Journal of Perioperative Medicine
Open Access

Sedation Protocols for Diagnostic Radiography: Benefits and Considerations

Hong Lu^{* *}Correspondence: Hong Lu, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Email:

Author info »

Description

Diagnostic radiography is a valuable tool in medical imaging that provides important information about a patient's condition. However, some patients may experience anxiety or discomfort during the procedure, which can affect the quality of the images and make it challenging for healthcare providers to obtain the necessary diagnostic information. Sedation protocols are often used to address these issues and improve patient comfort during diagnostic radiography. In this article, we will discuss the benefits and considerations of sedation protocols for diagnostic radiography.

Benefits of sedation protocols for diagnostic radiography

Sedation protocols can offer several benefits for patients undergoing diagnostic radiography. One of the most significant benefits is improved patient comfort. Sedation can reduce anxiety and discomfort, making the procedure more tolerable for patients. This can also help to improve the quality of the images obtained during the procedure, as patients who are relaxed and calm are less likely to move, which can cause blurring or distortion of the images [1].

Another benefit of sedation protocols is that they can help to reduce the risk of adverse events during the procedure. Patients who are anxious or agitated may be more prone to sudden movements, which can increase the risk of injury or complications. By keeping patients calm and relaxed, sedation can help to minimize these risks and ensure a safer procedure for both the patient and the healthcare provider [2].

Considerations for sedation protocols in diagnostic radiography

While sedation protocols can offer several benefits, they are not without their considerations. One of the primary considerations is patient safety. Sedation should only be administered by qualified healthcare professionals who have received the necessary training and have the appropriate equipment on hand to monitor the patient's vital signs and respond to any adverse events that may occur [3].

Another consideration is the potential for medication interactions or contraindications. Patients who are taking certain medications or have certain medical conditions may not be suitable candidates for sedation, as it could interact with their current medications or exacerbate their condition. Healthcare providers must carefully evaluate each patient's medical history and current medications before administering sedation [4].

The type and level of sedation must also be carefully considered. There are various levels of sedation, ranging from minimal sedation, where the patient is still able to respond to verbal cues, to general anesthesia, where the patient is completely unconscious. The appropriate level of sedation for each patient will depend on several factors, including their medical history, the procedure being performed, and their individual response to sedation.

It is also important to consider the potential for side effects or complications associated with sedation. While sedation is generally safe, there is a risk of adverse events, such as respiratory depression, cardiovascular instability, or allergic reactions. Healthcare providers must be prepared to monitor patients closely and respond promptly to any adverse events that may occur [5].

Conclusion

Sedation protocols can offer several benefits for patients undergoing diagnostic radiography. They can improve patient comfort, reduce the risk of adverse events, and improve the quality of the images obtained during the procedure. However, healthcare providers must carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of sedation and evaluate each patient's medical history and current medications before administering sedation. By following appropriate sedation protocols, healthcare providers can help to ensure a safer and more comfortable experience for their patients during diagnostic radiography.

References

1. Dalal PG, Murray D, Cox T, McAllister J, Snider R. Sedation and anesthesia protocols used for magnetic resonance imaging studies in infants: Provider and pharmacologic considerations. Anesth Anal. 2006;103(4):863-868.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ. Paediatric MRI under sedation: Is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(11):1353-64.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Mathur AM, Neil JJ, McKinstry RC, Inder TE. Transport, monitoring, and successful brain MR imaging in unsedated neonates. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38:260-264.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Schooler GR, Cravero JP, Callahan MJ. Assessing and conveying risks and benefits of imaging in neonates using ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia. Pediatr Radiol. 2021;52(4):616-621.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Oztek MA, Brunnquell CL, Hoff MN, Boulter DJ, Mossa-Basha M, Beauchamp LH, et al. Practical considerations for radiologists in implementing a patient-friendly MRI experience. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;29(4):181-186.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]