International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology

International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology
Open Access

ISSN: 2469-9837

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2015) Volume 2, Issue 3

Providing Daily Physical Education to Improve the Health and Fitness Levels of African American Youth

Reed JA1* and Hughey M2
1Associate Professor of Health Sciences, Furman University Greenville, SC 29613, Columbia, USA
2Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior Arnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina 915 Greene Street, Room 529 Columbia, USA
*Corresponding Author: Reed JA, Associate Professor of Health Sciences, Furman University Greenville, SC 29613, Columbia, USA, Tel: 864-294-2328 Email:

Abstract

Background: The purpose was to examine the effects of 45 minutes of daily physical education on the fitness performance of African American elementary and middle school youth. Methods: A pre/post-test design was used with repeated measures analysis of variance. Experimental and control school participants were pre-tested (September 2010) and post-tested (May 2011) on the FitnessgramR physical fitness items (e.g., aerobic capacity, muscular strength and muscular endurance). Results: Experimental elementary school females and males significantly improved on all sections of FitnessgramR’s fitness battery at the post-test assessment; whereas, there were no significant improvements among control elementary school females. Experimental elementary school females improved on aerobic capacity and push-ups significantly more than control elementary school females (P=0.025, P<0.0001, respectively). Experimental elementary school males improved on aerobic capacity, curl-ups, and push-ups significantly more than control elementary school males (P=0.048, P=0.0002, P=0.048, respectively). Consequently, experimental middle school females improved on these two assessments significantly more than control middle school females (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, respectively). Experimental middle school males significantly improved on all sections of FitnessgramR’s fitness battery at post-assessment; control middle school males only significantly improved on pushups. Conclusions: Providing 45 minutes of daily physical education can increase the fitness levels of African American youth.

Keywords: Physical education, Fitness levels

Introduction

Two decades ago a seminal paper entitled: Physical Education’s Role in Public Health [1], clearly defined the role of public health in regards to the importance of daily physical education [1]. Twenty years later, the authors re-examined the rationale and goals of their original work in Physical Education’s Role in Public Health: Steps Forward and Backward over 20 Years and HOPE for the Future [2].

Apparent from this retrospection is the continued importance of quality physical education to reduce society’s ills linked to obesity, inactivity and physical education’s role to improve the health and fitness of youth. Furthermore, the fitness levels of youth impact their ability to be physically active and low levels of fitness are linked to diabetes and cardiovascular disease [3]. However, the physical activity levels of youth continue to decline and childhood obesity remains a dangerous health threat. More than 33% of adolescents, approximately 25 million American children, are overweight or obese [4]. Overweight children and adolescents, compared to their non-obese peers, are more likely to have high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes [5]. These overweight children are more likely to become obese adults [6,7]. Moreover, a disparity in obesity exists between minority and non-minority youth. Overweight and obesity rates are disproportionately higher among African American and Hispanic children and adolescents compared to White children and adolescents, putting minority populations at more risk for health complications associated with obesity [8]. Due to the disproportionate rates of obesity among minority groups, reducing disparities in obesity across racial groups has been identified as a major public health goal [9].

Participating in regular physical activity, a widely accepted preventive behavior, not only contributes to the overall health of youth but can also improve fitness and reduce the prevalence of obesity. Unfortunately, physical activity levels decline precipitously once children enter adolescence [6,7]. Females of all ages are less active than males--with adolescent girls less likely to meet the 60-minute per day activity recommendation compared to boys [7,10].

Physical education is where youth learn essential skills to become physically active adults--yet less than 4% and 8% of US public elementary and middle schools, respectively, provide daily physical education [11]. Evidence has demonstrated that increasing physical education by 60 minutes can substantially lower child body mass index (BMI) and odds of becoming obese [12]. Legacy Charter School is the only public school in South Carolina to provide all children, in all grade levels, 45 minutes of physical education, five days a week

The primary purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of providing 45 minutes of daily physical education on the health and fitness performance of African American elementary and middle school youth attending a Title I charter school in South Carolina. The following purpose statement guided this study: a) purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of 45 minutes of daily physical education on FitnessgramR physical fitness tests [e.g., aerobic capacity (PACER), muscular strength and muscular endurance (Push-up and Curl-up)] [13]. One Title I elementary control school and one Title I middle control school were identified and utilized as comparisons

Methods

Background on legacy charter school and title I

Legacy Charter School is a public Title I school. The purpose of Title I is to improve the academic achievement of the disadvantaged and to ensure that all children in the US have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on challenging state academic achievement standards and state academic assessments [14]. Ninety-percent of all children attending Legacy Charter School are African American.

Physical education at experimental school and control schools

In the fall of 2009, Legacy Charter School in Greenville, South Carolina implemented a policy to provide 45 minutes of daily physical education to all students, kindergarten through high school. The physical education requirement for Greenville County School District for elementary schools (i.e., control) is 45 minutes-one day a week for grades 2nd-5th. Middle schools (i.e., control) provide 50 minutes of daily physical education for one semester in grades 6th-8th. Physical education at Legacy Charter School and both control schools were taught by certified physical education instructors. Elementary school physical education content at both the experimental school and control school utilized a developmental curriculum with an emphasis on fundamental skills. Middle school physical education at both the experimental school and control school utilized a multi-activity sport theme curriculum. Control middle school students in grades 6th-8th received 50 minutes of daily physical education daily for the fall semester only. Elementary control school students in grades 2nd-5th received only 45 minutes of physical education one day per week for the entire school year. All teachers and Legacy Charter School and both controls were certified by the state to teach physical education and are in good standing from the State’s Department of Education.

Testing physical fitness using FitnessgramR

All participants completing the Informed Consent at the experimental and control schools enrolled in grades 2nd-8th participated in the present study. Internal Review Board (IRB) procedures were strictly followed. A pre/post-test design was utilized in the present study. Legacy Charter School and control school participants were pre-tested on FitnessgramR physical fitness test items during the first week of September, 2010. Study participants were posttested at the end of the school year during the last two weeks of May, 2011. FitnessgramR physical fitness test items were administered by each school’s physical educator(s) assisted by the research staff.

Measures of Physical Fitness Using FitnessgramR

FitnessgramR was developed by the Cooper Institute [13] in an effort to provide physical educators with a tool that would facilitate communicating fitness testing results to students and to parents. Fitnessgram’sR physical fitness assessment program includes a variety of health related physical fitness tests designed to assess aerobic capacity (PACER), muscular strength, and muscular endurance (Pushup/ Curl-up). There are several types of standards commonly used with fitness tests. FitnessgramR uses criterion-referenced health standards or standards associated with good health. Scientific information is used to determine the amount of fitness needed to meet minimum health levels. PACER (time in seconds to complete a 15-meter shuttle run for elementary school and a 20-meter shuttle run for middle school), push-ups (total no. possible), and curl-ups (total no. possible with a maximum of 75) are all evaluated as three separate continuous outcomes.

Institutional testing of FitnessgramR

Institutional Testing per FitnessgramR manual is designed to help teachers and educators determine the fitness level of groups of participants at the experimental and control schools. It is important to note that fitness scores will typically be higher at the end of the school year than they are at the beginning of the school year because the students are ¾ of a year older. Older students do better on fitness tests than younger students [13] Furthermore, a significant amount of fitness test performance can be explained by heredity [15-17]. Although maturation and heredity contribute to physical fitness, so does frequency and duration of physical education time.

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed with SAS version 9.2. Descriptive statistics were computed for the experimental and control schools by demographics using chi-square tests and t-tests. 2 × 2 repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), a mixed effect linear model, was used to evaluate the effectiveness of 45 minutes of daily physical education on fitness performance (e.g., aerobic capacity, muscular strength and muscular endurance). Each analysis was stratified by gender and grade level (elementary school/middle school) and adjusted by age to help control for baseline differences by school. The mean change within school (experimental/controls) across time (pre/ post), between schools at each time point, and the interaction between time and school was estimated for each outcome. The unstructured, compound symmetry or first-order autoregressive correlation structure was controlled for serial autocorrelation. Akaike’s Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion were used to select among correlation structures. The data met all assumptions required of a mixed effect linear model. All P-values are two sided with α=0.05

Results

Participants

Two Title I schools (one elementary and one middle) were identified as controls; however, the demography of the student population at the two control schools differed from the experimental school. Therefore, oversampling techniques were utilized to identify a representative comparison sample of participants at both control schools. Control school administrators oversampled by grade level to provide additional classes with African American youth in grades 2nd-8th to serve as comparisons. The differences in demographics among the participants in grades 2nd-8th from the experimental and control schools are listed in Table 1.

Demographics Experimental
N=374
Control
N=290
P-value
Gender, n (%)
Male 194 (51.9) 151 (52.2) 0.960
Female 180 (48.1) 139 (47.9)
Age (years), mean (std) 10.5 (2.1) 11.4 (1.8) <0.0001
Grade Level, n (%)
Elementary school 185 (49.5) 77 (26.6) <0.0001
Middle school 189 (50.5) 213 (73.5)

Table 1: Participants from experimental school and control schools by demographics, N=664.

FitnessgramR Findings: Aerobic Capacity, Muscular Strength, and Muscular Endurance

Elementary school

Experimental elementary school females significantly improved on all sections of FitnessgramR’s fitness battery at the post-test assessment; whereas, there were no significant improvements among the control elementary school females (Table 2). Furthermore, experimental elementary school females who received 45 minutes of daily physical education improved on aerobic capacity and push-ups significantly more than the control elementary school females (P=0.025, P<0.0001, respectively).

  ES & Female ES & Male
FitnessgramRTests Experimental Control Experimental - Control P-value† Experimental Control Experimental - Control P-value†
Pacer-Pre 20.7 25.3 -4.6 (-9.4, 0.1) 0.025 17.4 16.7 0.7 (-3.2, 4.7) 0.048
Pacer -Post 28.5 27.9 0.6 (-4.8, 6.0)   22.0 17.6 4.4 (0.3, 8.5)*  
Pacer -
Post-Pre
7.8 (5.4, 10.2)* 2.6 (-1.3, 6.5)     4.6 (2.8, 6.4)* 1.0 (-2.2, 4.1)    
Curl up-Pre 18.8 31.0 -12.3 (-18.3, -6.2)* <0.0001 12.6 22.0 -9.4 (-14.2, -4.6)* 0.0002
Curl up -Post 29.3 28.7 0.6 (-5.7, 6.9)   21.1 22.0 -0.9 (-5.8, 4.0)  
Curl up -
Post-Pre
10.5 (7.3, 13.8)* -2.4 (-7.6, 2.8)     8.6 (6.4, 10.8)* 0.1 (-3.7, 3.8)    
Push up-Pre 12.4 6.7 5.7 (2.8, 8.5)* 0.328 6.9 7.8 -1.0 (-3.3, 1.4) 0.048
Push up -Post 15.0 8.0 7.1 (4.1, 10.0)*   11.1 9.3 1.8 (-1.5, 5.0)  
Push up -
Post-Pre
2.7 (1.2, 4.2)* 1.3 (01.1, 3.7)     4.2 (2.9, 5.6)* 1.5 (-0.8, 3.8)    
  MS and Female MS and Male
FitnessgramRTests Experimental Control Experimental - Control P-value† Experimental Control Experimental - Control P-value†
Pacer-Pre 27.7 23.6 4.1 (-0.1, 8.4) <0.0001 18.4 14.4 4.0 (1.4, 6.6)* <0.0001
Pacer -Post 38.2 15.7 22.5 (17.8, 27.3)*   28.7 7.5 21.2 (18.2, 24.2)*  
Pacer -Post-Pre 10.5 (7.4, 13.5)* -7.9 (-10.8, -5.1)*     10.3 (8.0, 12.6)* -6.9 (-8.9, -5.0)*    
Curl up-Pre 36.5 38.6 -2.2 (-8.9, 4.6) <0.0001 21.3 24.0 -2.7 (-7.2, 1.7) <0.0001
Curl up -Post 52.7 24.0 28.7 (20.6, 36.9)*   33.4 14.0 19.4 (14.2, 24.6)*  
Curl up -Post-Pre 16.2 (9.5, 22.9)* -14.6 (-20.8, -8.6)*     12.1 (7.9, 16.3)* -10.0 (-13.6, -6.4)*    
Push up-Pre 13.7 6.3 7.4 (5.3, 9.4)* 0.141 6.1 5.7 0.4 (-1.4, 2.3) 0.184
Push up -Post 14.7 5.7 8.9 (6.9, 11.0)*   10.2 11.4 -1.2 (-3.7, 1.3)  
Push up -
Post-Pre
1.0 (-0.6, 2.5) -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)     4.1 (2.2, 5.9)* 5.7 (4.1, 7.3)*    
†Test for an interaction between school and time.
Differences may vary due to rounding.
*P<0.05.
†Test

Table 2: Age-adjusted FitnessgramR test scores.

Similarly, experimental elementary school males significantly improved on all sections of FitnessgramR’s fitness battery at the posttest assessment; whereas, there were no significant improvements among the control elementary school males. In addition, experimental elementary school males who received 45 minutes of daily physical education improved on aerobic capacity, curl-ups, and push-ups significantly more than the control elementary school males (P=0.048, P=0.0002, P=0.048, respectively).

Middle School

Experimental middle school females significantly improved on aerobic capacity and curl-ups at the post-test assessment; whereas, there was a significant drop in aerobic capacity and curl-ups at the post-test assessment among control middle school females. Consequently, experimental middle school females who received 45 minutes of daily physical education improved on these two assessments significantly more than the control elementary school females (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, respectively).

Experimental middle school males significantly improved on all sections of FitnessgramR’s fitness battery at the post-test assessment; whereas, control middle school males only significantly improved on push-ups. Experimental control school males who received 45 minutes of daily physical education improved on aerobic capacity and curl-ups significantly more than the control middle school males (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, respectively). Moreover, there was a significant drop in aerobic capacity and curl-ups at the post-test assessment among the control middle school males.

Discussion

Fitness is essential to health [3] and participation in physical activity can improve the fitness levels of youth. Recent data demonstrates that low cardiorespiratory fitness is a greater contributor to mortality than traditional risk factors [18]. Regrettably, South Carolina is one of the nation’s leaders in the percentage of children (50%) who do not participate in afterschool team sports or lessons and 83% of high school students currently do not attend daily physical education when in school [19]. Furthermore, 65% of high school students currently do not attend physical education classes in an average week [19]. The CDC’s State Indicator Report on Physical Activity for 2010 14 found that only 20% of high school students are physically active and 49% of middle school and 67% of high school students respectively, did not meet recommended levels of physical activity; and 38% of middle school and 66% of high school students, respectively do not attend physical education classes at least once a week [19].

Findings from the South Carolina Obesity Burden Report disseminated in 2011 found that 30% of all South Carolina high school students were either overweight or obese, with males (32.3%) more likely to be overweight or obese than females (26.8%). Although 16.3% of all high school students were considered overweight, the percent of female students who were overweight (18.4%) was greater than the percent of male students who were overweight (14.3%).

There were differences by race/ethnicity for both overweight and obese [8]. Though 16.3% of all SC high school students were considered overweight, the percent of African American high school students who were overweight (23.4%) was greater than the percent of overweight among their White counterparts (12.6%) [8]. This disparity increases when considering high school students who are obese. While 13.3% of all high school students are considered obese, the percent of African American students who were obese (17.6%) was also greater than the percent of overweight among their White counterparts (9.9%) [8].

The CDC provide several strategies schools can utilize to help students meet national physical activity recommendations-without negatively impacting academic performance that include increasing the amount of time students spend in physical education [7].

Conclusions

Findings from the present study demonstrate that providing 45 minutes of daily physical education can enhance fitness among African American youth. The US public school system functions as an egalitarian institution. Regardless of race, ethnicity, socio-economic status or gender, all children have the right to attend public school. For many children, it is their only opportunity to be physically active. The current emphasis on performance pedagogy and standardized testing such as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), have led many school districts to reduce physical education offerings. In extreme cases the amount of daily recess has also been drastically reduced or eliminated to increase classroom contact hours in an effort to boost test scores adversely affecting their overall health and their fitness levels [20].

Limitations

The primary limitation in the present study was the variability in sample sizes among the experimental and control schools. The experimental school in the present study is a small neighborhood Title I charter school with limited enrollment. A representative sub-sample of elementary and middle school control participants was re-analyzed following the initial analysis of the data. This analysis yielded similar results suggesting that sample size differential did not statistically affect the results.

The demography of the two control schools was also a limitation in the present study. Oversampling techniques were utilized to identify enough minority participants in grades 2nd-8th to serve as controls. Although the physical education curriculum at the experimental and control schools mirrored each other-the lessons were not identical.

Acknowledgements

Support for this project was provided by Campbell Young Leaders.

References

  1. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL (1991) Physical education’s role in public health. Res Q Exerc Sport 62: 124-37.
  2. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Beets MW, Beighle A, Erwin H (2012) Physical education’s role in public health: steps forward and backward over 20 years and HOPE for the future. Res Q Exerc Sport 83: 125-35.
  3. Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, Taylor B, Rehm J, et al. (2009) The Preventable Causes of Death in the United States: Comparative Risk Assessment of Dietary, Lifestyle, and Metabolic Risk Factors. In: Hales S (ed). PLoS Med 6: e1000058.
  4. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, et al. (2006) Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. J Am Med Assoc 295: 1549-55.
  5. Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJR, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, et al. (2005) Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr 146: 732-7.
  6. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report (2008) United States Department of Health and Human Services.
  7. Center for Disease Control (2010) The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services 84.
  8. Simeon R (2011) South Carolina obesity burden report. SC Department of Health and Environmental Control/Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity & Obesity.
  9. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Healthy People 2020: Improving the health of Americans. Washington, DC.
  10. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, et al. (2008) Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40: 181.
  11. Lee SM, Burgeson CR, Fulton JE, Spain CG (2007) Physical Education and Physical Activity: Results From the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. J Sch Health 77: 435-63.
  12. Cawley J, Frisvold D, Meyerhoefer C (2013) The impact of physical education on obesity among elementary school children. J Health Econ 32: 743-55.
  13. Welk GJ, Meredith MD (2008) Fitnessgram/Activitygram reference guide. Dallas, TX: The Cooper Institue.
  14. United States Department of Education (2003). Background on Title 1 — Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged.
  15. Bouchard C, Dionne FT, Simoneau JA, Boulay MR (1992) Genetics of aerobic and anaerobic performances. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 20: 27-58.
  16. Bouchard C, Shepard RJ, Stephens T, Sutton JR, McPherson BD (1990) editors Exercise, Fitness, and Health. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 147-153.
  17. Pangrazi RPC (1990) Age as a factor relating to physical fitness test performance. Res Q Exerc Sport 61: 410-4.
  18. Blair SN (2009) Physical inactivity: the biggest public health problem of the 21st century Br J Sports Med 43: 1-2.
  19. Center for Disease Control (2010) State indicator report on physical activity Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services.
  20. Active Living Research (2012) Moving more at school — Increasing physical activity before, during and after school. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Citation: Reed JA, Hughey M (2015) Providing Daily Physical Education to Improve the Health and Fitness Levels of African American Youth. Int J Sch Cog Psychol 2:136.

Copyright: ©2015 Reed JA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top