Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques

Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques
Open Access

ISSN: 2157-7064

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2013) Volume 4, Issue 6

Preparation of Universal Peroxidase-Labelled Bacterial Protein Conjugates and Separation Properties

Angel Alberto Justiz-Vaillant*
Department of Para-clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
*Corresponding Author: Angel Alberto Justiz-Vaillant, MD, PhD, Department of Para-Clinical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago Email:

Abstract

The aim of this study was to produce chimeric bacterial protein conjugates, to separate them by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and study their reactivities with human serum immunoglobulins by immunoblot analysis. Universal conjugates: protein LA-peroxidase (SpLA-HRP), protein LG-peroxidase (SpLG-HRP), protein AG-peroxidase (SpAG-HRP), protein LAG-peroxidase (SpLAG-HRP) and others were prepared by the periodate method. The conjugates were polymeric, with high molecular weights (MW) ranging from between 80-90 kDa to greater than 220 kDa. All conjugates have similar numbers of protein bands. However SpLALG-HRP and SpLAG anti-IgY-HRP were less polymeric. Immunoblot blot analysis showed that all conjugates reacted with human serum Igs. These conjugates have a potential use in epidemiological surveys of zoonotic infections affecting avian and mammalian species.The periodate method was effective to producing chimeric conjugates of peroxidase-labelled immunoglobulin-binding proteins and the immunoblot analysis showed that they were funtional and effective in reacting with human serum immunoglobulins.

Keywords: Peroxidase–labelled immunoglobulin–binding protein; Staphylococcal protein–A (SpA); Streptococcal protein–G (SpG); Peptostreptococcal protein L (SpL); Commercially–prepared recombinant protein LA (SpLA); SDS–PAGE; Immunoblot analysis

Introduction

The reactivity of immunoglobulin–binding proteins for immunoglobulins (Igs) of mammalian species is well–known. These proteins are Staphylococcal protein–A (SpA), Streptococcal protein–G (SpG), Peptostreptococcal protein L (SpL) and a commerciallyprepared recombinant protein LA (SpLA) [14]. Perel'man et al. reported that the periodate method was efficient in the preparation of SpA–peroxidase conjugates, while the preparation of bacterial protein conjugates failed when glutaraldehyde was used as a cross–linker [5]. Yolken and Leister synthesised and used a SpA–peroxidase conjugate in an ELISA [6] and Nygren and Hansson had reported that the modified periodate method allowed the preparation of conjugated protein A, which when analysed by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed the presence of polymeric conjugates of large molecular size [7]. This study aimed to produce chimeric bacterial protein conjugates, to separate them by sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and record their reactivities with human serum immunoglobulins by immunoblot analysis.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of universal conjugates

Protein LA–peroxidase (SpLA–HRP), protein LG–peroxidase (SpLG–HRP), protein AG–peroxidase (SpAG–HRP) and protein LAGperoxidase (SpLAG–HRP) by the periodate method.Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) labelled SpA, SpG and/or SpL conjugates were prepared using the periodate method described by Nakane and Kawoi [8]. Horseradish peroxidase (500 μg in 50 μl NaCO3, pH 9.6) was mixed with freshly made sodium periodate solution (1.71 mg/ml) followed by incubation in the dark for 2 h. In the preparation of SpLA-HRP, SpLGHRP, SpAG–HRP and SpLAG–HRP conjugates the corresponding mixtures containing SpA and SpL (250 μg respectively); SpL and SpG (250 μg respectively); SpA and SpG (250 μg respectively); and equal amounts of SpA, SpG, and SpL giving a total weight 500 μg were added to the horseradish peroxidase–sodium periodate. The mixtures were incubated for 3 hours at 4°C with gentle agitation. Forty μl of freshly prepared NaBH4 solution (5 mg NaBH4/ml 0.1 mM NaOH) was then added to each of the preparations, which were incubated for 90 min at 4°C in the dark with gentle agitation. Cold 50% saturated ammonium sulphate solution (pH 7.4) was added drop by drop in the ratio 1:1 (v/v). The mixtures were then centrifuged for 25 min at 4°C. The pellets were resuspended in 200 μl of PBS pH=7.4 and dialysed against 1L of PBS for 24 h with 3 buffer changes. An equal volume of glycerol was added to the dialysates followed by 100 μl of bovine serum albumin, BSA (20 mg/ ml). The conjugates were then stored at –20°C until used. Preparation of both horseradish peroxidase labelled rabbit anti–chicken IgY–HRP, proteins LA [9], L and G (SpLAG–anti–IgY–HRP) and horseradish peroxidase labelled proteins LA,L and G (SpLA–LG–HRP).

To 100 μl of anti–chicken–IgY–HRP (Sigma–Aldrich Co.) conjugate was added 100 μl of a commercial 0.1 M carbonate–bicarbonate buffer pH: 9.6, 200 μl of freshly prepared sodium periodate (1.7 mg/ml) was added and the mixture centrifuged (13,000×g; 10 min; RT). A mixture containing 30 μg each of SpLA [9] and SpL (Sigma) and 50 μg SpG (Sigma) was then added; before centrifugation (30 min; RT). Sodium borohydride (38 μl of a 5 mg NaHB4/ml plus 0.1 mM NaOH solution) was added and the mixture centrifuged (13,000×g; 10 min; RT in the dark). One volume of cold saturated ammonium sulphate solution was added and the mixture again centrifuged (13, 000×g, 25 min, 4°C). The pellet was resuspended in 200 μl of PBS pH 7.4 and dialysed against 1 L of the same buffer for 24 h with mild agitation and occasional buffer changes. An equal volume of glycerol was added to the dialysate followed by 100 μl of BSA (20 mg/ml). The conjugate was then stored at –20°C until used. A similar procedure was followed for the preparation of SpLA–LG–HRP conjugate except that an unlabelled HRP was used in the oxidation step (sodium periodate treatment). Analysis of conjugates by sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDSPAGE) and immunoblot analysis.The conjugates were analysed by SDSPAGE as described by Neville [10] and Justiz Vaillant et al. [11] using 10% acrylamide gels. Aliquots of 5–7 μg/μl of each protein conjugate and aliquots of 2–4 μg/μl of HRP, SpA or SpL (boiled for 5 min at 100°C in sample buffer containing 0.125 M TrisCl, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 2% 2–mercaptoethanol, pH 6.8, 10 ml) were electrophoresed at 150 V for 1 h. A MW marker (10–220 kDa, Sigma–Aldrich Co, St. Louis, Missouri) was included with each SDS–PAGE. Gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue.

Following electrophoresis the conjugates were blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (approximately 75 minutes at 40 mAmps using running buffer: 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, pH 8.3, 20% methanol, 0.5% SDS). The membranes were blocked by incubating 2 h in 10% non–fat dry milk in PBS (with 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.4). The membranes were washed 4×10 min with PBS–Tween 20 and incubated overnight at 4°C in human serum (diluted 1:100). The following day membranes were again washed 4×10 min with PBS–Tween 20. SpLAHRP (homemade) diluted 1:5000 was added to the membranes, which were incubated for 2 h at RT and the washing procedure was repeated. Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) solution (Sigma) was added to the membranes, which were then incubated in the dark at RT for 5 min after which the membranes were shaken gently, rinsed thoroughly in de–ionised water, dried and photographed.

IgG purification

A commercially prepared protein–A antibody purification kit (Sigma–Aldrich Co, St. Louis Missouri) based on affinity chromatography was used to purified IgG molecules from different species of sera including horse, donkey, mule, dog, skunk, coyote and raccoon. For the IgG purification were followed the manufacturer’s instructions [11].

Results and Discusion

As shown in Figure 1 the conjugates are high MW compounds ranging from between 80–90 kDa to greater than 220 kDa. Similar numbers of protein bands were found for all the conjugates. However SpLA–LG–HRP and SpLAG–anti–IgY–HRP were less polymeric than the other conjugates (Figure 2), which did not contain the commercial unlabelled SpLA. Immunoblot blot analysis (Figure 3) showed that all conjugates reacted with human serum IgG. The optimal working dilutions of conjugates range from 1:1000 to 1:5000. Figure 4 shows the 10% non–denaturing SDS–PAGE of sera and purified immunoglobulins (IgGs) by affinity chromatography using a commercial kit (Sigma– Aldrich Co St. Louis Missouri). The purified mammalian IgG had a MW of approximately 150 kDa.

chromatography-separation-techniques-Denaturing-SDS-PAGE

Figure 1: 10% Denaturing SDS-PAGE of chimeric conjugates: lane 1 molecular marker, lane 2 HRP, lane 3 SpA, land 4 SpL, lane 5 buffer, lane 6 SpLA-HRP, lane 7 SpG-HRP, lane 8 SpLAG-HRP, lane 9 SpLG-HRP and lane 10 SpAG. The conjugates are high molecular weight (MW) compounds ranging from between 80-90 kDa to greater than 220 kDa. Similar numbers of protein bands were found for all the conjugates.

chromatography-separation-techniques-Denaturing-SDS-PAGE

Figure 2: 10% Denaturing SDS-PAGE of SpLA-LG-HRP conjugate (lanes 1-2) about 30 kDa and SpLAG-anti-IgY-HRP conjugate (lanes 3-4) that was denatured by heat and protein bands are very faint. Lane 5 is the MW marker.

chromatography-separation-techniques-Denaturing-SDS-PAGE

Figure 3: Denaturing SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of chimeric conjugates: lane 1 MW marker, lane 2 SpLA-HRP (Sigma), lane 3 SpLAHRP (homemade), lane 4 SpLG-HRP (homemade), lane 5 SpG-HRP (home made), lane 6 SpAG-HRP (homemade), lane 7 SpLA-LG-HRP and lane 8 SpLAG-HRP (homemade). Immunoblot analysis showed that all chimeric conjugates reacted with human serum immunoglobulins and it also confirmed their polymeric nature.

chromatography-separation-techniques-SDS-PAGE

Figure 4: The 10% non-denaturing SDS-PAGE of sera and purified immunoglobulins (IgGs). Lane 1 MW marker, lane 2 mule serum, lane 3 mule IgG, lane 4 donkey serum, lane 5 donkey IgG, lane 6 horse serum, lane 7 horse IgG, lane 8 dog serum, lane 9 dog IgG, lane 10 skunk serum, lane 11 skunk IgG, lane 12 coyote serum, lane 13 coyote IgG, lane 14 raccoon serum and lane 15 raccoon IgG. A commercially prepared protein-A antibody purification kit (Sigma-Aldrich Co, St. Louis Missouri) based on affinity chromatography was used to purified IgG molecules from the above different mammalian sera. The purified mammalian IgG had a MW of approximately 150 kDa.

Potential uses of the conjugates include epidemiological surveys of infectious diseases affecting poultry and mammals aiding in the selection of healthy animals for human consumption and enhancement of this industry. For example, conjugates used as a tool in ELISAs could be used in the diagnosis of avian and mammalian diseases or zoonotic diseases affecting both animals and humans.

Conjugates including SpLA–HRP, SpLG–HRP, SpAG–HRP, SpLAG–HRP, SpLA–LG–HRP and SpLAG–anti–IgY–HRP proved to be efficient binding reagents having the capacities to react with human serum immunoglobulins. The periodate method was efficient in the successful preparation of the peroxidase–bacterial protein conjugates. Although the SDS–PAGE analyses of the conjugates showed the presence of horseradish peroxidase excess, it did not affect the sensitivity of the immunoblot analysis as the HRP is washed away in the washing procedures, where conjugates were tested. In future work for optimizing the preparation of these products, different molar concentrations of the enzyme and the bacterial Ig–receptors should be tested. The enzyme–protein ratio of 1:1 used here allowed the formation of stable compounds and did not affect the binding of the different conjugates to antibodies and substrates.

Conclusion

I conclude that the periodate method was effective to producing chimeric conjugates of peroxidase–labelled immunoglobulin–binding proteins and the immunoblot analysis showed that they were funtional and effective in reacting with human serum immunoglobulins.

References

  1. Richman DD, Cleveland P, Oxman M, Johnson K (1982) The binding of staphylococcal Protein A by the sera of different animals. J Immunol 5: 2300-2305.
  2. Higgins DA, Cromie RL, Liu SS, Magor KE, Warr GW (1995) Purification of duck immunoglobulins: an evaluation of protein A and protein G affinity chromatography. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 44: 169-180.
  3. Bjorck L (1988) Protein L. A novel bacterial cell wall protein with affinity for Ig L chains. J Immunol 140: 1194-1197.
  4. Stobel K, Schonberg A, Staak C (2002) A new non-species dependent ELISA for detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi s. l. in zoo animals. Int J Med Microbiol 29: 88-99.
  5. Perel'man EV, Bulk VF, Shchetinina EV, Noskov FS, Zhebrun AB (1986) Choice of the method for isolating conjugates of staphylococcal protein A with peroxidase for immunoenzyme analysis. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 10: 68-71.
  6. Yolken RH, Leister FJ (1981) Staphylococcal protein A-enzyme immunoglobulin conjugates: versatile tools for enzyme immunoassays. J Immunol Methods 43: 209-218.
  7. Nygren H, Hansson HA (1981) Conjugation of horseradish peroxidase to staphylococcal protein A with benzoquinone, glutaraldehyde, or periodate as cross-linking reagents. J Histochem Cytochem 29: 266-270.
  8. Nakane PK, Kawaoi A (1974) Peroxidase-labeled antibody A new method of conjugation. J Histochem Cytochem 22: 1084-1091.
  9. Svensson HG, Hoogenboom HR, Sjobring U (1998) Protein LA, a novel hybrid protein with unique single-chain Fv antibody- and Fab binding properties. Eur J Biochem 258: 890-896.
  10. Neville DM Jr (1971) Molecular weight determination of protein-dodecyl sulfate complexes by gel electrophoresis in a discontinuous buffer system. J Biol Chem 246: 6328-334.
  11. Justiz Vaillant AA, Akpaka PE, McFarlane-Anderson N, Smikle MP, Wisdom B (2012) Purification of Immunoglobulin Y (IgY) from the Ostrich (Struthio camelus) by Staphylococcal Protein A (SpA) Affinity Chromatography. J Chromat Separation Techniq 3: 127.
Citation: Justiz-Vaillant AA (2013) Preparation of Universal Peroxidase-Labelled Bacterial Protein Conjugates and Separation Properties. J Chromatograph Separat Techniq 4:188.

Copyright: © 2013 Justiz-Vaillant AA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top