Andrology-Open Access

Andrology-Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0250

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2014) Volume 3, Issue 2

Pentoxifylline Associated with Other Antioxidants (Multimodal Therapy) on Patients with Peyronie's Disease. Results of a Controlled Study

Antonio Artegiani, Tommaso Brancato, Alessandro Palmieri, Alessandro Papini, Stefano Lauretti, Enrico Spera, Giuseppe Dachille, Andrea Fabiani, Antonio Vitarelli, Gianni Paulis*, Francesco Varvello, Enrico Conti, Paolo Turchi, Bruno Rovereto, Davide Barletta, Giovanni De Giorgio, Giorgio Cavallini and Furio Pirozzi Farina
Regina Apostolorum Hospital, Albano Laziale, Rome, Italy
*Corresponding Author: Gianni Paulis, Regina Apostolorum Hospital, Albano Laziale, Rome, Italy, Tel: +303395901291 Email:

Abstract

Pentoxifylline (PTX) with other antioxidants, in patients with PD enrolled for a conservative medical management.

Methods: We carried out a controlled study on 240 patients diagnosed with Peyronie's Disease (PD). We have divided two treatment groups, which differ from each other only for the association with PTX-penile injection. Two groups (A and B) were totally composed by 160 PD patients (80 patients for each group): Group A=PTX injection (penile and peri-lesional) 100 mg, every two weeks for six months + PTX 400 mg /oral/ twice daily + propolis 600 mg / oral / daily + blueberries 160 mg /oral/ daily + Vitamin E 600 mg / oral / daily + topical Diclofenac sodium 4% gel / twice a day, for a period of 6 months. Group B=the same therapy of group A but without PTX penile injection. Patients who refused treatment, for various reasons, were included in the control group=Group C (80 patients).

Results: In groups A and B after 6 months of treatment a reduction of penile plaque volume of 50.3% and 25.9% respectively was observed, while in group C a mean increase in plaque volume of 131% was observed. Furthermore, in groups A and B, the mean curvature decrease was -11.07° and -4.4° respectively, while in group C a mean increase of curvature =+14.09° was observed. Conclusion: Our results showed that multimodal treatment with PTX associated with antioxidants and topical Diclofenac is significantly effective in treating PD. Treatment outcomes obtained in the treatment-group A are statistically more significant than those achieved in group B. Pentoxifylline is more effective when the treatment program includes both routes of administration: oral + perilesional injection.

<

Keywords: Pentoxifylline; Antioxidants; Blueberry; Multimodal Therapy; Peyronie's Disease; Propolis; Vitamin

Introduction

Peyronie's Disease (PD) is a connective tissue disorder that affects primarily the tunica albuginea with the growth of fibrous inelastic plaques in penile corpora cavernosa. These plaques (also improperly called keloid scars), can obstacle the full and complete penile expansion during erection resulting in a possible penile bending. PD is a relatively common condition, indeed, several studies indicated a prevalence of 3.2 to 13.0 % in adult males [1,2]. The etiology of PD is not fully understood, although in recent years new studies propose the penile trauma as cause of PD [3]. A recent hypothesis suggests that the replicative/tumor-like nature of PD should be regarded as similar to that of keloids [4-8].The disease may occur as a result of traumas or injuries to the penis usually during sexual activity, although the majority of PD-patients do not remember a traumatic event.

Deposition of fibrin determines a secondary inflammatory process and production of phlogistic cytokines (Transforming growth factor beta-TGF-β etc.) associated with collagen overproduction and increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [9]. In what follows an activation of Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) with the consequent expression of genes on specific targets (collagen, fibrin, inducible nitric oxide synthase-iNOS, fibroblast growth factor-FGF and TGF-β) [10,11].

Conservative treatment is indicated in early phase of PD and in case of local pain. Surgery is indicated when disease is stabilized [12,13] and in patients with severe penile curvature and/or erectile dysfunction [14]. Nonsurgical treatments include: potaba, Vitamin E, colchicine, tamoxifen, propolis, verapamil, interferons, collagenase, cortisone, pentoxifylline, iloprost, iontophoresi, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) and Capacitive Resistive Energy Transfer (Tcare or TECAR therapy) [15-21]. Since we have already experienced the effectiveness of conservative treatment in the early phase of PD [17,22-24], we implemented a controlled study on patients with PD treated in association with several drugs: Pentoxifylline plus several antioxidants (Vitamin E, blueberries and propolis) and topical Diclofenac.

Materials and Methods

A controlled study was carried out to investigate the possible benefits of multimodal treatment, Pentoxifylline (PTX) associated with other Antioxidants, in patients with PD enrolled for a conservative medical management. This study was carried out by group of Andrologists Medical Researchers (all members of the Italian Society of Andrology - S.I.A.) in different locations of Andrological Operative Units of Italy: Rome, Albano L., Bologna, Pavia, Bari, Monopoli (Bari), Perugia, Prato, Macerata, Alba and Arezzo.

Between May 2, 2012 and October 31, 2013, 298 patients with PD were initially selected and enrolled for this study. All 298 patients had been informed about the possible surgical procedure. However, none of them wished to undergo surgery and 89 patients refused any treatment (both medical and surgical treatment) for severalmotives: costs of care, hope to heal, fear of the treatment, PD underestimation, distrust in the care, etc.

We have conducted two treatment groups with multimodal therapy, which differ from each other only for the association with PTX-penile injection:

Group A

Pentoxifylline (PTX) injection (penile and perilesional - with needle 30 Gauge) 100 mg, every two weeks (12 total injections - the first injection 50 mg) for six months + PTX 400 mg / oral / twice daily + propolis 600 mg / oral / daily (on an empty stomach to facilitate the intestinal absorption) + blueberries 160 mg / oral / daily + Vitamin E 600 mg / oral / daily + topical Diclofenac sodium 4% gel / twice a day, for a period of 6 months.

(To avoid further penile traumatism, in contrast to other studies, penile injections were not performed directly into the Peyronie's plaque but near the penile plaque: perilesional injection. PTX injection was performed with a very thin needle (30 Gauge) and without use of local anesthetic. Penile PTX injections were performed every 14 days and for a total period of 6 months. All patients of group A were then subjected to 12 total each injection).

Group B

PTX 400 mg / oral / twice daily + propolis 600 mg / oral / daily (on an empty stomach) + blueberries 160 mg / oral / daily + Vitamin E 600 mg / oral / daily + topical Diclofenac sodium 4% gel / twice a day, for a period of 6 months.

Group C

No treatment was provided to the patients who refused treatment and so all these patients were included in this study as a “control group”.

Exclusion criteria (for all patients including control group) were:

• Any medical therapy for sexual dysfunction, before or during the study

• Previous treatments for PD

• Stabilized PD

• Severe penile curvature and/or which prevents sexual intercourse

• Severe erectile dysfunction

• Hypotension (possible transient hypotensive effects by pentoxifylline)

• Patients receiving continued therapy with theophylline (concomitant administration of pentoxifylline and theophylline may increase theophylline levels with possible increase of adverse effects) or potent anticoagulant drugs (dicumarol, etc.)

• Patients with allergy to various substances were used in the present study

From the original 298 patients, 58 cases were excluded from the study because of the following reasons

Three patients with stabilized PD; nineteen patients who have used PDE-5 inhibitors in the 6 months prior to study; five patients who after using Diclofenac-gel had a strong local skin irritation; ten patients who had suffered unpleasant side effects (skin rash, tachycardia, hypotension, dizziness) after initial treatment with oral pentoxifylline and who discontinued quickly the treatment; twenty-one patients that did not guarantee the statistical homogeneity of the three groups for various reasons (plaque echogenicity, type and degree of penile curvature/deformity, plaque volume, calcification size, presence of erectile dysfunction, comorbidity).

Thus, the two treatment groups (Groups A and B) were totally composed by 160 PD patients and each group included 80 patients. The control group (Group C) was composed of 80 untreated PD patients. Nine patients (of the initial 89 cases) were initially excluded from the study because did not guarantee the statistical homogeneity with the other groups (already included in the twenty-one patients excluded - see above). However, also these patients have agreed to be studied and controlled and so these 80 patients were observed evaluating the natural progression of the disease with follow-up after 6 months. The two substances propolis and blueberries, with the same doses used in the study (600 mg and 160 mg respectively) are contained in a tablet of Propolberry-3P® (Brea Srl, Italy).

Main outcome measures

Together with the medical history and the physical examination, initially, all 240 patients were subjected to these tests: dynamic penile ultrasound study, photograph during maximum erection [25], penile pain questionnaire, questionnaire-International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Penile pain was evaluated by a conventional 11-point pain-scale (Visual Analogue pain Scale-VAS) [26]. The self-evaluation of the erection was evaluated by all patients using the questionnaire IIEF [27]; the evaluated answers were the questions 1-5 and 15 which specifically refer to penile rigidity (IIEF-EF normal score: 26-30). Patients who had a total score of less than 26 were identified as having erectile dysfunction (ED).

The ultrasound study included an evaluation of the 3 dimensions of the plaque (length, width, and thickness) [28]. The plaque-volume was measured in cm3 using the ellipsoid formula [29-31]. All 240 patients were controlled for a time of 6 months and then underwent the same tests as performed at the start of the study. We performed statistical analysis with software package “Primer of biostatistics” (by Stanton A.Glantz).

Specific informed consent was obtained from all patients. This study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, and the 1983 revision of the same.

Results

The study included 240 patients (mean age = 53.5 ± 10.9 years; range 22-73 years). In the majority of patients (194/240 cases) there was a penile curvature (80.8%) and the mean curvature was 30.4 degrees (± 15.7 SD). Penile pain was present in 162 patients (67.5% of total cases) and the mean pain-score (VAS) was 4.6 (± 2.1 SD). ED was present in 95 cases (39, 5% of total 240 cases) and the mean IIEF score was 19.78 (± 4.49 SD).

The three groups of this study were sufficiently homogeneous for a statistical analysis of results (patient age, PD duration, plaque size, calcification size, presence and intensity of ED, presence and intensity of penile pain, presence (and degree) of curvature and presence of comorbidities.

Clinical characteristics, basic demographics and comorbidities related to the three groups of PD patients are listed in Table 1.

Characteristics Treated group Treated group Treated group Statistical analysis
Group A Group B Group C
n. 80 cases  n. 80 cases  n. 80 cases  p-Value p-Value p-Value
A versus B A versus C B versus C
Mean age (years)+standard deviation 53.42 ± 11.76 53.62 ± 10.16 53.61 ± 11.00 p=0.909 (ANOVA) p=0.916 (ANOVA) p=0.995 (ANOVA)
Time since PD onset (months)+standard deviation 11.02 ± 6.47 11.31 ± 6.51 10.96 ± 7.48 p=0.778 (ANOVA) p=0.957 (ANOVA) p=0.753 (ANOVA)
Meanplaque volume (cm3)+standard deviation 0.711 ± 0.789 0.718 ± 0.990 0.7 ± 0.641 p=0.961 (ANOVA) p=0.923 (ANOVA) p=0.892 (ANOVA)
Cases with calcifications 25 23 24 p=0.971 p=0.903 p=0.885
Cases+%cases/total 31.2 28.7 30 2 test) 2 test) 2 test)
Meancalcification volume (cm3)+standard deviation 0.152 ± 0.372 0.148 ± 0.195 0.142 ± 0.089 p=0.932 (ANOVA) p=0.815 (ANOVA) p=0.803 (ANOVA)
Associatederectile dysfunction 31 33 31 p=0.871 p=1.000 p=0.871
Cases+%cases/total 38.7 41.2 38.7 2 test) 2 test) 2 test)
Erectile function index of PD patientswith EDmean score+standard deviation 19.6 ± 4.9 19.42 ± 5.12 19.29 ± 3.57  p=0.886 (ANOVA) p=0.777(ANOVA)  p=0.907 (ANOVA) 
Associated penile pain during 55 54 53 p=0.8653 p=0.8660 p=0.8666
Erectioncases+%cases/total 68.7 67.5 66.2 2 test) 2 test) 2 test)
VAS score of PD patients with penile PAINmean score+standard Deviation 4.727 ± 1.994 4.537 ± 1.829 4.735 ± 2.520 p=0.605 (ANOVA) p=0.985 (ANOVA) p=0.642 (ANOVA)
Objective penile curvature 65 64 65 p=0.841 p=1.000 p=0.841
Cases+%cases/total 81.2 80 81.2 2 test) 2 test) 2 test)
Curvature meandegrees°+standard deviation 31° ± 12.6 30.8° ± 14.8 29.2° ± 19.3 p=0.929 (ANOVA) p=0.535 (ANOVA) p=0.607 (ANOVA)
Patients with memory of recent 3 2 3 p=0.649 p=1.000 p=0.649
Penile trauma/cases+%cases/total 3.7 2.5 3.7 2 test) 2 test) 2 test)
Comorbidities n. cases n. cases n. cases p-Value(χ2 test) p-Value(χ2 test) p-Value (χ2 test)
Hypertension 21 22 20 p=0.858 p=0.856 p=0.857
Dyslipidemia 15 14 15 p=0.837 p=1.000 p=0.837
Ischaemic heart disease 6 7 7 p=0.772 p=0.772 p=1.000
Diabetes 9 7 8 p=0.792 p=0.797 p=0.786
Hypotestosteronemia 2 2 2 p=1.000 p=1.000 p=1.000
Chronic prostatitis 4 3 4 p=0.699 p=1.000 p=0.699
Dupuytren's contracture 3 3 2 p=1.000 p=0.649 p=0.649
Cigarette smoking 17 16 15 p=0.845 p=0.843 p=0.841
Benign prostatic hyperplasia 8 9 8 p=0.797 p=1.000 p=0.797
Total mixed comorbidities 96 94 91 p=0.909 p=0.650 p=0.820

Table 1: Clinical characteristics and basic demographics of PD patients in the three groups.

In all cases when calcification was present, it did not exist in the whole area of the plaque, but was only present in small part, confirming that the disease was in the progressive phase.

Evaluation of treatment outcomes (Table 2)

Studied patterns Group A Treated group Group B Treated group Group C Control group Statistical analysis
A versus B A versus C B versus C
Penile pain disappearance mean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 74.54(41/55) 55.55(30/54) 7.5 (4/53) p=0.045 (χ2 test) P<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
Change in VAS-Score in patients with Penile Painmean score+ Standard Deviation -4.0 ± 1.8 -3.3 ± 1.8 -0.4 ± 2.0 p=0.050 (ANOVA) p=0.000 (ANOVA) p=0.000 (ANOVA)
Appearance of penile painmean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 0 (0/25) 0 (0/26) 66.66 (18/27) p=1.000 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
Reduction of plaque sizemean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 100.0 (80/80) 81.25 (65/80) 0 (0/80) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
Change in penile plaque volume mean rate% + Standard Deviation -50.31 ± 18.76 -25.99 ± 28.12 + 131.04 ± 258.87 p=0.000 (ANOVA) p=0.000 (ANOVA) p=0.000 (ANOVA)
Increase in plaque volume mean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 0 (0/80) 5.0 (4/80) 100.0 (80/80) p=0.120 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
Disappearance of th eplaque mean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 1.25 (1/80) 1.25 (1/80) 0 (0/80) p=1.000 (χ2 test) p=0.315 (χ2 test) p=0.315 (χ2 test)
Reduction of penile calcification sizemean rate% /n. patients/t otal patients 96.0 (24/25) 65.21 (15/23) 4.16 (1/24) p=0.009 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
Change in penile calcification volume mean rate% + standard deviation -57.07 ± 30.26 -35.94 ± 38.03 + 102.12 ± 217.59 p=0.038 (ANOVA) p=0.001 (ANOVA) p=0.004 (ANOVA)
Disappearance of the calcification 12.0(3/25) 8.69 (2/23) 0 (0/24) p=0.708 (χ2 test) p=0.234 (χ2 test) p=0.234 (χ2 test)
Increase in penile calcification volume 4.0 (1/25) 0 (0/23) 75.0 (18/24) p=1.000 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
Appearance of new calcification mean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 0.0 (0/55) 0.0 (0/57) 37.5 (21/56) p=1.000 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
Improvement of penile curvature mean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 83.07 (54/65) 51.56 (33/64) 4.61 (3/65) p=0.0002 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
Change of curvature angleaverage -degrees°+ standard deviation -11.07° ± 8.07 -4.4° ± 5.6 + 14.09° ± 15.47 p=0.000 (ANOVA) p=0.000 (ANOVA) p=0.000 (ANOVA)
Percentage reduction of the penile curvature angle -36.4 ± 26.3 -19.3 ± 23.4 + 74.1 ± 76.7 p=0.000 (ANOVA) p=0.000 (ANOVA) p=0.000 (ANOVA)
Penile curvature unchanged mean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 16.92 (11/65) 46.87 (30/64) 15.38 (10/65) p=0.0003 (χ2 test) p=0.811 (χ2 test) p=0.0001 (χ2 test)
Disappearance of the curvature mean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 6.15(4/65) 1.5(1/64) 0(0/65) p=0.365 (χ2 test) p=0.119 (χ2 test) p=0.496 (χ2 test)
Worsening of penilecurvatur emean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 0(0/65) 0(0/64) 46.15(30/65) p=1.000 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
appearance of new penile curvature mean rate% /n. patients/ total patients 0(0/15) 0(0/16) 86.6(13/15) p=1.000 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
Improvement of penile rigidityin patients with Erectile Dysfunctionin patients with Erectile Dysfunctionmean rate% /n. patients / total patients 96.7(30/31) 69.6(23/33) 0(0/31) p=0.0062 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)
Change in IIEF-Scorein patients with Erectile Dysfunction/ mean scor e+ standard deviation 61.2(19/31)+3.7 ± 2.2 18.1(6/33)+1.2 ± 2.6 0(0/31)-1.6 ± 1.4 p=0.0007 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p=0.0246 (χ2 test)
p=0.000(ANOVA) p=0.000(ANOVA) p=0.000(ANOVA)
Appearance of erectile dysfunction mean rate % /n. patients/ total patients 0(0/49) 0(0/47) 71.42(35/49) p=1.000 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test) p<0.0001 (χ2 test)

Table 2: Outcomes after 6-month treatment

Intergroup analysis revealed statistically significant differences, in both groups A and B versus group C (control group), in terms of improvement of penile pain, effective plaque size reduction, effective penile calcification size reduction, improvement of penile curvature and effective improvement of erectile function index score.

In group A, after treatment of 6 months, penile pain disappeared in 74.5% of the cases, while in group B and group C pain disappeared in 55.5% (p=0.045) and 7.5% (p<0.0001) of the cases respectively.

In group A and group B, after treatment, a reduction of plaque size occurred in all cases (100%) and 81.2% of the cases respectively (p<0.0001), while group C it never occurred (p<0.0001).

Furthermore, in group A and group B, after therapy, the change in penile plaque size consisted in a reduction of plaque volume of 50.3% and 25.9% respectively (p=0.000), while in group C the change consisted in a mean increase in plaque volume of 131% (p=0.000). In group A and group B, after treatment, a worsening of penile curvature never occurred while in group C this worsening occurred in 46.1% of the cases (p<0.0001).

In group A and group B, after therapy, the improvement of curvature occurred in 83.07% and 51.5% of the cases respectively (p=0.0002), while in group C occurred only in 4.6% of the cases respectively (p<0.0001).

Moreover, in group A and group B, after treatment, the mean curvature decrease was –11.07° and –4.4° respectively (p=0.000), while in group C the change consisted in an increase of penile curvature (mean degrees°) corresponding to +14.09° (p=0.000). Interestingly, in group A and group B, after therapy, in PD patients with ED the restoration of rigid erection occurred in 61.2% and 18.1% respectively (p=0.0007), while in group C it never occurred (p<0.0001 and p=0.02). Otherwise, in group C and in PD patients without ED, at 6 months of follow-up, an erectile deficiency occurred in 71.4% of the cases, while in group A and group B this occurrence never occurred (p<0.0001). Although the treatment results of group A are better than B group, the treatment outcomes of B group versus C group outcomes were also statistically significant.

The tolerance of this multimodal therapy was satisfactory; adverse reactions divided “for each medication” and “for each group” are shown in Table 3 and 4 respectively. Gastro-enteric symptoms, skin rashes, headache and dizziness were the most frequent described effects after PTX treatment. Some of these adverse reactions after oral PTX were transient and disappeared rapidly during the treatment (11.8%). However, ten patients (10/170=5.8%) discontinued the medication (oral PTX treatment) because of unpleasant adverse effects (tachycardia, hypotension, dizziness and skin rashes). After PTX injections, three patients (3, 7%) had small ecchymoses at injection sites. After local use of Diclofenac 4% gel, five patients (3.03%) had a strong local skin irritation and they discontinued the medication. No serious adverse event was recorded.

Adverse events PTX oral PTX Injection Propolis+ Blueberry / oral Vitamin E oral Diclofenac sodium 4%-gel
n. cases% incidence rate (n. cases/ total cases) n. cases% incidence rate (n. cases/ total cases) n. cases% incidence rate (n. cases/ total cases) n. cases% incidence rate (n. cases / total cases) n. cases% incidence rate (n. cases / total cases)
Tachycardia 31.76% (3/170) side effect that caused the suspension of the drug (exclusion from the study) 0 0 0 0
Hypotension 10.58% (1/170) side effect that caused the suspension of the drug (exclusion from the study) 0 0 0 0
Skin rashes 42.35% (4/170) side effect that caused the suspension of the drug (exclusio nfrom the study) 0 0 0 0
Dizziness 21.17% (2/170) side effect that caused the suspension of the drug (exclusion from the study) 0 0 0 0
Headache 21.25% (2/160) 0 0 0 0
Hot flushes 21.25 (2/160) 0 0 0 0
Vomiting 10.62% (1/160) 0 0 0 0
Dyspepsia 42.5% (4/160) 0 0 0 0
Nausea 42.5% (4/160) 0 0 0 0
Meteorism 63.75% (6/160) 0 0 0 0
Stronglocal skinirritation 0 0 0 0 53.03% (5/165) side effect that caused the suspension of the drug (exclusion from the study)
Hematoma or severe skin ecchymosis 0 0 0 0 0
Small ecchymosis 0 33.75% (3/80) 0 0 0
Significant local pain 0 0 0 0 0
Local swelling 0 0 0 0 0
Total % incidence rate (concerns patients who have completed treatment) 11.8% (19/160) 3.75% (3/80) 0 0 0

Table 3: Adverse events after treatment (for each medication).

Adverse Events Group A (with PTX injection) Group B
Headache 1 1
Hot Flushes 1 1
Vomiting 0 1
Dyspepsia 1 3
Nausea 2 2
Meteorism 3 3
Local Skin Irritation 0 0
Hematoma Or Severe Skin Ecchymosis 0 0
Small Ecchymosis 3 0
Significant Local Pain 0 0
Local swelling 0 0
Incidence rate for each group(n. cases/total) 13.7% (11/80) 13.7% (11/80)
Total incidence ratein in both groups(n. cases/total) 13.7% (22/160)

Table 4: Adverse events for each treatment group

Although most severe side effects after use of PTX are extremely rare and they never occurred in our study, currently we are investigating the possibility of avoiding the secondary side effects to oral administration of PTX, by associating transdermal PTX iontophoresis (daily) along with PTX penile injection (every two weeks).

Discussion and Conclusions

Pentoxifylline (PTX) reduces ROS production and protects against tissue damage. PTX has antioxidant properties and it exerts antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory activity [29-31]. PTX is a non-specific inhibitor of Phosphodiesterase (PDE); this drug inhibits: TGF-beta-1-stimulated collagen deposition [32,33]; transcriptional activity of NF-kB and TNF-alpha release [35]. PTX also inhibits proliferation of Tunica Albuginea-Derived Fibroblasts (TADF) and attenuates TGF-β1-mediated collagen production in TADF [33]. PTX has inhibitory effects on both elastogenesis and collagen fiber deposition [32]. PTX attenuates the TGF-β1 mediated increase in elastogenesis, possibly by down-regulation of Smad1/5 via an iSmad6 dependent mechanism [33]. SMADs (Small Mother against Decapentaplegic) are intracellular proteins that transduce extracellular signals from TGF-β ligands to the nucleus where they activate downstream gene transcription [36].

Preventing the activity of NF-kB, PTX further contributes to the lower production of collagen. Some studies have indicated that PTX inhibits proliferation and extracellular matrix production and increases collagenase activity [37,38]. Thus PTX plays an important role in PD by inhibiting the TGF-β1-mediated processes leading to further plaque formation [32].

A double-blind placebo-controlled study in patients with PD, has shown that PTX (400 mg/oral/twice daily/6 months) was effective in reducing penile curvature and plaque size [16]. Other studies have confirmed the efficacy of PTX in the treatment of PD [39-42].

Vitamin E was the first oral therapy proposed for the treatment of PD; it is a potent antioxidant that is thought to reduce collagen deposits within the tunica albuginea. Some studies have found that Vitamin E and its metabolites have an anti-inflammatory and anti-COX2 property [43]. In our recent study we evaluated and verified the effectiveness of Vitamin E in the treatment of PD [17].

The components of Propolis, caffeic acid phenethyl ester and terpenoids inhibit the production of interleukins and NF-κB activity [44,45]. Blueberries are flowering plants (Vaccinium spp. Ericaceae) that contain anthocyanins, polyphenols and flavonoids. Blueberry anthocyanins are able to inhibit NF-KB, iNOS and COX-2 expression [46]. Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness of the mentioned antioxidants in the treatment of PD [17,22-24,47-50]. The properties of NSAID’s, including the anti-inflammatory activity of Diclofenac, are already known, and it has been already used in the multimodal treatment of PD [17,22,24].

The significant improvements obtained in group A and B concern the basic parameters of the disease: plaque size, degree of penile curvature and penile rigidity (if erectile dysfunction was present). Interestingly and in contrast to the current medical opinion was to observe in group A and B a significant decrease of calcification volume and even the possibility of determining its disappearance in 12.0 % and in 8,6 % of the cases respectively, after only six months of treatment. In the control group, only few cases where the curvature was improved (4.6 % = 3 cases / 65 cases with penile curvature) (p<0.0001), in reality, the disease, in these cases had progressed as shown by the ultrasound study that found always an increase in plaque volume. In these cases the inflammatory tissue area had progressed locally causing a paradoxical improvement of penile curvature. In group C after 6 months of observation, there was always a statistically significant worsening of the following: penile pain, penile curvature and ED (p<0.0001). Furthermore, in all untreated cases always occurred a local progression of disease (increase of plaque size and/or calcification volume).

Our results showed that multimodal treatment with Pentoxifylline associated with Antioxidants and topical Diclofenac is statistically and significantly effective in treating PD.

Pentoxifylline is more effective when the treatment program includes both routes of administration: oral + perilesional injection (group A). In fact, the outcomes obtained in the treatment-group A are statistically more significant than those achieved in group B, and they refer to the main endpoints of the study: modifications of the penile plaque volume (p < 0.0001), modifications of the penile curvature angle (p=0.000) and changes in erectile function (p=0.000). Good results were achieved only after 6 months of treatment and this may explain why in other reported studies, using the same drugs but with a shorter time limit of the treatment, showed less satisfactory results. In case the option for conservative therapy exists, as PD is a chronic illness, short-term therapies should therefore be avoided.

Our findings confirm and support that the best approach for treating PD is “multimodal therapy” [41,42,51-56], because it was able to achieve greater results than any single drug alone.

Acknowledgements

I take this opportunity to express my profound gratitude and deep regards to President of the Italian Society of Andrology-S.I.A. (for the period 2010-2013) Prof. Furio Pirozzi Farina for his exemplary guidance and constant encouragement throughout the course of this study. I also thank Prof. Eugenio Luigi Iorio, President of International Observatory of Oxidative Stress, for his encouragement and patronage given to this study. Dr. Gianni Paulis.

References

  1. Schwarzer U, Sommer F, Klotz T, Braun M, Reifenrath B, et al. (2001) The prevalence of Peyronie's disease: results of a large survey. BJU Int 88: 727-730.
  2. Dibenedetti DB, Nguyen D, Zografos L, Ziemiecki R, Zhou X (2011) A Population-Based Study of Peyronie's Disease: Prevalence and Treatment Patterns in the United States. AdvUrol 2011: 282503.
  3. Devine CJ Jr, Somers KD, Jordan SG, Schlossberg SM (1997) Proposal: trauma as the cause of the Peyronie's lesion. J Urol 157: 285-290.
  4. Haag SM, Hauck EW, Szardening-Kirchner C, Diemer T, Cha ES, et al. (2007) Alterations in the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta pathway as a potential factor in the pathogenesis of Peyronie's disease. EurUrol 51: 255-261.
  5. Mulhall JP, Branch J, Lubrano T, Shankey TV (2001) Perturbation of cell cycle regulators in Peyronie's disease. Int J Impot Res 13 Suppl 5: S21-28.
  6. Mulhall JP, Nicholson B, Pierpaoli S, Lubrano T, Shankey TV (2004) Chromosomal instability is demonstrated by fibroblasts derived from the tunica of men with Peyronie's disease. Int J Impot Res 16: 288-293.
  7. Mulhall JP, Barnas J, Kobylarz K, Mueller A (2010) p53-Associated Parkin-like cytoplasmic protein (Parc) short-interfering RNA (siRNA) alters p53 location and biology of Peyronie's disease fibroblasts. BJU Int 106: 1706-1713.
  8. Szardening-Kirchner C, Konrad L, Hauck EW, Haag SM, Eickelberg O, et al. (2009) Upregulation of mRNA expression of MCP-1 by TGF-beta1 in fibroblast cells from Peyronie's disease. World J Urol 27: 123-130.
  9. Gonzalez-Cadavid NF, Magee TR, Ferrini M, Qian A, Vernet D, et al. (2002) Gene expression in Peyronie's disease. Int J Impot Res 14: 361-374.
  10. Sikka SC, Hellstrom WJ (2002) Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in Peyronie's disease. Int J Impot Res 14: 353-360.
  11. Paulis G, Brancato T (2012) Inflammatory mechanisms and oxidative stress in Peyronie's disease: therapeutic "rationale" and related emerging treatment strategies. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 11: 48-57.
  12. Kendirci M, Hellstrom WJ (2004) Critical analysis of surgery for Peyronie's disease. CurrOpinUrol 14: 381-388.
  13. Hatzimouratidis K, Eardley I, Giuliano F, Hatzichristou D, Moncada I, et al. (2012) EAU guidelines on penile curvature. EurUrol 62: 543-552.
  14. Kadioglu A, Akman T, Sanli O, Gurkan L, Cakan M, et al. (2006) Surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease: a critical analysis. EurUrol 50: 235-248.
  15. Hauck EW, Diemer T, Schmelz HU, Weidner W (2006) A critical analysis of nonsurgical treatment of Peyronie's disease. EurUrol 49: 987-997.
  16. Safarinejad MR, Asgari MA, Hosseini SY, Dadkhah F (2010) A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of pentoxifylline in early chronic Peyronie's disease. BJU Int 106: 240-248.
  17. Paulis G, Brancato T, D'Ascenzo R, De Giorgio G, Nupieri P, et al. (2013) Efficacy of vitamin E in the conservative treatment of Peyronie's disease: legend or reality? A controlled study of 70 cases. Andrology 1: 120-128.
  18. Safarinejad MR, Hosseini SY, Kolahi AA (2007) Comparison of vitamin E and propionyl-L-carnitine, separately or in combination, in patients with early chronic Peyronie's disease: a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized study. J Urol 178: 1398-1403.
  19. Pavone C, Melloni C, Oxenius I, Napoli G, Usala M, et al. (2010) [Safety and tolerability of local treatment with Iloprost in patients with Peyronie's disease. A phase 1 pilot study and proposal of a new symptom questionnaire]. below Urologia 77: 172-179.
  20. Pavone C, Napoli G, Caruana G, Alonge V, Usala M, et al. (2012) Safety and tolerability of local treatment with iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue, in patients with Peyronie's disease: a phase I study. BJU Int 110: 117-121.
  21. Pavone C, Castrianni D, Romeo S, Napoli E, Usala M, et al. (2013) [TECAR therapy for Peyronie’s disease: a phase-one prospective study. Great evidence in patients with erectile dysfunction]. Urologia 80: 148-153.
  22. Paulis G, D'Ascenzo R, Nupieri P, De Giorgio G, Orsolini G, et al. (2012) Effectiveness of antioxidants (propolis, blueberry, vitamin E) associated with verapamil in the medical management of Peyronie's disease: a study of 151 cases. Int J Androl 35: 521-527.
  23. Paulis G, Cavallini G, Brancato T, Alvaro R (2013) Peironimev-Plus® in the treatment of chronic inflammation of tunica albuginea (Peyronie's disease). results of a controlled study. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 12: 61-67.
  24. Paulis G, Cavallini G, Giorgio GD, Quattrocchi S, Brancato T, et al. (2013) Long-term multimodal therapy (verapamil associated with propolis, blueberry, vitamin E and local diclofenac) on patients with Peyronie's disease (chronic inflammation of the tunica albuginea). Results of a controlled study. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 12: 403-409.
  25. Kelâmi A (1983) Autophotography in evaluation of functional penile disorders. Urology 21: 628-629.
  26. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94: 149-158.
  27. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, et al. (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49: 822-830.
  28. Prando D (2009) New sonographic aspects of peyronie disease. J Ultrasound Med 28: 217-232.
  29. Mitchell C, Winter T (2007) Renal Transplants: Clinical Sonography-a pratical guide. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, p 212.
  30. Behre HM, Zitzmann M (2010) Imaging Diagnostics: Andrology-Male Reproductive Health and Dysfunction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, p 101.
  31. Kim CK, Cho JY (2012) Prostate: Uroradiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, p 826.
  32. Shindel AW, Lin G, Ning H, Banie L, Huang YC, et al. (2010) Pentoxifylline attenuates transforming growth factor-ß1-stimulated collagen deposition and elastogenesis in human tunica albuginea-derived fibroblasts part 1: impact on extracellular matrix. J Sex Med 7: 2077-2085.
  33. Lin G, Shindel AW, Banie L, Ning H, Huang YC, et al. (2010) Pentoxifylline attenuates transforming growth factor-beta1-stimulated elastogenesis in human tunica albuginea-derived fibroblasts part 2: Interference in a TGF-beta1/Smad-dependent mechanism and downregulation of AAT1. J Sex Med 7: 1787-1797.
  34. Taha H, Grochot-Przeczek A, Was H, Kotlinowski J, Kozakowska M, et al. (2009) Modulation of inflammatory response by pentoxifylline is independent of heme oxygenase-1 pathway. J PhysiolPharmacol 60: 3-12.
  35. Deree J, Martins JO, Melbostad H, Loomis WH, Coimbra R (2008) Insights into the regulation of TNF-alpha production in human mononuclear cells: the effects of non-specific phosphodiesterase inhibition. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 63: 321-328.
  36. Attisano L, Wrana JL (2002) Signal transduction by the TGF-beta superfamily. Science 296: 1646-1647.
  37. Berman B, Duncan MR (1989) Pentoxifylline inhibits normal human dermal fibroblast in vitroproliferation, collagen, glycosaminoglycan, and fibronectin production, and increases collagenase activity. J Invest Dermatol 92:605-610.
  38. Berman B, Duncan MR (1990) Pentoxifylline inhibits the proliferation of human fibroblasts derived from keloid, scleroderma and morphoea skin and their production of collagen, glycosaminoglycans and fibronectin. Br J Dermatol 123: 339-346.
  39. Brant WO, Dean RC, Lue TF (2006) Treatment of Peyronie's disease with oral pentoxifylline. Nat ClinPractUrol 3: 111-115.
  40. Smith JF, Shindel AW, Huang YC, Clavijo RI, Flechner L, et al. (2011) Pentoxifylline treatment and penile calcifications in men with Peyronie's disease. Asian J Androl 13: 322-325.
  41. Abern MR, Larsen S, Levine LA (2012) Combination of penile traction, intralesional verapamil, and oral therapies for Peyronie's disease. J Sex Med 9: 288-295.
  42. Ciociola F, Colpi GM (2013) Peyronie's disease: a "triple oxygenant therapy". Arch ItalUrolAndrol 85: 36-40.
  43. O'Leary KA, de Pascual-Teresa S, Needs PW, Bao YP, O'Brien NM, et al. (2004) Effect of flavonoids and vitamin E on cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) transcription. Mutat Res 551: 245-254.
  44. Márquez N, Sancho R, Macho A, Calzado MA, Fiebich BL, et al. (2004) Caffeic acid phenethyl ester inhibits T-cell activation by targeting both nuclear factor of activated T-cells and NF-kappaB transcription factors. J PharmacolExpTher 308: 993-1001.
  45. de lasHeras B, Hortelano S (2009) Molecular basis of the anti-inflammatory effects of terpenoids. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 8: 28-39.
  46. Wang Q, Xia M, Liu C, Guo H, Ye Q, et al. (2008) Cyanidin-3-O-beta-glucoside inhibits iNOS and COX-2 expression by inducing liver X receptor alpha activation in THP-1 macrophages. Life Sci 83: 176-184.
  47. LemourtOliva M, FilgueirasLópez E, Rodríguez Barroso A, González Oramas E, Bordonado R (1998) [Clinical evaluation of the use of propoleum in Peyronie's disease]. Arch EspUrol 51: 171-176.
  48. LemourtOliva M, Rodríguez Barroso A, BordonadoRamírez R, González Oramas E, Molina Castillo F (2003) [Study of propoleum dosage in Peyronie's disease]. Arch EspUrol 56: 814-819.
  49. LemourtOliva M, Rodríguez Barroso A, Puente Guillén M, Vega Guerrero C, Navarro Cutiño M, et al. (2003) [Propoleum and Peyronie's disease]. Arch EspUrol 56: 805-813.
  50. LemourtOliva M, Rodríguez Barroso A, Puente Guillén M, Vega Guerrero C, Navarro Cutiño M, et al. (2003) [Propoleum and Peyronie's disease]. Arch EspUrol 56: 805-813.
  51. LemourtOliva M, Fragas Valdés R, BordonadoRamírez R, Santana JL, González Oramas E, et al. (2005) [Peyronie's disease. Evaluation of 3 therapeutic modalities: propoleum, laser and simultaneous propoleum-laser]. Arch EspUrol 58: 931-935.
  52. LemourtOliva M, Fragas Valdés R, BordonadoRamírez R, Santana JL, González Oramas E, et al. (2005) [Peyronie's disease. Evaluation of 3 therapeutic modalities: propoleum, laser and simultaneous propoleum-laser]. Arch EspUrol 58: 931-935.
  53. Cortés-González JR, Glina S (2010) [Conservative treatment of Peyronie's disease: colchicine vs. colchicine plus vitamin E]. ActasUrolEsp 34: 444-449.
  54. Kuehhas FE, Weibl P, Georgi T, Djakovic N, Herwig R (2011) Peyronie's Disease: Nonsurgical Therapy Options. See comment in PubMed Commons below Rev Urol 13: 139-146.
  55. Levine LA (2013) Peyronie’s disease: contemporary review of nonsurgical treatment. TranslAndrolUrol Published 2: 1.
  56. Halal AA, Geavlete P, Ceban E (2012) Pharmacological therapy in patients diagnosed with Peyronie's disease. J Med Life 5: 192-195.
Citation: Paulis G, Farina FP, Cavallini G, De Giorgio G, Barletta D, et al. (2014) Pentoxifylline Associated with Other Antioxidants (Multimodal Therapy) on Patients with Peyronie's Disease. Results of a Controlled Study. Andrology 3:123.

Copyright: © 2014 Paulis G, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top