Rheumatology: Current Research
Open Access

Physiological Considerations for Anesthetic Shoulder Implant

Olivier Verborgt^{* *}Correspondence: Olivier Verborgt, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Email:

Author info »

About the Study

In a shoulder replacement, a prosthetic implant is used to replace all or a portion of the glenohumeral joint. Such joint replacement surgery is typically performed to treat serious physical joint deterioration or reduce arthritis symptoms. Severe shoulder joint arthritis may be treated with shoulder replacement surgery. The cartilage in the joints is impacted by arthritis. The protective layer between the bones is lost as the cartilage wears down. As a result, excruciating bone-on-bone arthritis manifests. Extreme shoulder arthritis can limit motion and is very uncomfortable.

While some drugs and lifestyle changes may help to endure this, there may come a time when surgical intervention is required. A shoulder replacement often lasts more than ten years. According to a global study, patients can anticipate significant and longlasting improvements in their pain, strength, range of motion, and capacity to carry out daily duties. There are a few main methods for getting to the shoulder joint. The deltopectoral technique is the first option; while it spares the deltoid, it necessitates the subscapularis's severance. The second method offers a direct path to the glenoid and is known as the transdeltoid approach. This method, however, puts the deltoid at risk for potential harm.

Anesthesiological considerations

Shoulder replacement surgery can be done under either regional or general anesthesia. An interscalene brachial plexus block is one example of a frequently used regional anesthetic, and it has been used in a variety of shoulder procedures, including rotator cuff repairs, proximal humeral prosthetic replacements, total shoulder arthroplasties, anterior acromioplasties, and instability repairs. Less intraoperative bleeding, greater muscular relaxation, shorter hospital stays, reduced opioid use, and avoidance of general anesthesia's adverse effects are all advantages of regional anesthesia over general anesthesia. Regional anesthetic may also be more economical because it speeds up patients' recovery from surgery and decreases the amount of time in the operating room.

According to certain case studies, the success rate of inserting an interscalene brachial plexus block ranges from 84% to 98%. Major issues such seizures, cardiac arrests, Horner's syndrome, hoarseness, and unintentional spinal or epidural anesthesia could arise; as a result, patients should be closely watched from the time the block is inserted until the end of the procedure. Data on the simultaneous administration of interscalene blocks and general anesthesia are currently few. Longer surgical procedures and complex airway management are two reasons for combining anesthesia.

To extend the length and slow the onset of the nerve block, a combination of short- and long-acting local anesthetics is utilized. Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine are appropriate long-acting local anesthetics, while lidocaine is a suitable short-acting local anesthetic. Based on the patient's characteristics and the particular anesthetic technique employed, the dosage required for a patient during shoulder replacement can range from 30 ml to 50 ml.

Post-operative analgesia: Post-operative pain management is crucial for rehabilitation since shoulder replacement can produce moderate to severe discomfort, particularly during shoulder motion. This is due to the fact that joint tissues have good nociceptive innervation, making a surgical operation in the joint region result in ongoing, severe somatic discomfort and muscle spasms.

Common techniques for assisting with the treatment of pain following shoulder replacement surgery include the following anesthetics:

Interscalenic analgesia: Three types:

• Single shot

• Continuous infusion

• Patient controlled

Because of its brief duration, single shot interscalenic analgesia is best employed for small arthroscopic surgery, although it can still be a helpful alternative when continuous interscalenic analgesia is not possible. Due to the intense post-operative pain associated with shoulder replacement and the anatomical closeness of the interscalenic catheter to the shoulder joint, interscalenic analgesia is best suited for the continuous infusion technique. Depending on the type of surgery, the interscalenic catheter can be needed for three to five days.

Suprascapular combined with local anesthetic: Blocking the suprascapular nerve, which supplies sensory information to 70% of the joint capsule, helps lessen shoulder pain after surgery. The suprascapular nerve can be swiftly blocked with a nerve stimulator, an ultrasound device, or a needle insertion 1 cm above the midpoint of the scapular spine. The suprascapular and axillary nerves can also be blocked to further anaesthetize the shoulder joint. The benefit of the suprascapular nerve block is that it protects the phrenic nerve from being blocked by not impairing motor function in the regions of the upper limb innervated by the more inferior roots of the brachial plexus. The suprascapular nerve block has drawbacks, including the requirement for two separate needle punctures, the inability to block all of the shoulder joint's nerves, and a brief duration of action.

The operation can have a variety of adverse effects, including nerve injury, intravascular injection, and pneumothorax. Even though this method reduces pain more effectively than a placebo, it still falls short of the interscalene block.