Rheumatology: Current Research

Rheumatology: Current Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-1149 (Printed)

+44-77-2385-9429

Review Article - (2013) Volume 3, Issue 1

Role of X-Chromosome encoded miRNAs in Autoimmunity: Suppressing the suppressor and Female Predisposition

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, USA

Abstract

Role of skewed X inactivation may in part explain high prevalence of autoimmune diseases in women. Human X chromosome encodes approximately 7% of the total microRNAs identified. Recent studies have implicated over expression of X-linked miRNA in women affected by the autoimmune diseases. Potential biological targets of them include critically important genes such as FOXP3, CTLA-4, PDCD1 and, members of CBL and SOCS family ubiquitin ligases, which play an important role in the immune suppressive mechanisms and maintenance of tolerance. X-linked miRNA mediated post transcriptional suppression of immunosuppressive genes is an open area of study with potential to better understand why women develop many autoimmune disorders more often than men.

<

Keywords: Autoimmune disease; miRNA; Female-predisposition; X-chromosome; Immune suppression

Abbreviations

AID: Autoimmune Diseases; APC: Antigen Presenting Cells; BCR: B Cell Receptor; CBL: c-Cbl, Cbl proto-oncogene, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; CBLB: Cbl-b, Cbl proto-oncogene, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase B; CTLA-4: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4; DC: Dendritic Cells; FOXP3: Forkhead Box P3; GATA-3: GATA binding protein 3; miRNA: microRNA; MS: Multiple Sclerosis; PDCD1: PD-1, programmed cell death 1; PD-L1: Programmed cell Death Ligand 1; PD-L2: Programmed cell Death Ligand 2; SOCS: suppressor of cytokine signaling; TBET: T-cell-specific T-box transcription factor; TCR: T Cell Receptor; TGF-β: Transforming Growth Factor, beta; TLR: Toll-Like Receptor; UTR: UnTranslated Region

Introduction

Autoimmunity is generally defined as misdirected immune responses which attacks body’s own healthy cells and tissues. Low level occurrence of autoimmunity is common to all men and women. However, Autoimmune Diseases (AID) occurs when the autoimmunity is progressed from benign to pathogenic levels. Pro- inflammatory environment, defective immune regulatory mechanisms and persistently hyperactive T and B lymphocytes can contribute to autoreactive functions of immune system. Suppressor mechanisms exist normally to prevent disease development and, immunosuppressive medications are used to reduce inflammation in AID. Some of the prominent AID is Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), type 1 diabetes mellitus, T1DM, Coeliac disease, Crohns Disease and Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Majority of these diseases occur more frequently in women than men. Genetic, hormonal, immune function and behavioral differences in male and female biology can play an important role in female biased disease development. Having two X chromosomes may also predispose women to autoimmunity. Failures in negative feedback mechanisms that inhibit T/B cell autoreactivity and innate immune function are known to contribute to autoimmunity. X chromosome encodes more miRNA genes than most of the autosomes. Some X-linked miRNAs are over expressed in women compared to men, likely due to escape of X chromosome inactivation (XCI). Female-biased downregulation of genes involved in immunosuppressive pathways by X-linked miRNAs can drive chronic inflammatory conditions and autoimmunity in women. This review focuses on how induction of X-linked miRNA expression potentially blocks immune suppressive pathways in female predisposition to autoimmune diseases.

Innate and Adaptive Immune Systems in Autoimmunity

Immune system is evolved to mount strong and efficient immune responses against a pathogen. During this process self-antigens are released by the actions of cytotoxic T lymphocytes or by pathogenmediated cell destruction. Self-antigens can be taken up and processed by macrophages and dendritic cells resulting in enhanced presentation to T cells and B cells. Historically, the adaptive immune system had been the primary focus as the key player in AID. Abnormal recognition of self antigens by T and B lymphocytes play important roles in pathogenesis. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that synergistic interactions between adaptive and innate immune functions induce autoimmunity [1,2]. Association of the infectious agents with disease manifestation has been described for majority of the AID studied [1-3]. Anti infective mechanisms of the innate immune system; cytolytic processes and generation of harmful agents such as proteases and reactive oxygen species can damage host cells and tissues. Abnormal production of proinflammatory mediators produced by an overzealous innate immune response may break immune tolerance [4], and affect T and B cell differentiation. Furthermore, increased production of the chemokines by activated innate immune cells can expand activated T lymphocytes in periphery [5]. Once the pathogen is cleared; immune system is capable of executing multiple inhibitory mechanisms at molecular and cellular levels [6,7] to prevent development of chronic and autoimmune responses. Failures in these inhibitory mechanisms cause a constant risk of anti-self responses from the adaptive immune system [8].

Activation and Negative Regulatory Mechanisms of Immune System

Toll-Like Receptors (TLRs) present on macrophages and Dendritic Cells (DCs) are key receptors that initiate the innate immunity and the subsequent activation of the adaptive immune response. Binding of exogenous or endogenous epitopes to TLRs initiate a signaling cascade to induce the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines as well as upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules by APCs. Activated APCs could break immune tolerance by enhanced presentation of selfantigens to auto-reactive T and B cells in the adaptive immune system. The role of TLRs in AID has been described extensively by Ann Marshak- Rothstein in 2006 [9]. TLR7 is an X chromosome encoded member of the toll like receptor family of proteins and expressed in macrophages, DCs and B cells. TLR7 present in B cells can bind endogenous RNA and activate autoreactive B cells [10]. TLR7 mediated DC activation reduces the immune suppressive function of regulatory T [Treg] cells [11]. A study using Tlr7 transgenic [tg] mouse model by Walsh et al., has recently demonstrated that the development of Tlr7 induced B cell mediated lupus-like autoimmunity requires B cell interactions with T cells as well as innate immune cells [12]. TLR signaling cascade is negatively regulated at several levels by [1] proteasome-degradation of signal molecules mediated by E3 ubiquitin ligases such as SOCS and CBLB, [2] dephosphorylation of proteins in the cascade by the action of phosphatases, [3] transcription regulation and, [4] miRNA mediated downregulation of signal proteins. miR-155, miR-146a, miR-21 are some of the miRNAs involved in regulation of TLR signaling [13].

Antigen binding to T Cell Receptor (TCR) in the context of the class II Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) leads to T cell activation. Optimal T cell activation requires a co-stimulatory signal through CD28 co-receptor activation by interaction with APC counterparts. TCR engagement promotes a protein tyrosine phosphorylation mediated signaling cascade to activate T cell transcriptional machinery which determines T cell fate through cytokine production, cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation. Activated T cells can assist in antibody production by B cells or to carry out cytotoxicity of target cells. CD4+ T helper (Th) cells are involved in B cell maturation and activation of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and macrophages. Once activated CD4+ T cells can differentiate into Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, and Tfh cells, or memory T cells. These subsets express specialized cytokines and cell-surface molecules that determine their effector cell capacity. [IFN]- γ-producing Th1 subset of CD4+ T cell has long been considered to be the main effector T cell subset responsible for pathogenesis of autoimmunity. However, recent studies suggest that T helper 17(Th17) cells can mediate sustained autoimmune inflammation in accord with chronic conditions associated with AID [14]. Furthermore, Th17 cells have a greater capacity to provide B cell response compared with Th1 cells [15].

TGF-β signaling and Treg function plays an essential role in maintenance of peripheral T cell tolerance [16,17]. Treg controls autoreactive T cells in the periphery to maintain self-tolerance [18-21]. Defects in Treg function can contribute to autoimmunity [20,21]. Treg development and function are maintained by X chromosome encoded transcription factor FOXP3. CTLA-4 is believed to play an essential role in immunosuppressive functions of Foxp3+CD25+CD4+ natural Treg cells and, its deficiency in Treg cells leads to autoimmunity [18,22]. Surface expression of CTLA-4 on the surface of Treg cells downregulate costimulatory molecules on APCs CD80 and CD86 [23]. The cytokine TGF-β promotes the differentiation of induced Treg (iTreg) cells in the presence of IL2. TGF-β also controls the effector function of Th17 cells by maintaining the Th17 regulatory state rTh17 [24]. Deficiency in TGF-β can result in severe autoimmunity [25]. PD-1(PDCD1), which interacts with PD-L1 and PD-L2, is another co-inhibitory molecule that negatively regulates T cell activation. The PD-1: PD-L signaling pathway inhibits the expression of GATA-3 and TBET, the transcription factors associated with effector cell function [26,27]. Aged mice deficient in pdcd1 has been reported to develop lupus like autoimmunity [28].

B cells are needed for autoantibody production and formation of immune complexes that induce local inflammatory reactions and tissue destruction. In addition, B cells can promote T cell effector function through antigen presentation and various co-signals and cytokines. B cell activation is initiated by binding of antigen to the B Cell Receptor (BCR). BCR activation initiates the formation of kinase mediated ‘signalosome’, which regulates the downstream events resulting in B cell differentiation and proliferation into antibody-producing cells or memory B cells [29]. Recently identified IL10 producing regulatory B cell phenotype (B10) has been shown to downregulate inflammation [30]. They may exert their immunosuppressive function by inhibiting CD4+ T cell proliferation, Th1 differentiation and monocyte activation [31].

Ubiquitin Ligases as Negative Regulators of Immune Response

Ubiquitin mediated proteosomal degradation regulates many cellular functions including immune response [32]. CBL and Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) family proteins are well characterized E3 type ubiquitin ligases that promote negative regulation of innate and adaptive immune cell signaling pathways [33-35]. CBL family proteins act as negative regulators of TCR signaling pathways [http://www.kegg. jp/kegg-bin/show_pathway?map04660]. CBLB knockout mice develop severe autoimmune disease phenotype [36]. CBL deficient mice exhibit an increased expression of TCR and its components and enhanced selection of CD4+ thymocytes [37], increased levels of LCK and FYN, and enhanced activity of the ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase [37,38]. TCR engagement of thymocytes and peripheral T cells isolated from CBL deficient mice exhibits increase proliferative response. Furthermore, these studies have indicated that CBL act as a negative regulator of protein tyrosine kinase mediated signal transduction pathways in T cells. [37-39]. Reduced CBL expression in effector memory CD4+ T cells lowers the threshold of their functional response [40]. Furthermore, the expression of CBL protein is low in lupus T cells compared with normal controls [41]. CBL activation by LCK has been reported to promote ubiquitylation, lysosomal targeting and degradation of zetachain of TCR/CD3 [42] in Jurkat TAg cells. This study has linked T cell hyper-responsiveness to prolonged survival and sustained signaling from internalized TCR/CD3-complexes, resulting from reduced LCK and CBL activity. CBL mediated ubiquitylation of zeta-chain through ZAP70 adaptor function has been described in another study [43]. Furthermore, CBL mediated LAT ubiquitylation and internalization following TCR stimulation has been reported by Balagopalan et al. [44]. Therefore, these facts lend support to the hypothesis that the CBL down regulation in peripheral T cells could have pronounced defects in controlling TCR signaling pathways and contribute to the development of autoimmunity. CBL and CBLB have also been shown to interact with BCR signaling molecules and downregulate BCR signaling pathways [45,46]. In addition, CBL mediated ubiquitylation controls BCRmediated antigen processing and presentation [47].

SOCS proteins provide a negative feedback loop to attenuate cytokine action to modulate immune responses by several mechanisms, which involves blocking of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and ubiquitylation of signaling proteins for proteosomal degradation. They are important regulators of inflammation and adaptive immunity. Their expression is induced by a subset of cytokines including those belonging to the interferon, interleukin and colony-stimulating factor families. The roles of SOCS family proteins are important in preventing uncontrolled T cell activation. In addition, they may play a role in T cell differentiation from naïve cells into Th1, Th2, Th17, and T regulatory (Treg) functional subtypes by disrupting cytokine signaling pathways. Emerging evidence also suggests that disruption of SOCS expression or activity is associated with several immune and inflammatory diseases [48]. Within the SOCS subfamily, role of SOCS4, SOCS5, and SOCS7 in T cell biology is unclear. SOCS1 is an inhibitor of FNG and STAT1 Signaling pathways [49]. T cells in socs1-/- mice also displayed features of aberrant activation and hyper responsiveness to cytokine induced IFN gamma production [50]. A SOCS1 deficiency in hematopoietic cell induces multi-organ inflammatory disease phenotype [51]. SOCS1 overexpression in activated T cells prevents Th1 differentiation [52]. SOCS2 appear to play a role in regulating Th2 differentiation as the activated SOCS2−/− CD4+ T cells has been shown to produce higher levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 [53]. In addition, T cell activation in the absence of SOCS2 has resulted in enhanced STAT5 and STAT6 phosphorylation and SOCS1 and SOCS3 expression. SOCS3 has been shown to negatively regulate CD28-mediated IL-2 production [54]. Its inhibition disrupts the negative feedback regulation of STAT3 signaling and enhances the generation of Th17 cells [55]. SOCS6 has been shown to promote proteosomal degradation of active form of T cell-specific protein-tyrosine kinase LCK, to negatively regulate T cell activation [56]. CISH has been shown to physically associate with IL-2 receptor beta chain, inhibit IL2 mediated activation of STAT5, and negatively control IL-2 signaling pathways [57]. It is possible that decrease IL-2 signaling, could disrupt the function of Treg cells [58]. SOCS protein regulation can occur at the transcriptional, translational, and post-translational levels. Existing knowledge on post transcriptional regulation of SOCS proteins by microRNAs is not complete.

MicroRNA (miRNA)

MiRNAs are approximately 22 nucleotide-long, non-coding RNA molecules, which act as post-transcriptional negative regulators of protein synthesis in diverse cellular pathways. They bind to the 3′ untranslated regions (3′ UTRs) of target gene mRNAs and block the translation, or stimulate rapid degradation of the transcripts. MiRNA genes reside in genome as intragenic (miRNA-coding genes located within protein coding gene introns or exons) or intergenic (miRNAcoding genes located in between protein-coding genes). Approximately 50% of human miRNAs appear to be intragenic [59], and are expected to be co-transcribed with their host genes. Intergenic miRNAs are typically transcribed by RNA polymerase II through the same mechanisms by which protein coding genes are transcribed. Initial transcription of a miRNA or a cluster of miRNAs generates a longer (more than 1kb) primary transcript (pri-miRNA) which includes a precursor miRNA hairpin (pre-miRNA), or sometimes more than one co-transcribed pre-miRNAs. Nuclear cleavage of the pri-miRNA liberates ~60–70 nt long pre-miRNA stem-loop intermediates and exported to the cytoplasm where the final mature miRNA is excised [60]. There is ample evidence for dysregulation of global miRNA expression under various pathological conditions [61,62]. Cellular miRNA expression is regulated at transcriptional as well as posttranscriptional levels in miRNA biogenesis. Epigenetic mechanisms, nuclear receptor [63] and other basic cell signaling pathways [64] could contribute to transcriptional level regulation. Epigenetic events such as DNA demethylation and histone acetylation can reverse repressive chromatin marks to poise miRNA genes for transcription. Nuclear sex hormone receptors bind sex hormones as ligands and act as transcription factors to regulate miRNA gene expression. Estrogen, which functions as a ligand for estrogen receptor, can contribute to female- biased expression of miRNA [65]. Estrogen independent female biased induction of miRNA expression can occur when the miRNA genes located on the X chromosome escape inactivation, and transcribed from both X alleles [65,66]. Post transcriptional steps in miRNA biogenesis pathway such as miRNA processing, RNA editing as well as miRNA-target interactions could further influence the levels of cytoplasmic miRNA [65-67]. It is widely accepted that miRNAs regulate the expression of multiple genes in the cells of origin. In addition, miRNAs can be transferred from cell-to cell by lipid based carriers and exert their potential role in intercellular communication. Growing evidence suggests that miRNAs excreted from incipient cells and extracellular microRNAs [miRNAs] stably exist in human body fluids [68]. Association of dysregulated miRNA expression with the risk or severity of AID has been summarized recently in several review articles [69-71].

Human X chromosome is highly enriched in miRNAs, second only to the chromosome 1 which encodes 134 miRNAs (Figure 1). Based on miRBase miRNA archive [www.mirbase.org 2012], 113 miRs are encoded by human X chromosome, while Y chromosome encodes only 2. Pinheiro et al. have previously reviewed the importance of X-linked miRNAs in immunity and cancer, and hypothesized that X-linked miRNAs may contribute to sex differences in disease pathogenesis [72]. The purpose of this review is to evaluate X-linked miRNAs for their potential to inhibit genes involved in immunosuppressive mechanisms and potential contribution to autoimmunity. MiRNA mediated downregulation of immunosuppressive pathways may be a contributing factor for AID pathogenesis. Female biased over expression of X-linked miRNAs which target immunosuppressive genes may play an important role in female predisposition.

rheumatology-current-human-chromosomes-database

Figure 1: Number of annotated miRNAs located in human chromosomes,based on miRBase miRNA database.

Skewed X-Chromosome Inactivation and Female Predisposition to Autoimmune Diseases

Hormones such as estrogen and prolactin may play a role in female predilection to AID, as does having 2 X chromosomes [73]. In diploid cells, females have two copies of X chromosome and males have only one copy. To neutralize the gene dosage difference of the X chromosome between the genders, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated in females, silencing the gene expression from inactive X [Xi]. DNA methylation is one of the mechanisms that contribute to repressive chromatin modifications associated with specific silencing of the genes from Xi. Despite this chromosome-wide silencing, about 15% of X-linked genes escape X inactivation in women and are expressed bi-allelically [74]. Previous studies have shown that the X chromosome encoded immune active genes can escape silencing on Xi due to DNA demethylation and over expressed in women compared with men [75]. Over expression of immune active genes can cause T cell autoreactivity, a hallmark of lupus disease manifestation. The men with Klinefelter’s Syndrome (47,XXY) develop lupus at the same rate as women also suggest that the presence of 2 X chromosomes contributes to disease development [76].

Suppressing the Suppressor –Mirna Mediated Downregulation of Negative Regulators of Immune System

To date, only a handful of X-linked miRNAs are functionally characterized in autoimmunity. Increased expression of miR-18b has been reported in PBMCs of MS patients experiencing a relapse [77]. MiR-223 is significantly upregulated in peripheral T-cells from RA patients compared with healthy donors [78]. MiR-223 can also potentially target CBLB (Table 1). Mir-221/222 cluster was reported to be upregulated in RA SF of human TNF transgenic mouse model [61]. On the contrary: a recent study has shown that X-linked miR-221 suppress genes involved in proliferation and survival [79] indicating miR-221 as a direct suppressor of immune response. Inhibition of miR-miR-221 increased T cell proliferation and survival indicating that miR-221 indeed serves in a feed back negative regulatory mechanism to control immune response. MiR-221 is also predicted to target several immunosuppressive genes (Table 1), indicating a suppressor of suppressor function. Increased expression of miR-221 in FOXP3+ Treg cells could prevent Treg proliferation and survival leading to an increased immune response. Lu et al., reported over expression of miR- 224 in SLE T cells [80]. It is possible that the functional consequence of upregulation of miR-221 is determined by T cell subset and micro environment. Transfection of Jurkat cells with miR-224 suppressed apoptosis inhibitory protein 5 [API5] and induced activation-induced cell death. MiR-510 expression is significantly higher in Treg cells of T1DM patients compared with healthy controls [81]. However, this differential expression between T1DM and healthy controls was not observed in conventional T cells, indicating a T cell subset specific overexpression of miR-510 in T1DM. Mir-510 can potentially target SOCS2 and SOCS3 (Table 1). Suppression of SOCS2 and SOCS3 function by miR-510 may be a contributing factor for chronic inflammation in T1DM. It is generally assumed that there is no gender bias in development of T1DM. However, in a study conducted by Howson et al., a subgroup of type 1 diabetic patients sensitive to a CTLA-4 allelic variation has shown a female biased association [1.94:1] [82].

mRNA X-linked miRNAs with poteintial to target 3' UTR
FOXP3 miR-1184,miR-448,miR-502-5p,miR-508-3p,miR-532-3p,miR-542-3p,miR-892a
CTLA4 miR-105/105ab,miR-1587,miR-3690,miR-3978,miR-4330,miR-4666-5p,miR-501-3p/502-3p,miR-502-5p,miR-505/505-3p,miR-542-3p,miR-548an,miR-892b
CBL miR-105,miR-1321,miR-1587,miR-188-3p,miR-18b,miR-221,mir-222,miR-224,miR-23c, miR-361-3p,miR-361-5p, miR-363,miR-3672,miR-374a,miR-3978,miR-421,miR-424,miR-4328,miR-4329,miR-450b-5p,miR-452,miR-4768-3p,miR-936,miR-98
CBLB miR-221/222,miR-223,miR-450b-5p,miR-4768-5p, miR-507,miR-513a-5p,miR-513c/514b-5p,miR-548an,miR-891b
SOCS1 miR-1912,miR-221/222,miR-361-3p,miR-766, miR-98
SOCS2 miR-1264,miR-188-3p,miR-224,miR-3202,miR-3690,miR-374c,miR-421,miR-448/448-3p,miR-452, miR-507,miR-510,rniR-513a-3p,miR-514/514b-3p,miR-542-5p,miR-890
SOCS3 miR-1184,miR-1321,miR-1468,miR-2114,miR-221/222,miR-3202,miR-361-3p,miR-384/384-3p,miR-3915,miR-3978,miR-450b-3p,miR-508-3p,miR-510,miR-718,miR-764,miR-766,miR-767-3p,miR-890
PDCD1 miR-188-3p,miR-188-5p,rniR-3202,rniR-361-3p,rniR-3672,miR-374ab,miR-3915,rniR-4428,miR-510,miR-532-3p,miR-548m,miR-766

3’UTR region of the immunosuppressive genes were scanned using TargetScan to identify potential miRNA binding sites. X-Chromosome encoded miRNAs were selected from the list of miRNA predicted to target each gene. Highlighted in bold are the miRNAs we have identified in as overexpressed in CD4+ T cells of women with lupus in respect to men with lupus. MiRNAs overexpressed in experimentally demethylated CD4+ T cells are underlined.

Table 1: X-linked miRNAs predicted to target immune suppressive genes.

Table 1 demonstrates that a large number of X-linked miRNAs are predicted to target genes that play essential roles in immunosuppressive pathways. Even though most of these miRNA:mRNA target pairs remained to be experimentally verified, it is reasonable to assume that key immunosuppressive genes could be the functional targets of these miRs. In a study to evaluate the differential expression of X-linked miRNAs in women with lupus in respect to men with lupus, we have identified 18 X -linked miRNAs over expressed in CD4+ T cells of women with lupus. Of those 5 [miR-188, miR-421, miR-503, Let- 7f2* and miR-98] were upregulated in experimentally demethylated CD4+ T cells suggesting that the escape of X inactivation due to DNA demethylation is a contributing factor for the upregulation. In addition, we have identified ERE binding matrices in all miRNAs over expressed in women with lupus. Estrogen mediated nuclear receptor binding may also play a role in transcriptional regulation of these miRNA genes. Let7f/miR-98 cluster is mapped to HUWE1 intronic region at dosage sensitive region Xp11.22 [83]. Mir-98 has been shown to reduce TLR4 mediated expression of immunosuppressive genes Il-10 in macrophages [84]. This study has also revealed that the overexpression of miR-98 results in increase expression of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6. X linked miRNA miR- 106a has also been identified as a regulator IL-10 expression [85]. In another study, Wang S et al. have demonstrated that miR-98 negatively regulates FAS mediated activation of cell death (AICD) [86]. AICD, which is found to be defective in SLE T cells [87], plays an important role in maintaining peripheral tolerance by eliminating autoreactive T cells. MiR-98, miR-188-3p and miR-421 are predicted to target CBL. We have verified that CBL is downregulated at both mRNA and protein levels upon transient transfection of miR-98 and miR-188-3p into CD4+ T cells obtained from healthy females. Previous studies have shown that CBL protein is downregulated in lupus CD4+ T cells [41]. It is likely that X-linked miRs such as miR-98 and miR-188-3p may mediate CBL downregulation in a female biased manner. TargetScan [www.targetscan.org] prediction indicates, that several other femalebiased miRNAs [highlighted in bold, Table 1] identified in our system potentially regulate the expression of FOXP3, CTLA-4, CBL, CBLB and SOCS family proteins. X chromosome encoded FOXP3 is constitutively expressed in nTregs, itself is subjected to X inactivation [88]. FOXP3 locus is demethylated exclusively in human nTregs, but not in activated FOXP3+ conventional T cells; suggesting FOXP3 demethylation status as a biomarker for nTregs [89,90]. FOXP3 expression in fresh cord blood T cells has been shown to be negatively regulated by miR- 31, a miR encoded from chromosome 9. To the best our knowledge, there is no published data specifically examining X-linked miRNA mediated regulation of FOXP3 expression. However, TargetScan predictions indicate X-linked miRNA binding sites on 3’UTR region of FOXP3 transcript. Balancing act of FOXP3 overexpression due to DNA demethylation and miRNA mediated downregulation appear to play an important role in determining Treg function associated with AID. Furthermore, TargetScan is one of many bioinformatics tools that are available for predicting interactions with mRNAs, and none are considered to be more accurate than the others. Therefore, experimental validation of these miRNA: mRNA pairs are needed to confirm true biological function. However, these predictions are intended to help design strategies in identifying their effects on disease mechanisms. Since miRNAs can be excreted from incipient cells and taken up by other immune cells, they can function as translational inhibitors in recipient cells as well. Finally, the overexpression of miRNAs from X chromosome and their compounding effects in blocking immunosuppressive pathways can be a contributing factor to immune system hyper responsiveness and female predisposition to AIDs.

Conclusion

Human X chromosome is highly enriched in miRNAs. However, we are still in the early stages of understanding how female-biased X-linked miRNA expression contributes to autoimmunity. Overexpression of X-linked miRNA due to skewed X inactivation could lead to unbalanced miRNA levels between sexes. Initial studies indicate that E3 Ubiquitin ligases such as CBL and SOCS family members as well as FOXP3, CTLA-4 and PDCD1 are potential biological targets of many X-linked miRNA. These molecules play an essential role in immunosuppressive mechanisms to maintain immune tolerance. Female-biased expression of X-linked miRNA and their suppression of protein production of the immunosuppressive genes may contribute to over active immune function and consequently, to female predilection in autoimmunity. The identification of X-linked miRNAs targeting immune suppressive genes may provide us a new arena for exploration of mechanisms for female-biased autoimmunity. It will also provide us new insight in the development of miRNA based therapies to autoimmune diseases.

Acknowledgments

Relevant research projects were supported by Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research Grant 2-UL1-TR-000433-06/project U034555, and VA Merit AR42525. I thank Dr. Bruce Richardson and Dr. Dipak Patel of University of Michigan for their suggestions and support.

References

  1. Waldner H (2009) The role of innate immune responses in autoimmune disease development. Autoimmun Rev 8: 400-404.
  2. Lang KS, Burow A, Kurrer M, Lang PA, Recher M (2007) The role of the innate immune response in autoimmune disease. J Autoimmun 29: 206-212.
  3. Bogdanos DP, Smyk DS, Invernizzi P, Rigopoulou EI, Blank M, et al. (2012) Infectome: A platform to trace infectious triggers of autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev .
  4. Moudgil KD, Choubey D (2011) Cytokines in autoimmunity: role in induction, regulation, and treatment. J Interferon Cytokine Res 31: 695-703.
  5. Luster AD (2002) The role of chemokines in linking innate and adaptive immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 14: 129-135.
  6. Viganò S, Perreau M, Pantaleo G, Harari A (2012) Positive and negative regulation of cellular immune responses in physiologic conditions and diseases. Clin Dev Immunol 2012: 485781.
  7. Germain RN (2012) Maintaining system homeostasis: the third law of Newtonian immunology. Nat Immunol 13: 902-906.
  8. Agrawal A, Sridharan A, Prakash S, Agrawal H (2012) Dendritic cells and aging: consequences for autoimmunity. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 8: 73-80.
  9. Marshak-Rothstein A (2006) Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Immunol 6: 823-835.
  10. Green NM, Moody KS, Debatis M, Marshak-Rothstein A (2012) Activation of autoreactive B cells by endogenous TLR7 and TLR3 RNA ligands. J Biol Chem 287: 39789-39799.
  11. Hackl D, Loschko J, Sparwasser T, Reindl W, Krug AB (2011) Activation of dendritic cells via TLR7 reduces Foxp3 expression and suppressive function in induced Tregs. Eur J Immunol 41: 1334-1343.
  12. Walsh ER, Pisitkun P, Voynova E, Deane JA, Scott BL, et al. (2012) Dual signaling by innate and adaptive immune receptors is required for TLR7-induced B-cell-mediated autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 16276-16281.
  13. Kondo T, Kawai T, Akira S (2012) Dissecting negative regulation of Toll-like receptor signaling. Trends Immunol 33: 449-458.
  14. Shi G, Ramaswamy M, Vistica BP, Cox CA, Tan C, et al. (2009) Unlike Th1, Th17 cells mediate sustained autoimmune inflammation and are highly resistant to restimulation-induced cell death. J Immunol 183: 7547-7556.
  15. Patakas A, Benson RA, Withers DR, Conigliaro P, McInnes IB, et al. (2012) Th17 effector cells support B cell responses outside of germinal centres. PLoS One 7: e49715.
  16. Miyara M, Gorochov G, Ehrenstein M, Musset L, Sakaguchi S, et al. (2011) Human FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in systemic autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev 10: 744-755.
  17. Kaminitz A, Yolcu ES, Stein J, Yaniv I, Shirwan H, et al. (2011) Killer Treg restore immune homeostasis and suppress autoimmune diabetes in prediabetic NOD mice. J Autoimmun 37: 39-47.
  18. Wing K, Sakaguchi S (2010) Regulatory T cells exert checks and balances on self tolerance and autoimmunity. Nat Immunol 11: 7-13.
  19. Dieckmann D, Plöttner H, Dotterweich S, Schuler G (2005) Activated CD4+ CD25+ T cells suppress antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells but induce a suppressive phenotype only in CD4+ T cells. Immunology 115: 305-314.
  20. Otsubo K, Kanegane H, Kamachi Y, Kobayashi I, Tsuge I, et al. (2011) Identification of FOXP3-negative regulatory T-like (CD4(+)CD25(+)CD127(low)) cells in patients with immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome. Clin Immunol 141: 111-120.
  21. Ellis JS, Wan X, Braley-Mullen H (2013) Transient depletion of CD4(+) CD25(+) regulatory T cells results in multiple autoimmune diseases in wild-type and B-cell-deficient NOD mice. Immunology 139: 179-186.
  22. Sojka DK, Hughson A, Fowell DJ (2009) CTLA-4 is required by CD4+CD25+ Treg to control CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia-induced proliferation. Eur J Immunol 39: 1544-1551.
  23. Wing K, Onishi Y, Prieto-Martin P, Yamaguchi T, Miyara M, et al. (2008) CTLA-4 control over Foxp3+ regulatory T cell function. Science 322: 271-275.
  24. Li MO, Flavell RA (2008) TGF-beta: a master of all T cell trades. Cell 134: 392-404.
  25. Aoki CA, Borchers AT, Li M, Flavell RA, Bowlus CL, et al. (2005) Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev 4: 450-459.
  26. Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH (2008) PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 26: 677-704.
  27. Fife BT, Pauken KE (2011) The role of the PD-1 pathway in autoimmunity and peripheral tolerance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1217: 45-59.
  28. Nishimura H, Nose M, Hiai H, Minato N, Honjo T (1999) Development of lupus-like autoimmune diseases by disruption of the PD-1 gene encoding an ITIM motif-carrying immunoreceptor. Immunity 11: 141-151.
  29. Harwood NE, Batista FD (2010) Early events in B cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol 28: 185-210.
  30. Bouaziz JD, Calbo S, Maho-Vaillant M, Saussine A, Bagot M, et al. (2010) IL-10 produced by activated human B cells regulates CD4(+) T-cell activation in vitro. Eur J Immunol 40: 2686-2691.
  31. Bouaziz JD, Le Buanec H, Saussine A, Bensussan A, Bagot M (2012) IL-10 producing regulatory B cells in mice and humans: state of the art. Curr Mol Med 12: 519-527.
  32. Bhoj VG, Chen ZJ (2009) Ubiquitylation in innate and adaptive immunity. Nature 458: 430-437.
  33. Liu YC (2004) Ubiquitin ligases and the immune response. Annu Rev Immunol 22: 81-127.
  34. Hoyne GF (2011) Mechanisms that regulate peripheral immune responses to control organ-specific autoimmunity. Clin Dev Immunol 2011: 294968.
  35. Gay DL, Ramón H, Oliver PM (2008) Cbl- and Nedd4-family ubiquitin ligases: balancing tolerance and immunity. Immunol Res 42: 51-64.
  36. Chiang YJ, Kole HK, Brown K, Naramura M, Fukuhara S, et al. (2000) Cbl-b regulates the CD28 dependence of T-cell activation. Nature 403: 216-220.
  37. Naramura M, Kole HK, Hu RJ, Gu H (1998) Altered thymic positive selection and intracellular signals in Cbl-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 15547-15552.
  38. Murphy MA, Schnall RG, Venter DJ, Barnett L, Bertoncello I, et al. (1998) Tissue hyperplasia and enhanced T-cell signalling via ZAP-70 in c-Cbl-deficient mice. Mol Cell Biol 18: 4872-4882.
  39. Dou H, Buetow L, Hock A, Sibbet GJ, Vousden KH, et al. (2012) Structural basis for autoinhibition and phosphorylation-dependent activation of c-Cbl. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 184-192.
  40. Brembilla NC, Weber J, Rimoldi D, Pradervand S, Schütz F, et al. (2008) c-Cbl expression levels regulate the functional responses of human central and effector memory CD4 T cells. Blood 112: 652-660.
  41. Jury EC, Kabouridis PS, Flores-Borja F, Mageed RA, Isenberg DA (2004) Altered lipid raft-associated signaling and ganglioside expression in T lymphocytes from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Invest 113: 1176-1187.
  42. Methi T, Berge T, Torgersen KM, Taskén K (2008) Reduced Cbl phosphorylation and degradation of the zeta-chain of the T-cell receptor/CD3 complex in T cells with low Lck levels. Eur J Immunol 38: 2557-2563.
  43. Wang HY, Altman Y, Fang D, Elly C, Dai Y, et al. (2001) Cbl promotes ubiquitination of the T cell receptor zeta through an adaptor function of Zap-70. J Biol Chem 276: 26004-26011.
  44. Balagopalan L, Barr VA, Sommers CL, Barda-Saad M, Goyal A, et al. (2007) c-Cbl-mediated regulation of LAT-nucleated signaling complexes. Mol Cell Biol 27: 8622-8636.
  45. Shao Y, Yang C, Elly C, Liu YC (2004) Differential regulation of the B cell receptor-mediated signaling by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cbl. J Biol Chem 279: 43646-43653.
  46. Kitaura Y, Jang IK, Wang Y, Han YC, Inazu T, et al. (2007) Control of the B cell-intrinsic tolerance programs by ubiquitin ligases Cbl and Cbl-b. Immunity 26: 567-578.
  47. Katkere B, Rosa S, Drake JR (2012) The Syk-binding ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl mediates signaling-dependent B cell receptor ubiquitination and B cell receptor-mediated antigen processing and presentation. J Biol Chem 287: 16636-16644.
  48. Yoshimura A, Suzuki M, Sakaguchi R, Hanada T, Yasukawa H (2012) SOCS, Inflammation, and Autoimmunity. Front Immunol 3: 20.
  49. Kile BT, Alexander WS (2001) The suppressors of cytokine signalling (SOCS). Cell Mol Life Sci 58: 1627-1635.
  50. Marine JC, Topham DJ, McKay C, Wang D, Parganas E, et al. (1999) SOCS1 deficiency causes a lymphocyte-dependent perinatal lethality. Cell 98: 609-616.
  51. Chong MM, Metcalf D, Jamieson E, Alexander WS, Kay TW (2005) Suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 in T cells and macrophages is critical for preventing lethal inflammation. Blood 106: 1668-1675.
  52. Diehl S, Rincón M (2002) The two faces of IL-6 on Th1/Th2 differentiation. Mol Immunol 39: 531-536.
  53. Knosp CA, Carroll HP, Elliott J, Saunders SP, Nel HJ, et al. (2011) SOCS2 regulates T helper type 2 differentiation and the generation of type 2 allergic responses. J Exp Med 208: 1523-1531.
  54. Matsumoto A, Seki Y, Watanabe R, Hayashi K, Johnston JA, et al. (2003) A role of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3/CIS3/SSI3) in CD28-mediated interleukin 2 production. J Exp Med 197: 425-436.
  55. Qin H, Yeh WI, De Sarno P, Holdbrooks AT, Liu Y, et al. (2012) Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3/suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (STAT3/SOCS3) axis in myeloid cells regulates neuroinflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 5004-5009.
  56. Choi YB, Son M, Park M, Shin J, Yun Y (2010) SOCS-6 negatively regulates T cell activation through targeting p56lck to proteasomal degradation. J Biol Chem 285: 7271-7280.
  57. Aman MJ, Migone TS, Sasaki A, Ascherman DP, Zhu Mh, et al. (1999) CIS associates with the interleukin-2 receptor beta chain and inhibits interleukin-2-dependent signaling. J Biol Chem 274: 30266-30272.
  58. Palmer DC, Restifo NP (2009) Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) in T cell differentiation, maturation, and function. Trends Immunol 30: 592-602.
  59. Rodriguez A, Griffiths-Jones S, Ashurst JL, Bradley A (2004) Identification of mammalian microRNA host genes and transcription units. Genome Res 14: 1902-1910.
  60. Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116: 281-297.
  61. Pandis I (2012) Identification of microRNA-221/222 and microRNA-323-3p association with rheumatoid arthritis via predictions using the human tumour necrosis factor transgenic mouse model. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 71: 1716-1723.
  62. Chan EK, Ceribelli A, Satoh M (2013) MicroRNA-146a in autoimmunity and innate immune responses. Ann Rheum Dis 72 Suppl 2: ii90-90ii95.
  63. Yang Z, Wang L (2011) Regulation of microRNA expression and function by nuclear receptor signaling. Cell Biosci 1: 31.
  64. Blahna MT, Hata A (2013) Regulation of miRNA biogenesis as an integrated component of growth factor signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 25: 233-240.
  65. Bhat-Nakshatri P, Wang G, Collins NR, Thomson MJ, Geistlinger TR, et al. (2009) Estradiol-regulated microRNAs control estradiol response in breast cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 4850-4861.
  66. Morgan CP, Bale TL (2012) Sex differences in microRNA regulation of gene expression: no smoke, just miRs. Biol Sex Differ 3: 22.
  67. Breving K, Esquela-Kerscher A (2010) The complexities of microRNA regulation: mirandering around the rules. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 42: 1316-1329.
  68. Kosaka N, Iguchi H, Yoshioka Y, Takeshita F, Matsuki Y, et al. (2010) Secretory mechanisms and intercellular transfer of microRNAs in living cells. J Biol Chem 285: 17442-17452.
  69. Liston A, Papadopoulou AS, Danso-Abeam D, Dooley J (2012) MicroRNA-29 in the adaptive immune system: setting the threshold. Cell Mol Life Sci 69: 3533-3541.
  70. Kapsogeorgou EK, Gourzi VC, Manoussakis MN, Moutsopoulos HM, Tzioufas AG (2011) Cellular microRNAs (miRNAs) and Sjögren's syndrome: candidate regulators of autoimmune response and autoantigen expression. J Autoimmun 37: 129-135.
  71. Amarilyo G, La Cava A (2012) miRNA in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Immunol 144: 26-31.
  72. Pinheiro I, Dejager L, Libert C (2011) X-chromosome-located microRNAs in immunity: might they explain male/female differences? The X chromosome-genomic context may affect X-located miRNAs and downstream signaling, thereby contributing to the enhanced immune response of females. BioEssays: news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology 33: 791-802.
  73. Strickland FM, Hewagama A, Lu Q, Wu A, Hinderer R, et al. (2012) Environmental exposure, estrogen and two X chromosomes are required for disease development in an epigenetic model of lupus. J Autoimmun 38: J135-143.
  74. Berletch JB, Yang F, Xu J, Carrel L, Disteche CM (2011) Genes that escape from X inactivation. Hum Genet 130: 237-245.
  75. Lu Q, Wu A, Tesmer L, Ray D, Yousif N, et al. (2007) Demethylation of CD40LG on the inactive X in T cells from women with lupus. J Immunol 179: 6352-6358.
  76. Dillon S, Aggarwal R, Harding JW, Li LJ, Weissman MH, et al. (2011) Klinefelter's syndrome (47,XXY) among men with systemic lupus erythematosus. Acta Paediatr 100: 819-823.
  77. Otaegui D, Baranzini SE, Armañanzas R, Calvo B, Muñoz-Culla M, et al. (2009) Differential micro RNA expression in PBMC from multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS One 4: e6309.
  78. Fulci V, Scappucci G, Sebastiani GD, Giannitti C, Franceschini D, et al. (2010) miR-223 is overexpressed in T-lymphocytes of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis. Hum Immunol 71: 206-211.
  79. Grigoryev YA, Kurian SM, Hart T, Nakorchevsky AA, Chen C, et al. (2011) MicroRNA regulation of molecular networks mapped by global microRNA, mRNA, and protein expression in activated T lymphocytes. J Immunol 187: 2233-2243.
  80. Lu MC, Lai NS, Chen HC, Yu HC, Huang KY, et al. (2013) Decreased microRNA(miR)-145 and increased miR-224 expression in T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus involved in lupus immunopathogenesis. Clin Exp Immunol 171: 91-99.
  81. Hezova R, Slaby O, Faltejskova P, Mikulkova Z, Buresova I, et al. (2010) microRNA-342, microRNA-191 and microRNA-510 are differentially expressed in T regulatory cells of type 1 diabetic patients. Cell Immunol 260: 70-74.
  82. Howson JM, Dunger DB, Nutland S, Stevens H, Wicker LS, et al. (2007) A type 1 diabetes subgroup with a female bias is characterised by failure in tolerance to thyroid peroxidase at an early age and a strong association with the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 gene. Diabetologia 50: 741-746.
  83. Froyen G, Belet S, Martinez F, Santos-Rebouças CB, Declercq M, et al. (2012) Copy-number gains of HUWE1 due to replication- and recombination-based rearrangements. Am J Hum Genet 91: 252-264.
  84. Liu Y, Chen Q, Song Y, Lai L, Wang J, et al. (2011) MicroRNA-98 negatively regulates IL-10 production and endotoxin tolerance in macrophages after LPS stimulation. FEBS Lett 585: 1963-1968.
  85. Sharma A, Kumar M, Aich J, Hariharan M, Brahmachari SK, et al. (2009) Posttranscriptional regulation of interleukin-10 expression by hsa-miR-106a. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 5761-5766.
  86. Wang S, Tang Y, Cui H, Zhao X, Luo X, et al. (2011) Let-7/miR-98 regulate Fas and Fas-mediated apoptosis. Genes Immun 12: 149-154.
  87. Xu L, Zhang L, Yi Y, Kang HK, Datta SK (2004) Human lupus T cells resist inactivation and escape death by upregulating COX-2. Nat Med 10: 411-415.
  88. Tommasini A, Ferrari S, Moratto D, Badolato R, Boniotto M, et al. (2002) X-chromosome inactivation analysis in a female carrier of FOXP3 mutation. Clin Exp Immunol 130: 127-130.
  89. Wieczorek G, Asemissen A, Model F, Turbachova I, Floess S, et al. (2009) Quantitative DNA methylation analysis of FOXP3 as a new method for counting regulatory T cells in peripheral blood and solid tissue. Cancer Res 69: 599-608.
  90. Baron U, Floess S, Wieczorek G, Baumann K, Grützkau A, et al. (2007) DNA demethylation in the human FOXP3 locus discriminates regulatory T cells from activated FOXP3(+) conventional T cells. Eur J Immunol 37: 2378-2389.
Citation: Hewagama A (2013) Role of X-Chromosome encoded miRNAs in Autoimmunity: Suppressing the suppressor and Female Predisposition. Rheumatol Curr Res 3:118.

Copyright: © 2013 Hewagama A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top