Enzyme Engineering

Enzyme Engineering
Open Access

ISSN: 2329-6674

Research Article - (2013) Volume 2, Issue 2

Reuse of Cyclodextrin Glycosyltransferase through Immobilization on Magnetic Carriers

Kate Cristina Blanco1, Francisco José Dos Santos2, Natalia Sozza Bernardi1, Miguel Jafelicci Júnior3, Rubens Monti4 and Jonas Contiero1*
1Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Biological Sciences Institute, Unesp-Universidade Estadual Paulista, 24 A Avenue, Bela Vista, Rio Claro, SP, CEP 13506-900, Brazil
2Procell Biologics-Av. Comendador. Alfredo Maffei, 4001-Jardim São Carlos, São Carlos, SP Cep: 13561-270, Brazil
3Department of Physical Chemistry, Chemical Institute, Unesp-Universidade Estadual Paulista, Prof. Francisco Degni Street, Quitandinha, Araraquara, SP. CEP 14800- 900,, Brazil
4Department of Food and Nutrition, Unesp-Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú, Km 1, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
*Corresponding Author: Jonas Contiero, Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Biological Sciences Institute , Unesp-Universidade Estadual Paulista, 24 A Avenue, Bela Vista, Rio Claro, SP, CEP 13506-900, Brazil, Tel: +55 19 35264180, Fax: +55 19 3526 4176 Email:

Abstract

CGTase from Bacillus lehensis isolated from wastewater of a cassava flour mill in the state of São Paulo, Brazil was immobilized after being partially purified using precipitation with ammonium sulfate. The partially purified CGTase was immobilized by covalent binding on a magnetite support, which was silanized with 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane and activated with glutaraldehyde, resulting in a yield of 16.27% and final activity of 17.54% of the initial activity. The physicochemical properties and kinetics of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Bacillus lehensis were determined. The optimum temperature of the immobilized CGTase was higher than that of the soluble enzyme (70°C and 55°C, respectively). The optimum pH of the immobilized enzyme was the same as that of the soluble enzyme (pH 8.0). In the pH and thermo stability assays, 50% of enzyme activity was maintained after 24 h and 26.22% of the initial activity was retained after 160 min, respectively. The Michaelis-Menten constant was 0.82 mg.ml-1 and maximum velocity was 45.45 mol.ml−1.min−1. In the reuse study of the immobilized enzyme after four cycles, 16.66% of the initial catalytic activity was maintained, demonstrating the ability to recover and reuse the enzyme immobilized on magnetite.

Keywords: Magnetite, Magnetic separation, Cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase, Bacillus lehensis, Immobilization

Introduction

Cyclodextrins (CDs) are compounds formed from five or more units of glucose linked by α-1,4 glycosidic bonds. The most common CDs have six (α-CD), seven (β-CD) and eight (γ-CD) glucose units forming the cone shaped structure, that is able to accommodate hydrophobic molecules within is interior, the diameter of which is approximately 5.2 A° (α-CD), 6.6 A° (β-CD), and 8.4 A° (γ-CD) [1]. Externally, the structure is sufficiently hydrophilic to make CDs water soluble [2]. These cyclic glucose polymers are used in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food industries [3].

CD production involves starch catalysis by the enzyme cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase), produced by bacteria of the genera Bacillus [4], Paenibacillus [5], Klebsiella [6] and Thermoanaerobacterium [7]. Enzyme stability during catalytic activity and the separation of the product from the reaction medium are important factors to address, when using CGTase for CD production. A viable alternative may be the use of immobilized CGTase. Immobilized enzymes preserve function during repeated use through an enhancement of functional stability [8]. Immobilization confines the physical enzyme to a defined region of space, allowing the catalytic activity to be used continuously [9]. Immobilized enzymes exhibit resistance to proteolysis [10], and can be stored at high temperatures [11]. Immobilized proteins retain their enzyme activity due to the non-modification of the structure of immobilized enzyme [10]. Moreover, immobilized enzymes have demonstrated the capacity for cyclic reuse [12], and are widely employed in different industries due to their desirable properties such as recovery, stability, selectivity and reduced inhibition by different substances [13].

Enzymes can be immobilized on an insoluble support for subsequent separation from the reaction medium. Magnetite (iron oxide) has been employed in biotechnology and biomedicine for the separation of biological molecules, as well as use in magnetic resonance, the controlled release of drugs and clinical diagnoses [14]. The encapsulation on porous support consists of physical entrapment of the enzyme in the internal cavities of a porous matrix. On porous substrates can be adhered substances that are not the enzyme of interest. Other limitation in the use of agarose, and of porous supports is the high cost. The method of covalent immobilization of the enzyme on the support present the advantage of stable nature of the bonds formed between enzyme and matrix, and the advantage of the enzyme not be released into the solution upon use.

It is important to characterize the physicochemical and kinetics properties of immobilized CGTase, which differ from those of the free enzyme. Magnetite offers an advantage over conventional supports due to the ease of recovery of the immobilized enzyme from the medium with the application of a magnetic field, thereby eliminating the need for expensive separation systems [15]. Nanoparticles can be used as supports for the immobilization of catalysts that are more accessible to reactants [16].

The main advantages of enzymes encapsulation in nanoparticles refer to the high surface-to-volume rate, which facilitates contact enzyme support. The method of hydrothermal synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles used in this work is cheap and easy realization, in comparison to methods of chemical synthesis.

The aim of the present study was to describe the immobilization of CGTase from B. lehensis on magnetite nanoparticles and determine the proprieties of the immobilized enzyme, which demonstrates greater stability in comparison to the soluble form.

Experimental Section

Strain and enzyme

Bacillus lehensis was isolated from wastewater from a cassava flour mill in Brazil. The 16S rRNA sequence was deposited with the Genetic sequence database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (GenBank: HQ399547) [4]. The strain was cultivated to produce CGTase in an optimized medium containing 6.96 g.L-1 of cassava starch, 8.07 g.L-1 of nitrogen sources, 9.45 g.L-1 of sodium carbonate, 1.00 g.L-1 of K2HPO4, 0.20 g.L-1 of MgSO4.7H2O and 10.00 g.L-1 of Na2CO3. Incubation was performed at 35 ± 1°C for 72 h on a rotary shaker (New Brunswick Scientific Co, NJ, USA), at 150 rpm with an initial pH of 9.2. The cell-free supernatant was used to obtain the partially purified enzyme through precipitation with ammonium sulfate at a concentration of 80%. The precipitate was re-suspended in HCl-Tris buffer, pH 8.0, and dialyzed using a 12 kDa cellulosic membrane against the same buffer. The buffer was changed every two hours.

Supports for immobilization

Hydrothermal synthesis: The support synthesis (magnetite nanoparticles) was performed using 10 M of FeCl3.H2O (97% pure) and 20 M β-CD. The reaction mixture was heated to 65°C for 30 min and the pH was adjusted to 10 by the addition of NH4OH 35% (w/v). Hydrothermal synthesis occurred in a steel reactor internally coated with Teflon, with total volume of 100 mL. The following were the reaction conditions: temperature of 150°C, pressure of 1907 atm and reaction time of 6 hours. The synthesized particles were washed six times with deionized water and dried at 100°C.

Support silanization and activationc

To silanize the support, the synthesized particles were treated with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES, Aldrich). The silanization process was as follows: 50 mg of synthesized particles were treated with 1 ml of APTES ( = 98%) at 80°C under 1500 rpm for 6 h, followed by a washing step with 0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. To activate the support, the magnetite particles were re-suspended in 5% glutaraldehyde (w/v) in Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, at room temperature under 1500 rpm for 4 h. The activated support was washed six times with deionized water at room temperature for 30 min. The particles were re-suspended in Tris- HCl buffer 0.05 M, pH 8.0, and stored at 4°C.

Immobilization

One ml of 0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 0.1 mg CGTase as the protein, was added to 100 mg of the synthesized magnetite support, as described in section 4.3. The reaction product was stirred in a thermo mixer at 200 rpm for 6 h. After chemicallythe coupling step, the supernatant was removed and the magnetite support was washed abundantly with deionized water.

Enzyme activity, partial purification and protein determination

Enzyme activity was measured based on the discoloration of phenolphthalein solutions, following the method described by Makela et al. [17]. The enzyme was incubated in 1% (w/v) potato starch in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, at 55°C. Reaction samples were withdrawn at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 min, and the enzymes were inactivated at 100°C for 5 min. Total CD content was determined by absorption at 550 nm in a solution containing phenolphthalein (3 mM) and carbonate sodium buffer (0.6 M). One unit of CGTase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that produces 1 µmol of β-CD.min-1. For partial purification, the enzyme was precipitated using 80% ammonium sulfate, resuspended in 0.05 M HCl-Tris buffer, pH 8.0, and dialyzed using a 12 kDa cellulosic membrane against 0.05 M HCl-Tris buffer, pH 8.0 for 10 h. Protein determination of CGTase was made using bovine serum albumin, as described in Lowry’s method [18].

Enzyme stability in reuse of immobilized CGTase

The CGTase immobilized on magnetite was incubated under the optimum conditions. Reuse was determined by measuring the absorbance (550 nm) of the phenolphthalein/β-CD complex, after its production in the enzyme reaction. At the end of each cycle, the immobilized CGTase was submitted to magnetic separation and washing with Tris-HCl 0.05 M, pH 8.0, followed by re-suspension in the same buffer to initiate a new cycle.

Characterization of immobilized CGTase on support

Optimum pH and temperature: Optimum pH was determined using 0.05 M buffers in the 3.0 to 10.0 range. The following buffers were used: glycine-HCL (pH 3.0), sodium acetate (pH 4.0 to 5.0), phosphate (pH 6.0), Tris-HCl (pH 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0) and glycine-NaOH (pH 10.0) at 55°C. The enzyme activity of immobilized CGTase was measured in accordance with that described in item 4.6. For the determination of optimum temperature, the purified enzyme was analyzed in the range from 35 to 85°C in Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.

Thermal and pH stability of CGTase: The CGTase stability at pH 3.0 to 10.0 was determined by performing the reaction at 70°C (optimum temperature), with incubation for 12 h and 24 h. CGTase thermal stability assays were performed by incubating the enzyme at 70°C for 110 min.

Substances effect on immobilized CGTase: The effect of different compounds on the enzyme activity of immobilized CGTase was investigated using concentrations of 2 mM of each substance for 12 min at 70°C in 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8. In all experiments, CGTase activity without the addition of inhibitors (control) was considered to be 100%.

Kinetic parameters of CGTase: For the determination of kinetic parameters, 5 mL of immobilized enzyme were mixed with 5 mL of starch solution (3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 mM) in 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, at 70°C for 30 min. The Michaelis-Menten constant (Km) and maximum velocity (Vmax) were defined by the Lineweaver-Burk plot.

Results and Discussion

Immobilization efficiency

In the present study, the enzyme CGTase from Bacillus lehensis was immobilized on magnetite. The advantages to use of magnetite as a magnetic carrier of enzymes are their simpler fabrication processes, and ability to be manipulated under a magnetic field. From such properties can perform easily the enzymatic separation for its use more of one time. The properties this inorganic support includes physical and microbial resistance when compared to organic carrier as natural polymers (agarose, albumin, etc) and synthetic polymers (polyacrylamide). The availability of magnetite present low cost when compared with natural polymers, as proteins that require purification processes of high cost.

The magnetite was silanized with 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane and activated with glutaraldehyde. The activation processes are generally generating electrophilic groups on the support. In the signaling of the magnetite support, the residue 3-Aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTES) is dislocated to the hydroxyl group of the magnetite support surface, producing an alkylamino derivative. Glutaraldehyde activates the reaction for the formation of the Schiff base, which generates an intermediate–the active aldehyde group. The activated aldehyde from the support binds with CGTase in the presence of Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0. This pH prevents the polymerization of the aldehyde near the surface of the support with a positive charge. Binding occurs between the aldehyde groups of the enzyme and support. The reaction sequence is shown in Figure 1.

enzyme-engineering-reactions-immobilization-magnetite

Figure 1: Representation of reactions involved in the immobilization of CGTase on magnetite.

The immobilization method using a magnetite support (silanized with 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane and activated with glutaraldehyde) was efficient for immobilizing CGTase from Bacillus lehensis. The covalent bond between the activated surface of magnetite and CGTase from B. lehensis was efficient for immobilization of the enzyme. The immobilization factor of 11.21 and 16.27% yield indicate that the enzyme was recovered 11 times in the immobilization process and 16% of the enzyme activity was maintained after immobilization on the magnetite support (Table 1). Thus, stable binding between the enzyme and matrix result on low yield of immobilized activity.

Immobilization Total activity (U) Total protein (mg) Specific activity (U.mg-1) Yield (%) Immobilization fold
Crude extract 637.15 34.50 18.46 100.00 1.00
Immobilized CGTase 111.80 0.54 207.00 16.27 11.21

Table 1: Immobilization of CGTase from Bacillus lehensis CGII.

The specific activity of 207 U.mg-1 and immobilization fold of 11.21 demonstrates the high efficiency of this immobilization system for CGTase from B. lehensis. The specific activity of the lipase on porous polypropylene was 7.8-fold, due to greater instability as binding of the enzyme with the porous support this system [19].

CGTase immobilized on chitosan exhibited recovered enzyme activity of 5.2% [20]. Table 2 displays the results of the cycles of immobilized CGTase on magnetite. With each use of CGTase, enzyme activity was reduced. The covalent bond between the enzyme and the matrix decays the enzymatic activity, beyond this link (irreversivel) to occasion the discard of matrix together with the enzyme. However, CGTase function was maintained for four cycles. A similar finding is reported with CGTase immobilized on magnetic nanoparticles over seven cycles. However, Ivanova [21] using nanoparticles of magnetite as support for lipase immobilization obtained after 20 cycles [22]. According to Sheldona [23], the loss of activity in successive reuses reflects either the amount of linked CGTase on the carrier that is released into the assay solution or the loss enzyme function.

N° of cycles Enzyme activity (U.mL-1) Retention of activity (%)
1 112.00 100.00
2 105.65 94.33
3 53.91 51.03
4 10.44 19.37

Table 2: Cycles of immobilized CGTase on magnetite.

Optimal pH and temperature and thermal and pH stability

The analysis of the activity of an immobilized enzyme involves specific assays, as it exhibits a different structure from that of the soluble enzyme. Optimum temperature and pH for immobilized CGTase were evaluated in the range of 50 to 100°C and 3 to 10, respectively. Figure 2a and 2b displays the results of enzyme activity at an optimum temperature of 70°C and optimum pH of 8. A significant difference was found between soluble and immobilized CGTase regarding pH. However, the temperature of 70°C was 15°C higher than the optimum temperature for the soluble CGTase. This physical characteristic is important for applications in enzymatic industrial processes [22], due the enzymatic reaction generally be accelerated and reduce contamination. Conformational changes in the protein upon immobilization can cause changes in the properties of the immobilized enzyme such, as optimum temperature, pH, etc. Matte et al. [24] report a reduction in optimum temperature of immobilized CGTase from Thermoanaerobacter [23].

enzyme-engineering-Influence-temperature-immobilized

Figure 2: Influence of temperature on the activity of CGTase immobilized on magnetite (a); Optimum pH (■) and stability in pH (●) of immobilized CGTase (b); Thermal stability of immobilized CGTase (c).

The optimal temperature of enzyme free changed after of its immobilization. This indicates the possibility of a change in its structure. The conformational change of the immobilized enzyme increased its optimal temperature.

Thermostability is an important aspect in industrial applications of immobilized CGTase. Figure 2c displays the results of the thermal stability assays, demonstrating that 26.22% of the initial activity was retained after 160 min at the optimum temperature of 70°C. The thermal stability of immobilized enzymes is often not greater than that of soluble enzymes, as demonstrated by Matte et al. [24] for CGTase immobilized on chitosan.

Maximum activity of the immobilized CGTase from B. lehensis was achieved at pH 8.0 (Figure 2b), which was the same as that for soluble CGTase. The optimum pH of immobilized enzyme no changed of its free conformation. This indicate that the enzyme structure no was affected. Ivanova [21] found that the optimum pH for CGTase from Paenibacillus macerans immobilized on magnetic nanoparticles was 7, which was the same as that for the soluble enzyme. Bruno et al. [8] suggest that immobilization confers a kind of protection to enzymes, demonstrating different optimum pH for immobilized and soluble enzymes. Figure 2b shows that 50% of relative activity was maintained in the pH range of 3 to 10 after incubation for 24 h at 4°C. Stability in different pH values is due to the ability of the immobilized enzyme to exist in a stable conformation.

Effect of substances on immobilized CGTase

Enzyme stability was measured based on activity in the presence of 2 mM of different substances. The inhibitor/activator effects of the substances on immobilized CGTase are shown in Table 3. The ions, Mg2+, Mn2+ and Cu2+ and sodium dodecyl sulfate and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid inhibited CGTase activity, indicating that the presence these ions interferes with the catalytic activity of CGTase on immobilized magnetite. These results are in agreement with findings reported for CGTase from the alkaliphilic Bacillus pseudalcaliphilus 20RF [25]. In contrast, Ca2+, Zn2+, Na and Fe did not exhibit an inhibitory potential on the enzyme, as the loss of enzyme activity in the presence of these substances was negligible (2.01%). The catalytic activity of enzymes depends on the integrity of its protein structure. With the structure of CGTase stabilized by immobilization, the catalytic center of the enzyme was not inhibited by these substances.

Ions and reagents (2 mM) Residual activity (%)
No reagent 100.00
CaCl2 99.80
Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2.6H2O 98.73
FeCl3 100.34
FeSO4.7H2O 98.12
Fe2(SO4)3.nH2O 98.01
Ca(CH3COO)2 99.72
CaCO3 98.78
ZnSO4.H2O 98.59
Na2SO4 99.04
CuSO4.5H2O 73.92
MnSO4.H2O 50.39
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) 74.48
MgSO4.7H2O 65.03
Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) 64.24

Table 3: Effect of additives on immobilized CGTase from Bacillus lehensis.

Kinetic parameters

Enzymatic activity is defined with the CD formation per enzyme unit and time. The Michaelis-Menten model was used in this work to characterize a system of immobilized enzyme in magnetic support. The Michaelis-Menten model can be used to evaluate effects of immobilization on enzyme activity in the immobilized state. The Michaelis-Menten kinetics occurs when the rate of enzyme reaction for CD formation is constant, even with increased concentration of starch. The Vmax of product form of 45.45 mol.ml-1.min-1 was determined with of 0.826 mg.ml-1.

Conclusions

The present study developed magnetite nanoparticles to immobilize CGTase for use as a recyclable producer of CD. The enzyme was immobilized on a magnetite support, to assist in the separation of the enzyme from the reaction medium under the influence of a magnetic field. CGTase immobilization on magnetite altered enzyme properties, such as its optimum temperature, which was increased by 15°C, indicating that the support promoted the thermal protection of the enzyme. CGTase recovery by separation from the reaction mixture in the presence of a magnetic field proved efficient, allowing the reuse of the enzyme for four cycles.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for financial assistance in this research.

References

  1. Connors KA (1997) The stability of cyclodextrin complexes in solution. Chem Rev 97: 1325-1358.
  2. Leclercq L, Bricout H, Tilloy S, Monflier E (2007) Biphasic aqueous organometallic catalysis promoted by cyclodextrins: Can surface tension measurements explain the efficiency of chemically modified cyclodextrins. J Colloid Interface Sci 307: 481-487.
  3. Hedges AR (1998) Industrial applications of cyclodextrins. Chem Rev 98: 2035-2044.
  4. Blanco KC, de Lima CJB, Monti R, Martins J, Bernardi NS, et al. (2012) Bacilluslehensis-an alkali-tolerant bacterium isolated from cassava starch wastewater: optimization of parameters for cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase production. Ann Microbiol 62: 329-337.
  5. Ayadi DZ, Kammoun R, Jemli S, Bejar S (2011) Excretory overexpression of Paenibacillus pabuli US132 cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) in Escherichia coli: gene cloning and optimization of the culture conditions using experimental design. Biologia 66: 945-953.
  6. Gawande BN, Sonawane AM, Jogdand VV, Patkar AY (2003) Optimization of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase production from Klebsiella pneumoniae AS-22 in batch, fed-batch, and continuous cultures. Biotechnol Prog 19: 1697-1702.
  7. Leemhuis H, Dijkstra BW, Dijkhuizen L (2003) Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase. Eur J Biochem 270: 155-162.
  8. Bruno LM, Coelho JS, Melo EHM, Lima-Filho JL (2005) Characterization of Mucor miehei lipase immobilized on polysiloxane-polyvinyl alcohol magnetic particles. World J Microb Biotec 21: 189–192.
  9. Brena BM, Batista-Viera F (2006) Immobilization of enzymes. Immobilization enzymes and cells, Springer 22: 15-30.
  10. Kumar CV, Chaudhari A (2000) Proteins immobilized at the galleries of layered α-zirconium phosphate: Structure and activity studies. J Am Chem Soc 122: 830-837.
  11. Tischer W, Wedekind F (1999) Immobilized enzymes: Methods and applications. Top Curr Chem 200: 95-126.
  12. Zeng L, Luo K, Gong Y (2006) Preparation and characterization of dendritic composite magnetic particles as a novel enzyme immobilization carrier. J Mol Catal B Enzym 38: 24-30.
  13. Mateo C, Palomo JM, Fernandez-Lorente G, Guisan JM, Fernandez-Lafuente R, et.al. (2007) Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques. Enzyme Microb Tech 40: 1451-1463.
  14. Sun X, Zheng C, Zhang F, Li L, Yang Y, et al. (2008) β-cyclodextrin-assisted synthesis of super paramagnetic magnetite nanoparticles from a single Fe (III) precursor. J Phys Chem C 112: 17148-17155.
  15. Lee DG, Ponvel KM, Kim M, Hwang S, Ahn IS, et al. (2009) Immobilization of lipase on hydrophobic nano-sized magnetite particles. J Mol Catal B Enzym 57: 62-66.
  16. Hu A, Yee GT, Lin W (2005) Magnetically recoverable chiral catalysts immobilized on magnetite nanoparticles for asymmetric hydrogenation of aromatic ketones. J Am Chem Soc 127: 12486-12487.
  17. Makela MJ, Korpela TK, Puisto J, Laakso SV (1988) Nonchromatographic cyclodextrin assays: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and conversion mixture applications. J Agri Food Chem 36: 83-88.
  18. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent, J Biol Chem 193: 265-275.
  19. Pencreac;h G, Baratti JC (1997) Activity of Pseudomonas cepacia lipase in organic media is greatly enhanced after immobilization on a polypropylene support. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 47: 630-635
  20. Sobral KCA, Rodrigues RMO, Erio ROG, Oliveira DDE, Flavio FDM, et al. (2003) Immobilization of Cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) from Bacillus firmus in commercial chitosan. J Inc Phenom Macro Chem 44: 383-386.
  21. Ivanova V (2010) Immobilization of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from Paenibacillus macerans ATCC 8244 on magnetic carriers and production of cyclodextrins. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 1: 516-528.
  22. He F, Zhuo RX, Liu LJ, Jin DB, Feng J, et al. (2001) Immobilized lipase on porous silica beads: preparation and application for enzymatic ring-opening polymerization of cyclic phosphate. React Funct Polym 47: 153-158.
  23. Sheldon RA (2007) Enzyme immobilization: The quest for optimum performance. Adv Syn Catalysis 349: 1289-1307.
  24. Matte CR, Nunes MR, Benvenutti EV, Schöffer JDN, Ayub MAZ, et al. (2012) Characterization of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase immobilized on silica microspheres via aminopropyltrimethoxysilane as a “spacer arm”. J Mol Catal B Enzym78: 51-56.
  25. Atanasova N, Kitayska T, Bojadjieva I, Yankov D, Tonkova A (2011) A novel cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from alkaliphilic Bacillus pseudalcaliphilus 20RF: Purification and properties. Process Biochem 46: 116-122.
Citation: Blanco KC, dos Santos FJ, Bernardi NS, Júnior MJ, Monti R, et al. (2013) Reuse of Cyclodextrin Glycosyltransferase through Immobilization on Magnetic Carriers. Enz Eng 2:111.

Copyright: © 2013 Blanco KC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top