Clinical & Experimental Cardiology

Clinical & Experimental Cardiology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9880

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2018) Volume 9, Issue 6

Predictors of Ischaemia and Outcomes in Egyptian Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Referred for Perfusion Imaging

Samir Rafla*, Ahmed Abdel-Aaty, Mohamed Ahmed Sadaka, Aly Ahmed Abo Elhoda and Ahmed Mohamed Shams
Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Samir Rafla, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, 398 Tareek Elhoria, 21321, Egypt, Tel: +201001495577, Fax: 00201001495577 Email:

Keywords: Thallium-201, Diabetes, Coronary artery disease, SPECT, Prognosis

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus has emerged as a significant health problem with international importance [1].

Cardiovascular diseases account for between 70% and 80% of the mortality in diabetic patients [2,3]. In a series of 4755 patients presenting with suspected CAD undergoing MPI investigation, even in a relatively short follow up period of 2.5 years, the diabetic cohort sustained nearly twice (8.6% vs. 4.5%) the cardiac event rate (cardiac death or nonfatal MI) compared to the non-diabetic patients (p<0.0001) [4].

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been extensively employed as a diagnostic tool in CAD, and is a potent prognostic tool for risk stratification [4-8]. Indeed, its role in diabetic patients with asymptomatic CAD has been widely reported [9]. MPI plays an important role in identifying those diabetic patients most at risk of CAD and, thus, in need of more aggressive management [9]. This is important because once CAD is symptomatic, diabetic patients confront significant morbidity and risk of mortality [9]. A number of investigators have examined the role of MPI in detection of silent ischemia among diabetic patients with no known or suspected CAD. In an asymptomatic population, Mohagheghie et al. [9] reported 30.1% of patients to have an abnormal MPI; most (92%) with reversible defects. Prior et al. [7] reported a 31% prevalence of silent ischemia in diabetic patients.

The aim was to estimate the prevalence and to detect the predictors of significant scintigraphic ischemia and subsequent cardiac events in a cohort of stable outpatients with DM referred for SPECT MPI. Also to assess the impact of gender, comorbidities, type of stress, and symptom status on these findings.

This study was conducted to examine the incremental prognostic value of SPECT MPI in risk stratification of an Egyptian diabetic patient population with known or suspected CAD.

Methods

Study population

The study population was a consecutive cohort of patients with suspected CAD or known CAD referred for diagnostic investigation with SPECT-MPI at the Alexandria Main University hospital Gama camera unit. The study was conducted on 194 diabetic patients who were referred to undergo SPECT stress MPI in cardiology nuclear laboratory in Alexandria Main University Hospital retrospectively during the period from 1-1-2012 to 1-1-2016; as well as the prospective cases during the period from 1-4-2016 to 1-7-2016.

Inclusion criteria: All patients with DM referred to do SPECT-MPI.

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with CCS IV anginal pain. 2. Patients with electrical or hemodynamic unstability.

SPECT-MPI Study

One hundred sixty nine subjects underwent stress-rest gated- SPECT MPI protocol; also 25 subjects underwent Rest-Redistribution Protocol SPECT-MPI was performed. Supine images were acquired with a dual-head symbia E Siemens Gama camera with low-energy and high-resolution collimators. Each camera head acquired 180°C of data by 60 projections at 30 to 40 seconds per projections. The data from the 2 heads were combined to give 360°C of coverage.

Radionuclide Image Processing

All radionuclide images and associated data were processed according to standard protocols using proprietary V-Quant software (Charlottesville, VA). Myocardial perfusion was calculated as the relative percent tracer uptake in each of the 17 segments of a standard model) Uptake deviating ≥ 2 SDs from institution-derived sex-specific normal databases was flagged as abnormal in a reversible or fixed pattern [10,11]. Experienced nuclear cardiology specialists used this quantitative data as well as visual image analysis to interpret each MPI study [12-15]. Readers assigned a score to each segment (0-4 for normal, mild, moderate, severe, and absent uptake, respectively). The semi-quantitative summed stress, rest, and difference scores were calculated from these segmental values, with the 5 apical segments receiving 40% weighting (each apical segmental score × 0.4) to correct for the over-representation of the apex partially in the standard 17- segment model. Finally, the percentage of myocardial ischemia was obtained by dividing the difference between summed stress and summed rest scores by 56, the maximum possible difference. LV ischemia of 1% to 9% was considered mild-moderate, and ≥ 10% LV ischemia was considered significant. Non-Perfusion Parameters: transient ischemic dilation (TID) of LV and lung uptake was recorded.

Lung uptake: A qualitative assessment of lung 201TI uptake was made by two observers for each image. A grade of 0 was chosen for qualitatively normal pulmonary uptake, 1+ for moderately increased pulmonary uptake that was greater than normal but less than myocardial activity, and 2+ for greatly increased pulmonary activity that approached myocardial activity. Half grades were allowed. The grades of the two observers were averaged for each observation.

Follow-up: Data of cardiac mortality, nonfatal MI, decompensated HF, stroke and revascularization were collected initially through ≥ 3 follow-up telephone contact attempts, follow up was done to 135 patients for two years, to six patients for one year and not available to 53 patients.

Clinical Characteristics at Baseline and Follow-up

Clinical characteristics were obtained at baseline and at follow-up visits. Traditional risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, smoking and family history of premature CAD were also established. Diabetes mellitus was defined according to American Diabetes Association criteria and was considered present if the patient used oral diabetic medications or insulin.

Statistical analysis of the data [16]

All continuous variables are expressed as the mean value ± SD. The mean differences for continuous variables were compared by the Student t test (2-tailed). Categorical variables were compared as means using a χ2 (chi square) statistic. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Kaplan Meier survival curve was used (Table 1).

Variable Description (%)
Age (years) 58.79 ± 9.52
Gender  
Male 131 (67.5)
Risk factors  
HTN 131(67.5)
IDDM 26 (13.4)
 DM type 2 168 (86.6)
Dyslipidemia 48 (24.7)
Family history 76 (39.2)
Smoking 124 (63.9)
Abnormal SPECT-MPI  
SSS (>8) 137 (70.6)
SRS(>8) 99 (51.0%)
Transient LV dilation 120 (61.9)
Lung uptake 73 (37.6)
Percentage of ischemia≥10 76(39.2)
Symptom  
Typical CCS 179 (92)
Atypical 15 (7.7)
Follow Up  
Sudden Cardiac death 35 (18.0)
MI 44 (22.7)
HF 73 (37.6)
Stroke 18 (9.3)
Not Available 53 (27.3)
Revascularization  

Table 1: Base Line Characteristics of the Study population

Results

There was statistically significant relation between CCS class and MI (p<0.001). There was statistically significant relation between CCS class and HF (p=0.002) (Figure 1).

clinical-experimental-cardiology-angina-pain

Figure 1: Relation between degree of angina pain and outcome.

There was no statistically significant relation between age and SSS (P=0.549) There was statistically significant relation between male gender and (P=0.04) (Table 2,3). There was statistically significant relation between IDDM and SSS (P=0.028). There was statistically significant relation between DM type 2 and SSS (P=0.029). There was statistically significant relation between HTN and SSS (P=0.030).

    SSS  p
0–3 (n= 26) 4 – 8 (n= 31) >8 (n= 137)
No. % No. % No. %
Demographic data Age (years)             2.822 MCp= 0.549
<40 1 3.8 1 3.2 3 2.2
40 – 60 15 57.7 20 64.5 72 52.6
>60 10 38.5 10 32.3 62 45.3
Gender             6.450* 0.040*
Male 12 46.2 23 74.2 96 70.1
Female 14 53.8 8 25.8 41 29.9
Risk factors IDDM 3 11.5 9 29.0 14 10.2 6.817* MCp= 0.028*
NIDDM 23 88.5 22 71.0 123 89.8 6.817* MCp= 0.029*
HTN 12 46.2 20 64.5 99 72.3 6.817* 0.030*
Dyslipidemia 5 19.2 8 25.8 35 25.5 0.491 0.782
Smoking 10 38.5 22 71.0 92 67.2 8.595* 0.014*
Family history 10 38.5 15 48.4 51 37.2 1.328 0.515
Follow up Sudden Cardiac death 1 3.8 0 0.0 34 24.8 14.621* 0.001*
MI 0 0.0 9 29.0 35 25.5 8.982* 0.002*
HF 3 11.5 6 19.4 64 46.7 16.771* <0.001*
Stroke 0 0.0 2 6.5 16 11.7 3.597 MCp= 0.174

Table 2: Relation between demographic data, risk factors, outcomes and SSS

            SRS  p
0–3 (n=57) 4–8 (n=38) >8 (n=99)
No. % No. % No. %
Age (years)                
<40 3 5.3 0 0.0 2 2.0 6.544 MCp= 0.127
             
40 – 60 37 64.9 20 52.6 50 50.5
>60 17 29.8 18 47.4 47 47.5
Risk factors IDDM 10 17.5 3 7.9 13 13.1 1.842 0.398
NIDDM 47 82.5 35 92.1 86 86.9 1.842 0.398
HTN 33 57.9 27 71.1 71 71.1 3.337 0.187
             
Dyslipidemia 12 21.1 7 18.4 29 29.3 2.333 0.311
Smoking 27 47.4 19 50.0 78 78.8 19.452* <0.001*
             
Family history 28 49.1 14 36.8 34 34.3 3.424 0.181
Follow up Sudden  Cardiac death 3 5.3 1 2.6 31 31.3 24.190* <0.001*
MI 7 12.3 13 34.2 24 24.2 6.630* 0.038*
HF 12 21.1 8 21.1 53 53.5 21.795* <0.001*
Stroke 2 3.5 1 2.6 15 15.2 8.306* 0.016*

Table 3: Relation between SRS, demographic data, risk factors and clinical outcomes

There was statistically significant relation between smoking and SSS (P=0.014) There were statistically significant relation between sudden cardiac death, MI, HF and SSS P=0.001, P=0.002, and P<0.001 respectively, Figure 2.

clinical-experimental-cardiology-Summed-stress

Figure 2: Relation between Summed stress score (SSS) and follow up.

There were statistically significant relation between SRS, sudden cardiac death, MI, HF, and stroke with p<0.001, p=0.038, p<0.001 p=0.016 respectively.

Correlation analysis was performed utilizing degree of complaint (CCS class), sudden cardiac death, MI and HF, We found that there was positive correlation between CCS class of anginal pain and sudden cardiac death (r=0.166, p=0.026).There was a positive correlation between CCS class of angina pain and MI (r=0.282, p<0.001) There was positive correlation between CCS class of angina pain and HF (r=0.251, p=0.001).

Correlation analysis was performed utilizing SRS, sudden cardiac death, MI, HF, and stroke. We found: There was positive correlation between SRS and sudden cardiac death (r=0.344, p<0.001). There was no correlation between SRS and MI. (r=0.121, p=0.094). There was strong positive correlation SRS and HF. (r=0.333, p<0.001) There was positive correlation between stroke and SRS (r=0.200, p=0.005).

Also we found There was strong positive correlation between SSS and sudden cardiac death (r=0.396, p<0.001), There was positive correlation between SSS and MI (r=0.142, p=0.049), There is strong positive correlation between SSS and HF (r=0.370, p<0.001); and There was positive correlation between SSS and stroke (r=0.233, p=0.001), Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariate Analysis for Variables Associated with MI

We found that, typical pain is the most predictive variable for MI (p=0.001, HR=6.100), also, SSS, lung uptake, transient LV dilation, all of them have a predictive value for MI with HR=1.100, 1.115, and 1.401 respectively. On multivariate analysis typical pain is the most predictive (p=0.001 HR=6.100), Tables 4,5.

  p HR 95% CI
LL UL
SSS (>8) 0.021* 2.587* 1.151 5.815
Lung uptake 0.046* 1.845* 1.012 3.363
Transient LV dilation 0.039* 1.959* 1.034 3.712
Typical pain <0.001* 0.151* 0.054 0.423

Table 4: Univariate analysis for variables prognostic for MI.

  p HR 95% CI
LL UL
Age (≥ 60) 0.024* 2.174* 1.106 4.276
SSS (>8) 0.006* 15.901* 2.175 116.26
SRS (>8) <0.001* 10.321* 3.636 29.30
Lung uptake <0.001* 5.844* 2.795 12.200
Transient LV dilation <0.001* 14.492* 3.468 60.547
Typical pain 0.012* 3.121* 1.289 7.558

Table 5: Univariate analysis for variables prognostic for Sudden Cardiac death.

On univariate analysis, we found that the following variables were predictors of sudden cardiac death; SSS (p=0.006, HR=15.901), TID of LV (P<0.001, HR=14.492), SRS (P<0.001, HR=10.321), lung uptake (P<0.001, HR=5.844), typical angina pain (P=0.012, HR=3.121) and age (P=0.024, HR=2.217). But on multivariate analysis TID of LV was the most predictor (P=0.041, HR=5.077).

Discussion

One of the strengths of nuclear MPI is the abundance of the published literature addressing its prognostic implications, Klocke et al., Iskandrian et al., Bourque et al., and Di Carli et al. demonstrated that MPI is most frequently performed using the nuclear techniques of SPECT and positron emission tomography (PET). When first introduced half a century ago, SPECT and PET were primarily viewed as diagnostic tools. Beginning with the publication of a landmark paper by Brown in 1991, the major role of MPI has shifted from simply detecting CAD to providing relevant prognostic information and aiding in risk stratification and management decisions [17-21].

Prognostic relevance of symptoms versus objective evidence of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients

In our study, typical anginal pain and also atypical angina pain both of them were associated with significant scintigraphic parameters, there is statistically significant relation between atypical pain in diabetics and SSS (P=0.001), also there is statistically significant relation between atypical pain in diabetics and SRS. (X=10.491, P=0.004), and there is statistically significant relation between atypical pain and SDS (P=0.018). We found that there was positive correlation between CCS class of anginal pain and sudden cardiac death (r=0.166, p=0.026).

There was strong positive correlation between CCS class of angina pain and MI (r=0.282, p<0.001).

In Zellweger et al. study of a large, consecutive series of diabetic patients referred for evaluation of possible or suspected CAD showed that silent CAD, as diagnosed by MPS, was found in 39% of patients. The rate of abnormal MPS results did not differ from that of patients with angina or angina like chest pain, in contrast to non-diabetic patients [17]. In our study and in previous studies there is strong correlation between the symptoms and hard and soft cardiac events, but in our study those who had atypical are statistically related only to HF, and this may absence of awareness about atypical presentation of CAD in diabetics, so unfortunately the patients present with heart failure due to misdiagnosis of MI.

Prognostic yield of semiquantitative parameters in diabetic patients

In our study, we categorize SSS and SRS as normal SSS 0 to 3; mild SSS 4 to 8; and moderate to severe abnormal SSS>9. And this similar to what was done by Kasim et al. [18].

In our study we apply the semiquantitative role, and we found that there is statistically significant relation between SSS and soft and hard cardiac events, as regard sudden cardiac death (X=14.621, p=0.001), also there was statistically significant relation between SSS and MI (X=8.982, p=0.002), more over the most significant relation was between SSS and HF (X=16.771, p<0.001).

Also, in our study, there were statistically significant relations between SRS and MI (X=6.630, p=0.038), statistically significant relation between SRS and stroke (X=8.306, p=0.016). Moreover, we found statistically significant relation between SRS and HF (X=21.795, p<0.001).

Also we found statistically significant relation between SRS and sudden cardiac death (X=24.190, p<0.001).

On applying correlation analysis between SSS and outcomes, we found significant positive correlation between SSS and MI (r=0.142 p=0.049), stroke (r=0.233, p=0.001), but the most significant positive correlation was between SSS and sudden cardiac death (r=0.396, p<0.001) followed by HF (r=0.370, p<0.001).

On correlation analysis between SRS and outcomes, we found that the most significant positive correlation with sudden cardiac death (r=0.344, p<0.001), followed by HF (R=0.333, p<0.001). Also there was significant positive correlation between SRS and MI (r=0.333, p=0.094) also positive correlation with stroke (r=0.200, p=0.005).

So in our study SSS and SRS, both of them have positive correlation with hard and soft cardiac events especially sudden cardiac death and heart HF.

In our study on applying Kaplan Meier survival curve, we found that SSS is a predictor sudden cardiac death (HR=2.682). Also SRS can predict sudden cardiac death (HR=2.66), HF (HR=1.298), and stroke (HR=1.281). This is more severe in our study, when the SSS >8, the rate of sudden cardiac death is 24.8%, and rate of MI is 25.5% but the rate of HF is 47%.

Although SSS is the MPI variable that has been most extensively validated for prognosis, SDS may be the best predictor of nonfatal myocardial infarction and is the variable most predictive of subsequent coronary angiography and early revascularization [22,23].

In our study SDS ranged from 0 to 24.0 with mean ± SD=5.23 ± 4.77. Hachamovitch et al. demonstrated that SDS can be calculated as the percent myocardium ischemic by dividing SDS by 68 (17 segments with a maximal score of 4 per segment) × 100. Using the 17 segment model, a SDS score of 7 is equivalent to 10% of the myocardium ischemic. In his study this threshold was demonstrated to represent the amount of ischemic myocardium necessary to demonstrate an improvement in outcome in patients treated by revascularization vs. those treated with medications alone [24].

Transient ischaemic dilation of LV

Petretta et al. demonstrated that TID of LV provides additional value over clinical and perfusion data to identify the presence of severe CAD in diabetic patients. When abnormal TID was considered in addition to summed stress score the sensitivity for diagnosing the diabetic patients with severe CAD improved without reducing specificity. TID of LV was used to reclassify patients with borderline perfusion defects (summed stress score between 3 and 7) [23]. In our study of 194 diabetic patients, TID of LV was present in 120 patients (61.9%), there was statistically significant relation between TID of LV and dyspnea (X=23.020, p<0.001).

On applying Multivariate analysis for parameters associated with HF, TID of LV was the most predictive factor (P<0.001 HR=4.329).

Lung thallium uptake

On applying univariate, multivariate analysis and Kaplan Meier curve, we found that lung uptake was prognostic to MI, sudden cardiac death, HF, and stroke (HR=1.115, HR=1.552, HR=1.208, and HR=2.576 respectively), these results are in harmony with the previous studies of Iskandrian et al. [25].

We found that TID of LV was strongly prognostic to sudden cardiac death (P=0.041, HR=5.077), and, TID of LV had a prognostic value to MI (HR=1.401). Also it had prognostic value to stroke (HR=9.967).

Study limitations

1. This is a single center study.

2. This is an observational study.

3. No available registry data about the duration of DM and the degree of glycemic control.

4. Follow up data was not available in 53 patients, i.e. about 27%.

However, the results through light on predictors of MACE in Egyptian diabetic patients.

Conclusion

Semi-quantitative parameters such as SSS, SRS, SDS and percentage of ischaemic myocardium are independent predictors of MACE in both symptomatic and asymptomatic diabetic patients, also nonperfusion parameters such as TID of LV and lung uptake were found to have strong prognostic yield in diabetic patients.

In our cohort of diabetic Egyptian patients we found high ischaemic burden in (39.2% of patients had >10% ischaemic myocardium).

References

  1. Mihardja L, Delima, Manz HS, Ghani L, Soegondo S (2009) Prevalence and determinants of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in Indonesia (a part of basic health research/Riskesdas). Acta Med Indones 41: 169-174.
  2. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H, et al. (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27: 1047-1053.
  3. D’Souza A, Hussain M, Howarth FC, Woods NM, Bidasee K, et al. (2009) Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of accelerated atherosclerosis in the diabetic heart. Mol Cell Biochem 331: 89-116.
  4. Giri S, Shaw LJ, Murthy DR, Travin MI, Miller D, et al. (2002) Impact of diabetes on the risk stratification using stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease. Circulation 105: 32-40.
  5. Dweck M, Campbell IW, Miller D, Francis CM (2009) Clinical aspects of silent myocardial ischaemia: with particular reference to diabetes mellitus. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 9: 110-116.
  6. Dweck M, Miller D, Campbell IW, Francis CM (2009) Mechanisms of silent myocardial ischaemia: with particular reference to diabetes mellitus. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 9: 99-102.
  7. Prior JO, Monbaron D, Koehli M, Calcagni ML, Ruiz J, et al. (2005) Prevalence of symptomatic and silent stress-induced perfusion defects in diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32: 60-69.
  8. Elhendy A, Huurman A, Schinkel AFL, Bax JJ, Van Domburg RT, et al. (2005) Association of ischemia on stress 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging with all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Nucl Med 46: 1589-1595.
  9. Mohagheghie A, Ahmadabadi MN, Hedayat DK, Pourbehi MR, Assadi M, et al. (2011) Myocardial perfusion imaging using technetium-99m sestamibi in asymptomatic diabetic patients. Nuklearmedizin 50: 3-8.
  10. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, et al. (2003) ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging-- executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1318-1333.
  11. Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE (2004) Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 11: 171-185.
  12. Bourque JM, Beller GA (2011) Stress myocardial perfusion imaging for assessing prognosis: an update. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:1305-1319.
  13. Di Carli MF, Murthy VL (2011) Cardiac PET/CT for the evaluation of known or suspected coronary artery disease. Radiographics 31: 1239-1254.
  14. Kasim M, Currie GM, Tjahjono M, Siswanto BB, Harimurti GM, et al. (2013) Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Utility in Predicting Cardiovascular Events Among Indonesian Diabetic Patients. Open Cardiovasc Med J 7: 82-89.
  15. Sharir T, Germano G, Kang X, Lewin HC, Miranda R, et al. (2001) Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction. J Nucl Med 42: 831-837.
  16. Kotz S, Balakrishnan N, Read CB, Vidakovic B (2006) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience.
  17. Zellweger MJ, Hachamovitch R, Kang X, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, et al. (2004) Prognostic relevance of symptoms versus objective evidence of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. Eur Heart J 25: 543-550.
  18. Kasim M, Currie GM, Tjahjono M, Siswanto BB, Harimurti GM, et al. (2013) Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Utility in Predicting Cardiovascular Events Among Indonesian Diabetic Patients. Open Cardiovasc Med J 7: 82-89.
  19. Valeti US, Miller TD, Hodge DO, Gibbons RJ (2005) Exercise single-photon emission computed tomography provides effective risk stratification of elderly men and elderly women. Circulation 111: 1771-1776.
  20. Chavoshi M, Fard-Esfahani A, Fallahi B, Emami-Ardekani A, Beiki D, et al. (2015) Assessment of prognostic value of semiquantitative parameters on gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in a large middle eastern population. Indian J Nucl Med 30: 233-238.
  21. Miller TD, Roger VL, Hodge DO, Hopfenspirger MR, Bailey KR, et al. (2001) Gender differences and temporal trends in clinical characteristics, stress test results and use of invasive procedures in patients undergoing evaluation for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 38: 690-697.
  22. Giri S, Shaw LJ, Murthy DR, Travin MI, Miller DD, et al. (2002) Impact of diabetes on the risk stratification using stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease. Circulation 105: 32-40.
  23. Petretta M, Acampa W, Daniele S, Petretta MP, Nappi C, et al. (2013) Transient ischemic dilation in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for prediction of severe coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. J Nucl Cardiol 20: 45-52.
  24. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS, et al. (2003) Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 107: 2900-2907.
  25. Iskandrian AS, Heo J, Nguyen T, Lyons E, Paugh E, et al. (1990) Left ventricular dilatation and pulmonary thallium uptake after single-photon emission computer tomography using thallium-201 during adenosine-induced coronary hyperemia. Am J Cardiol 66: 807-811.
Citation: Rafla S, Abdel-Aaty A, Sadaka MA, Elhoda AAA, Shams AM (2018) Predictors of Ischaemia and Outcomes in Egyptian Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Referred for Perfusion Imaging . J Clin Exp Cardiolog 9:591.

Copyright: © 2018 Rafla S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top