, Laya F. El-Bana, Hassanain MA(2008) Monogenean parasites as bioindicators for heavy metals status in some Egyptian Red Sea Fishes. Global Veternaria 2: 117-122.
  4. Heba I, Mawla A, Walaa TE (2012) Some studies on parasitic infection among Moronelabrax (Seabass fish) as bio-indicator of environmental conditions. Egyptian Journal for Aquaculture. 2.
  5. Abou E, Mohamed E (2013) Some Bacterial and Fungal affections Causing Disease Problems in Cultured SeabreamSparusAurata in Damietta Governorate and Trials for Control. Arabian Aquaculture Society 8:357-372
  6. Reversat J, Silan P, Maillard C (1992) Structure of monogenean populations, ectoparasites of gilthead sea bream Sparusaurata. Marine biology 112: 43-47.
  7. Papoutsoglou SE, Costello MJ, Stamou E,Tziha G (1996) Environmental conditions at sea-cages, and ectoparasites on farmed European sea-bass, Dicentrarchuslabrax (L.), and gilthead sea-bream, Sparusaurata L, at two farms in Greece. AquacultRes 27: 25-34.
  8. Hayward C (2004)Polyopisthocotyleans and their impact on marine fish culture. In: K. uchmann (Ed.), Diagnosis and Control of Fish Diseases. Frederiksberg Bogtrykkeri A/S, Frederiksberg,Denmark11.
  9. Hutson KS, Ernst I, Whittington ID (2007) Risk assessment for metazoan parasites of yellowtail kingfishSeriolalalandi (Perciformes: Carangidae) in South Australian sea-cage aquaculture. Aquaculture 271: 85-99.
  10. Sanz F (1992) Mortality of cultured sea bream (Sparusaurata) caused by an infection with a trematode of the genus Microcotyle. Bull EurAssoc Fish Pathol 12: 186-188.
  11. Alvarez-Pellitero P (2004) Report about fish parasitic diseases. Alvarez-Pellitero P, Barja JL, Basurco B, Berthe F, Toranzo AE (Eds) Mediterranean Aquaculture Diagnostic Laboratories 103-129.
  12. Lia RP, Zizzo N, TinelliA, Lionetti A, Cantacessi C (2007) Mass mortality in wild greater amberjack (Serioladumerili) infected by Zeuxaptaseriolae (Monogenea: Heteraxinidae) in the Ionian Sea. Bull EurAssoc Fish P 27: 108-111.
  13. Strona G, Stefani F, Galli P (2010) Monogenoidean parasites of Italian marine fish: an updated checklist. Ital J Zool 77:419-437.
  14. Akmirza A (2013) Monogeneans of fish near Gökçeada, Turkey. Turk J Zool37: 441-448
  15. Molnar K (1972) Studies on gill parasitosis of the grass carps (Ctenopharyngodonidella) caused by DactylogyruslamellatusAchmerov, 1952. IV. Histopathological changes. ActaVeterinariaAcademiaeScientiarumHungaricae22: 9-24.
  16. PapernaI (1991) Diseases caused by parasites in the aquaculture of warm water fish. Annual Review of Fish Diseases1: 155-194.
  17. Noga EJ (2000) Fish disease: Diagnosis and treatment. Iowa State University Press 92- 97.
  18. PapernaI, van As JG, Basson L (1984)Review of diseases affecting cultured cich lids. FishelsonLandYaron Z (eds) Proceedings of an International Symposium on Tilapia Aquaculture. Tel Aviv University 174-184.
  19. Thoney DA, Hargis WHJ (1991) Monogenea (Platyhelminthes) as hazards for fish in confinement. Annu Rev Fish Dis. 1: 133-153.
  20. Pritchard MH, Kruse GO (1982) The collection andpreservation of animal parasites.Tech. Bull. No.1, Harold W.Manter Laboratory. Univ.Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
  21. Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol 83: 575-583.
  22. Chisholm LA, Whittington ID (1998) Morphology and development of haptors among the Monocotylidae (Monogenea). Hydrobiologica 383: 251-261.
  23. Yamaguti S (1963) HelminthumMonogenea and Aspidocotylea. Interscience Publishers, London.
  24. Bancroft D, Stevens A, R Turner (1996) Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques (2nd Edn) Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, Melbourne.
  25. Fioravanti ML, Caffara M, Florio D, Gustinelli A, Marcer F, et al. (2006) Parasitic diseases of marine fish: epidemiological and sanitary considerations. Parassitologia 48: 15-18.
  26. Kardousha MM, Al-Ansi MA, Al-Khayat JA (2002) Monogenea of Arabian Gulf Fishes 3. Encotyllabespari and E. Kuwaitensis (Capsalidae) From Qatari Waters. Rivista Di Parasitologia XIX (LXIII) N.
  27. Khalil LFand Abdul-Salam IB (1988) The subfamily Encotyllabinae(Monogenea: Capsalidae) with the description of Alloencotyllabecaranxi n. g., n. sp. and Encotyllabekuwaitensisn. sp. Systematic Parasitology 11: 139-150.
  28. Kohn A, Abramson B, Macedo B (1984) Studies on some monogenean parasites of Haemulonsciurus (Shaw, 1803) (Pomadasyidae). Journal of Helminthology 58: 213-218.
  29. Fioravanti ML, Caffara M, Florio D, Gustinelli A, Marcer F, et al. (2006) Parasitic diseases of marine fish: epidemiological and sanitary considerations. Parassitologia 48: 15-18.
  30. Paperna I (1978) Occurence of fatal parasitic epizootics in maricultered tropical fish. Fourth International Congress of Parasitology, Warsawa 198.
  31. Paperna I, Baudin LF (1979)Parasitic infections of sea bass, Dicentrarchuslabrax L. and gilt head sea bream, Sparusaurata, in mariculture facilities in France. Aquaculture 16: 173-175.
  32. Laetitia A,Quilichini Y Marchand B (2010) Sparicotylechrysophrii (Van Beneden and Hesse 1863) (Monogenea: Polyopisthocotylea) parasite of cultured Gilthead sea bream Sparusaurata (Linnaeus 1758) (Pisces: Teleostei) from Corsica: ecological and morphological study. Parasitol Res 107 :389-398.
  33. Merella P, Garippa G, Salati F (2006) Parasites of cage cultured European seabassDicentrarchuslabrax and gilthead seabreamSparusaurata from Sardinia (western Mediterranean): first results. Parassitologia, 48: 290.
  34. Bashirullah AKM, Rado NE (1987) Co. occurrence of three species of Choriocotyle (Monogenea: Diclidophoridae) in the grunt Orthopristisruber and their host specificity. J Fish Biol30:419-422.
  35. Padros F, Crespo S (1995) Proliferative Epitheliocystis associated with monogean infection in juvenile Sea bream in the N.E. of Spain, Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 15: 42.
  36. Caffara M, Quaglio F, FioravantiML, Gustinelli A, Marcer F et al. (2005)CoinfectionPolysporoplasma dotted all (Myxozoa) and Sparicotylechrysophrii (Monogenea) in sea bream (Sparusaurata). Acts Of Xii National Conference SIPI, Cesenatico (FC) 47.
  37. Whittington ID (1990) The egg bundles of the monogeneanDionchusremorae and their attachment to the gills of the remora, Echeneisnaucrates. Int J Parasitol 20: 45-49.
Citation: Mahmoud NE, Mahmoud AM, Fahmy MM (2014) Parasitological and Comparative Pathological Studies on Monogenean Infestation of Cultured Sea Bream (Sparus aurata, Spariidae) in Egypt. Oceanography 2: 129.

Copyright: © 2014 Mahmoud NE, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top