Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology

Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9899

Short Communication - (2017) Volume 8, Issue 5

Potential Involvement of the ILC2-Regulatory T Cell - Amphiregulin Axisin Liver Cancer Development: Novel Concepts for Immunotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Katrin Neumann, Aaron Ochel and Gisa Tiegs*
Institute of Experimental Immunology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
*Corresponding Author: Professor Gisa Tiegs, Institute of Experimental Immunology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg,, Germany, Tel: +49-40-741058731 Email:

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver tumor and its incidence is increasing. Since this type of cancer is largely resistant to systemic therapies, there is urgent need to identify cellular and molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of HCC. Recent evidence implicates inflammation-induced, immune cell-derived amphiregulin (AREG) about interactions between immune cells of the innate and adaptive immune system by AREG in HCC development. We postulate an immunological network with pro-tumorigenic activity comprising AREG, type 2 innate lymphoid cells and regulatory T cells that might constitute a promising target for novel cancer immunotherapies.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; AREG; IL-33; ILC2; Tregs

Abbreviations

HCC: Hepatocellular Carcinoma; NASH: Non- Alcoholic Steatohepatitis; AREG: Amphiregulin; EGFR: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor; Tregs: Regulatory T Cells; ILC2s: Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells; HBV: Hepatitis B Virus; HCV: Hepatitis C Virus; HSCs: Hepatic Stellate Cells; ECM: Extracellular Matrix; KLRG1: Killer-Cell Lectin Like Receptor G1; Foxp3: Forkhead Box Protein P3

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver and is among the most lethal and prevalent cancers in humans [1,2]. The majority of HCC cases develops in the setting of hepatic cirrhosis as a result of chronic liver inflammation predominantly caused by viral infection, alcohol, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the progressive form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [3]. Chronic liver injury induces repeated cycles of hepatic inflammation, necrosis, and compensatory regeneration causing fibrogenesis, a reversible, organ integrity-maintaining response characterized by excessive wound-healing and extracellular matrix deposition. Progression of fibrosis towards non-reversible cirrhosis is a result of hepatocyte necrosis, replacement of functional liver parenchyma by scar tissue and regenerative nodules, as well as hepatocyte dysplasia accompanied by loss of liver function and a high risk to develop HCC. So far, there are very limited therapeutic options and no effective targeted therapy exists for patients with advanced HCC. The multikinase inhibitor Sorafenib is the only systemically active drug approved for the treatment of advanced HCC but it improves survival of HCC patients by only few months [4]. Therefore, identifying cellular and molecular effectors involved in the pathogenesis of HCC is essential for developing novel immunotherapies to treat HCC and hence to improve patient prognosis.

The AREG/EGFR Axis in HCC

The epidermal growth factor amphiregulin (AREG) mediates mitogenic signals to various cell types and its expression was found to be up-regulated in human and rat cirrhotic livers [5]. AREG conveys anti-apoptotic signals in hepatocarcinoma cells thereby enhancing their survival and chemoresistance [6]. In patients with HCC, elevated AREG levels were associated with poor prognosis [7] and there are multiple studies that have correlated AREG expression with tumorigenesis and tumor progression in breast, lung, ovarian, and gastric cancer [8], suggesting AREG as a potential target for cancer therapy. Indeed, administration of an AREG neutralizing antibody inhibited growth of lung [9] and ovarian tumors in mice and strongly enhanced chemotherapy efficacy [10]. AREG binds to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which belongs to a family of tyrosine kinases involved in the development and growth of various types of cancer including HCC [11,12]. Upon ligand binding, EGFR induces signal transduction cascades crucial for processes in tumorigenesis such as cell proliferation and angiogenesis as well as resistance to apoptosis and invasive behavior. Similar to AREG itself, EGFR is frequently overexpressed in a variety of tumors and serves as a negative prognostic factor for HCC [13,14]. Thus, several studies have addressed inhibition of EGFR activity as therapeutic strategy in HCC treatment and are reviewed elsewhere [15]. However, targeting the AREG/EGFR axis in cancer therapy bear the risk of severe side effects as AREG is involved in many physiological processes such as mammary gland development and lung morphogenesis and is essential for tissue repair and integrity following damage as demonstrated in liver regeneration [5,16]. Thus, identifying tumor-associated, inflammation-induced modulators of the AREG/EGFR axis may help to establish more selective cancer immunotherapies.

IL-33, ILC2s and AREG

There is increasing body of evidence that the AREG/EGFR axis plays an important role in immunological networks that are critical for mediating immunity and tolerance. During inflammation, AREG is expressed by different activated immune cells such as Th2 cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cells, and basophils, but also regulatory T cells (Tregs) and type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) [17]. Numerous mediators stimulate AREG expression in immune cells including prostaglandin E2, transforming growth factor-β, and the cytokine IL-33. Cytokines released during carcinogenesis are thought to be essential mediators of interactions between immune cells in the inflammatory tumor environment. In this context, IL-33 has been implicated as a modulator of tumorigenesis in various cancers [18]. In HCC patients, there are currently conflicting data about the correlation of IL-33 with tumor progression and clinical outcome. One research group correlated elevated IL-33 levels with tumor growth and metastasis [19] while another study found no altered IL-33 expression in HCC [20]. However, IL-33 has been proven as pathogenic factor in patients with liver cirrhosis [21], chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) [22] and chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection [23], all of them with a high risk to develop HCC. This indicates that IL-33 facilitates inflammatory responses in the context of chronic liver inflammation thereby driving development of HCC. Indeed, IL-33 aggravated liver inflammation in murine immune-mediated hepatitis [24] and was further identified as a key mediator of fibrogenesis in mouse models of hepatic fibrosis [21]. Both studies described a recently unknown immunological network comprising IL-33 and ILC2s in liver disease. ILC2s are tissue-resident cells [25] that become activated by IL-33 released from necrotic hepatocytes and start to express the cytokines IL-5 and IL-13. ILC2-derived IL-5 worsened disease pathogenesis by activation and recruitment of pro-inflammatory eosinophils [24]. Moreover, hepatic ILC2s were found to exert their pro-fibrotic function by expression of IL-13, which in turn activates hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), the most fibrogenic cell population in the liver, to transdifferentiate to extracellular matrix (ECM)-producing myofibroblasts [21].

So far, there is no direct link between hepatic ILC2s and HCC but one might speculate that hyperactive ILC2s concur to progression of liver fibrosis towards cirrhosis with the possibility to develop HCC. In general, ILC2s have been considered as a population with predominant pro-tumorigenic activity and the IL-33/ILC2/IL-13 circuit was shown to be critically involved in promoting cholangiocyte hyperplasia in murine cholangiocarcinoma [26] and in activating myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which inhibit anti-cancer immunity in breast cancer [27]. Interestingly, IL-33-activated ILC2s also express AREG early after tissue damage. In murine models of colitis [28] and infection-induced lung injury [29,30], AREG-expressing ILC2s were associated with restoration of epithelial integrity and tissue function. However, although early induction of AREG is important for the resolution of acute inflammation, the situation is quite different in the context of chronic inflammation where ILC2-derived AREG amplified excessive wound healing in skin lesions of atopic dermatitis patients [31] and triggered injury-induced regenerative responses driving development of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [26].

Although the activity of ILC2s is mainly regulated by cytokines such as IL-33, there are other mechanisms involved in the modulation of ILC2 function. Activated ILC2s increase expression of the inhibitory killer-cell lectin like receptor G1 (KLRG1), a ligand of the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. KLRG1/E-cadherin interaction limits ILC2 activity and down-regulation of E-cadherin expression was identified as reason for chronically active ILC2s in patients with atopic dermatitis [31]. In HCC, down-regulation of E-cadherin has been associated with tumor progression [32] and liver-specific deletion of E-cadherin was shown to promote development of HCC [33]. Thus, loss of E-cadherinmediated inhibitory signals during carcinogenesis might cause hyperactivation of hepatic ILC2s, which exert their pro-tumorigenic function by continuous expression of AREG and/or IL-13.

AREG, Macrophages and HSCs

Macrophages can adopt a pro-tumorigenic phenotype in the tumor microenvironment thereby suppressing anti-tumor immune responses and promoting tumor cell invasion and persistent growth [34]. Recent data indicate that AREG participates in both recruitment of tumorassociated macrophages (TAMs) by inducing macrophage-attracting chemokines [35] and suppressive function of TAMs in carcinogenesis [36]. Liver-resident macrophages, namely Kupffer cells, were shown to up-regulate AREG expression during murine hepatic fibrosis that in turn triggers ECM production by HSCs [37]. Moreover, in HBVinfected livers, Kupffer cells also expressed AREG and promoted viral persistence by promoting Treg-mediated inhibition of anti-viral CD8+ T-cell responses [38], indicating that Kupffer cell-derived AREG supports chronic liver inflammation and thus, might increase the risk to develop HCC.

HSCs are another liver-resident cell population that is activated during chronic inflammation. The capability of activated HSCs to express AREG was shown in murine models of liver fibrosis [37] and NASH, as well as in NASH patients [39]. AREG induced proliferation, survival and ECM production of HSCs [39] thereby stimulating their pro-fibrogenic activity that may result in development of cirrhosis with progression to HCC. Unlike Kupffer cells that do not express ST2 [40], HSCs express the IL-33 receptor and become activated by IL-33 as shown in murine bile-duct ligation-induced hepatic fibrosis [41], pointing to another mechanism by which IL-33 drives chronic inflammation and tissue remodeling in the liver.

AREG and Tregs

Tregs play an important role in tumorigenesis and constitute a tumor escape mechanism, for example by inhibiting tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells with anti-tumor activity as shown in various types of cancer including HCC [42]. One recently described mechanism by which hepatocarcinoma cells improve immunosuppressive intratumoral Treg function is via release of AREG [43]. During inflammation, activated Tregs up-regulate expression of EGFR and AREG/EGFR signaling was found to be crucial for effective Treg function in lung and gastric cancer [44]. In HBV infection, EGFR+ Tregs responded to increased AREG expression by potent inhibition of anti-viral CD8+ T cells resulting in immune tolerance and persistent HBV infection [45]. As chronic HBV infection is the major cause for HCC, this indicates that infection-induced AREG might concur to HCC development by activation of intrahepatic Tregs and maintenance of Treg function in the chronically inflamed liver.

The function of Tregs is critically linked with sustained expression of the transcription factor forkhead box protein P3 (Foxp3) and AREG/EGFR signaling was found to stabilize Foxp3 expression in Tregs thereby preserving Treg function during inflammation [44]. In addition to the direct regulation of Tregs by AREG, it was shown that a functionally distinct Treg subset expresses AREG upon activation [46], suggesting an autocrine feedback loop to further maintain Treg function independently of exogenous AREG. Tregs are also poised to respond to IL-33 through expansion of a Treg subset expressing the IL-33 receptor ST2 as well as AREG.

IL-33/ST2 signaling also ensures Treg function and adaption to the inflammatory environment as demonstrated in intestinal inflammation [47]. Interestingly, IL-33-activated ST2+ Tregs infiltrate the inflamed liver during immune-mediated hepatitis [24,48] and murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV)-induced liver damage [49]. IL-33-/- mice showed reduced infiltration of ST2+ Tregs in the liver and developed more severe immune-mediated hepatitis [48]. Similar results were shown in MCMV-infected ST2-/- mice where ST2 deficiency aggravated liver pathology due to impaired hepatic accumulation of Tregs [49], indicating immunosuppressive function of ST2+ Tregs in liver disease pathogenesis. In the setting of chronic inflammation, it is conceivable that inflammation-triggered IL-33 and AREG expression leads to constitutively active Tregs with high suppressive function providing the basis of an immunotolerant milieu that allows and supports the development of HCC.

Conclusion

Accumulating evidence indicates that dysregulation of the dialog between the immune system and the AREG/EGFR signaling pathway contributes to pathology in the context of chronic liver disease and HCC. We here postulate a so far not described immunological network that might concur to HCC development and therefore might be a target for novel immunotherapeutic strategies in cancer treatment. In this network, IL-33 is an important link between liver inflammation-driven tissue damage and local immune response since it activates tissue-resident ILC2s and HSCs and recruits Tregs, all of them expressing the pro-tumorigenic growth factor AREG and other immune mediators that favor carcinogenesis. AREG in conjunction with IL-33 might further ensure effective intratumoral Treg function in the inflammatory tumor environment and might induce recruitment of TAMs resulting in immunosuppression of anti-tumor immunity (Figure 1). However, despite the present data, a clear link between the ILC2/Treg/AREG circuit and cancer has not been identified in humans until now. Thus, further research is needed to characterize the contribution of this immunological network to carcinogenesis and to define its impact in the development of HCC.

clinical-cellular-immunology-HCC-development

Figure 1: The ILC2/Treg/AREG axis in HCC development. In the chronically inflamed liver, IL-33 is released by necrotic hepatocytes and leads to activation of tissue-resident type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and recruitment of regulatory T cells (Tregs). All cell populations start to express amphiregulin (AREG), which promotes regenerative processes following liver tissue damage. Activated Tregs increase expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and AREG/EGFR signaling further sustains Treg function in the inflammatory environment. Chronic inflammation-induced constitutive activation of AREG-expressing ILC2s and Tregs might trigger excessive wound healing and particularly Tregs might contribute to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by favoring an immune tolerant milieu and by inhibiting anti-tumor activity of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (CTLs). KC: Kupffer Cells, iMΦ: Inflammatory Macrophages, TAM: Tumor-Associated Macrophages.

Grant Support

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): The Priority Programme “Innate lymphoid cells” (SPP 1937) granted to GT and KN, and SFB 841 project B1 and integrated research training group granted to GT.

References

  1. El-Serag HB (2011) Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 365: 1118-1127.
  2. Farazi PA, DePinho RA (2006) Hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis: from genes to environment. Nat Rev 6: 674-687.
  3. Lafaro KJ, Demirjian AN, Pawlik TM (2005) Epidemiology of Hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 24: 1-17.
  4. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Ganeet E, et al. (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359: 378-390.
  5. Berasain C, García-Trevijano ER, Castillo J, Erroba E, Lee DC, et al. (2005) Amphiregulin: An early trigger of liver regeneration in mice. Gastroenterology 128: 424-432.
  6. Castillo J, Erroba E, Perugorría MJ, Santamaria M, Lee DC, et al. (2006) Amphiregulin contributes to the transformed phenotype of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 66: 6129-6138.
  7. Han SX, Bai E, Jin GH, He CC, Guo XJ, et al. (2014) Expression and clinical significance of YAP, TAZ, and AREG in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunol Res 2014: 261365.
  8. Busser B, Sancey L, Brambilla E, Coll JL, Hurbin A (2011) The multiple roles of amphiregulin in human cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta-Rev Cancer 1816: 119-131.
  9. Hsu YL, Huang MS, Cheng DE, Hung JY, Yang CJ, et al. (2011) Lung tumor-associated dendritic cell-derived amphiregulin increased cancer progression. J Immunol 187: 1733-1744.
  10. Carvalho S, Lindzen M, Lauriola M, Shirazi N, Sinha S, et al. (2015) An antibody to amphiregulin, an abundant growth factor in patients’ fluids, inhibits ovarian tumors. Oncogene 35: 1-10.
  11. Normanno N, De Luca A, Bianco C, Strizzi L, Mancino M, et al. (2006) Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene 366: 2-16.
  12. Hisaka T, Yano H, Haramaki M, Utsunomiya I, Kojiro M (1999) Expressions of epidermal growth factor family and its receptor in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines: relationship to cell proliferation. Int J Oncol 14: 453-460.
  13. Ito Y, Takeda T, Sakon M, Tsujimoto M, Higashiyama S, et al. (2001) Expression and clinical significance of erb-B receptor family in hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 84: 1377-1383.
  14. Buckley AF, Burgart LJ, Sahai V, Kakar S (2008) Epidermal growth factor receptor expression and gene copy number in conventional hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 129: 245-251.
  15. Berasain C, Avila MA (2014) The EGFR signalling system in the liver: From hepatoprotection to hepatocarcinogenesis. J Gastroenterol 49: 9-23.
  16. Berasain C, García-Trevijano EE, Castillo J, Erroba E, Santamaría M, et al. (2005) Novel role for amphiregulin in protection from liver injury. J Biol Chem 280: 19012-19020.
  17. Zaiss DMW, Gause WC, Osborne LC, Artis D (2015) Emerging functions of amphiregulin in orchestrating immunity, inflammation, and tissue repair. Immunity 42: 216-226.
  18. Wasmer MH, Krebs P (2017) The role of IL-33-dependent inflammation in the tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol 7: 682.
  19. Zhang P, Liu X-K, Chu Z, Ye JC, Li KL, et al. (2012) Detection of interleukin-33 in serum and carcinoma tissue from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical implications. J Int Med Res 40: 1654-1661
  20. Bergis D, Kassis V, Ranglack A, Koeberle V, Piiper A, et al. (2013) High Serum Levels of the Interleukin-33 Receptor Soluble ST2 as a Negative Prognostic Factor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Transl Oncol 6: 311-318.
  21. Mchedlidze T, Waldner M, Zopf S, Walker J, Rankin AL, et al. (2013) Interleukin-33-dependent innate lymphoid cells mediate hepatic fibrosis. Immunity 39: 357-371.
  22. Wang J, Zhao P, Guo H, Sun X, Jiang Z, et al. (2012) Serum IL-33 levels are associated with liver damage in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Mediators Inflamm 2012: 819636.
  23. Wang J, Cai Y, Ji H, Feng J, Ayana DA, et al. (2012) Serum IL-33 levels are associated with liver damage in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Interferon Cytokine Res 32: 248-253.
  24. Neumann K, Karimi K, Meiners J, Voetlause R, Steinmann S, et al. (2017) A Proinflammatory Role of Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells in Murine Immune-Mediated Hepatitis. J Immunol 198: 128-137.
  25. Gasteiger G, Fan X, Dikiy S, Lee SY, Rudensky AY (2015) Tissue residency of innate lymphoid cells in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs. Science 350: 981-985.
  26. Nakagawa H, Suzuki N, Hirata Y, Hikiba Y, Hayakawa Y, et al. (2017) Biliary epithelial injury-induced regenerative response by IL-33 promotes cholangiocarcinogenesis from peribiliary glands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114: E3808-E3815.
  27. Jovanovic IP, Pejnovic NN, Radosavljevic GD, Pantic JM, Milovanovic MZ, et al. (2014) Interleukin-33/ST2 axis promotes breast cancer growth and metastases by facilitating intratumoral accumulation of immunosuppressive and innate lymphoid cells. Int J Cancer 134: 1669-1682.
  28. Monticelli LA, Osborne LC, Noti M, Tran SV, Zaiss DMW, et al. (2015) IL-33 promotes an innate immune pathway of intestinal tissue protection dependent on amphiregulin-EGFR interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 10762-10767.
  29. Monticelli L, Sonnenberg GF, Abt MC, Alenghat T, Ziegler CG, et al. (2011) Innate lymphoid cells promote lung-tissue homeostasis after infection with influenza virus. Nat Immunol 12: 1045-1054.
  30. Turner JE, Morrison PJ, Wilhelm C, Wilson M, Ahlfors H et al. (2013) IL-9-mediated survival of type 2 innate lymphoid cells promotes damage control in helminth-induced lung inflammation. J Exp Med 210: 2951-2965.
  31. Salimi M, Barlow JL, Saunders SP, Xue L, Gutowska-Owsiak D, et al. (2013) A role for IL-25 and IL-33-driven type-2 innate lymphoid cells in atopic dermatitis. J Exp Med 210: 2950.
  32. Matsumura T, Makino R, Mitamura K (2001) Frequent down-regulation of E-cadherin by genetic and epigenetic changes in the malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 7: 594-599.
  33. Nakagawa H, Hikiba Y, Hirata Y, Font-Burgada J, Sakamoto K, et al. (2014) Loss of liver E-cadherin induces sclerosing cholangitis and promotes carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 1090-1095.
  34. Noy R, Pollard JW (2014) Tumor-Associated Macrophages: From Mechanisms to Therapy. Immunity 41: 49-61.
  35. Nickerson NK, Mill CP, Wu H-J, Riese DJ, Foley J (2013) Autocrine-Derived Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ligands Contribute to Recruitment of Tumor-Associated Macrophage and Growth of Basal Breast Cancer Cells In Vivo. Oncol Res Featur Preclin Clin Cancer Ther 20: 303-317.
  36. Yamaguchi T, Fushida S, Yamamoto Y, Tsukada T, Kinoshita J et al. (2016) Tumor-associated macrophages of the M2 phenotype contribute to progression in gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. Gastric Cancer 19: 1052-1065.
  37. Perugorria MJ, Latasa MU, Nicou A, Cartagena-Lirola H, Castillo J, et al. (2008) The epidermal growth factor receptor ligand amphiregulin participates in the development of mouse liver fibrosis. Hepatology 48: 1251-1261.
  38. Dai K, Huang L, Sun X, Yang L, Gong Z (2015) Hepatic CD206-positive macrophages express amphiregulin to promote the immunosuppressive activity of regulatory T cells in HBV infection. J Leukoc Biol 98: 1071-1080.
  39. McKee C, Sigala B, Soeda J, Mouralidarane A, Morgan M, et al.(2015) Amphiregulin activates human hepatic stellate cells and is upregulated in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Sci Rep 5: 8812.
  40. Sakai N, Van Sweringen HL, Quillin RC, Schuster R, Blanchard J, et al. (2012) Interleukin-33 Is hepatoprotective during liver ischemia/reperfusion in mice. Hepatology 56: 1468-1478.
  41. Tan Z, Liu Q, Jiang R, Lv L, Shoto SS, et al. (2017) Interleukin-33 drives hepatic fibrosis through activation of hepatic stellate cells. Cell Mol Immunol.
  42. Fu J, Xu D, Liu Z, Shi M, Zhao P, et al. (2007) Increased regulatory T cells correlate with CD8 T-cell impairment and poor survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Gastroenterology 132: 2328-2339.
  43. Yuan CH, Sun XM, Zhu CL, Liu SP, Wu L, et al. (2015) Amphiregulin activates regulatory T lymphocytes and suppresses CD8+ T cell-mediated anti-tumor response in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncotarget 6: 32138-53.
  44. Wang S, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Ye P, Li J, et al. (2016) Amphiregulin confers regulatory T cell suppressive function and tumor invasion via the EGFR/GSK-3β/Foxp3 axis. J Biol Chem 291: 21085-21095.
  45. Dai K, Huang L, Chen J, Yang L, Gong Z (2014) Amphiregulin promotes the immunosuppressive activity of intrahepatic CD4 + regulatory T cells to impair CD8 + T cell immunity against hepatitis B virus infection. Immunology 144: 506-517.
  46. Burzyn D, Kuswanto W, Kolodin D, Shadrach JL, Cerletti M, et al. (2013) A Special Population of regulatory T Cells Potentiates muscle repair. Cell 155: 1282-1295.
  47. Schiering C, Krausgruber T, Chomka A, Fröhlich A, Adelmann K, et al. (2014) The alarmin IL-33 promotes regulatory T-cell function in the intestine. Nature 513: 564-568.
  48. Noel G, Arshad MI, Filliol A, Genet V, Rauch M, et al. (2016) Ablation of interaction between IL-33 and ST2+ regulatory T cells increases immune cell-mediated hepatitis and activated NK cell liver infiltration. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 311: G313-23.
  49. Popovic B, Golemac M, Podlech J, Zeleznjak J, Bilic-Zulle L, et al. (2017) IL-33/ST2 pathway drives regulatory T cell dependent suppression of liver damage upon cytomegalovirus infection. PLoS Pathog 13: e1006345.
Citation: Neumann K, Ochel A, Tiegs G (2017) Potential Involvement of the ILC2 - Regulatory T Cell-Amphiregulin Axis in Liver Cancer Development: Novel Concepts for Immunotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Cell Immunol 8: 524.

Copyright: © 2017 Neumann K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top