Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Devices
Open Access

Role of Microfluidics in Biotechnology

Dimitri Barry^{* *}Correspondence: Dimitri Barry, School of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, United Kingdom, Email:

Author info »

About the Study

Microfluidics is the study of how fluids behave, are precisely controlled, and are moved on a microscopic scale where surface forces outweigh volumetric forces. Engineering, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, nanotechnology, and biotechnology are all included in this multidisciplinary field [1].

Over past years, there has been a sharp increase in interest in labon- a-chip devices due to their potential applications in biotechnology. Today, a large number of start-ups provide specialized microfluidic solutions for a variety of uses and scientific problems. Experts' statements over the past ten years have generally been along these lines: "The future for micro fabricated fluidics devices—or the lab-on-a-chip—looks quite promising" or "Microfluidics, as an emerging technique, provides new approaches to precisely control fluidic conditions on small scales and collect data in high-throughput and quantitative manners." Microfluidics enables biotechnological techniques to continue on a scale (microns) at which bodily techniques consisting of osmotic motion, electrophoretic-motility and surface interactions become stronger. At the micro scale pattern volumes and assay times are decreased, and procedural fees are reduced.

Microfluidic devices can provide a number of benefits over extra traditional systems, e.g. their compact length, disposable nature, elevated application and a prerequisite for reduced concentrations of pattern reagents. Miniaturized assemblies can be designed to perform a huge range of responsibilities that variety from detecting airborne toxins to analyzing DNA and protein sequences [2]. Therefore, microfluidics structures offer an actual capacity for enhancing the efficiency of strategies carried out in drug discovery and diagnostics. In order for microfluidic generation to interface with, and offer upgrades for, current assaying strategies it wishes to be adaptable. Some business microfluidics structures illustrate their suitability to biotechnological applications. To provide an explanation for, why biotechnological studies ought to make the most of an inclusion of microfluidic strategies and a greater severe communicate among microfluidics and biotechnology researchers, we first list the precise strengths of microfluidics. Typically, microfluidic structures are channels filled with fluid, which includes response media or buffers [3].Characteristic dimensions are the channel height and/or width in the variety of few micrometers to three hundred micrometers. The apparent advantages supplied via microfluidics is the use of small volumes and precise liquid dealing with, which allow cost-powerful highthroughput biochemical assays and diagnostics , however there are nevertheless others being of capability relevance for biotechnology studies. Biotechnology is a noticeably various subject in which enzymes, mobile extracts or complete organisms are used for technical programs and the manufacturing of precious compounds. While white biotechnology is dedicated to provide industrially relevant merchandise in a cost and timeeffective way, crimson biotechnology may be very tons focused on clinical programs, e.g., healing proteins or organ-on-a-chip devices. Microfluidic answers have drastically developed along the years: at first, a downscaling method from macro scale to micro scale has been accompanied leading to the so-called micro flows lab-chips where micro flows are circulating in restricted micro channels on the downscaled photo of macroscopic networks. This technique turned into first stimulated through genomics and the want for DNA popularity [4]. As the desires of biologists diverse and step by step grew to become to protein reputation and cell tradition and/or evaluation, new microfluidic solutions have been advanced. Progressively a massive panel of answers has emerged, which go away from the mere downscaling method.

Conclusion

Bridging the gap to decorate interdisciplinary research between microfluidics and Biotechnology is not a feasible challenge. We finish that there are already a big range of a success collaborations linking the two disciplines. The technical improvements taking region in microfluidics, as well as biotechnological programs in reality show off the ability for floor-breaking studies. Interestingly, as more research businesses and groups undertake microfluidic methods, greater creative answers and programs rise up. Given that gaps are bridged by the above made guidelines, microfluidics has an extremely good capacity, providing effective structures for biotechnological research. However, its miles still difficult to are expecting while microfluidics could be a way fully mounted in almost each biotechnologist’s lab in close to destiny.

References

1. Burmeister A, Hilgers F, Langner A, Westerwalbesloh C, Kerkhoff Y, Tenhaef N, et al. A microfluidic co-cultivation platform to investigate microbial interactions at defined microenvironments. Lab on a Chip. 2019;19(1):98-110

   [Crossref][Google Scholar].

2. Caicedo HH, Brady ST. Microfluidics: the challenge is to bridge the gap instead of looking for a ‘killer app’. Trends in Biotechnology. 2016;34(1):1-3

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed].

3. Crater JS, Lievense JC. Scale-up of industrial microbial processes. FEMS microbiology letters. 2018;365(13):fny138

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed].

4. Galán A, Comor L, Horvatić A, Kuleš J, Guillemin N, Mrljak V, et al. Library-based display technologies: where do we stand?. Mol. Biosyst. 2016;12(8):2342-58

   [Google Scholar].