Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology

Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9899

Commentary - (2018) Volume 9, Issue 5

View PDF Download PDF

Protective Effect of Secoisolariciresinol Diglycoside in Carbon Tetrachloride Induced Hepatotoxicity in Rats

Sadiq S Mareai1*, Khalid M Naji2, Kavishankar Gawli3 and J Rajesha3
1Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry Division, University of Thamar, Thamar, Yemen
2Department of Chemistry, University of Sannio, Yemen
3Department of Biochemistry, Yuvaraja's College, University of Mysore, Mysore-570005, Karnataka, India
*Corresponding Author: Sadiq S Mareai, Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry Division, University of Thamar, Thamar, Yemen Email:

Keywords: Synthetic SDG; Hepatotoxicity; SGOT; SGPT; SALP; Histopathology; CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity

Introduction

Liver is constantly exposed to environment toxicants and abused by poor drug habits, alcohol and over the counter drugs which can eventually lead to various liver ailment [1,2]. Thus, disease of the liver continues to be a worldwide health problem. Scientists face a serious challenge to International Public Health through different ways to discover adequate synthetic drugs for the treatment of liver ailments with very little side effects.

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) can be made in different ways within living organisms, normal aerobic respiration stimulates polymorphonuclear leukocytes and peroxisomes appear to be the main endogenous sources of most of the oxidants formed by cells. Exogenous sources of ROS include tobacco smoke, solvents, certain pollutants, pesticides and organic [3-5].

Oxidative stress produced from the toxic effects of free radicals on the tissues plays a key role in the pathogenesis of various pathological conditions such as ageing process, asthma, inflammation, mongolism, anemia, arthritis, neurodegeneration, Parkinson's disease, ischemia, and perhaps dementia [6]. Antioxidants protect the human body by scavenging free radicals, inhibiting lipid peroxidation and by other mechanisms thereby helping in preventing the free radical caused diseases [7].

Epidemiological studies have shown that diets rich in plants product are associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular diseases [8] and certain types of cancers [9]. These beneficial health effects have been attributed in part to the presence of phenolic compounds in dietary plants, which may exert their effects as a result of their antioxidant properties [10,11]. The antioxidant effect of lignans varies considerably according to their backbone structures and kind of functional groups present in their chemical structure.

The abundant major lignan found in flaxseed is Secoisolariciresinol Diglucoside (SDG) which has been shown to exert in vivo and in vitro antioxidant activities [12] and is effective against development of hypercholesterolemic atherosclerosis [13] and Type I and II diabetes [14]. Moreover, flaxseed SDG has got chemoprotective potential in both colon [15] and mammary [16] cancers and displayed greater efficacy in reducing deoxyribose oxidation and DNA strand breakage with maximum protection offered at 100 Μm [17].

Based on in vitro and in vivo studies, many classical antioxidants have been appeared to protect various cells like hepatocytes and nephrocytes against lipid peroxidation or inflammation, thereby preventing the occurrence of kidney damage, hepatic necrosis and other radical associated effects [18].

Therefore, the current study was undertaken to explore the hepatoprotective effects of synthetic SDG by measuring the levels of hepatic diagnostic enzymes markers, as also bilirubin level along with thymus and spleen indices and total protein in Wistar albino rats.

Materials and Methods

Drugs and chemicals

All the chemical solvents used in the experiments were of analytical grade from Ranbaxy Chemicals Ltd. (Mumbai, India). The diagnosis hepatic enzymes (SGOT, SGPT, SALP), Bilirubin and total Protein kit were procured from Span Diagnostics Ltd. (Surat, India). Standard Silymarin was purchased from Micro labs, Tamilnadu. India.

Synthesis of SDG

SDG was chemically synthesized from commercially available compounds. In brief, a novel five-step synthesis sequence starting from bromination of commercially available 3,4-dimethoxy toluene with Nbromo succinimide in presence of carbon tetrachloride to achieve 1,2- dimethoxy-4-bromomethylbenzene (1). Further stirring of compound (1) with 1,4-butanediol in presence of n-butyl lithium and DMF 2,3-bis afforded (3,4-dimethoxy benzyl) butane-1,4-diol (2). Sequential condensation of compound (2) with 2,3,4,6 tetra-o-acetyl α-D glucopyranosyl bromide gave 2,3- bis(3,4- dimethoxybenzyl)butane-1,4-O-tetra acetyl glucose (3). Compound, 2,3-bis(3,4- dimethoxybenzyl)butane-1,4 -O- glucose (4) was achieved by deacetylation of compound (3) and finally SDG was recovered via regioselective partial demethylation of compound (4).

Animals

Healthy Wistar albino rats of either sex weighing 180-220 g (40 in total) were used in the study. The rats were procured from the animal house of the Department of Studies in Zoology, University of Mysore. Mysore, India. They were housed in well ventilated polypropylene cages with paddy husk as bedding at room temperature (24°C ± 2°C) and relative humidity of 40% in hygienic condition. A 12/12-h light– dark day cycle was followed. All the animals were allowed to have free access to water ad libitum and fed with standard commercial pelleted rat diet (Bangalore, India).

The hepatoprotective activity of the synthetic SDG was tested using CCl4 model. The experiments were carried out based on the guidelines of ‘Committee for Prevention and Control of Scientific Experimentation on Animals’ (CPCSEA) New Delhi. All the experimental procedures and protocols used in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), University of Mysore, Mysore, India, ( Approval No :UOM/IAEC/ 01/2011). Prior to the start of experiments, the animals were allowed to acclimatize to laboratory conditions for a week.

The animals were randomly divided into eight groups, each consisting of five animals. Group-I (normal control) received normal saline solution orally (2 ml/kg); Group-II and III received olive oil with and without treatment of toxin, respectively. Group-IV (induction control) was given a single intraperitoneal dose of CCl4 (2.0 g/ kg b.w, I.P.). Group-V served as positive control and received orally 25 mg/kg b.w. of Silymarin mixed with olive oil. Group-VI and VII served as pretreatment groups and received synthetic SDG at 12.5 and 25 mg/kg b.w, per orally, respectively. Group-VIII served as post treatment group and received synthetic SDG (25 mg/kg b.w, P.O.) after injection of CCl4 (I.P.).

All groups were administered with their respective treatments for 14 consecutive days. The animals of Group-II, IV, V, VI and VII were given single dose of CCl4 (2.0 g/ kg b.w, I.P.) 6 h after the last feeding on the fourteenth day.

Assessment of hepatoprotective activity

Hepatoprotective activity was evaluated biochemically and histopathologically. After 24 h of CCl4 administration, the animals were anesthetized, weighed and dissected under ether anaesthesia. The liver, spleen and thymus were excised from the animal and weighed immediately. The thymus and spleen indices were calculated as for the following formula:

Thymus/spleen index=weight of thymus/spleen ÷ body weight × 100.

Blood samples were withdrawn from each rat by direct cardiac puncture under light ether anaesthesia. Blood samples were collected in previously labelled heparinized centrifuging tubes and allowed to clot for 30 min at room temperature. Serum was separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min and was used for analysing SGPT, SGOT, SALP [19,20], bilirubin [21] and total protein [22].

Liver from each animal was removed after dissection and preserved in 10% formalin for histopathological study. Representative blocks of liver tissues from each lobe were taken and possessed for paraffin embedding as for the standard microtechnique [23]. Sections (5 μm) of livers stained with hemotoxylin and eosin were used for histopathological studies.

Statistical analysis

The values are expressed as mean ± SD. The statistical analysis was carried out by One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by the Student’s t-test to determine the significant differences between treatments.

Results

Effect of synthetic SDG on thymus and spleen indices in CCl4 induced rats

It is believed that thymus and spleen are important immune organs, and their indices could partially reflect the immune function of the organism. The effects of different concentrations of synthetic SDG on thymus and spleen indices in Wistar albino rats are summarized in Figure 1.

cellular-immunology-thymus-spleen

Figure 1: Effect of synthetic SDG on thymus and spleen indices in CCl4 induced rats. Data were presented as means ± SD (n=5). #P<0.05, compared with normal group (PBS). *P<0.05, compared with CCl4 treated group. **P<0.01, compared with CCl4 treated group.

Administration of CCl4 (2.0 g/ kg b.w, I.P.) to Group IV rats caused a significant decrease (p<0.05) in both spleen and thymus indices compared to PBS treated rats (Group I). This indicated that immune functions of spleen and thymus of rats were diminished with CCl4 treatment. Treating rats with synthetic SDG at 12.5 mg/kg showed a significant increase (p<0.01) in spleen and thymus indices compared to CCl4 treated group. In addition, rats pretreated with synthetic SDG at 25 mg/kg showed a marked increase (p<0.05) in thymus and spleen indices compared to CCl4 treated group. Subsequently, posttreatment of synthetic SDG at 25 mg/kg showed significant effect (p<0.01) on thymus and spleen indices compared to CCl4 treated group. The restoration of thymus and spleen indices caused by synthetic SDG was dose dependent and comparable to that of silymarin treated animals (Group-V).

These results indicated that the immune function was reduced in animals treated with CCl4. However, treating rats with synthetic SDG at different doses produced significant and dose dependent increase in thymus and spleen indices. Therefore, it is evident that administration of synthetic SDG overcame the immunosuppressed action of CCl4.

Effect of synthetic SDG on biochemical parameters in CCl4 induced rats

The hepatocurative effect of synthetic SDG in CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity in albino rats at different doses was carried out. The results showed that, treatment of rats with CCl4 (Group-IV) caused a significant increase (p<0.01 ) in levels of SGOT, SGPT, SALP, bilirubin and also increase in liver weight and decrease in serum total protein when compared to normal control (Group-I). In contrast, pretreatment of rats with Silymarin (Group-V) for 14 consecutive days lowered significantly (p<0.05) the levels of SGOT, SGPT, SALP and bilirubin and restored the serum total protein.

The rats pretreated with synthetic SDG (Group-VI & VII) demonstrated dose dependent control of elevation of the biochemical parameters. Pretreatment of rats with synthetic SDG at 12.5 and 25 mg/kg for 14 consecutive days significantly (p<0.05) controlled the elevation of biochemical parameters which is comparable with Silymarin (Group-V). Post treatment with synthetic SDG of rats intoxicated with carbon tetrachloride, illustrated significant (p<0.05) recovery of biochemical parameters when compared to CCl4 treated rats (Group-IV). Table also shows the comparison of effects among the untreated (normal control), CCl4 treated (induction control) and silymarin treated (standard) group with different doses of synthetic SDG treated group of rats. The synthetic SDG exhibited significant protection against CCl4-induced liver injury as manifested by the reduction in toxin mediated rise in SGPT, SGOT and SALP level of rats.

Effect of synthetic SDG on histology of CCl4 induced rats liver

Histopathological results provided supportive evidence for biochemical findings. Histology of liver section of one animal from each group is presented in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 2(A), liver section of normal control rat (Group-I) exhibited distinct hepatic cells, the central vein is seen and there is no visible lesion, the sinusoids are normal and the epithelium lining is also seen. CCl4 induced liver damage can be observed directly in Figure 2(D), where the section shows total loss of hepatic architecture, massive fatty change, necrosis, lymphocyte infiltration, loss of cellular boundaries, and joining together of nucleus. In addition congestion of sinusoids, Kupffer cell hyperplasia, crowding of central vein and apoptosis are also evident.

cellular-immunology-liver-histopathology

Figure 2: Photomicrographs showing the effect of Synthetic SDG (12.5 and 25 mg/kg) and Silymarin on liver histopathology of CCl4 treated rats. (A) Liver section of normal group; (B) Olive oil +intoxicated with CCl4 group; (C) Olive oil group ; (D) CCl4 control group; (E) Silymarin (25 mg/kg)+intoxicated with CCl4 group ;(F) SDG (12.5 mg/kg)+intoxicated with CCl4 group; (G) SDG (25 mg/kg)+intoxicated with CCl4 group; (H) intoxicated with CCl4+SDG (25 mg/kg) group. (Magnification 10X).

Rats treated with Silymarin (Figure 2(E)) show less necrosis and almost normal liver architecture with no obvious necrosis as compared to CCl4 treated rats section (2(D)). Sections of Figure 2 (F and G) pretreated groups with SDG (12.5 and 25 mg/kg) show gradual recovery of hepatic architecture and fatty changes and the central vein is seen and the sinusoids are having hepatitis alteration. Only very slight lymphocyte infiltration is observed in Figure 2G. These sections are nearly comparable to the silymarin treated group. In the posttreatment with 25 mg/kg SDG of intoxic rats for 14 consecutive days, section suggests moderate degree of damage, with some fatty change, necrosis, and lymphocyte infiltration (Figure 2H). The overall histopathological examination reveals hepatic degeneration, necrosis and fatty infiltration in CCl4 treated rats indicating liver damage and the histopathology results suggest that this damage could be overcome by utilizing SDG up to 25 mg/kg as this concentration will not have any adverse effects on human liver.

Discussion

The possible role of hepatoprotective activity of synthetic SDG in carbon tetrachloride induced hepatotoxicity has been demonstrated. CCl4 is commonly used hepatotoxin in the experimental study of liver ailments. The CCl4 hepatotoxic effects are primarily due to production of free radicals [24]. Thus, it was extensively used as a liver toxicant, and its metabolites such as trichloromethyl radical (CCl3S) and trichloromethyl peroxyl radical (CCl3O2S) are found to be involved in the liver pathogenesis [25]. The biotransformation of CCl4 by the cytochrome P450 system produces free radicals (CCl3S, CCl3O2S), which in turn bind to cell membranes and organelles to elicit lipid peroxidation [26]. The massive production of free radicals in CCl4 caused liver damage provokes a sharp increase in lipid peroxidation in liver due to the increase in interaction of these free radicals with phospholipids structure and finally destroying the organ structure [27].

The several doses influence of synthetic SDG has been investigated for their efficacy in controlling the CCl4 induced liver damage. The findings of the current study proved that the treatment of CCl4 intoxicated rats with synthetic SDG restored the depleted thymus and spleen indices. The increase in thymus and spleen indices suggested that SDG effectively stimulated the immune function of treated rats. SDG showed significant effects on both thymus and spleen indices as shown in Figure 1. Thymus is the organ in which T-lymphocytes develop, differentiate, and mature, while spleen contains T and B-cells. The SDG acts on T and B-lymphocytes resulting in different effects on spleen and thymus indices in treated albino rats. However, to understand the exact mechanism requires further and in-depth investigations.

Liver function can be determined by estimating the activities of SGPT, SGOT, and SALP which are enzymes originally present in cytoplasm with high concentration. These enzymes are leaked into the blood stream in conformity with the extent of liver damage when there is hepatopathy [23]. These enzymes are used as diagnostic indicators of hepatic injury. SGOT, SGPT, SALP and serum bilirubin are the most sensitive tests employed in the diagnosis of hepatic diseases [28,29]. The major release of these enzymes from the cells are indicative of cellular leakage and loss of functional integrity of the cell membrane in liver [30,31] and this could be as a result of hepatocyte necrosis or abnormal membrane permeability. SGOT is a sensitive indicator of acute damage of liver and elevation of this enzyme in non-hepatic diseases is unusual. SGPT is more selectively a liver parenchymal enzyme than SGOT [32].

It is believed that liver damage is reflected by an increase in the levels of hepatospecific enzymes; these are cytoplasmic and are released into circulation when cellular damage occurs [33].

CCl4-treated rats experiment extensive liver damage induced by toxin. The elevated levels of these marker enzymes in the current study were observed in Group IV rats. However, during the study, reduction of SGOT, SGPT and SALP concentrations were observed due to the influence of SDG (Table 1).

Group Treatment Total Bilirubin mg/dL direct Bilirubin mg/dL Indirect Bilirubin mg/dL SGOT U/L SGPT U/L SALP U/L Total Protein g/dL
I PBS (Control) 0.882 ± 0.04  0.164 ± 0.02 0.402 ± 0.02 389.3 ± 5.6 77.38 ± 4.74 199.72 ± 6.1 7.1 ± 0.62
II CCl4+Olive oil 3.15 ± 0.05  1.56 ± 0.278 2.09 ± 0.24 920.2 ± 22.3 401.6 ± 14.15 493.4 ± 11.78 4.81 ± 0.72
III Olive oil  0.788 ± 0.05  0.152 ± 0.028 0.268 ± 0.04 340.2 ± 5.4 67.64 ± 3.67 198.64 ± 11.14 6.98 ± 0.29
IV CCl4  3.44 ± 0.42d  1.72 ± 0.319d 2.22 ± 0.37d 1120.6 ± 242d 569.1 ± 7.38d  526.2 ± 22.77d 4.44 ± 0.45d
V CCl4+Silymarin 25 mg/kg 1.67 ± 0.05c  0.157 ± 0.03c 0.202 ± 0.9a 360.6 ± 9.44b 78.6 ± 3.0a 190.2 ± 3.83a 7.82 ± 0.645b
VI CCl4+SDG 12.5 mg/kg 1.786 ± 0.04a 0.276 ± 0.05b 0.396 ± 0.2b  454.24 ± 6.3c 115.2 ± 2.46c 259. 4 ± 3.75b  5.96 ± 0.24b
VII CCl4+SDG 25 mg/kg 1.284 ± 0.056c  0.142 ± 0.09c 0.198 ± 0.1a 389.8 ± 3.96a  88.4 ± 3.70a 197.9 ± 3.6c 8.85 ± 0.35a
VIII *SDG 25 mg/kg+CCl4 1.182 ± 0.046a 0.136 ± 0.07a 0.218 ± 0.09c  378.4 ± 3.05a 94.6 ± 3.1a 186 ± 2.74a  6.62 ± 0.39c
Values are mean ± SD, (n=5); number of rats used in each group=5; aP<0.001 compared to respective CCl4 treated group (IV). bP <0.05 compared to respective CCl4 treated group (IV). cP<0.01 compared to respective CCl4 treated group (IV). dP<0.01 compared to respective control group (I). *Pre-treatment group.

Table 1: Effects of synthetic SDG administration on the levels of SGOT, SGPT, SALP, Bilirubin and Protein in serum of CCl4 induced rats.

Bilirubin is considered as one of the most useful clinical clues to the severity of necrosis and its accumulation is a measure of binding, conjugation and excretory capacity of hepatocyte. SDG treatment decreased serum bilirubin level in liver damage induced by CCl4, indicating the effect of SDG in normalizing the liver functions.

In this study, significant increases in total bilirubin content and SGOT, SGPT and SALP activities in the CCl4 treated group are the indicatives of liver damage. SDG treatment attenuated the CCl4 induced increase in total bilirubin and SGOT, SGPT and SALP activities. CCl4 induces dramatically increase in liver weight due to blocking the secretion of hepatic triglycerides in plasma [34]. The increase in liver weight in rats was overcome with the administration of either Silymarin or SDG in dose dependent manner. The histological observations of liver of studied animals induced by CCl4 administration provided complementary evidence to prove that pre and post treatment with synthetic SDG attenuated the cytoplasmatic changes. This effect could be attributable to the antioxidant activity of SDG, which normalizes the oxidative threat caused by CCl4 and restored normal physiological functions.

The mechanism by which synthetic SDG offers protection towards CCl4-induced hepatocellular metabolic alterations could be due to inducing microsomal enzymes either by accelerating the detoxification and excretion of CCl4 or by inhibition of lipid peroxidation through inhibition of cytochrome P-450 aromatase favoring liver regeneration.

Conclusion

The present study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of synthetic SDG on the liver functions in CCl4 induced injuries. Enzymatic activities, bilirubin and microscopic appearance of liver were used as parameters and hepatocurative studies were performed. Activities of SGPT, SGOT and SALP in serum were increased in CCl4-intoxicated rats. A marked elevation in the concentration of bilirubin was observed in the hepatotoxin-treated rats. The findings of the study have shown the ability of SDG to recover from the CCl4 damage hepatic enzymes, bilirubin and thymus and spleen indices levels to almost the normal levels and restore the normal functioning of the liver. The severe necrosis and disappearance of nuclei in liver histology of CCl4-treated rats which could be due to the formation of highly reactive radicals were very much reduced in rats treated with synthetic SDG. The current study results provide scientific bases to the use of SDG in liver disease and can be used to compensate the declining activities of antioxidant enzymes and thereby reduce the risks of lipid peroxide.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to the Departments of Biochemistry, YCM, University of Mysore, Mysore, for providing facilities and financial assistance. Authors are also thankful to DOS in Zoology, UOM, Mysore, for providing animals and infrastructure facilities and to CFTRI, Mysore for their encouragement and help in carrying out the research work. SSM acknowledges the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Republic of Yemen for granting research fellowship.

References

  1. Sharma A, Chakraborti S, Handa SS, Chakraborti KK (1991) Anti-hepatotoxic activity of some Indian herbal formulations as compared to silymarin. Fitoterapia 62: 229-235.
  2. Subramonium A, Pushpangadan P (1999) Development of phytomedicines for liver diseases. Indian J Pharmacol 31: 166-175.
  3. Davies KJA (1994) Oxidative stress the paradox of aerobic life. Biochem Soc Symp 61: 134.
  4. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM (1989) Free radicals in biology and medicine. UK: Clarendon Press Oxford.
  5. Robinson EE, Maxwell SRJ, Thorpe GHG (1997) An investigation of antioxidant activity of black tea using enhanced chemiluminescence. Free Rad Res 26: 291–302.
  6. Mahakunakorn P, Tohda M, Murakami Y, Matsumoto K, Watanabe H (2004) Antioxidant and free radical-scavenging activity of Choto-san and its related constituents. Biol Pharm Bul 27: 38-46.
  7. Miller N J, Rice-Evans C (1997) Factors influencing the antioxidant activity determined by the ABTS radical cation assay. Free Rad Res 26: 195-199.
  8. Bazzano LA, He J, Ogden LG, Loria CM, Vupputuri S, et al. (2002) Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease in US adults: The first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am J Clin Nutr 76:93-99.
  9. Block G, Patterson B, Subar A (1992) Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: A review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Cancer 18: 1-29.
  10. Hertog MG, Feskens EJ, Hollman PC, Katan MB, Kromhout D (1993) Dietary antioxidant flavonoids and risk of coronary heart disease: the Zutphen Elderly Study. Lancet 342: 1007-1011.
  11. Knekt P, Jarvinen R, Seppanen R, Hellovaara M, Teppo L, et al. (1997) Dietary flavonoids and the risk of lung cancer and other malignant neoplasms. Am J Epidemiol 146: 223-230.
  12. Rajesha J, Kotamballi N, Chidambara M, Karun KM, Basavaraj M, et al. (2006) Antioxidant potentials of flaxseed by in vivo model. J Agric Food Chem 54: 3794-3799.
  13. Prasad K, Kalra J (1993) Oxygen free radicals and hypercholesterolemic atherosclerosis: Effect of vitamin E. Am Heart J 125: 958-973.
  14. Prasad K (1998) Prevention of IDDM in BBdp rats by secoisolariciresinol diglucoside (SDG) isolated from flaxseed. Diabetes 47: A360.
  15. Jenab M, Thompson LU (1996) The influence of flaxseed and lignans on colon carcinogenesis and b- glucuronidase activity. Carcinogenesis 17: 1343-1348.
  16. Serraino M, Thompson LU (1991) The effect of flaxseed supplementation and early markers of mammary carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 60: 135-142.
  17. Kitts DD, Yuan YV, Wijewickreme AN, Thompson LU (1999) Antioxidant activity of the flaxseed lignin secoisolariciresinol diglycoside and its mammalian lignan metabolites enterodiol and enterolactone. Mol Cell Biochem 202: 91-100.
  18. Hsio G, Shen MY, Lin KH, Lan MH, Wu Li-Yu, et al. (2003) Antioxidant & hepatoprotective effects of Anthodia canphore extracts. J Agric Food Chem 512: 3302-3308.
  19. Reitman S, Frankel S (1957) In vitro determination of tranaminase activity in serum. Am J Clin Pathol 28: 56.
  20. Kind PRN, King EJ (1954) Estimation of plasma phosphatase by determination of hydrolysed phenol with amino antipyrine. J Clin Pathol 7: 322.
  21. Jendrassik L, Grof P (1938) Simplified photometric methods for the determination of the blood bilirubin. Biochemische Zeitschrift 297: 81-89.
  22. Gornall AG, Bardwill CJ, David MM (1949) Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reaction. J Biol Chem 177: 751-756.
  23. Nkosi CZ, Opoku AR, Terblanche SE (2005) Effect of pumpkin seed (Cucurbita pepo) protein isolate on the activity levels of certain plasma enzymes in CCl4-induced liver injury in lowprotein fed rats. Phy the Res 19: 341-345.
  24. Shenoy KA, Somayaji SN, Bairy KL (2001) Hepatoprotective effects of Ginkgo biloba against carbon tetrachloride induced hepatic injury in rats. Indian J Pharmacol 33: 260-266.
  25. Recknagael R (1967) Carbontetrachloride hepatotoxicity. Pharmacol Rev 19: 145-196.
  26. Recknagel RO, Glende EA, Dolak JA, Waller RLC (1989) Mechanism of carbon tetrachloride toxicity. Pharmacol Ther 43: 139-154.
  27. Gil MI, Tomas-Barberan FA, Hesspierce B, Holecroft DM, Kader AA (2000) Antioxidant activity of pomegranate juice and its relationship with phenolic composition and processing. J Agric Food Chem 48: 4581-4589.
  28. Harper HA (1961) The functions and tests of the liver, In: Review of physiological chemistry. Los Altos, California: Lange Medical Publishers 271-283.
  29. Sathiyanarayanan L, Arulmozhi S, Chidambaranathan N (2006) Anticholesterolemic, hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity of Glinus lotoides Linn. against ethanol induced liver damage in rats. Phcog Mag 2: 160-162.
  30. Drotman RB, Lawhorn GT (1978) Serum enzymes as indicators of chemical induced liver damage. Drug Chem Toxicol 1: 163-171.
  31. Abul K, Najmi KK, Pillai SN, Aqil PM (2005) Free radical scavenging and hepatoprotective activity of jigrine against galactosamine induced hepatopathy in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 97: 521-25.
  32. Shah M, Patel P, Phadke M, Menon S, Francis M, et al. (2002) Evaluation of the effect of aqueous extract from powders of root, stem, leaves and whole plant of phyllanthus debilis against CCL4 induced rat liver dysfunction. IDMA 39: 333–337.
  33. Sallie R, Tredger JM, William R (1991) Drug and the liver. Biopharm. Drug Disp12: 251-259.
  34. Aniya Y, Koyama T, Miyagi C, Miyahira M, Inomata C, et al. (2005) Free radical scavenging and hepatoprotective actions of the medicinal herb, Crassocephalum crepietioides from Okinowa islands. Biol Pharm Bul 28: 19-23.
Citation: Mareai SS, Naji KM, Gawli K, Rajesha J (2018) Protective Effect of Secoisolariciresinol Diglycoside in Carbon Tetrachloride Induced Hepatotoxicity in Rats. J Clin Cell Immunol 9: 567.

Copyright: © 2018 Mareai SS, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top