Journal of Plant Biochemistry & Physiology

Journal of Plant Biochemistry & Physiology
Open Access

ISSN: 2329-9029

+44 1478 350008

Expert Review - (2013) Volume 1, Issue 4

Root Phenomics-New Windows to Understand Plant Performance and Increase Crop Productivity

Michael Gomez Selvaraj1, Satoshi Ogawa1,2 and Manabu Ishitani1*
1International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), A.A. 6713, Cali, Colombia, USA
2Department of Global Agriculture Science, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Science, University of Tokyo, Japan
*Corresponding Author: Manabu Ishitani, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia Email:

Received Date: Apr 26, 2013 / Accepted Date: Oct 21, 2013 / Published Date: Oct 28, 2013

Abstract

Roots with ideal characteristics are important for sustaining crop yields, particularly when plants are grown in soils with inadequate water and nutrients [1-4]. Understanding the development of roots and their interaction with the soil environment is vital to manipulate the root traits, and ultimately, the food security [5]. For instance, rice has a significant level of genetic variation in root traits [6-9], that can be harnessed for improving its adaptation to abiotic stresses. However, genetic improvement of root systems through phenotypic selection at the breeding level is impractical due to complexity in phenotyping root traits [3,10,11].

Roots with ideal characteristics are important for sustaining crop yields, particularly when plants are grown in soils with inadequate water and nutrients [1-4]. Understanding the development of roots and their interaction with the soil environment is vital to manipulate the root traits, and ultimately, the food security [5]. For instance, rice has a significant level of genetic variation in root traits [6-9], that can be harnessed for improving its adaptation to abiotic stresses. However, genetic improvement of root systems through phenotypic selection at the breeding level is impractical due to complexity in phenotyping root traits [3,10,11].

Monoliths, soil cores and minirhizotrons have so far been the methods most commonly used for field root phenotyping, whereas methods relying on aeroponics, hydroponics, moistened paper roll towel, metallic net floating and petri dishes, have been used for the high-throughput screening of root system architecture (RSA) under controlled conditions. These high-throughput methods have been widely used to identify QTLs in several crops. The other mediumthroughput innovative methods, namely root basket, have been employed recently and also cloned a major deeper rooting quantitative trait loci (Dro1) that determines the RSA in rice [12-14]. This approach maintains the shallow and deep orientation of roots, enabling the sequential screening of ratio of deeper roots. Field validation of Dro1 introgressed lines of IR64 demonstrated positive relationship between RSA and yield performance under drought stress [14]. This validation will be essential for testing the field application of promising root traits that are identified under controlled conditions. So far, limited literature is available for the analyses of genetic factors contributing to RSA due to the difficulty in observing root distributions and complexity of environmental effects under field conditions. This review paper will highlight the recent advances in root phenomics technologies and their possibility to apply these techniques in crop phenotyping experiments that are relevant for plant performance field conditions.

Although root phenotyping has been a bottleneck for trait-based selection in the past, innovative high-throughput methods have been developed recently, allowing the evaluation of many root traits and phenes that could be important for resistance to abiotic stress. Recent advances in methods to measure root traits suggest that highthroughput simple screening techniques are also becoming available for field studies. Recently, Trachsel et al. [15] developed a shovelomics strategy of screening RSA traits in the field with a high-throughput phenotyping of Maize. With this strategy, ten different architectural traits of the root crown of field grown maize plants were visually scored [15]. Also, there is a great potential to apply the same strategy to rice, and with increased efficiency by using recent analytical methods, such as morphometric or fractal analysis. Taking imaging techniques from the medical field, phenomics offers to crop physiologists new choices into the inner workings of crop plants. Over the past decade or so, nondestructive methodologies, including ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and X-rays have been used in soil systems, in an attempt to confine the inner space of soil and its contents in three dimensions [16-18]. Recent advances in Computed Tomography (CT) have led to improvements in scan resolution, quality, acquisition time and sample size. Of all possible non-destructive techniques, CT has been renowned as the one that is able to deal effectively with the complex geophysical and geochemical complexities of soil across wide range of environments [19]. Also, CT technology serves as a stepping stone for a better understanding of the role of plants in the critical zone at the soil-atmosphere interface.

Recently, investigation observed a high correlation between micro- CT-observed wheat roots and roots observed by standard methodology. The CT technique is speedy, safe and sound to detect roots at quite high spatial resolutions [20]. The drawback of the CT methodology lies not in the scanning technique, but in the software available to digitally segment roots from soil and air. However, this will be improved significantly as automated segmentation algorithms are developed [20]. This can be achieved through the strong collaboration between software engineers and crop physiologists. The combination of very fast scans and programmed segmentation will allow CT methodology to perform its potential as a high-throughput technique for the examination of roots in soils. A novel 3D imaging and RootReader3D software platform was developed for high-throughput phenotyping of root traits in rice [21]. This sophisticated platform provides the capability to measure root traits with a high degree of spatial and temporal resolution, and will facilitate novel investigations into the development of entire root systems or selected components of root systems.

More recently, root-tracking algorithms were developed to segment roots from their surroundings by using features of roots, such as shape and continuous growth [5,22,23]. RooTrak can successfully, with minimal user intervention, extract a range of RSA from the surrounding soil and promises to facilitate future root phenotyping efforts [5]. As said above, new technologies can be employed to dissect the phenotypes for genetic mapping and in physiological studies for trait validation in crop breeding programmes.

References

  1. Bengough AG, McKenzie BM, Hallett PD, Valentine TA (2011) Root elongation, water stress, and mechanical impedance: A review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. J Exp Bot 62: 59-68.
  2. Gowda VRP, Henry A, Yamauchi A, Shashidhar HE, Serraj R (2011) Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Res 122: 1-13.
  3. Lynch JP (2011) Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: Tools for future crops. Plant Physiol 156:1041-1049.
  4. Lynch JP, Brown KM (2012) New roots for agriculture: Exploiting the root phenome. Philos T Roy Soc B 367: 1598-1604.
  5. Mairhofer S, Zappala S, Tracy SR, Sturrock C, Bennett M, et al. (2012) RooTrak: Automated recovery of three dimensional plant root architecture in soil from X-ray microcomputed tomography images using visual tracking. Plant Physiol 158: 561-569.
  6. Kamoshita A, Babu RC, Boopathi NM, Fukai S (2008) Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of drought-resistance traits for development of rice cultivars adapted to rainfed environments. Field Crops Res 109: 1-23.
  7. Witcombe JR, Hollington PA, Howarth CJ, Reader S, Steele KA (2008) Breeding for abiotic stresses for sustainable agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363: 703-716.
  8. Bernier J, Serraj R, Kumar A, Venuprasad R, Impa S, et al. (2009) The large-effect drought-resistance QTL qtl12.1 increases water uptake in upland rice. Field Crops Res 110: 139-146.
  9. Henry A, Gowda VRP, Torres RO, McNally KL, Serraj R (2011) Variation in root system architecture and drought response in rice (Oryza sativa): Phenotyping of the Oryza SNP panel in rainfed lowland fields. Field Crops Res 120: 205-214.
  10. De Dorlodot S, Forster B, Pages L, Price A, Tuberosa R, et al. (2007) Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops. Trends Plant Sci 12: 474-481.
  11. Pieruschka R, Poorter H (2012) Phenotyping plants: Genes, phenes and machines. Funct Plant Biol 39: 813-820.
  12. Uga Y, Okuno K, Yano M (2010) Fine mapping of Sta1, a quantitative trait locus determining stele transversal area, on rice chromosome 9. Mol Breed 26: 533-538.
  13. Uga Y, Okuno K, Yano M (2011) Dro1, a major QTL involved in deep rooting of rice under upland field conditions. J Exp Bot 62: 2485-2494.
  14. Uga Y, Sugimoto K, Ogawa S, Rane J, Ishitani M et al. (2013) Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat Genet 45:1097-1102.
  15. Trachsel S, Kaeppler SM, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2011) Shovelomics: High throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays L.) root architecture in the field. Plant Soil 341: 75-87.
  16. Young I, Crawford J, Nunan N, Otten W, Spiers A (2008) Microbial distribution in soils: physics and scaling. Adv Agron 100: 81-121.
  17. Gregory P, Bengough A, Grinev D, Schmidt H, Thomas WTB, et al. (2009) Root phenomics of crops-Opportunities and challenges. Funct Plant Biol 36: 992-929.
  18. Tracy S, Roberts J, Black C, McNeill A, Davidson R, et al. (2010) The X-factor: Visualizing undisturbed root architecture in soils using X-ray computed tomography. J Exp Bot 61: 311-313.
  19. Lontoc-Roy M, Dutilleul P, Prasher SO, Han L, Brouillet T, et al. (2006) Advances in the acquisition and analysis of CT scan data to isolate a crop root system from the soil medium and quantify root system complexity in 3-D space. Geoderma 137: 231-241.
  20. Flavel RJ, Guppy CN, Tighe M, Watt M, McNeill A, et al. (2012) Non-destructive quantification of cereal roots in soil using high-resolution X-ray tomography. J Exp Bot 63: 2503-11.
  21. Clark R, MacCurdy R, Jung J, Shaff J, McCouch S, et al. (2011) Three-dimensional root phenotyping with a novel imaging software platform. Plant Physiol 156: 455-465.
  22. Mooney SJ, Pridmore TP, Helliwell J, Bennett M (2012) Developing X-ray computed tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil. Plant Soil 352: 1-22.
  23. Tracy SR., Black CR, Roberts JA, McNeill A, Davidson R, et al. (2012) Quantifying the effect of soil compaction on three varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using X-ray micro computed tomography (CT). Plant Soil 353: 195-208.
Citation: Selvaraj MG, Ogawa S, Ishitani M (2013) Root Phenomics-New Windows to Understand Plant Performance and Increase Crop Productivity. J Plant Biochem Physiol 1:116. doi: 10.35248/2090-7214.13.1.116

Copyright: © 2013 Selvaraj MG, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top