Andrology-Open Access

Andrology-Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0250

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2017) Volume 6, Issue 2

Pure Egyptian Cattle Bulls Show both Individual Variation and Different Interaction with Extender in the Post-Thawing Sperm Parameters

Alaa A Mohammed* and Wahid M M Ahmed
Animal Reproduction and Artificial Insemination,Veterinary Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Alaa A Mohammed, Animal Reproduction and Artificial Insemination,Veterinary Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt, Tel: 33371362 Email:

Abstract

Objectives: As very few studies were done on the freezability of pure Egyptian cattle bull sperm. So, we designed this study to evaluate the individual variations in freezability of native bull semen extended in Tris based diluent and sodium citrate-based diluent.
Methods: Semen was collected by artificial vagina, examined at once in farm laboratory. Only semen samples fit the minimum parameters are extended in two extenders first the universal one (TRIS) and second modified Sodium citrate extender by adding glycerol (CU-16) which created at Cornell University to evaluate the individual bull variation and interaction between extender and bull.
Results: Post-Thawing individual sperm motility, live, abnormal, acrosome integrity percentage was evaluated in addition to Hypo-Osmotic Swelling test (HOS). The highest value for motility, live abnormal and acrosome percentage were 44.00 ± 1.12, 52.25 ± 1.60, 21.25 ± 0.81 and 62.80 ± 2.58 from bull 2, 1, 3 and 2, respectively for semen extended in TRIS, and 42.25 ± 1.61, 52.00 ± 1.76, 22.15 ± 0.85 and 57.40 ± 3.07, from bull 1, 1, 4, 3, respectively for semen extended in CU-16. The results of HOS were 59.25 ± 1.76 and 55.95 ± 2.13 from bull 1 extended in TRIS and CU-16, respectively.
Conclusion: A significant variation (p<0.05) in tested parameter was clear when semen extended in TRIS extender with the absence of such variation when semen extended in CU-16 except in live sperm percentage. With ignoring the extender effect a clear significant variations were detected between bulls in all tested parameters.

<

Keywords: Egyptian cattle bull; Semen cryopreservation; Extender

Introduction

Semen cryopreservation is a well-developed technique commonly used worldwide; it extends the life of spermatozoa by decreasing sperm metabolism and toxin production, but induces partially irreversible injury to sperm membranes, which may reduce sperm motility, viability and the fertilization rate after artificial insemination [1-5]. Sperm damage during preservation in liquid nitrogen at -196°C has been attributed by many authors to cold shock, ice crystal formation, oxidative stress, osmotic changes, cryoprotectant toxicity and reorganizations of lipid-protein and phospholipid layers within the cell membranes [6-8]. It is proposed that membrane is thought to be a primary target of cold shock or freezing damage in cells, which leads to a loss of integrity and selective permeability of the sperm plasma membrane [9,10]. Cryopreservation damages many sperm structures and is detrimental to the post-thawed sperm characteristics plasma membrane integrity and including motility [11-13].

Bull sperm membrane characteristics by high concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids and low cytoplasmic contents so sperm have low concentrations of antioxidant. Therefore, sperm as a cell is highly susceptible to lipid peroxidation by free radicals such as O2, lacking antioxidant activity lead to the structural damage of sperm membranes during the freezing-thawing process [14,15]. The composition of extender containing the suitable cryoprotectants seems to play a significant role for successful semen cryopreservation [2,16]. Therefore, in last years, different antioxidants have been used to protect spermatozoa from the destructive effects of cryopreservation and free radicals [17].

Therefore, this work planned to evaluate the post-thawing parameters difference between pure Egyptian cattle bull their parent purchased from new valley province in 1986. And the interaction between bull and two type of diluent first one the standard Tris diluent and the other is sodium citrate supplemented with glycine amino acid (CU-16) on the post-thawing sperm parameters.

Materials and Methods

Experimental animals

Five mature native Egyptian bulls aged 3-4 years were used in the present study. Parents of these bulls were purchased from New- Valley Governorate at Upper Egypt during 1986. The bulls were raised under identical management conditions practiced in the National Research Centre Experimental Farm at Abou-Rawash, Giza, where they kept tied in bran provided with a covered shelter, away from cows. All bulls were clinically sound and examination of their genitalia proved to be normal with an absence of any palpable abnormalities. The general management schedule for disease prevention used by the Egyptian Organization for Veterinary Services was followed.

All animal experiments carried out in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986 and associated guidelines.

Semen collection

Prior to the experiment, bulls were subjected to routine daily exercise and were trained to mount an anestrous cow as a teaser for at least three months. Semen collection was done using a Danish model artificial vagina (AV). Two successive ejaculates per week were obtained from each bull. The ejaculates were then immediately transferred to the farm laboratory and placed in a warm water bath at 30°C for assessment and processing.

Semen evaluation

Directly after collection, evaluation of semen characteristics was carried out. The following criteria were considered:

Semen volume was estimated to the nearest 0.1 ml using graduated collection tubes.

Individual sperm motility was evaluated in semen samples diluted with 2.9% sodium citrate dihydrate solution, spread almost evenly under a glass cover slide and examined microscopically using adjusted hot-stage microscope at 38°C. Individual sperm motility percent was determined on a personal scale of 0-100% to the nearest 5% after viewing some microscopic fields.

Sperm cell concentration (X106 /ml) was determined by direct cell count using the standard haemocytometric method and the total sperm per ejaculate was calculated.

Live and abnormal sperm percentages were assayed by staining smears with Eosin-Nirgosin [18]. A total of 200 sperm cells were examined unsystematically. Live sperm percentage and total sperm abnormalities were recorded.

Hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOS) was carried according to Rota et al. with modification considered in the washing process of the sperm [19].

Acrosome integrity was evaluated by staining using trypan blue and Giemsa stains according to Way et al. [20].

Semen processing

Only semen samples with at least 70% sperm motility, 700 × 106 sperm/ml and 80% morphologically normal sperm were used for processing.

Diluents used

consists of Tris (hydroxymethyl-aminomethane) 3.028 g, Citric acid monohydrate 1.675 g, Fructose 1.25 g, Glycerol 8.0 ml, Distilled water 92 ml and Egg yolk 25 ml. Antibiotics were added at rate 1 gm dihydrostreptomycin sulfate and 1×106 units of penicillin G sodium to 1000 ml diluent [21].

CU-16 consists of Sodium citrate dehydrate 1.45 g, Glucose 1.25 g, Glycine 0.94 g and Distilled water to 100 ml. The final extender composed of 20 parts egg yolk and 80 parts buffer to which antibiotics were added at rate 1 gm dihydrostreptomycin sulfate and 1 × 106 units of penicillin G sodium to 1000 ml diluent [22].

Semen samples were extended with the first portion of extender contains no glycerol at 30°C and cooled to 5°C within 2 hours. At 5°C, the glycerolized portion of the extender was added. The extended semen samples were equilibrated for 2 hours. Semen packed in 0.25 ml French straws and frozen on the surface of liquid nitrogen for 10 minutes after that embedded in liquid nitrogen.

Statistical analysis

Results are shown as means ± standard error of means (SEM). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan descriptive tests by SPSS software version 14 for Windows (SPSS, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Values with p<0.05 regarded as statistically significant. Regression analysis was performed using the same software.

Results

The post-thawing sperm parameter of different native bull semen diluted in TRIS diluent was tabulated in Table 1. The best sperm motility (44.00 and 43.75) was observed with bull No. 2 and 1, respectively, while the lowest results obtained from bull No. 4 (38.75) with a significant difference between them. Live sperm percent higher significantly in bull 1 (52.25) than bull number 3 and 4 (46.15 and 46.75, respectively). The lowest abnormal percent obtained from bull No. 1 (18.95) and the highest value with bull No. 3 (21.25). The best result of HOS test obtained from bull No. 1 (59.25) and the lowest value from bull No.3 (50.20). Acrosome integrity percent were higher with bull number 2 (62.80) and lower with bull number 3 (51.15) with a significant variation between bulls. So the better post-thawing sperm parameters were obtained from bull number 1 and 2 without any significant variation between them, while the worst results from bull number 3 and 4 without any significant variation between them except motility % but the difference does not reach the level of significance.

Bull 1 2 3 4 5
Post-thaw - - - - -
Sperm motility percent 43.75 ± 2.02ab 44.00 ± 1.12a 43.25 ± 1.93ab 38.75 ± 1.25b 40.00 ± 1.74ab
Live sperm percent 52.25 ± 1.60a 50.30 ± 1.67ab 46.15 ± 1.87b 46.75 ± 1.36b 48.95 ± 1.66ab
Abnormal sperm percent 18.95 ± 1.09 21.20 ± 0.63 21.25 ± 0.81 20.25 ± 0.99 20.80 ± 0.85
HOS test 59.25 ± 1.76a 58.65 ± 2.30a 50.25 ± 1.45b 50.20 ± 1.84b 55.75 ± 2.03ab
Acrosome integrity percent 58.50 ± 1.85ab 62.80 ± 2.58a 51.15 ± 1.54c 51.70 ± 1.98c 55.90 ± 1. 29b
Row with different superscript are significantly differs at (P<0.05)

Table 1: Effect of individual bull on post-thaw sperm parameters of native bull semen diluted in Tris (Mean ± SE).

The post-thawing sperm parameter of native bull semen diluted in CU-16 was tabulated in Table 2. The lowest result of post-thaw sperm motility was (37.75) for bull No. 4 diluted in CU-16. With the highest results for bull No. 1 (42.25) with an absence of significant difference between bull. The best results for abnormal sperm percentage and HOS were obtained from bull number 1 (19.7 ± 1.04 and 55.95 ± 2.13, respectively), while the worst results obtained from bull number 4 (22.15 ± 0.83 and 50.10 ± 2.28, respectively). For acrosome integrity percentage highest value obtained from bull number 3 (57.40 ± 3.07) while the lowest value obtained from bull number 1 (51.70 ± 1.75). The only significant variation between bull semen diluted in CU-16 was obtained for live sperm percentage with the best value gained from bull number 1 (52.00 ± 1.76) while the lowest value with bull number 4 (45.3 ± 2.11).

Bull 1 2 3 4 5
Post-thaw - - - - -
Sperm motility percent 42.25 ± 1.61 40.75 ± 1.41 41.00 ± 1.65 37.75 ± 2.04 39.00 ± 1.52
Live sperm percent 52.00 ± 1.76a 49.70 ± 1.28ab 49.10 ± 1.74ab 45.30 ± 2.11b 47.15 ± 1.62ab
Abnormal sperm percent 19.70 ± 1.04 20.25 ± 0.94 21.15 ± 0.83 22.15 ± 0.85 21.90 ± 0.88
HOS test 55.95 ± 2.13 51.40 ± 1.89 55.35 ± 2.69 50.10 ± .2.28 51.55 ± 1.97
Acrosome integrity percent 51.70 ± 1.75 55.30 ± 2.38 57.40 ± 3.07 53.45 ± 1.37 54.60 ± 1.54
Row with different superscript are significantly differs at (P<0.05).

Table 2: Effect of individual bull on post-thaw sperm parameters of native bull semen diluted in CU-16 (Mean ± SE).

Individual variations between bulls irrespective to diluent use were summarized in the Table 3 the best results of sperm motility, live, abnormal and HOS percentage were found from bull number 1, while the best results for acrosome integrity percentage obtained with bull number 2 with clear significant variations between bulls in tested parameters.

Bull Motility% Live % Abnormal % HOS Acrosome
1 43.00 ± 1.28a 52.13 ± 1.18a 19.33 ± 0.74a 57.60 ± 1.39a 55.10 ± 1.37ab
2 42.38 ±  0.93a 50.00 ± 1.04ab 20.73 ± 0.56ab 55.03 ± 1.58ab 59.05 ± 1.83a
3 42.13 ± 1.26a 47.62 ± 1.28bc 21.20 ± 0.57ab 52.80 ± 1.55bc 54.27 ± 1.77b
4 38.25 ± 1.18b 46.03 ± 1.25c 21.20 ± 0.66ab 50.15 ± 1.45c 52.58 ± 1.20b
5 39.50 ± 1.14ab 48.05 ± 1.16bc 21.35 ± 0.59b 53.65 ± 1.44abc 55.25 ± 1.22ab
Total 41.05 ± 0.53 48.77 ±  0.54 20.76 ± 0.28 53.84 ± 0.68 55.25 ± 0.68
Columns with different superscript are significantly differs at (P<0.05).

Table 3: Post-thawing sperm parameters of native bull semen showing individual variation.

Studying the difference between two used extender regardless to the bull effect, the results tabulated in Table 4. The statistical analysis with independent T-test reveal absences of significant variation between extender in all tests post-thawing sperm parameter.

Extender Motility% Live % Abnormal % HOS Acrosome
TRIS 41.95 ± 0.76 48.88± 0.75 20.49 ± 0.39 54.82 ± 0.92 56.01 ± 0.98
CU-16 40.15 ± 0.74 48.65 ± 0.79 21.03 ± 0.41 52.87 ± 0.99 54.49 ± 0.95
Total 41.05 ± 0.53 48.77 ± 0.54 20.76 ± 0.28 53.84 ± 0.68 55.25 ± 0.68

Table 4: Post-thawing sperm parameters of native bull semen extended in TRIS and CU-16 extender.

Discussion

Individual variation in the percentage of post-thawing apoptotic sperm between five Portuguese local breeds (Ramo Grande) bulls was observed [23]. The absence of individual variation between three fertile Brangus–Simmental cross-bred bulls from the University Putra Malaysia farm were cleared [24].

Alterations in sperm DNA integrity are induced during the cryopreservation process and during in vitro incubation and manipulation of bull semen. The type of semen extender affect the DNA integrity of sperm and may partially explain the observed fertility changes after AI with Norwegian Red semen in skimmed milk-egg yolk (SMEY) and Triladyl®. Additionally, the deviations in sperm DNA quality during in vitro incubation of extended semen may be linked to the bull breed [25].

Sperm motility evaluations are important for the evaluation of semen quality and assessments of membrane integrity. Plasma membrane functionality measured by the hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST), sperm plasma membrane integrity and acrosomal integrity were considered good predictors of conception rate, also confirmed that the combination of Eosin/Negrosin staining test and HOST was highly correlated with in vitro fertility; and showed that when sperm plasma and acrosomal integrity (assessed by Trypan/Blue Giemsa staining) a higher correlation coefficient was obtained, also the morphological variables identified as important predictors of fertility [26].

The quality of semen can be influenced by the extender used in dissimilar to our results which may be attributed to the difference in the breed, number of examined bulls the diluent used [27].

The post-thaw sperm motility, intact acrosome and total sperm abnormalities were affected by genetic constituents of bulls so it differs between bulls form same breed [28,29]. On the same line variations between pure and crossbred bulls as between ejaculates from the same bull in the deep freezing quality sperm in the same time, they cleared the effect of diluent in the post-thaw sperm parameters [30]. Same found for crossbred bulls, Tharparkar X Jersey, Sahiwal X Jersey and Jersey X Non-Desoript bulls [31]. And to overcome bad freezer bulls authors suggested overcome by adjusting freezing and thawing protocol for each bull or over packing sperm in the straw [32]. For hypo-osmotic swollen test variation was very clear between 5 bulls from same breed (Piedmontese) which extended in Tris [33]. The sensitivity of sperm to osmotic stress during cryopreservation and thawing and thawing differ between individual bulls can classified bulls as good freezers or bad freezers implies the presence of certain membrane structure characteristics and that differences are genetically coded [4]. Crossbred of Holstein Friesian X Hariana diluted in Tris exposed to post-thawing hypo-osmotic swollen test results varied significantly between bulls [34].

The discovery of the biological effects of amino acids in the prevention of cell damage during the freezing-thawing process [35]. The published data suggested that addition of amino acids to extender improved post-thawing sperm motility, sperm viability, acrosome integrity and membrane integrity in goat glutamine, different concentrations of Taurine, Cysteine and Trehalose, Cysteine, glycine, L-cysteine DL-alanine Glycine L-glutamine L-tryptophan, addition of glycine to Standard extender Tris with concentration 25 mm to bull semen improve post-thawing sperm motility, viability, decrease abnormality and dramatically improve the conception rate, ram [36-40]. However, by which mechanism these amino acid components protect spermatozoa during the freezing-thawing process, have not clearly understood and are still unclear.

Glycine used in the basic diluent for bull sperm [41]. The role of glycine in the protection of sperm during freezing-thawing process still not clear but many authors explain a suspected role in protection, as free amino acids and quaternary nitrogen containing compounds retard thermal denaturation of enzymes or provide thermal protection or maintain enzyme structure and function [42-44].

Conclusion

Clear variation between post-thawed tested parameters in the native bull semen although they are from the same parents. Such results need more investigation over an extended time to select the best bulls for preservation native breed from extinction. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

None

References

  1. Bailey JL, Morrie A, Cormier N (2003) Semen cryopreservation: Success and persistent in farm species. Can J Anim Sci 83: 393-401.
  2. Hammerstedt RH, Graham JK, Nolan JP (1990) Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: What we ask them to survive. J Androl 11: 73-88.
  3. Moore AI (2005) Effect of cholesterol supplementation on the cryosurvival of equine spermatozoa. Dissertation, Colorado State University.
  4. Watson PF (2000) The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim Reprod Sci 60:  481-492.
  5. Matsuoka T, Imai H, Kohno H, Fukui Y (2006) Effects of bovine serum albumin and trehalose in semen diluents for improvement of frozen-thawed ram semen. J Reprod Dev 52: 675-683.
  6. Bailey JL, Bilodeau JF, Cormierm N (2000) Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals: A damaging and capaciting phenomenon. J Androl 21: 1-7.
  7. Drobnis EZ, Crowe LM, Berger T, Anchordoguy TJ, Overstreet JW, et al. (1993) Cold shock damage is due to lipid phase-transitions in cell membranes: A demonstration using sperm as a model. J Exp Zool 265: 432- 437.
  8. Watson PF, Martin IC (1975) Effects of egg yolk, glycerol and the freezing rate on the viability and acrosomal structures of frozen ram spermatozoa. Aust J Biol Sci 28: 153-159.
  9. Morris GJ, Clarke A (1981) Effects of low temperature on biological membranes. New York, Academic Press  241-377.
  10. Morris GI, Clarke A (1987) Cell at low temperatures. Edward Arnold London , pp: 72-119.
  11. Lessard C, Parent S, Leclerc P, Bailey JL, Sullivan R (2000) Cryopreservation alters the levels of the bull sperm surface protein P25b. J Androl 21: 700-707.
  12. Royere D, Barthelemy C, Hamamah S, Lansac J (1996) Cryopreservation of spermatozoa: A review. Hum Reprod Update 2: 553-559.
  13. Yoshida M (2000) Conservation of sperms: Current status and new trends. Anim Reprod Sci 60-61: 349- 355.
  14. Gadella BM, Rathi R, Brouwers JF, Stout TA, Colenbrander B (2001) Capacitation and the acrosome reaction in equine sperm. Anim Reprod Sci 68: 249-265.
  15. Sinha MP, Sinha AK, Singh BK, Prasad PL (1996) The effect of glutathione on the motility, enzyme leakage and fertility of frozen goat semen. Theriogenol 41: 237-243.
  16. Curry MR, Millar JD, Watson PF (1994) Calculated optimal cooling rates for ram and human sperm cryopreservation fail to confirm with empirical observations. Biol Reprod 51: 1014-1021.
  17. Baumber J, Ball BA, Gravance CG, Medina V, Davies-Morel MC (2000) The effect of reactive oxygen species on equine sperm motility, viability, acrosomal integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential and membrane lipid peroxidation. J Androl 21: 895-902.
  18. Campbell RC, Dott HM, Glover TD (1965) Nigrosin-Eosin as stain for differentiating live dead spermatozoa. J Agric Sci 48: 1-8.
  19. Rota A, Penzo N, Vincenti L, Mantovani R (2000) Hypoosmotic swelling (HOS) as a screening assay for testing in vitro fertility of bovine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 53: 1415-1420.
  20. Way AL, Griel LC, Killian GJ (2000) Effects of accessory sex gland fluid on viability, capacitation, and the acrosome reaction of cauda epididymal bull spermatozoa. J Androl 21: 213-219.
  21. Foote RH (1970) Influence of extender, extension rate, and glycerolating technique on fertility of from bull semen. J Dairy Sci 53: 1478-1482.
  22. Shannon P (1964) The effect of diluents containing glycine, and glycine and glycerol, on the fertility of diluted bovine semen. New Zealand J Agric Res 7: 357-363.
  23. Chaveiro A, Santos P, da Silva FM (2007) Assessment of sperm apoptosis in cryopreserved bull semen after swim-up treatment: A flow cytometric study. Reprod Dom Anim 42: 17-21.
  24. Kaka A, Haron W, Yusoff R, Yimer N, Khumran AM, et al. (2015) Effect of docosahexanoic acid (DHA) on quality of frozen- thawed bull semen using Tris extender. Reprod Fertil Dev 29: 490.
  25. Waterhouse KE, Gjeldnes A, Tverdal A, De Angelis PM, Farstad W, et al. (2010) Alterations of sperm DNA integrity during cryopreservation procedure and in vitro incubation of bull semen. Anim Reprod Sci 117: 34- 42.
  26. Oliveira LZ, de Arruda RP, de Andrade AF, Celeghini EC, Reeb PD, et al. (2013) Assessment of in vitro sperm characteristics and their importance in the prediction of conception rate in a bovine timed-AI program. Anim Reprod Sci 137: 145-155.
  27. Sugulle AH, Bhuiyan MMU, Shamsuddin M (2006) Breeding soundness of bulls and the quality of their frozen semen used in cattle artificial insemination in Bangladesh. Livestock Res Rural Dev 18.
  28. Chandler JE, Adkinson RW, Hay GM, Crain RL (1985) Environmental and genetic sources of variation for seminal quality in mature Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci 68: 1270-1279.
  29. Prathalingam NS, Holt WV, Revell SG, Jones S, Watson PF (2006) Dilution of spermatozoa results in improved viability following a 24 h storage period but decreased acrosome integrity following cryopreservation. Anim Reprod Sci 91: 11-22.
  30. Iqbal MJ, Tomar NS (1989) Studies on the efficacy of certain additives and methods of glycerolisation for deep freezing of zebu and buffalo bull semen. Indian Vet J 66: 237.
  31. Narasimha AV, Rao YVR (1996) Seminal characteristics and sperm freezability of crossbred bulls. Indian Vet J 73: 1086-1088.
  32. Parkinson TJ, Whitfield CH (1987) Optimisation of freezing conditions for bovine spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 27: 781-797.
  33. Arangasamy, Singh LP (2002) In vitro assessment of fertilizing potential of post-thaw crossbred bull (HF X H) spermatozoa with added prostaglandin F2α, oxytocin, and BHT. Indian J Anim Sci 72: 61.
  34. Chu TM, Aspinall D, Paleg LG (1974) Stress metabolism: Part 6 Temperature stress and the accumulation of proline in barley and radish. Aust J Plant Physiol 1: 87-97.
  35. Al Ahmad MZ, Chatagnon G, Amirat-Briand L, Moussa M, Tainturier D, et al. (2008) Use of Glutamine and low density lipoproteins isolated from egg Yolk to improve buck semen freezing. Reprod Dom Anim 43: 429-436.
  36. Atessahin A, Bucak MN, Tuncer PB, Kizil M (2008) Effects of anti-oxidant additives on microscopic and oxidative parameters of angora goat semen following the freeze-thawing process. Small Rumin Res 77: 38-44.
  37. Uysal O, Bucak MN (2007) Effect of oxidized serum albumin, cysteine and lycopene on the quality of frozen-thawed ram semen. Acta Vet 76: 383-390.
  38. Khalili B, Jafaroghli M,  Farshad A, Paresh-Khiavi M (2010) The effects of different concentrations of glycine and cysteine on the freezability of moghani ram spermatozoa. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 23: 318-325.
  39. El-Sheshtawy RI, El-Nattat WS, Sabra HA, Amal HA (2012) Cryopreservation of extended bull semen using Aromated and Non-Aromated amino acids with emphasis on conception rate. Global Veterinaria 9: 508-511.
  40. Yang DH, McMillan AG, Standley NT, Shannon P, Xu ZZ (2012) Extracellular calcium is involved in egg yolk-induced head to head agglutination of bull sperm. Theriogenology 78: 1476-1486.
  41. Paleg LG, Douglas TJ, Van Daal A, Keech DB (1981) Proline and betaine protect enzymes against heat inactivation. Aust J Plant Physiol 8: 107-114.
  42. Heber U, Tyankova L, Santarius KA (1971) Stabilization and inactivation of biological membranes during freezing in the presence of amino acids. Biochim Biophys Acta 241: 578-592.
  43. Bowlus RD, Somero GN (1979) Solute compatibility with enzyme function and structure: rationales for the selection of osmotic agents and end products of anaerobic metabolism in marine invertebrates. J Exp Zool 208: 137-151.
  44. Curry MR (2000) Cryopreservation of semen from domestic livestock. Rev Reprod 5: 46-52.
Citation: Mohammed AA, Ahmed WMM (2017) Pure Egyptian Cattle Bulls Show both Individual Variation and Different Interaction with Extender in the Post-Thawing Sperm Parameters . Andrology (Los Angel) 6: 193.

Copyright: © 2017 Mohammed AA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top