Biochemistry & Pharmacology: Open Access

Biochemistry & Pharmacology: Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0501

+44-77-2385-9429

Editorial - (2012) Volume 1, Issue 6

Restoration of Tight-Junction Function: A New Therapeutic Approach for the Treatment of Cancer

Girish V Shah*
Department of Pharmacology, University of Louisiana, Monroe, LA 71291, USA
*Corresponding Author: Girish V Shah, Department of Pharmacology, University of Louisiana, Monroe, LA 71291, USA Email:

Abstract

Cancer affects a significant proportion of the population of the United States and the rest of the world. In the U.S. approximately 12 million people were directly affected by cancer in 2010. In a significant percentage of these patients, the disease will become invasive and may eventually be the primary cause of death.

<

Cancer affects a significant proportion of the population of the United States and the rest of the world. In the U.S. approximately 12 million people were directly affected by cancer in 2010 [1]. In a significant percentage of these patients, the disease will become invasive and may eventually be the primary cause of death. Classical treatment of cancer involves surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. However, chemo and radiation therapies cause more harm rather than in the long run as it is becoming evident that radiation/chemo therapies induce mutations that could transform the tumor into a drug-resistant and metastatic cancer [2-4]. Recent advances in cancer biology provide a hope for the development of novel, personalized and targeted therapy for cancer patients. Among many new directions of research in cancer, the understanding of the mechanisms that transform a localized tumor into an invasive one is the most exciting.

Although cancer is frequently considered as a disease of abnormal proliferation and accelerated abnormal growth, cancer progression is not determined solely by proliferative advantage of malignant cells within a tumor [5]. Other factors such as resistance to apoptosis and ability to bypass senescence pathways also contribute significantly to the process [6]. Correct adhesion between adjacent epithelial cells is important in determining the normal structure and function of epithelial tissues [7]. Accumulating evidence suggests that dysregulated cell-cell adhesion is associated with development and progression of most epithelial cancers [8].

Cell-cell adhesion is a critical component for the assembly of coherent sheets of barrier-forming epithelial cells that eventually line most organs, ducts and lobules. However, it is now understood that cell-cell contacts are not static structures that maintain barriers by just holding cells together. These contacts undergo constant remodeling to allow extrusion of apoptotic cells and to replace them with newly formed epithelial cells without the loss of barrier function. Cell-cell contacts are also remodeled to meet special physiological and developmental needs such as puberty, pregnancy, lactation, or involution. During wound healing, epithelial cells undergo coordinated movement and proliferation to bridge the wound, and establish new cell-cell contacts with epithelial cells from the opposing side of the wound [9-11].

Epithelial cell-cell contacts consist of three main adhesive structures: tight junctions (TJs), adherens junctions and desmosomes, as well as gap junctions. In polarized epithelial cells the TJs and adherens junctions are asymmetrically distributed at the apical region of the lateral membrane. This asymmetry forms the apical junctional complex, which encircles the apex of the cells and marks the border between apical and basolateral membrane domains [9,12]. These adhesive structures are composed of integral transmembrane proteins such as claudins or occludin that link the neighboring cells through homophilic and heterophilic interactions. These transmembrane proteins are anchored to cytoskeleton by zonula occludens proteins, which also organize signaling complexes and anchor cell-cell contacts to the actin cytoskeleton [13,14]. Especially, zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) plays a key role in organizing TJs by serving as a scaffold and providing multiple interaction domains where several transmembrane and signaling proteins can bind to form the TJ structure [13,15,16]. As the most apical structure between epithelial and endothelial cells, TJs control paracellular diffusion of ions and certain molecules [17]. In addition, TJs play a vital role in maintaining cell to cell integrity and cohesion of the organ lining [18]. The loss of cohesion between tight junctions could lead to dysplastic changes, which may eventually transform into cancer [19].

It must be noted that a relationship between TJ proteins and epithelial cancers is complex. An intact and functional TJ complex acts as a barrier to the initiation and progression of epithelial cancers by regulating important processes such as cell polarity, cell fate and cell movement. However, any imbalance in the protein components of this complex (whether increased or decreased) might disrupt the homeostatic control required to maintain the tissue in its differentiated state. The imbalance can also alter cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions, and cause disordered organ lining that makes cells chronically leaky to mitogens and growth factors. Together, these events can promote cancer formation in premalignant epithelial tissues [7]. Disruptive changes in TJ complex can also alter cell adhesion, free tumor cells from both neighboring cells and the underlying matrix; and confer onto them a migratory or invasive characteristics [20]. The role of individual TJ proteins in this process is suggested by the following few examples from a large body of evidence. The role of claudin-1 in the control of cell fate is indicated by increased expression in senescent epithelial cells and reduced expression in invasive cancers [21]. Decreased ZO-1 expression correlates with decreased glandular differentiation of breast tumor specimens [22]. ZO-1 and ZO-2 also regulate cell cycle progression and proliferation in a cell densitydependent manner through transcription factors such as ZONAB [23].

A large majority of cancers affecting elderly population are epithelial, and display dysregulated cell-cell adhesion. With better understanding of the factors and mechanisms involved in dysregulated cell-cell adhesion, it is becoming apparent that therapies specifically directed at restoring normal TJ function might be beneficial in halting the progression of epithelial tumors and in restoring normal cell-cell adhesion patterns. Unfortunately, the delivery of the TJ-targeting therapeutic agents to the site of action can pose a major problem. The agent must traverse epithelial and/or endothelial barriers to reach the site of action. Since the TJ is the primary regulator of paracellular transport across such cells, successful drug delivery may require modulation of TJ proteins to allow drug molecules to pass [24]. However, as noted before, disruption of TJ proteins purely for drug delivery may itself promote cancer progression by disturbing homeostatic mechanisms of polarity, differentiation, cell fate, and migration [25]. It may rather be easier to intervene pharmacologically via the activation of signaling proteins or enzymes loosely affiliated with the TJ plaque. Feasibility of this approach is demonstrated by the evidence that the activation of calcitonin receptor, which is associated with TJ proteins in prostate cancer cells, disassembles the TJ scaffold and induces invasive phenotype. In contrast, the knock-down of this receptor restores normal TJ function, abolishes invasive characteristics and restores the normal ability of prostate cells to organize acinii in 3D culture [26].

Unfortunately, there are no cancer therapies on the market that specifically target TJs. However, a recent report demonstrates the potential of this approach. A novel, relatively non-toxic anticancer molecule extracted from a marine sponge from Red Sea, 4-hydroxyphenylmethylene hydantoin (PMH), prevented TJ disassembly and restored TJ function as assessed by transepithelial electric resistance and paracellular permeability of prostate cancer cells. The compound also reduced orthotopic prostate tumor growth and almost abolished distant metastasis in transgenic mouse model of prostate cancer [27]. These observations support the concept that the restoration of TJ function can attenuate cancer progression and metastasis.

To conclude, the therapeutic modulation of cancer via selective targeting of tight junctions is in its infancy but demonstrates a strong potential. Further investigations into the cell biology of TJs should provide more directions for the development of TJ-targeted therapies for preventing or limiting cancer progression and/or metastasis.

References

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 62: 10-29.
  2. Yu JL, Coomber BL, Kerbel RS (2002) A paradigm for therapy-induced microenvironmental changes in solid tumors leading to drug resistance. Differentiation 70: 599-609.
  3. Chevillard S, Lebeau J, Pouillart P, de Toma C, Beldjord C, et al. (1997) Biological and clinical significance of concurrent p53 gene alterations, MDR1 gene expression, and S-phase fraction analyses in breast cancer patients treated with primary chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 3: 2471-2478.
  4. Fletcher GH (1984) Radiation and drug resistance of breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 7: 617-624.
  5. Andreeff MD, Pardee AB (2000) Cell Proliferation, Differentiation and Apoptosis in Cancer Medicine.
  6. Kong Y, Cui H, Ramkumar C, Zhang H (2011) Regulation of senescence in cancer and aging. J Aging Res 2011: 963172.
  7. Brennan K (2010) Tight junctions: a barrier to the initiation and progression of breast cancer? J Biomed Biotechnol 460-607.
  8. Emery LA, Tripathi A, King C, Kavanah M, Mendez J, et al. (2009) Early dysregulation of cell adhesion and extracellular matrix pathways in breast cancer progression. Am J Pathol 175: 1292-1302.
  9. Schober M, Fuchs E (2011) Tumor-initiating stem cells of squamous cell carcinomas and their control by TGF-ß and integrin/focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 10544-10549.
  10. Itoh M, Bissell MJ (2003) The organization of tight junctions in epithelia: implications for mammary gland biology and breast tumorigenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 8: 449-462.
  11. Perez-Moreno M, Fuchs E (2006) Catenins: keeping cells from getting their signals crossed. Dev Cell 11: 601-612.
  12. Köhler K, Zahraoui A (2005) Tight junction: a co-ordinator of cell signalling and membrane trafficking. Biol Cell 97: 659-665.
  13. Fanning AS, Jameson BJ, Jesaitis LA, Anderson JM (1998) The tight junction protein ZO-1 establishes a link between the transmembrane protein occludin and the actin cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem 273: 29745-29753.
  14. Fanning AS, Mitic LL, Anderson JM (1999) Transmembrane proteins in the tight junction barrier. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 1337-1345.
  15. Fanning AS, Anderson JM (2009) Zonula occludens-1 and -2 are cytosolic scaffolds that regulate the assembly of cellular junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1165: 113-120.
  16. Fanning AS, Little BP, Rahner C, Utepbergenov D, Walther Z, et al. (2007) The unique-5 and -6 motifs of ZO-1 regulate tight junction strand localization and scaffolding properties. Mol Biol Cell 18: 721-731.
  17. Matter K, Balda MS (2003) Signalling to and from tight junctions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 225-236.
  18. McClay DR, Ettensohn CA (1987) Cell adhesion in morphogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Biol 3: 319-345.
  19. Rohrbeck A, Borlak J (2009) Cancer genomics identifies regulatory gene networks associated with the transition from dysplasia to advanced lung adenocarcinomas induced by c-Raf-1. 4: e7315.
  20. Bryant DM, Mostov KE (2008) From cells to organs: building polarized tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 887-901.
  21. Koch S, Nusrat A (2009) Dynamic regulation of epithelial cell fate and barrier function by intercellular junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1165: 220-227.
  22. Hoover KB, Liao SY, Bryant PJ (1998) Loss of the tight junction MAGUK ZO-1 in breast cancer: relationship to glandular differentiation and loss of heterozygosity. Am J Pathol 153: 1767-1773.
  23. Balda MS, Garrett MD, Matter K (2003) The ZO-1-associated Y-box factor ZONAB regulates epithelial cell proliferation and cell density. J Cell Biol 160: 423-432.
  24. González-Mariscal L, Nava P, Hernández S (2005) Critical role of tight junctions in drug delivery across epithelial and endothelial cell layers. J Membr Biol 207: 55-68.
  25. Matsuhisa K, Kondoh M, Takahashi A, Yagi K (2009) Tight junction modulator and drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 6: 509-515.
  26. Shah GV, Muralidharan A, Gokulgandhi M, Soan K, Thomas S (2009) Cadherin switching and activation of beta-catenin signaling underlie proinvasive actions of calcitonin-calcitonin receptor axis in prostate cancer. J Biol Chem 284: 1018-1030.
  27. Shah GV, Muralidharan A, Thomas S, Gokulgandhi M, Mudit M, et al. (2009) Identification of a small molecule class to enhance cell-cell adhesion and attenuate prostate tumor growth and metastasis. Mol Cancer Ther 8: 509-520.
Citation: Shah GV (2012) Restoration of Tight-Junction Function: A New Therapeutic Approach for the Treatment of Cancer. Biochem Pharmacol 1:e130.

Copyright: © 2012 Shah GV. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top