Virology & Mycology

Virology & Mycology
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-0517

Research Article - (2016) Volume 5, Issue 3

Rabies lyssavirus Isolates from Brazilian Different Reservoirs Species Present Distinct Pattern of Propagation in N2a Cell

Bruno Amorim Costa1, Natalia Langenfeld Fuoco2, Luciana Botelho Chaves1, Adriana Candido Rodrigues1, Orlando Garcia Ribeiro2, Keila Iamamoto Nogi1, Karin Corrêa Scheffer1 and Iana Suly Santos Katz1*
1Rabies Diagnostic Laboratory, Pasteur Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2Immunogenetics Laboratory, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
*Corresponding Author: Iana Suly Santos Katz, Rabies Diagnostic Laboratory, Pasteur Institute, São Paulo SP, Brazil, Tel: +551131453183 Email:

Abstract

Background: Rabies cell culture infection test was developed for the isolation of Rabies lyssavirus and as an alternative for the mouse inoculation test. However, tissue culture for street rabies strains produces low viral titer. Here, we assessed the quantity of brain tissue for successful viral isolation toward increased virus titer in effective way.

Methods: Brain tissue isolates from different reservoirs species of Brazil were harvested in different concentration and inoculated in mouse neuroblastoma cells (N2a). These isolates were measured infectious viral titer and cell viability followed by consecutive passages in N2a cells.

Results: Inoculum containing were prominent Rabies lyssavirus due to higher viral titer and not significantly dead cell. After consecutive passages in N2a cells Rabies lyssavirus variant maintained by vampire bat had remarkable adaptation to the culture system, while isolates from marmoset presents distinct pattern of propagation in N2a cell when compared with other groups.

Conclusion: Based on these results, the isolation followed by viral replication assay may be used in isolates from different reservoirs which enable an effective amplification of the wild type virus strains.

<

Keywords: Wild type Rabies lyssavirus; Viral replication; Dog virus; Bat virus; Marmoset virus

Introduction

Rabies is one of the most important zoonosis that affects the central nervous system of mammals, including the orders Carnivora, Chiroptera and Primate. Due to total number of canine rabies cases has decreased in both North and South America is extremely important over the years to study rabies in wild species, especially bats, since these wild species are nowadays the main perpetuators of rabies [1,2]. A panel of eight monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against Rabies lyssavirus nucleoprotein was developed by the Centro Panamericano de Zoonosis (CEPANZO) and the Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) for antigenic variants (V) identification in both North and South America [3]. This panel established 11 V found in Latin America isolates, including two major reservoir hosts - the dog (V-2) and the vampire bat (V-3), but has not identified the marmoset antigenic profile [2,4,5]. Antigenic variant of vampire bat was also identified in others hosts as cattle and horses, and V of marmoset (V-M) in man [2,4]. Until recently, our knowledge of Rabies lyssavirus pathogenesis was limited and largely based on experimental infection with laboratory-adapted strains [6-8]. Moreover, street Rabies lyssavirus have distinct biological characteristics (e.g. virus ability to spread from cell to cell, virus internalization and virus replication in a tissue culture system) when compared with tissue culture-adapted strains [6,9,10]. Biochemical and biology investigation frequently require a large quantity of virus, such as viral replication, viral entry and viral spread techniques into host cells. For virus stocks preparation, virus cell isolation is the first procedure, following virus replication in consecutive passages in cells for the preparation of large amount of virus. Unlike street virus, adapted virus in cell culture is easier to obtain a large amount of virus lead to in vivo experiments [11-16]. Obstacles such slow development of virus and low efficiency of cell infection have been reported with street virus isolation. In this way, studies have shown that N2a cells are more sensitive for the isolation of street rabies virus than are BHK-21 cells [12,15]. Additionally, techniques for the isolation of street Rabies lyssavirus from suspect material in cell cultures have been developed using a 10-2 dilution of the original brain tissue [11,12]. As reported previously a 10-1 dilution decreased numbers of infected cells when compared with a 10-2 dilution due to a possible problem associated with bacterial and/ or toxic contaminants [11,12]. However, another study has shown that 10-fold dilution was necessary to remove or suitably reduce the problem [12,15,17]. Given the fact that virus isolation in culture system is required to produce large quantities of viable infectious virus. In this study we describe the optimal conditions for the isolation of street Rabies lyssavirus isolates from different reservoir species by using a rabies tissue culture infection test (RTCT) and replication in vitro system. We assess that V-3 group had a higher viral titer when compared with other groups and Rabies lyssavirus isolates from different reservoir of Brazil showing a distinct pattern of propagation in N2a cell.

Material and Methods

Cells

Neuroblastoma cell line (N2a) (N2a, ATCC, CCL-131) grew in Eagle’s minimum essential medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 3% of gentamicin and 3% nonessential amino acids (complete medium) at 37°C and 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Virus strains

Twenty-three Rabies lyssavirus isolates from different reservoirs were obtained from first passage isolates in Swiss-Webster mice inoculated with 20% suspensions of central nervous systems (CNS) (Table 1) and propagated seventh-passage in N2a cells.

All Rabies lyssavirus isolates were characterized antigenically using eight monoclonal antibody panel from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Instituto Pasteur from São Paulo. The samples isolated from domestic dogs, bats and marmoset were characterized as variant 2 (V-2), variant 3 (V-3) and marmoset variant (V-M), respectively [3,4]. Challenge Virus Standard (CVS-31), brain tissue uninfected and complete medium were used as controls [18].

Inoculum preparation

Brain tissue of different street Rabies lyssavirus strain (Table 1) were macerated, homogenized manually on ice and diluted with complete medium at 20%, 10% and 5% (w/v) concentrations and then centrifuged at 3,000 xg for 30 minutes.

Virus titration

For virus titration by direct fluorescent antibody assay, N2a cells in 96-well plates (Corning/Costar) were infected using different dilutions of a brain homogenate (20%, 10% and 5%) with serial 10-fold virus dilutions in minimum essential medium (MEM) and incubated at 37°C for 3 days [19]. Foci were counted using a fluorescence microscope, and virus titers calculated in focus-forming units (FFU) per milliliter. The expression of the virus titer was presented on a logarithmic scale. All titrations were determined in quadruplicate.

Cell viability

For each well, 0.1 mL of N2a cell (5×105 cells/mL) suspension, 0.04 mL of the brain suspension (20%, 10% and 5%) and 0.1 mL of medium complete were added in a 96-well plate (Corning/Costar). After 72 hours, trypsinized cells were suspended and viable cells were identified and enumerated in a hemocytometer by 0.2% trypan blue exclusion.

Virus replication in consecutive passages

Nine Rabies lyssavirus strains were obtained from first passage isolates in mice inoculated with 20% suspensions of CNS, and propagated seventh-passage in N2a cells in the presence of complete medium. For each well, 1 mL of N2a cell (1×106 cells/mL) suspension, 0.5 mL of the tissue culture suspension and 2.5 mL of medium complete were added in a 6-well plate (Corning/Costar). After 72 hours, each passage was titrated as described above.

Statistical analyses

Isolates of each variant were evaluated by statistical analysis. Viral titer and cell viability data were calculated and checked for normality. Each group were compared statistically by using a two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for multiple groups. Student’s t test was used to compare two groups. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted by using Prism software (GraphPad Software®, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

The amount of the brain tissue may be a determining factor for Rabies lyssavirus isolation due to quality and quantity of sample. To establish more stable condition for Rabies lyssavirus isolation, firstly, we assessed the viral titer and the death cell with virus inoculum containing different amounts of brain tissue (20%, 10% and 5%).

We evaluated samples from different Brazilian reservoirs species, of whom 8 were V-2, including viruses maintained in domestic dog, 8 were V-3, including viruses maintained in hematophagous bat and 7 were V-M including viruses maintained in marmoset (Table 1).

Sample Year Host Antigenic Variant*
IP 2476 2014 Canisfamiliaris V-2
IP 2478 2014 Canisfamiliaris V-2
IP 1729 2014 Canisfamiliaris V-2
IP 2484 2014 Canisfamiliaris V-2
IP 2480 2014 Canisfamiliaris V-2
IP 2477 2014 Canisfamiliaris V-2
IP 2489 2014 Canisfamiliaris V-2
IP 2479 2014 Canisfamiliaris V-2
IP 1410 2014 Desmodusrotundus V-3
IP 3444 2014 Artibeuslituratus V-3
IP 4292 2013 Desmodusrotundus V-3
IP 4660 2013 Diphyllaecaudata V-3
IP 2303 2014 Artibeuslituratus V-3
IP 2258 2014 Artibeuslituratus V-3
IP 3664 2015 Bat host species undetermined V-3
IP 3667 2015 Bat host species undetermined V-3
IP 1304 2014 Callithrixjacchus V-M (Marmoset**)
IP 1301 2014 Callithrixjacchus V-M (Marmoset**)
IP 3109 2011 Callithrixjacchus V-M (Marmoset**)
IP 2884 2014 Callithrixjacchus V-M (Marmoset**)
IP 6294 2014 Callithrixjacchus V-M (Marmoset**)
IP 1770 2012 Callithrixjacchus V-M (Marmoset**)
IP 3113 2011 Callithrixjacchus V-M (Marmoset**)
IP: Samples registered in the Pasteur Institute, São Paulo, Brazil. V-2: Antigenic variant maintained in domestic dog. V-3: Antigenic variant maintained in vampire dog. V-M: Antigenic variant maintained in marmoset.*antigenic variants were found, as defined in the monoclonal antibody panel produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Atlanta, USA. **antigenic profile previously reported in isolates from marmoset [4].

Table 1: RABV isolates from different reservoirs, year in which the samples were collected, species from which the samples were collected and antigenic characterization of rabies virus isolates.

The mean titration results obtained for each brain tissue concentration of isolates of each variant are shown in Figure 1. No significant differences between samples sharing the same antigenic profile each group were observed. We verified that virus isolation in N2a cell culture occurred in all samples and dilutions of brain tissue, however using inoculum containing 20% of brain's tissue the virus titer was significantly higher in V-3 and V-2 groups (p<0.001) compared with other brain tissue concentration (Figure 1a). No significant differences of virus titer were identified in V-M group between inoculum containing brain tissue diluted in different concentration (Figure 1a).

virology-mycology-Antigenic-variant-domestic-dog

Figure 1: Viral titer (a) and percentage of dead cells (b) in different RABV variant. V-2: Antigenic variant maintained in domestic dog. V-3: Antigenic variant maintained in vampire dog. V-M: Antigenic variant maintained in marmoset. 20%: inoculum containing 20% of brain's tissue. 10%: inoculum containing 10% of brain's tissue. 5%: inoculum containing 5% of brain's tissue. Data are mean ± standard deviation. P value: calculated between inoculum containing brain tissue diluted in different concentration. Statistical analyses were conducted using the two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.

When examining relationship between brain inoculum and viral titers we observed that virus titer is greater in cell culture with larger amount of tissue, V-M group’s exception (Figure 1a).

Poor-quality sample could interfere with viral isolation as a result of the increased number of dead cells. This study observed that the inoculum containing 20% of CNS had a higher percentage of dead cells when compared with the other dilutions (Figure 1b).

We also investigated the relationship between virus titer and dead cell percentage in each group. Virus titer and death cell in culture system was higher when a larger amount of brain tissue were inoculated, showing a positive relation among all concerned parameters (Figure 2). Interestingly, V-3 group had a higher viral titer when compared with other groups independent of tissue concentration used (Figures 1 and 2).

virology-mycology-viral-titer-ercentage-dead-cells

Figure 2: Relationship between viral titer and percentage of dead cells in different RABV variants. V-2: Antigenic variant maintained in domestic dog. V-3: Antigenic variant maintained in vampire dog. V-M: Antigenic variant maintained in marmoset. 20%: inoculum containing 20% of brain's tissue. 10%: inoculum containing 10% of brain's tissue. 5%: inoculum containing 5% of brain's tissue. Data are mean ± standard deviation. P value: calculated between inoculum containing brain tissue diluted in different concentration. Statistical analyses were conducted using the two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.

For Rabies lyssavirus propagation, its isolation in cell culture system is a basic prerequisite for continuous cultivations and enables an easy transfer of supernatant in serial passage. Thus, supernatant containing viral particle were inoculated at 7 serial passages in N2a cells to propagate the viruses. Here, we used the viral inoculum containing 20% of brain tissue due to the higher titer obtained in isolation cell culture rabies and reasonable cell death. Virus propagation in 6-well microplate showed more efficient than in 96-well microplate, reached a minimum titer of 6×104 TCID 50/mL in a single passage (Figure 3). As shown in Figure 3, infective virus titers of samples increased exponentially during supernatant passages in N2a cells. Extracellular virus reached the maximum titer (p=0.026) at seventh passages in V3 group (Figure 3). However, in V-2 and V-M group virus reached the maximum titer at 5th passage (p=0.002) and 3th (p=0.005) passage, respectively (Figure 3).

virology-mycology-Antigenic-variant-marmoset

Figure 3: Virus replication in seven consecutive passages in N2a cells. V-2: Antigenic variant maintained in domestic dog. V-3: Antigenic variant maintained in vampire dog. V-M: Antigenic variant maintained in marmoset. 20%: inoculum containing 20% of brain's tissue. 10%: inoculum containing 10% of brain's tissue. 5%: inoculum containing 5% of brain's tissue. P: N2a-cell-passaged street rabies virus. Data are mean ± standard deviation. P value: calculated between inoculum containing brain tissue diluted in different concentration. Statistical analyses were conducted using the two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.

Discussion

Isolation of street Rabies lyssavirus in tissue cultures have been used to virus isolation [12-20]. It is previously shown that 10% brain suspension is optimum for isolation of Rabies lyssavirus in N2a cells [12,15,17]. Another study shows that 20% of the original brain present same results [16]. However, some difficulties such as low efficiency of cell infection and slow replication of street rabies viruses is observed. Here, we showed that Rabies lyssavirus isolates from different hosts could have different titer in the virus isolation and virus propagation in N2a cells dependent on brain suspension concentration used.

As shown in Figure 1, viral titer in V-M group was equal independent of brain tissue concentration used. However, in V-2 and V-3 group showed higher viral titer in tissue culture when used inoculum containing 20% of brain tissue (Figure 1). Unlike the other groups, no evidence of a significantly increased was observed in viral titer of V-M group until third passage in N2a cells (Figure 3). We also assessed that regardless amount of brain tissue used in the viral isolation, the V-3 group had a higher viral titer compared with other groups, showing remarkable adaptation of RABV strain from vampire bat to the culture system (Figures 1-3). Taken together, our results provide evidence that isolated from different reservoirs are differently adapted and replicated in N2a cells.

These results support the hypothesis that street viruses may use different cell surface molecules [21]. Accordingly, Rabies lyssavirus strains originating from bats and dogs could exhibit differences in glycoproteins, thus using different receptors to infect cells [6,10,21,22]. Moreover, other non-structural proteins, such as P protein interacts with the dynein light chain LC8, which it could involve in regulatory role in viral polymerase activity [23].

It is also known that the spillover of a RABV strain from one species to another may be benefited by virus subpopulations that have a selective advantage in a new host. In this way, it is possible that that isolated from bat will be best adapted to overgrow in N2a cells due the most promiscuous of bat RABV strain [24].

Importantly, the finding that Rabies lyssavirus isolated from marmoset seems not propagate efficiently in N2a cells. Our results show the inadequate interaction between Rabies lyssavirus of V-M group with N2a cells, suggesting the possibility of a better adaptation of Rabies lyssavirus of V-M group in other cell types.

Serial passage of street Rabies lyssavirus demonstrated low efficiency in N2a cell infection in 96-well plates (data not shown). Nevertheless, street rabies viruses seeded in 6-well plates showed high virus propagation in N2a cells (Figure 3) as shown in material and methods. Thus, high cell concentration and low viral load could be more effective for street virus replication.

Previous studies have shown that decomposed sample could cause problems associated with dead cell due to bacterial and/ or toxic contaminants [24-26]. The trypan blue method is a very common assay for assessing cytotoxicity in laboratory research, where live cells with intact cell membranes are not colored [27-29]. We observed positive relationship among amount of brain tissue, viral titer and number of dead cells (Figures 1 and 2). Nevertheless, our data indicated that about 10 percent of dead cell observed in 20% brain tissue's inoculum did not affect viral isolation (Figure 1b).

Together, these data indicate that inoculum containing 20% brain tissue concentration is optimal for isolation and replication of the Rabies lyssavirus in N2a cells due to higher viral titer, discreet cytotoxicity, and consequently effective for acquiring of a high viral titer after consecutive passage in N2a cells. However, inoculum containing 5% of brain's tissue would be better for laboratory diagnosis by reason of using a smaller brain tissue’s amount and detecting rabies virus.

In conclusion, our data show that this method provides a good option for virus isolation and replication will help in the producing enough virus material that could be used to characterize street stains in vitro and in vivo . In addition, replication system could be a good alternative in samples with low virus titer or in decomposed tissue situations.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Willian de Oliveira Fahl for have trialed the RABV virus samples.

This work was supported by Instituto Pasteur/São Paulo/Brazil.

References

  1. Messenger SL, Smith JS, Rupprecht CE (2002) Emerging epidemiology of bat-associated cryptic cases of rabies in humans in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 35: 738-747
  2. Favoretto SR, de Mattos CC, de Mattos CA, Campos AC, Sacramento DR, et al.(2013) The emergence of wildlife species as a source of human rabies infection in Brazil. Epidemiol Infect 14: 1552-1561.
  3. Diaz AM, Papo S, Rodriguez A, Smith JS (1994) Antigenic analysis of rabies-virus isolates from Latin America and the Caribbean. ZentralblVeterinar med B 41:153-160.
  4. Favoretto SR, Mattos CC, Morais NB, Araujo FAA, Mattos CA (2001) Rabies in marmosets (Callithrixjacchus) from the State of Ceará, Brazil. EmergInfec Dis 7:1062-1065.
  5. De Mattos CC, de Mattos CA, Loza-Rubio E, Aguilar-Setién A, Orciari LA, et al.(1999) Molecular characterization of Rabies virus isolates from Mexico: implications for transmission dynamics and human risk. Am J Trop Med Hyg 61:587-597
  6. Faber M, Faber ML, Papaneri A, Bette M, Weihe E, et al. (2005) A single amino acid change in Rabies virus glycoprotein increases virus spread and enhances virus pathogenicity. J Virol 79:14141-14148.
  7. Dietzschold B, Li J, Faber M, Schnell M (2008) Concepts in the pathogenesis of rabies. Future Virol 3:481-490.
  8. Coulon P, Derbin C, Kucera P, Lafay F, Prehaud C, et al.(1989)Invasion of the peripheral nervous systems of adult mice by the CVS strain of Rabies virus and its avirulent derivative AvO1. J Virol 63:3550-3554.
  9. Cunha EM, Nassar AF, Lara Mdo C, Villalobos EC, Sato G, et al.(2010) Pathogenicity of different Rabies virus isolates and protection test in vaccinated mice. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 52:231-236.
  10. Preuss MA, Faber ML, Tan GS, Bette M, Dietzschold B, et al.(2009) Intravenous inoculation of a bat-associated Rabies virus causes lethal encephalopathy in mice through invasion of the brain via neurosecretory hypothalamic fibers. PLoSPathog 5:e1000485.
  11. Webster WA (1987) A tissue-culture infection test in routine diagnosis. Can J Vet Res 51:367–369.
  12. Rudd RJ, Trimarchi CV (1987) Comparison of sensitivity of BHK-21 and murine neuroblastoma cells in the isolation of a street strain rabies virus. J ClinMicrobiol 25: 1456-1458.
  13. Koprowski H (1973) The mouse inoculation test. In: Kaplan MM, Koprowski H (eds.). Laboratory techniques in rabies (3rdedn.). World Health Organization.pp: 85-93
  14. Iwasaki YI,Clark HF (1977) Rabies virus infection in mouse neuroblastoma cells. Lab Invest 36: 578-584
  15. Madhusudana SN, Sundaramoorthy S, Ullas PT (2010) Utility of human embryonic kidney cell line HEK-293 for rapid isolation of fixed and street rabies viruses: comparison with Neuro-2a and BHK-21 cell lines. Int J Infect Dis 14: e1067-1071
  16. Castilho JC, Iamamoto K, Lima JYO, Scheffer KC, CarnieliJr P, et al. (2007) Standardization and application of isolation technique rabies virus in mouse neuroblastoma cells (N2a). BolEpidemiolPaulista 4: 12-18.
  17. Webster WA, Casey GA (1996) Virus isolation in neuroblastoma cell culture. Laboratory Techniques in Rabies (4th edn.) World Health Organisation.pp: 96-104
  18. Wiktor TJ,Koprowski H (1980) Antigenic variants of rabies virus. J Exp Med 152: 99-112.
  19. Hierholzer JC, Killington RA (1996) Suspension assay method. Virology Methods Manual, Academic, San Diego. pp: 39-40.
  20. Smith AL, Tignor GH, Emmons RW, Woodie JD (1978) Isolation of field Rabies virus strains in CER and murine neuroblastoma cell cultures. Intervirology 9:359-361.
  21. Morimoto K, Patel M, Corisedo S, Hooper DC, Fu ZF, et al. (1996) Characterization of a unique variant of bat Rabies virus responsible for newly emerging human cases in North America. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 93:5653-5658.
  22. Zhang G, Wang H, Mahmood F, Fu ZF (2013) Rabies virus glycoprotein is an important determinant for the induction of innate immune responses and the pathogenic mechanisms. Vet Microbiol 162: 601-613.
  23. Albertini AA, Baquero E, Ferlin A, Gaudin Y (2012) Molecular and cellular aspects of rhabdovirus entry. Viruses 4: 117-139.
  24. Valentini EJ, Albas A, Augusto VL, Ito FH (1991) Immunofluorescence performed in brain of mice, infected with the CVS strain of the rabies virus, in different stages of decomposition. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 33: 181–186.
  25. Houpikian P, Raoult D (2003) Diagnostic methods. Current best practices and guidelines for identification of difficult-to-culture pathogens in infective endocarditis. CardiolClin 21: 207-217
  26. Lewis VJ,Thacker WL (1974) Limitations of deteriorated tissue for rabies diagnosis. Health Lab Sci 11:8–12.
  27. Katz IS, Albuquerque LL, Suppa AP, de Siqueira DM, Rossato C, et al. (2014) 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced myelotoxicity differs in mice selected for high or low acute inflammatory response: relationship with aryl hydrocarbon receptor polymorphism. Int J Toxicol 33:130-142.
  28. Katz IS, Albuquerque LL, Suppa AP, da Silva GB, Jensen JR, et al. (2016) 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced genotoxicity on bone marrow cells from mice phenotypically selected for low acute inflammatory response. DNA Repair (Amst) 37:43-52.
  29. Tennant JR (1964) Evaluation of the trypan blue technique for determination of cell viability. Transplantation 2: 685- 694.
Citation: Costa BA, Fuoco NL, Chaves LB, Rodrigues AC,Ribeiro OG,Nogi KI, Scheffer KC and Katz ISS (2016) Rabies lyssavirus Isolates from Brazilian Different Reservoirs Species Present Distinct Pattern of Propagation in N2a Cell . Virol-mycol 5:159.

Copyright: © 2016 Costa BA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top