Journal of Pharmaceutical Care & Health Systems
Open Access

Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine in Polypharmacy Management

Yuma Mulers^{* *}Correspondence: Yuma Mulers, Department of Pharmacy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, Email:

Author info »

Description

Managing polypharmacy is a growing challenge in healthcare, particularly as population age and chronic conditions become more prevalent. Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of multiple medications, often increases the risk of adverse drug reactions, medication errors and patient non-adherence. Technological solutions have emerged as critical tools in addressing these challenges, offering innovative ways to improve medication management enhance patient safety and optimize therapeutic outcomes [1].

One of the most transformative technological advancements in this area is the use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). These systems enable healthcare providers to maintain comprehensive medication histories, identify potential drug interactions and ensure accurate prescriptions [2,3]. By integrating EHRs with Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS), providers receive real-time alerts about possible contraindications, dosage errors, or duplications. Such interventions not only enhance patient safety but also streamline the workflow for clinicians, reducing the cognitive burden associated with managing complex medication regimens [4].

Mobile Health (mHealth) technologies have also revolutionized the management of polypharmacy, particularly from the patient perspective. Smartphone applications designed for medication tracking and reminders empower patients to take an active role in their treatment plans. These apps can send alerts for missed doses, provide information about medication purposes and side effects and even facilitate communication with healthcare providers [5]. For older adults or patients with cognitive impairments, mHealth tools can be paired with caregiver notifications, ensuring that adherence remains a priority even when self-management is challenging [6].

Telemedicine platforms further extend the reach of healthcare professionals in managing polypharmacy. Through virtual consultations, pharmacists and physicians can conduct medication reviews, address patient concerns and adjust treatment plans as needed [7]. This is particularly beneficial for individuals in remote or underserved areas, where access to inperson care may be limited. By incorporating telepharmacy into routine care, healthcare systems can ensure continuity of care and address potential medication-related problems promptly [8].

Another critical innovation is the use of automated dispensing systems in healthcare settings. These technologies ensure that medications are dispensed accurately, reducing the risk of human error. Automated systems often incorporate barcoding or RFID (Radio-Frequency Identification) technologies to verify the correct medication and dosage for each patient. In hospital settings, these tools contribute to a safer and more efficient medication administration process, which is particularly important for patients with complex regimens [9].

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning are also becoming integral to managing polypharmacy. These technologies analyze vast amounts of patient data to predict potential adverse drug reactions and optimize medication combinations. By identifying patterns and correlations that might not be immediately apparent to human providers, AI tools can support more informed clinical decisions. For instance, predictive analytics can identify patients at high risk of nonadherence or adverse events, enabling proactive interventions.

Pharmacogenomics, facilitated by technological advancements, is another promising avenue for managing polypharmacy. By using genetic information to predict individual responses to medications, healthcare providers can tailor treatments to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse effects. This personalized approach not only improves patient outcomes but also reduces the trial-and-error process often associated with prescribing for individuals on multiple medications [8].

Despite the promise of these technologies, challenges remain in their implementation. Data interoperability between different healthcare systems is a significant barrier, as fragmented systems can limit the effectiveness of integrated tools like EHRs and CDSS. Additionally, the digital divide may prevent some patients, particularly older adults or those in low-resource settings, from accessing or benefiting from mHealth solutions. Ensuring that technological innovations are accessible and userfriendly is critical to their success [10].

Training and adoption among healthcare providers also pose challenges. While technologies like AI and pharmacogenomics offer substantial benefits, they require clinicians to be proficient in interpreting complex data outputs and integrating these insights into patient care. Ongoing education and support are essential to ensure that providers can leverage these tools effectively. care.

Conclusion

Technological solutions offer transformative potential for managing polypharmacy in healthcare settings. From EHRs and CDSS to mHealth apps, telemedicine, automated dispensing systems, AI and pharmacogenomics, these innovations address key challenges associated with polypharmacy, enhancing safety, adherence and therapeutic outcomes. However, realizing their full potential requires addressing barriers to implementation, ensuring equitable access and fostering provider proficiency. As technology continues to evolve, its integration into polypharmacy management will remain a critical component of advancing patient-centered care and optimizing healthcare delivery.

References

1. Harfield S, Davy C, Kite E, McArthur A, Munn Z, Brown N, et al. Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care models of service delivery: A scoping review protocol. JBI Data Sys Rev Impl Rep. 2015;13(11):43-51.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

2. Grella CE. Services for perinatal women with substance abuse and mental health disorders: The unmet need. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1997;29(1):67-78.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

3. Battista N, Bari M, Maccarrone M. Endocannabinoids and reproductive events in health and disease. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2015:341-365.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

4. Pereira N, Schattman GL. Fertility preservation and sexual health after cancer therapy. J Oncol Pract2017;13(10):643-651.[ Crossref]

   [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

5. Malloggi L, Leclère B, Le Glatin C, Moret L. Patient involvement in healthcare workers’ practices: How does it operate? A mixed-methods study in a French university hospital. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):391.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

6. Newell S, Jordan Z. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Syn. 2015;13(1):76-87.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

7. Kim RY, Kwakye G, Kwok AC, Baltaga R, Ciobanu G, Merry AF, et al. Sustainability and long-term effectiveness of the WHO surgical safety checklist combined with pulse oximetry in a resource-limited setting: Two-year update from Moldova. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(5):473-479.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

8. Huang F, Blaschke S, Lucas H. Beyond pilotitis: Taking digital health interventions to the national level in China and Uganda. Global Health. 2017;13(1):49.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. Keddy KH, Saha S, Kariuki S, Kalule JB, Qamar FN, Haq Z, et al. Using big data and mobile health to manage diarrhoeal disease in children in low-income and middle-income countries: Societal barriers and ethical implications. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(5):e130-e142.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

10. Verma N, Mamlin B, Flowers J, Acharya S, Labrique A, Cullen T. OpenMRS as a global good: Impact, opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned from fifteen years of implementation. Int J Med Inform. 2021;149:104405. 

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]