Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal

Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal
Open Access

ISSN: 2150-3508

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2017) Volume 8, Issue 2

Population Dynamics of Pseudotolithus Senegalensis and Pseudotolithus Typus and Their Implications for Management and Conservation within the Coastal Waters of Liberia

Austin Saye Wehye1*, Patrick K Ofori-Danson2 and Angela Manekuor Lamptey2
1Bureau of National Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Liberia
2Department of Marine and Fisheries Sciences, University of Ghana, Ghana
*Corresponding Author: Austin Saye Wehye, Bureau of National Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Liberia, Tel: +231775717273 Email:

Abstract

The study evaluated some aspect of population parameters of Pseudotolithus senegalensis and Pseudotolithus typus within Liberia’s coastal waters. A total of 177 and 152 samples of P. senegalensis and P. typus respectively were collected from July to December, 2016. Individual fish samples was measured for standard length and analysed using FiSAT II software. From the results, P. senegalensis growth parameter were estimated at asymptotic length (L∞)=66.68 cm, growth rate (K)=0.13 yr-1, the longevity (tmax)=21.49 years, theoretical age at birth (t0)=-1.586 years and growth performance index (φ')=2.762. While P. typus growth parameters asymptotic length (L∞)=66.68 cm, growth rate (K)=0.14 yr-1, the longevity (tmax)=19.3 years, theoretical age at birth (t0)=-2.126 years and growth performance index (φ')=2.294. Mortality parameters for P. senegalensis and P. typus were calculated as total mortality rate (Z)=0.93 yr-1 and 0.70 yr-1, natural mortality rate (M)=0.37 yr-1and 0.39 yr-1 and fishing mortality rate (F)=0.56 yr-1 and 0.31 yr-1 respectively. The calculated fishing mortality rates (F) compared to Fopt=0.4M were beyond the limit for sustainable fishing. The exploitation rate (E) of P. senegalensis (E=0.60) was higher than the Eopt=0.5 criterion. It implies that P. senegalensis is overexploited while P. typus was at the peak of exploitation (E=0.45). Results from the study revealed that the P. senegalensis fishery in Liberia is slightly overexploited while P. typus is at the optimal level of exploitation; as well as the presence of growth overfishing within the two species population within Liberian coastal waters. Thus, to avert the consequences of growth overfishing, sustainable fisheries measures including monitoring of fishing efforts, and increase in mesh size should be implemented and enforced.

Keywords: Liberia; Pseudotolithus senegalensis; Pseudotolithus typus; Growth; Mortality; Exploitation rate

Introduction

The world per capita fish consumption is reported to have increased from an average of 9.9 kg in the 1960s to 19.2 kg in 2012 [1]. On the other hand, the proportion of assessed marine fish stocks fished within biologically sustainable levels declined from 90% in 1974 to 71.2% in 2011, with 28.8% of fish stocks estimated to be overfished [1]. Although fish are renewable resources, this huge irremediable depletion of marine biodiversity by location and depth partly due to intense fishing activities has led to decline of marine capture fisheries [2,3]. The declining trend in global marine catches has led some fisheries scientists to forecast the collapse of ocean fisheries [4]. More so, the trends in catches forecast that more stocks will become overexploited and collapsed [5].

The total marine landed catch for Liberia was estimated at 1,570.82 tons in 2013 excluding artisanal catch and drop speedily to 204 tons in 2014 (BNF unpublished data, 2016). This drastic decline may be due to the reduction in fishing fleets from four (4) vessels in 2013 to two (2) vessels in 2014. The family Sciaenidae was among the species targeted. There was a new development in 2016 that increased the fishing intensities on this family. It was the main focus of export by local exporters to Asian markets. This has enticed local artisanal fishers to target Pseudotolithus senegalensis and Pseudotolithus typus by doubling the price per pound from one United States dollar to two United States dollars and providing outboard motors. This has exacerbated the already existing tension on these species that are mostly consumed by Liberian.

In Liberia, factors such as poor fisheries data collection, limited resources, conflicts and illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) do not only make it difficult to estimate the status of almost all of the marine biodiversity but also presents a great challenge to fisheries managers [6,7]. However, Togba [8] reported that Sardinella, Barracudas, Croakers (P. senegalensis and P. typus ), Sharks and Ilisha africana constituted 83% and 59.06% of local fish supply in 2004 and 2005 respectively; indicating that there has been a declined in fish catches.

Furthermore, the paucity of information on population parameters and biology pertaining to commercially important fish species within Liberian coastal waters cripples any management interventions geared towards sustainable fisheries in Liberia. It is against this backdrop that the present study sought to estimate some population parameters of the family Sciaenidae residing in Liberian coastal waters to enhance already existing management interventions.

Methodology

Study area

Liberia is a relatively small coastal state located in West Africa with geographical coordinates as 6.4281 °N, 9.4295 °W. The coastline of Liberia is 570 kilometers comprising of relatively warm waters and low nutrient contents [9]. However, the study focused on two fish landing sampling stations (ELWA, N 06.23355° and W 010.69365°; and Marshall, N 06.13833° and W 010.38171°) within two coastal counties along the coastline of Liberia (Figure 1).

fisheries-and-aquaculture-journal-Liberia-map

Figure 1: Map showing the sampling sites and Liberia map.

The main source of livelihood for the majority of the inhabitants residing within the selected two fish landing sampling stations is fishing and its related activities such as fish processing and fish trade. However, a few of the indigenes are engaged in alternative forms of livelihoods including farming, driving, and others.

Data collection

Monthly fish samples were collected from artisanal fishermen who operated with multifilament gears from the selected fish landing stations. Fish sample collection was performed from July, 2016 to December, 2016 (six months). According to Pauly [10] analysis of the structure of fish population requires at least data collected over a period of six months. Morphometric measurements of the obtained fish samples including standard length and weights were recorded in the lab at the Bureau of National Fisheries. The standard length was measured using the 100 cm Measuring Board to the nearest 0.1 cm, whereas the weight was measured using the electronic weighing scale to the nearest 0.01 g. Fish samples were identified to the species level using fish identification keys by Schneider [11]. In all, a total of 177 and 152 specimens of Pseudotolithus senegalensis and Pseudotolithus typus respectively were sampled.

Growth and mortality parameters

The growth of the fish was assumed to follow the von Bertalanffy’s growth function (VBGF) which has the basic form image Where, L is the asymptotic length that is the mean length the fish of a given stock would reach if they were to grow indefinitely, K is a growth constant, t0 is the age of the fish at zero length, Lt is the length at age and t is age at length. These parameters were fitted in FISAT II [12] for estimation. Pauly’s [13] empirical equation for the theoretical age at length zero (t0) was used to obtain this parameter as log10(‐t0)=‐0.392 ‐ 0.275 log10 L‐ 1.038 log10K.

In order to compare different estimations of growth parameters, the empirical equation of growth performance,

image of Pauly and Munro [14] was used.

The total instantaneous mortality rate (Z) was estimated using length converted catch curve method as implemented in FiSAT II. Natural mortality rate (M) was estimated using Pauly’s empirical relationship using a mean surface temperature (T) of 27°C:

Log M=‐ 0.0066 ‐ 0.279 1og L + 0.6543 log K + 0.4634 log T [15],

Where M is the instantaneous natural mortality, L is the asymptotic length, T is the mean surface temperature and K refers to the growth rate coefficient of the VBGF. Fishing mortality (F) was calculated using the relationship: F=Z–M [16], where Z is the total mortality, F the fishing mortality and M is the natural mortality. The exploitation level (E) was obtained using the relationship: E=F/Z [16],

Optimum fishing (Fopt) which is directly related to the natural mortality (M) was calculated for the selected fish species using the expression below:

Fopt=0.4M ………………………………………[14].

Length at first capture (LC50)

The ascending left arm of the length converted catch curve incorporated in FiSAT II tool was used to estimate the probability of length at first capture (Lc50) in addition to the length at both 25 and 75 captures which corresponded to the cumulative probability at 25% and 75% respectively. The probability of capture gives clear idea about the estimate of the real size of the fish in the fishing area that is being caught by specific gear. It is an important tool for fisheries managers in sustainably managing a target fishery, because it helps would be managers determining the minimum mesh size of a fishing fleet.

Length at first maturity (Lm)

To estimate the length at first maturity (Lm) for the assessed species, the procedure by Hoggarth et al. [17] below was used. The input parameters for the model included asymptotic length only (L).

Length at first maturity (Lm)=L * 2/3..............................[17].

Recruitment pattern and yield per recruit

The recruitment pattern of the stock was determined by backward projection on the length axis of the set of available length-frequency data as described in FiSAT. This routine reconstructs the recruitment pulse from a time series of length–frequency data to determine the number of pulses per year and the relative strength of each pulse. Input parameters included L and K. Normal distribution of the recruitment pattern was determined by NORMSEP (Separation of the normally distributed components of size-frequency samples) [18] in FiSAT. The midpoint of the smallest length group in the catch was estimated as the length at recruitment (Lr) length at recruitment [19].

The relative biomass per recruit (B'/R) was estimated as B'/ R=(Y'/R)/F. Emax which depicts exploitation rate producing maximum yield, E0.1 highlighting exploitation rate at which the marginal increase of Y'/R is 10% of its virgin stock with E0.5 implying exploitation rate under which the stock is reduced to half its virgin biomass were computed using the procedure incorporated using the Knife-edge option fitted in the FiSAT II Tool.

Data Analysis

The length frequency data were pooled into groups with 1cm length intervals. Then the data were analyzed using the FiSAT II (FAOICLARM Population Assessment Tools) software [12].

Results

Growth parameters

Figure 2 show the restructured length frequency with superimposed growth curves. The observed curves of growth portrayed the existence of six cohorts within the population of both targeted species.

fisheries-and-aquaculture-journal-growth-curves

Figure 2: a. Restructured frequency distribution output from FiSAT II with superimposed growth curves for P. senegalensis . b. Restructured frequency distribution output from FiSAT II with superimposed growth curves for P. typus .

The asymptotic length (L) and growth rate/ constant (K) for the two targeted species were estimated at 66.68 cm SL and 0.13 yr-1 respectively with its longevity (tmax) as 21.49 years for P. senegalensis ; while the asymptotic length (L) and growth rate/constant (K) for P. typus were 66.68 cm SL and 0.14 yr-1 correspondingly, with its longevity as 19.3 years. The growth performance index (φ') and theoretical age at birth (t0) were estimated at 2.762 and -1.686 years for P. senegalensis whereas P. typus recorded 2.294 and -2.126 years for growth performance index (φ') and theoretical age at birth (t0) respectively. Using the estimated growth parameters (L, K and t0), the VBGF for length at time (t) for the two targeted species were expressed as:

P. senegalensis

SLt=66.68 (1‐e‐0.13 (t‐(‐1.586))

P. typus

SLt=66.68 (1‐e‐0.14 (t‐(‐2.126)))

Estimated growth parameters of P. senegalensis and P. typus in the current study were compared to what other authors reported in different localities (Table 1).

Species Authors Country SL K φ' t0
P. senegalensis Sidibe [20] Guinea 60.8 (TL) 0.35 3.112 -0.329
Sossoukpe [21] Benin (Site 1) 42.98 0.24 2.753 -0.60
Sossoukpe [21] Benin (site 2) 42.98 0.16 2.549 -0.90
Current study Liberia 66.68 0.13 2.762 -1.586
P. typus Sidibe [20] Guinea 73.8 (TL) 0.35 3.280 -0.149
Sossoukpe [21] Benin (Site 1) 48.6 0.19 2.652 -0.73
Sossoukpe [21] Benin (site 2) 48.6 0.15 2.549 -0.92
Current study Liberia 66.68 0.14 2.294 -2.126

Table 1: Estimated growth parameters of P. senegalensis and P. typus from the current study compared to other authors.

The above equations were used to estimate the lengths of the two species of Sciaenidae at various ages (Table 2). P. senegalensis attain at least 50% of the asymptotic length when at the fourth class, while P. typus attain at least 50% of the asymptotic length when at the third class.; both indicating less rapid growth in length at the early age class (Table 2).

Age class (yr) Pseudotolithussenegalensis Pseudotolithustypus
SL (TL) (cm) % of L SL (TL) (cm) % of L
1 19.04 (21.14) 29 23.63 (26.24) 35
2 24.85 (27.58) 37 29.26 (32.48) 44
3 29.95 (33.25) 45 34.15 (37.91) 51
4 34.42 (38.22) 52 38.4 (42.63) 58
5 38.36 (42.58) 58 42.09 (46.73) 63

Table 2: Calculated age-length data for the two-sciaenid based on their respective von Bertalanffy growth equation.

In doing a comparative analysis of the calculated age-length data of both species for the current study, the estimated values were compared with what other authors reported in different countries (Table 3).

Species Authors Country 1yr 2yrs 3yrs 4yrs 5yrs
P. senegalensis Troadec [22] Congo 23.12 31.85 38.01 42.35 45.41
Sun [23] Senegal 9.77 18.01 24.97 30.84 35.79
Coutin and Payne [24] Sierra Leone 13.81 24.45 32.66 38.99 43.87
Njock [25] Cameroon 11.16 19.94 26.84 32.27 36.55
Sidibe [20] Guinea 23.15 36.67 44.71 49.49 52.23
Sossoukpe [21] Benin (Site 1) 18.3 25.68 31.34 35.72 39.13
Sossoukpe [21] Benin (site 2) 15.31 20.98 25.7 29.61 32.92
Current study Liberia 21.14 27.58 33.25 38.22 42.58
P. typus Bayagbona [26] Nigeria 29.21 47.79 61.68 72.09 79.87
Poinsard [27] Congo 26.86 36.96 45.43 52.54 58.51
Njock [25] Cameroon 14.26 25.24 33.69 40.19 45.19
Sidibe [20] Guinea 24.44 36.97 46.07 52.68 57.48
Sossoukpe [21] Benin (Site 1) 18.12 25.14 30.77 35.33 39.04
Sossoukpe [21] Benin (site 2) 17.11 22.35 27.34 31.54 35.10
Current study[28] Liberia 26.24 32.48 37.91 42.63 46.73

Table 3: Calculated age-length data of P. senegalensis and P. typus of the fisheries waters of Liberia compared with what others reported.

Mortality coefficients and current exploitation rate

Figure 3 shows the calculated mortalities from the length converted catch curve fitted in the FiSAT II (Table 4). From Figure 3, mortality parameters for P. senegalensis were estimated as: Z=0.93 yr-1, M=0.37 yr-1 and F=0.56 yr-1 whereas the estimates for P. typus were Z=0.70 yr-1, M=0.39 yr-1 and F=0.31 yr-1 (Table 5). However, the dark circles in the figure represent the points used in calculating (Z) through least squares regression lines. The yellow circles represent frequencies of fishes either not fully recruited or approaching (L), and hence discarded from the calculation. The estimated optimum fishing mortality rate for P. senegalensis and P. typus were Fopt=0.37 yr-1 and Fopt=0.28 yr-1 respectively. The values of M/K ratio were 2.85 and 2.79 for P. senegalensis and P. typus , respectively (Table 6).

Species Authors Country Z (yr-1) M (yr-1) F (yr-1) E
P. senegalensis Sidibe Guinea 1.20 0.97 0.51 0.64
Sossoukpe (2011) Benin (Site 1) 3.26 0.63 2.63 0.81
Sossoukpe (2011) Benin (site 2) 0.91 0.49 0.42 0.47
Current study Liberia 0.93 0.37 0.56 0.60
P. typus Sidibe (2003) Guinea 1.26 0.66 0.60 0.65
Sossoukpe (2011) Benin (Site 1) 2.65 0.52 2.13 0.80
Sossoukpe (2011) Benin (site 2) 1.60 0.45 1.15 0.72
Current study Liberia 0.70 0.39 0.31 0.45

Table 4: Estimated mortality parameters of P. senegalensis and P. typus of the fisheries waters of Liberia compared to those off other regions.

Species TLm50 (cm) TLc50 (cm) Authors Localities
P. senegalensis 44.5 (SL) 33.84 (SL) Current study Liberia
30.4 25.5 Sossoukpe [21] Benin
29.0 - Sidibe [20] Guinea
31.0 - Domain et al. [29] Guinea
26.5 - Jock [25] Cameroon
26.4- 28.0 - Troaddec [22] Congo
P. typus 44.5 (SL) 30.23 Current study Liberia
30.1 22.76 Sossoukpe [21] Benin
40.0 - Sidibe [20] Guinea
37.0 - Domain et al [29] Guinea
26.5 - Jock [25] Cameroon
33.0 - Fontana [30] Congo

Table 5: Estimated length at first capture and length at first maturity of P. senegalensis and P. typus of the fisheries waters of Liberia compared to those off other regions.

Parameters P. senegalensis P. typus
SL(cm) 66.68 (TL=74.03) 66.8 (TL=74.03)
K (yr-1) 0.13 0.14
φ' 2.762 2.294
t0 (yr-1) -1.586 -2.126
tmax (yrs) 21.49 19.3
Z (yr-1) 0.93 0.70
M (yr-1) 0.37 0.39
F (yr-1) 0.56 0.31
M/K 2.85 2.79
Z/K 7.15 5.00
Fopt (yr-1) 0.37 0.28
Ecurrent 0.60 0.45
Lc25(cm) 30.57 28.46
Lc50(cm) 33.84 30.23
Lc75(cm) 37.11 32.00
Lm50(cm) 44.45 44.45
Lc/L 0.51 0.45
E0.1 0.807 0.704
E 0.5 0.376 0.357
Emax 0.963 0.829

Table 6: Summary of estimated growth and other derived fish population parameters for the two species of concern from July 2016 to December 2016.

fisheries-and-aquaculture-journal-length-converted

Figure 3: FISAT II output of linearized length-converted catch curve for P. senegalensis and P. typus (a for P. senegalensis and b for P. typus ).

From Table 6, the current exploitation rate of the two species were estimated as follow: for P. senegalensis it was estimated Ecurrent=0.60 and Ecurrent=0.45 for P. typus . The Z/K ratio were estimated as 7.15 and 5.00 for P. senegalensis and P. typus respectively. The reliability of the estimated natural mortality rate, M, was ascertained using the M/K ratios because this ratio has been reported to be within the range 1.12-2.5 for most of the fish [28].

Estimated mortality parameters of both species were compared with what other authors reported from different regions in Africa (Table 4).

Length at first capture (Lc50) and Length at first maturity (Lm50)

Figure 4 shows the probability of capture and length at first maturity for the two targeted fish species. The probability of capture for P. senegalensis and P. typus at 25%, 50% and 75% were estimated as: 30.57 cm, 33.84 cm and 37.11 cm for P. senegalensis and 28.46 cm, 30.23 cm and 32 cm for P. typus respectively. The length at first maturity (Lm50 ) was estimated at 44.5 cm for both species (Table 6). Figure 4 below shows FiSAT II output of the probability of capture. The estimated Lc/L ratios using the relationship between the Length at first maturity (Lc50) and the asymptotic length (L) for the two-treated species were 0.51 and 0.45 for P. senegalensis and P. typus correspondingly (Table 6).

Estimated length at first capture and length at first maturity of P. senegalensis and P. typus of the present study compared with those of other authors from different localities (Table 5).

Recruitment pattern

Figure 5 shows the recruitment pattern of the two targeted fish species P. typus and P. senegalensis . The recruitment pattern for the two targeted fish species was continuous throughout the period of study with two recruitment peaks-major and minor (Figure 5). Using macro inspection, the months for the major and minor recruitment peaks were May and September for P. senegalensis , and October and May for P. typus correspondingly. The calculated length at recruitment were 8.52 cm and 9.53 cm for P. senegalensis and P. typus respectively (Figure 5).

Relative yield per recruit (Y'/R)

Figure 6 shows the various exploitation rates based on the Beverton and Holt relative yield per recruit model. Emax which implies exploitation rate producing maximum yield (yellow dashes), E0.1 suggesting exploitation rate at which the marginal increase of Y'/R is 10% of its virgin stock (green dashes) and E0.5 indicating exploitation rate under which the stock is reduced to half its virgin biomass (red dashes) of P. senegalensis and P. typus were estimated as E0.1=0.807, E0.5=0.376 and Emax=0.963; and E0.1=0.704, E0.5=0.357 and Emax=0.829 respectively (Figure 6). Table 5 showed the actual values of E0.1, E0.5 and Emax by sexes of the targeted fish species.

Discussion

Growth parameters

The asymptotic length (L) for P. senegalensis in the present study is higher than what were reported by other authors but similar to estimate by Sidibe (Table 1) [20]. While the value of asymptotic length for P. typus in the current study is close to what was reported by Sidibe [20] and higher than what were reported by other authors (Table 1). The difference in values could be linked to the diversity of methods used for the assessment of growth parameters, length of largest species, time and period of sampling as well as the nature of the length distribution The asymptotic length estimated for the two-species in the present study is lower than the highest length recorded by Sidibe [20] from Guinea (100 cm P. senegalensis ) and 108 cm P. typus ). This assertion suggests that the stock being exploited in Liberian fisheries waters is relatively small. The K (yr-1) for the both species from the study were lower and t0 higher than what were reported from Benin and Guinea respectively, indicating that maximum size is rapidly attained for both species in Benin and Guinea than for those of Liberia (Table 1). The φ' mean values for P. senegalensis and P. typus were close to what were reported by other authors (Table 1). In this study the φ' mean values estimates of P. senegalensis fall within range estimated by Baijot et al. [31] for some important fishes in Africa range of 2.65-3.32 which were considered as low; moreover, P. typus φ' mean values estimates slightly fall below 2.65; so these species are regarded as showing slow growth performance in Liberian fisheries water. The growth performance index of the two-species in the current study appeared to be in line with estimates from other studies (Table 1). This finding demonstrates that they are of similar taxonomic family. Further, the growth performance index indicates the important availability of food and other favorable environmental conditions [32]. Moreover, the growth rate (K) was found to be lower than 0.34, demonstrating that, P. senegalensis and P. typus are slow growing fish species, evinced by the long lifespan of 21.49 and 19.3 years respectively [33]. This slow growth rate might be induced by changes in the physical and chemical characteristics of the water amplified by the persistent climate change problems [34].

The calculated age-length data result show that for P. senegalensis growth was similar to what were reported in Congo and Guinea; but the growth was slower in other countries (Table 3). The linear growth of P. typus was closer to what were reported in Congo, Guinea and Nigeria and by far higher than what was reported in other localities (Table 3). This observation show that P. senegalensis and P. typus in Liberian waters are fast growing than some countries in Table 3 and are growing almost at the same rate with others countries (Table 3). Evidently, this affirmed the first assertion that these two-species within the Liberian coastal waters are physiologically healthy.

Mortality coefficients and current exploitation rate

The fishing mortality (0.56 yr-1) for P. senegalensis from the current study was relatively greater than the natural mortality (F=0.37 yr-1). This estimate agrees with estimates from Benin from site 1, but contradicts what where reported from Guinea and Benin site 2 (Table 4). Additionally, the obtained fishing mortality was found to be higher than the optimum fishing rate (Fopt=0.37 yr-1), which is an indication of over-fishing. Beverton et al. [28] suggested that when the natural mortality and fishing mortality are equal (that is; exploitation rate (E)=0.5), then the stock is in a healthy state and optimally exploited. The estimated current exploitation rate (E) was 0.60, which indicated heavy exploitation. Further, the estimated Z/K ratios for P. senegalensis which was greater than 1 (Z/K=7.15) as in Table 6 also strengthen the presence of heavy exploitation as a result of increased fishing mortality [35]. The estimated Ecurrent compared favourably with [28] but lower than [32] from Site 1 (Table 4). This variation could be due to the high rate of fishing pressure on stock in Benin than in Liberia. However, the calculated exploitation rate was not intense because it (Ecurrent=0.60) was much lower than the maximum allowable limit based on the yieldper- recruit calculation (Emax=0.963). Nonetheless, the exploitation of this stock could soon approach the maximum sustainable yield if the current level of exploitation is not monitored accordingly with subsequent negative consequences on the stock biomass and food security for fishing households. Therefore, the present level of fishing mortality (in terms of number of fishing vessels, especially artisanal canoes) should be of urgent concern for fisheries managers in Liberia.

The natural mortality (M=0.39 yr-1) for P. typus was concurrent to estimate by Sossoukpe et al. [21] from Benin site 2 (Table 6), and relatively lower than estimates reported by Sossoukpe et al. [21] from Benin site 1 and [20] from Guinea in Table 4. This observation could be due to the fact that P. typus stock in Liberian coastal waters is less susceptible to natural mortality conditions than the P. typus in Benin and Guinea waters. Further, it shows that environmental conditions in Liberian waters are more favourable than in Benin coastal waters.

Fishing mortality (F) is mostly reported to cause changes in population parameters such as size ratio, growth rate, size composition and size at first maturity [36]. The estimated fishing mortality for P. typus compared to other studies was relatively lower; this could be due to the low numbers of industrial fishing vessels resulting in low fishing pressure. For instance, industrial fishing vessels in Liberia in 2013 was 7 vessels and has decreased drastically to 2 vessels in 2016, although there has been an increased in artisanal fleets 2,986 canoes in 2013 to 3,250 canoes in 2016; thou their capacity still remain low. P. senegalensis fishing mortality in the current study was similar to estimates by Sidibe et al. [20,21] in Table 4.

The exploitation rate (Ecurrent=0.45) from the present study was lower than 0.5, depicting that the P. typus stock is currently underexploited. In comparison with studies done elsewhere (Table 4), the Ecurrent reported were more than 0.5, which is an indication that P. typus is overexploited in Guinea and Benin.

Length at first capture (Lc50) and Length at first maturity (Lm50)

The length at first maturity (Lm50=44.5 cm for both species) was relatively higher than the length at first capture for both targeted fish species (Lc50=33.84 cm for P. senegalensis and Lc50=30.23 cm for P. typus ). This signifies that the stocks of the two species are harvested before they could reach the matured stage, a characteristic feature of growth overfishing [37]. Growth overfishing is mostly characterized by small size fish species within the harvested catch. From the twoassessed fish species P. typus recorded Lc/L ratios (0.45) was less than 0.5 which indicated that majority of the catch landed constituted juvenile fish species [31]. This assertion affirmed the evidence of growth overfishing. The abundance of small-sized fishes in the catches could be explained by the indiscriminate use of small mesh sized gears and the non-selectivity of fishing gears mostly deployed within the nursery zone of juvenile fishes.

In comparison of the length at first capture of the two assessed species are slightly higher than what was reported by Sossoukpe et al. [21] from Benin (Table 5). The length at first maturity in the current study of P. typus was close to what was reported by Sidibe et al. [20,29] both from Guinea respectively, and greater than what were reported by Sossoukpe et al. [21,25] from Cameroon (Table 5). And also the length at first maturity for P. senegalensis in the current study was higher than what were reported by other authors in Table 5. This confirmed the early assertion that P. senegalensis and P. typus in the Liberian fisheries waters are fast growing than those of Benin. Sossoukpe et al. [38] concluded that the size at first sexual maturity is relatively variable with the species and its bio-geographical zone.

Recruitment pattern and relative yield per recruit (Y'/R)

The population structure of P. senegalensis and P. typus was bimodal indicating probably two spawning periods for this species per year. The presence of two recruitment peaks (one major and one minor) from the study was in line with the description of the recruitment pattern for tropical fishes put forward by Pauly [39]. The observed small length at first recruitment (Lr) for P. senegalensis was Lr=8.52 cm and for P. typus was Lr=9.53 cm (Figure 5) supports the use of small mesh sized fishing gears by fishermen in Liberian coastal fishing operations with no regards to the damage they cause to the fishery [40]. The presence of recruit throughout the year indicated that recruitment within the targeted species is continuous [41]. Thus, this observation suggests the absence of recruitment overfishing within the fishery of the targeted fish species; there spite the use of small mesh sized fishing gears. For instance, the length at first recruitment was lower than the length at first capture, indicating that species get recruited before been captured by any fishing gear. This finding confirms the assertion that recruitment overfishing is absent within the population of the assessed stock.

However, the continual use of small mesh sized fishing gears in addition to high fishing effort can result in diminished economic benefits, reduced catch per effort, and the collapse of the fisheries for the current target species [42]. Therefore, it is mandatory for fisheries managers to appropriately increase the mesh sizes after careful scientific research, while ensuring that fishers comply with the use of the approved appropriate mesh sized fishing gear in order to avert the occurrence of recruitment overfishing. This is because larger mesh sized gears catch large sized fishes, while allowing juvenile fish to spawn at least once before they are harvested [43-45].

Conclusion

The study has revealed that P. senegalensis population within Liberia’s coastal waters is currently overexploited while the population of P. typus is experiencing exploitation rate close to the maximum sustainable yield amidst the presence of heavy fishing pressure. However, P. senegalensis and P. typus fisheries in Liberia are currently exhibiting growth overfishing signs which could lead to severe implications on the population size and food security within vulnerable fishing households in the future. Therefore, urgent management interventions in form of monitoring fishing efforts and mesh size regulation (to increase length at first capture) are needed to safeguard these commercially important fish species from possible collapse in the future.

Acknowledgement

This is part an MPhil dissertation presented to the Department of Marine and Fisheries Sciences, University of Ghana. The authors acknowledge the financial support by the United States Agency for International Development, as part of the Feed the Future initiative, under the CGIAR Fund, award number BFSG1100002, and the predecessor fund the Food Security and Crisis Mitigation II grant, award number EEMG000400013.

References

  1. Christensen V, Guenette S, Heymans JJ, Walters CJ, Watson R (2003) Hundred-year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes. Fish and Fisheries pp: 1-24.
  2. Swartz W, Sala E, Tracey S, Watson R, Pauly D (2010) The spatial expansion and ecological footprint of fisheries (1950 to present). PLoS ONE 5: 1-6.
  3. Worm B, Barbier EB, Beaumont N, Duffy JE, Folke C (2006) Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: 787-790.
  4. Pitcher T, Cheung W (2013) Fisheries: Hope or despair. Mar Pollut Bull 74: 506-516.
  5. MRAG (2014) Fisheries Stock Assessment. Report produced under WARFP/BNF Contract 11/001. Republic of Liberia, West Africa.
  6. Sherif SA (2014) The development of fisheries management in Liberia: vessel monitoring system (vms) as enforcement and surveillance tools: national and regional perspectives. World Maritime University Dissertations.
  7. Togba GB (2008) Analysis of profitability of trawl fleet investment in Liberia. University of Akureyri.
  8. BNF (2014) Fisheries and Aquaculture Policy Strategy. Ministry of Agriculture. Republic of Liberia 1-73
  9. Pauly D (1987) A review of the ELEFAN system for analysis of length-frequency data in fish and aquatic invertebrates. The international conference on the theory and application of length-based methods for population assessment. Italy.
  10. Schneider W (1990) FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Field guide to the commercial marine resources of the Gulf of Guinea. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United nations, Rome pp: 268.
  11. Gayanilo FC, Sparre P, Pauly D (2005) FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools II (FiSAT II). Revised. User's guide. Rome: FAO Computerized Information Series. pp: 168.
  12. Pauly D (1979) Theory and management of tropical multispecies stocks: a review with emphasis on the Southeast Asian demersal fisheries stud.
  13. Pauly D (1984) Fish population dynamics in tropical waters: a manual for use with programmable calculations. ICLARM Stud pp: 325.
  14. Pauly D (1980) A selection of simple method for the assessment of tropical fish stocks. FAO pp: 54.
  15. Gulland J (1971) The Fish Resources of the Oceans. FAO/Fishing News Books, Surrey pp: 255.
  16. Hoggarth DD, Abeyasekera S, Arthur RI, Beddington JR, Burn RW (2006) Stock Assessment for fishery management. A framework guide to the stock assessment tools of the Fisheries Management Science Programme (FMSP). Rome pp: 261
  17. Pauly D, Caddy JF (1985) A modification of Bhattacharya's method for the analysis of mixtures of normal distributions. FAO Fish Circpp: 16.
  18. Gheshlaghi P, Vahabnezhad A, Motlagh SAT (2012) Growth parameters, mortality rates, yield per recruit, biomass, and MSY of Rutilusfrisiikutum, using length frequency analysis in the Southern parts of the Caspian Sea. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Science 11 48-62.
  19. Sidibe A (2003) Coastal demersal fishery resources of Guinea. Exploitation, biology and dynamics of the main species of the community at Sciaenidae. Ensar, Rennes.
  20. Sossoukpe E (2011) Ecological studies on Pseudotolithusspp (Sciaenidae) in Benin (West Africa) nearshore waters: Implications for conservation and management. University of Ghana, Legon.
  21. Troadec JP (1971) Biology and dynamics of an African Sciaenidae, Pseudotolithustypus. Document Scientifique Oceanographic Research Center, Abidjan 2: 1-125.
  22. Sun C (1975) Study of the biology and dynamics of Pseudotolithussenegalensis V. (1833). Fish Sciaenidae on the coast of Senegal. University Doctorate, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France pp: 145.
  23. Coutin PC, Payne AI (1989) The effect of long term exploitation of demersal fish populations off the coasts of Sierra Leone, West Africa. J Fish Biol 35: 163-167.
  24. Jock JCN (1990) Coastal demersal resources of Cameroon: Biology and exploitation of the main fish species. University Aix-Marseille 2, Cymbium, France pp: 187.
  25. Bayagbona EO (1969) Age determination and the Bertalanffy growth parameters of Pseudotolithustypus and Pseudotolithussenegalensis using the “burnt otolith technique”. UNESCO 27: 349-359.
  26. Poinsard F (1973) Growth of PseudotolithustypusBlkr in the Black Point region. Doc Scient Centre Rech.
  27. Beverton RJH, Holt JS (1957) On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fish Invest pp: 533.
  28. Domain F, Chavance P, Bah A (2000) Description of the continental shelf Coastal Fisheries in Guinea. Resources and Exploitation, Paris pp: 159-171.
  29. Fontana A (1979) Study of the Congolese demersal coastal stock. Biology of the main species exploited. Proposals for the management of the fishery. France pp: 300.
  30. Baijot E, Moreau J (1997) Biology and demographic status of the main fish species in the reservoirs of Burkina Faso. Hydrological Aspects of Fisheries in Small Reservoirs in the Sahel Region. Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, Commission of the European Communities, Wageningen, Netherlands pp: 79-109.
  31. Sossoukpe E, Djidohokpin G, Fiogbe ED (2016) Demographic parameters and exploitation rate of Sardinellamaderensis (Pisces: Lowe 1838) in the nearshore waters of Benin (West Africa) and their implication for management and conservation. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 4: 165-171.
  32. Kienzle MO (2005) Estimation of the population parameters of the Von Bertalanffy Growth Function for the main commercial species of the north sea. pp: 34.
  33. Ofori-Danson, PK, de Graff GJ, Vanderpuye CJ (2002) Population parameters estimates for Chrysichthysauratus and C. nigrodigitatus (Pisces: Claroteidae) in lake Volta, Ghana. Fish Res 54: 267-277.
  34. Etim L, Sankare Y, Brey T, Arntz W (1998) The dynamics of unexploited population of Corbulatrionga (Bivalvia: Corbulidae) in a brackisk-water lagoon. Arch Fish Mar Res 46: 253-262.
  35. Chimatiro SK (2004) The biophysical dynamics of the lower shire river floodplain fisheries in Malawi. Rodes University.
  36. Amponsah SKK, Ofori-Danson PK, Nunoo FKE (2016) Fishing regime, growth, mortality and exploitation status of Scomberjaponicus from catches landed along the eastern coastline of Ghana. Int J Fish Aqua Res 1: 5-10.
  37. Sossoukpe E, Nunoo FKE, Ofori-Danson PK, Fiogbe ED, Dankwa HR (2013) Growth and mortality parameters of P. senegalensis and P. typus (Sciaenidae) in nearshore waters of Benin (West Africa) and their implications for management and conservation. Fish Res 137: 70-80.
  38. Pauly D (1982) Studying single species dynamics in a tropical multi-species context. Theory and Management of Tropical Fisheries pp: 33-70.
  39. Getabu A (1992) Growth parameters and total mortality in Orochromisniloticus (Linnaeus) from Nyanza Gulf Lake Victoria. Hydrobiologia 232: 91-97.
  40. Abowei J, George A, Davies O (2010) Mortality, Exploitation rate and Recruitment pattern of Callinectesamnicola from Okpoka Creek, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Asian J AgriScipp: 27-34.
  41. Miranda L, Agostinho A, Gomes L (1999) Appraisal of the selective properties of gill nets and implications for yield and value of the fisheries at the Itaipu Reservoir, Brazil–Paraguay. Fish Res 45: 105-116.
  42. Alagaraja K, Suseelan C, Muthu MS (1986) Mesh Selectivity Studies for Management of Marine Fishery Resources in India. J Mar Biol Ass India  pp: 202-212.
  43. Pauly D, Soriano ML (1986) Some practical extensions to Beverton and Holt’s relative yield-per-recruit model. The First Asian Fisheries Forum, Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, Philippines pp: 491-496.
  44. Beverton RJH Holt SJ (1966) Manual of Methods for Fish Stock Assessment. Part II. Tables of yield function. FAO 38: 67.
Citation: Wehye AS, Ofori-Danson PK, Lamptey AM (2017) Population Dynamics of Pseudotolithus Senegalensis and Pseudotolithus Typus and Their Implications for Management and Conservation within the Coastal Waters of Liberia. Fish Aqua J 8:201.

Copyright: © 2017 Wehye AS, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top