Entomology, Ornithology & Herpetology: Current Research

Entomology, Ornithology & Herpetology: Current Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-0983

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2013) Volume 2, Issue 2

Serum Complement Activity in Two Species of Divergent Central African Crocodiles

Mark Merchant1*, Charles Determan1, Rodolfo Falconi1 and Matthew Shirley2
1Department of Chemistry, McNeese State University, Lake Charles, LA, USA
2Department Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
*Corresponding Author: Mark Merchant, Ph.D, Professor of Biochemistry, McNeese State University, Lake Charles, LA, USA, Tel: (337) 475-5773, Fax: (337) 475-5950 Email:

Abstract

Serum complement in the serum of two divergent Central African crocodiles, the African dwarf crocodile (Osteolaemus tetraspis) and the slender-snouted crocodile (Mecistops cataphractus) was assessed using a sheep red blood cell (SRBC) hemolytic assay. The hemolysis for both crocodilian species was serum volume-, time-, and temperature-dependent. Although the serum volume-dependent activities were similar for both species (CH50 = 81 μL for Osteolaemus tetraspis and 96 μL for Mecistops cataphractus), the kinetic curves show a greater amount cooperativity, and thus more rapid SRBC lysis, for Osteolaemus tetraspis. In addition, the hemolytic activities were very similar at 10 – 35°C, but the serum from Osteolaemus tetraspis was more active than that of Mecistops cataphractus at the temperature extremes tested (5°C and 40°C). The activities for both species were almost completely inhibited by 1 mM EDTA, indicating the dependency on divalent metal ions. However, the EDTA-inhibited hemolysis could be restored by the addition of excess Mg2+ and Ca2+, but not Ba2+, Cu2+, or Fe2+, which exhibited the specificity for Mg2+or Ca2+. These data indicate that these sympatric, but evolutionarily and ecologically divergent crocodile species have similar SRBC hemolysis activities with similar mechanisms, thus reinforcing the idea that serum complement is an ancient, innate immunity host defense system.

<

Keywords: Crocodilian; Innate immunity; Serum complement

Introduction

Serum complement is a key component of innate immunity that can be found in all vertebrates and many ancient invertebrates [1,2]. Although serum complement constitutes a non-specific immune response, it is an important first line of defense upon initial infection [3]. Mutations in mammalian serum complement proteins result in serious clinical conditions [4], and acquired serum complement deficiencies can result in a plethora of disease states [3].

Serum complement can be activated by three distinct mechanisms: 1) the classical mechanism, which relies on the interaction of antibody: antigen complexes, 2) the lectin pathway, which is dependent upon common microbial surface carbohydrate pattern recognition, and 3) the alternative pathway, which is activated by the cleavage of an internal thioester in a specific protein component in response to foreign antigen. All three of these complement activation mechanisms involve a proteolytic cleavage cascade of common components, and eventually culminate in the formation of a multiprotein “membrane attack complex” in the outer envelope of microbes, which compromises the integrity of the membrane, and results in eventual lysis. The complement cascades can be activated by, and attack, a broad spectrum of microbes, and do not result in immunological memory, and thus are considered to be part of the innate immune system [5]. However, several of the proteolytic products that are generated during complement activation have important function in the activation of the acquired immune response. For instance, after complement component C3 is cleaved into C3a and C3b, C3a acts as an anaphylatoxin [6] and C3b functions as a potent opsonin, rendering microbes susceptible to phagocytosis [7]. In addition, C1q and C5a act as chemoattractants for the chemotaxis of dendritic cells and neutrophils, respectively [8,9] thereby recruiting important cellular components to the site of infection. Furthermore, complement protein C4a mediates inflammation [10] by activation of phagocytic cells, stimulation of the release of granule-based enzymes, and generation of oxidants [11].

Previous studies in our laboratory have shown that several crocodilian species exhibit potent and broad-acting serum complement activities [12-15]. This study was conducted to examine the complement activity in two species of sympatric, but morphologically and ecologically divergent crocodilians in Central Africa.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Biochemicals

SRBCs (10% v/v, washed and pooled) were purchased from Rockland Immunochemicals (Rockland, MD, USA). Ethylene diamine tetraacetate (EDTA), calcium chloride, magnesium chloride, barium sulfate, ferrous chloride, cupric chloride and pronase derived from Streptomyces griseus were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Treatment of Animals

Crocodiles were captured from the N’Dougou Lagoon, Bongo River, and Nyanga River areas of the Gamba Complex region in Gabon, Africa. Animals were captured using standard crocodilian capture techniques, including by hand, tongs, locking snare, or research darting [16]. Blood was collected from a total of 22 Osteolaemus tetraspis and 15 Mecistops cataphractus. 5 mL of whole blood were collected from animals measuring less than 80 cm, and ≥ 10 mL of blood were collected from larger animals, depending on body size and condition. Blood was collected from crocodiles via the spinal vein [17,18] using 3.8 cm, 18 ga needles and 10 mL syringes. The whole blood was allowed to clot at ambient temperature, and the serum was separated and stored on ice in the field, and then at -20°C until analysis. The sera samples for each species were pooled, such that subsequent analyses could be considered averages for each respective species. All animals were released at the site of capture. All of the activities were approved by McNeese State University and University of Florida Animal Care and Use Committees.

Serum complement assay

A 100 μL suspension of 2% SRBCs (v/v) in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) was treated with an equal volume of various dilutions of crocodile serum. The SRBCs were incubated for 30 min at ambient temperature, and then centrifuged at 16,000xg to pellet intact cells and cellular debris. The resulting (175 μL) supernatant was transferred to a microtiter plate and the optical density (540 nm) was measured in a BioRad Benchmark Plus™ microtiter plate reader.

For assays in which the kinetic parameters of SRBC hemolysis were examined, 1 mL of serum was mixed with 1 mL of 2% SRBCs (v/v). Samples were removed to 10 μL of 1 M EDTA at different time points, and immediately centrifuged (3000xg, 5 min, ambient temperature). The resulting supernatants (175 μL) were removed to a microtiter plate, and the absorbance at 540 nm was measured.

To determine the temperature-dependency of SRBC hemolysis for the crocodile serum, samples and 2% SRBCs (v/v) were incubated separately at different temperatures for 10 minutes to reach thermal equilibrium. Equal volumes of SRBC and serum were mixed, and incubated for 30 minutes, followed by centrifugation at ambient temperature (5 min, 3000xg). The absorbencies of the supernatants were measured at 540 nm as described above.

The requirements of divalent metal ions on the hemolysis of 1% SRBCs by crocodile serum were determined by including different concentrations of EDTA (0.1 - 5.0 M) in the incubation. The samples were incubated for 30 min at ambient temperature, and then processed as previously described. The effects of Mg2+, Ca2+, Ba2+, Fe2+ and Cu2+ on the EDTA-inhibited SRBC hemolysis were investigated using similar methodology.

Statistics and controls

All data are displayed as the results of means ± standard deviations of four independent determinations. The hemolysis value for each sample was compared to a positive hemolysis control (1% SRBCs in 0.1% Triton-X detergent, vortexed for 1 min) and expressed as the % of maximum hemolysis. CH50 values for the serum from each species were determined as previously described [13]. The statistical significance between treatment groups was determined by analysis of variance using Duncan’s post-hoc comparisons [19].

Results

Substantial serum volume-dependent hemolytic activity was observed with only 100 μL of serum (per 1 mL reaction volume) from both Mecistops cataphractus (52.0 ± 6.0%) and Osteolaemus tetraspis (61.6 ± 6.01.9%) serum, and maximum activity (102.4 ± 1.0%) was achieved at only 300 μL of serum for Osteolaemus tetraspis (Figure 1). In contrast, the serum from Mecistops cataphractus exhibited 94.7 ± 0.9% activity at 300 μL and then slowly increased to 99.1 ± 1.2% and 102.4 ± 0.9% at 400 and 500 μL, respectively.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-volume-dependent-hemolysis

Figure 1: Serum volume-dependent hemolysis of SRBCs. Incubation of 1% (v/v) SRBCs with different volumes of serum from Osteolaemus tetraspis Or Mecistops cataphractus for 30 min resulted in a volume-dependent hemolysis, as measured spectrophotometrically at 450 nm. The results are expressed as % of maximum hemolysis, relative to a positive control, and represent the means ± standard deviations, and represent the results of four independent determinations.

The rate of SRBC hemolysis was measured for Osteolaemus tetraspis and Mecistops cataphractus (Figure 2). Serum from Osteolaemus tetraspis exhibited measurable hemolytic activity (4.3 ± 0.1%, P<0.05) within 2 min of exposure to SRBCs and near-maximum activity (75.5 ± 6.2%) was observed at 15 min. In contrast, Mecistops cataphractus serum did not display measurable hemolytic activity until 10 min exposure and maximum activity was observed at 20 min (75.8 ± 1.1%; Figure 2). Despite the delay in activity of the Mecistops cataphractus serum, the slopes of the lines are very similar (0.0854 for Osteolaemus tetraspis and 0.0833 for Mecistops cataphractus). Despite the differences in the initial rate of reaction, the serum from both species reached the same maximum values, 78.8 ± 0.7% for Osteolaemus tetraspis and 78.6 ± 0.2% for Mecistops cataphractus (P>0.05), at 30 min.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-Kinetic-analysis

Figure 2: Kinetic analysis of SRBC hemolysis. Incubation of 1% SRBCs (v/v) with Osteolaemus tetraspis Or Mecistops cataphractus serum, diluted in normal saline, for different amounts of time resulted in a time-dependent hemolysis. The results are expressed as the % of maximum hemolysis, relative to a positive control, and represent the means ± standard deviations, and represent the results of four independent determinations.

The serum complement activities for both species were the same at 10 and 15°C (P>0.05). The activity of serum complement for Osteolaemus tetraspis was slightly higher at 20-35°C (P<0.05). However, the activity for Osteolaemus tetraspis at (Figure 3) the temperature extremes of 5°C (71.8 ± 2.5%) and 40oC (66.7 ± 2.7%) was significantly higher than that for Mecistops cataphractus (41.7 ± 4.6% and 31.5 ± 2.8%, respectively; P<0.01).

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-Mecistops-cataphractus

Figure 3: Effects of temperature on hemolysis of SRBCs by Osteolaemus tetraspis Or Mecistops cataphractus. Incubation of 1% SRBCs (v/v) with 0.5% crocodile serum, diluted with normal saline, for 30 min resulted in a temperature-dependent hemolysis. The results are expressed as % of maximum hemolysis, relative to a positive control, and represent the results of four independent determinations.

There was no significant difference in the effects of 0, 0.1, or 0.5 mM EDTA on crocodile serum-mediated SRBC hemolysis for serum from either species (Figure 4; P>0.05). However, the addition of 1 mM and 5 mM EDTA reduced the activity to 9.7 ± 0.5% and 8.8 ± 0.2 % activity, respectively (p<0.01).

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-hemolysis-SRBCs

Figure 4: Effects of EDTA on the hemolysis of SRBCs by serum from O. tetraspis or M. cataphractus. Incubation of crocodile serum with different concentrations of EDTA resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of SRBC hemolysis. The results are expressed as % of maximum hemolysis, relative to a positive control, and represent the results of four independent determinations.

The effects of a variety of divalent metal ions on the EDTAinhibited hemolysis of SRBCs were investigated, and the results are illustrated in Figure 5. Untreated Osteolaemus tetraspis and Mecistops cataphractus sera samples generated 96.2 ± 3.65 and 94.1 ± 2.1% of maximum activity, respectively. Treatment of the sera samples with 1 mM EDTA produced an approximate 90% decrease in activity for both species. However, treatment with 1 mM EDTA and 5 mM Ca2+ or Mg2+ produced corresponding SRBC lysis values of 94.3 ± 1.1% and 96.1 ± 2.0% Osteolaemus tetraspis serum, and 96.1 ± 1.9% and 94.3 ± 2.7% for Mecistops cataphractus serum. However, treatment of Osteolaemus tetraspis serum with 1 mM EDTA and 5 mM Ba2+, Cu2+ or Fe2+ resulted in only 7.2 ± 0.4, 9.6 ± 0.8, or 8.9 ± 0.7%. None of these results were significantly different from treatment with 1 mM EDTA alone (P>0.5). Likewise the same treatments for serum from Mecistops cataphractus produced 4.3 ± 0.7%, 6.9 ± 0.4%, and 8.6 ± 0.5% of maximum activity, none of which were significantly different from treatment with EDTA alone (P>0.05).

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-crocodile-serum

Figure 5: Effects of divalent metal ions on the EDTA-mediated inhibition of SRBC hemolysis by crocodile serum. Incubation of 1% SRBCs (v/v) with O. tetraspis or M. cataphractus serum in the presence of 1 mM EDTA inhibited hemolysis. However, addition of 5 mM Ca2+ or Mg2+, but not Ba2+, Cu2+, or Fe2+ reversed the EDTA-mediated inhibition. The results are expressed as % of maximum hemolysis, relative to a positive control, and represent the results of four independent determinations.

Discussion

Unlike acquired immunity, innate immune responses are not specific to a particular pathogen, but instead rely on the recognition of conserved molecular patterns on the surface of microbes [20]. The serum complement system of proteins, considered to be among the most important components of innate immunity, acts to kill microbes in a nonspecific manner. In addition, serum complement proteins work to activate other elements of innate immunity, and also act as critical stimulators of some components of acquired immunity [21].

Some crocodilian species are known to exhibit potent and broad-acting serum complement activities and have been shown to demonstrate other effective innate immune components including serum phospholipase A2 activity [12,22,23], the production of superoxide [24], and iron withholding [14]. However, at least some components of acquired immunity, including the presence of well developed B- and T-lymphocytes, seem to be less developed than those of mammalians [25]. This discrepancy in innate versus acquired immune capacity in crocodilians, and other ancient vertebrates (e.g., teleost fish; [26]), supports it as the basal condition and advanced acquired immunity is a more recently derived feature of younger tetrapod lineages like birds and mammals [27].

Serum from Osteolaemus tetraspis and Mecistops cataphractus exhibited potent serum complement activities relative to other crocodilian species. For instance, CH50 values, the volume of serum required for hemolysis of 50% of 1 mL solution of 1% (v/v) SRBCs, for Osteolaemus tetraspis (81 μL) and Mecistops cataphractus (96 μL) are much lower than that reported for A. mississippiensis (539 μL, [13]), Caiman latirostris (386 μL, [15]), Crocodylus acutus (329 μL, [28]), and Crocodylus porosus and Crocodylus johnstoni (473 μL and 451 μL, respectively, [29]). This may be a result of their largely equatorial distribution where hot, stable climates are conducive to continual bacterial growth year round. If we control for potentially confounding effects of shared evolutionary descent by examining this trend at the family level we see this pattern emerging (i.e., Alligatorids - A. mississippiensis vs. Caiman latirostris sampled at latitudes of 30º and -26º, respectively; Crocodylids – Crocodylus porosus, C. johnstoni and C. acutus versus Osteolaemus and Mecistops sampled at -17º, 23º and -2º, respectively). Sampling of latitudinally-distributed populations within a given species would be necessary before further conclusions can be drawn. Interestingly, it has recently been hypothesized that the Mecistops + Osteolaemus clade is sister to the true crocodiles [30-32] suggesting that there is, additionally, a phylogenetic underpinning to certain innate immune serum activities. Little work has been done on the phylogenetic basis for convergent or divergent innate immune response between closely related species and it is likely to be informative of these processes in the future.

Biochemical and physiological processes in ectothermic vertebrates are closely tied to environmental temperatures and this relationship may serve as the basis for an alternate explanation for the serum complement potency seen in Osteolaemus and Mecistops. Not only do both species show more potent serum complement activity than that seen in other crocodilian species, but they exhibit a much higher range of temperature-dependent activity as well [13,15,28,29], another factor possibly explained by the phylogenetic sister relationship of Mecistops and Osteolaemus compared to other crocodilians. Even though these species were sampled near the equator, an area which experiences more stable annual temperature cycles, Osteolaemus and Mecistops both prefer heavily forested wetlands [33,34] that provide little opportunity for basking, perhaps necessitating more potent innate immunity. For these same reasons, ecological differences between these two species are likely driving differences observed in the serum temperaturedependent activity range between them; the serum from Osteolaemus tetraspis exhibits a higher range of activity than that of Mecistops cataphractus (Figure 3). Osteolaemus spends the day in subterranean burrows exposing it to much lower temperatures with less capacity for thermoregulation than Mecistops.

While the direct relationship between temperature-dependent serum activity has not been assessed in vivo, assuming they are the same it seems unlikely that internal body temperatures in these crocodilians would regularly reach as high as 40°C, considering that most crocodilians thermoregulate to 31-32°C [35]. However, a febrile response to infection has been previously shown in the American alligator with internal body temperatures rising as high as 37.5°C (M. Merchant, unpublished observations) [36]. Therefore, it is conceivable that, during a febrile response, Osteolaemus tetraspis could potentially elevate internal temperatures to near 40°C, particularly considering the tropical climate of the Gabonese forests in which this crocodilian resides relative to the temperate climate of alligators. At the lower end of temperature-dependent serum activity, the internal body temperature of a crocodilian at the equator would certainly never be below 10°C and, therefore, it is unlikely that the high complement activity of Osteolaemus. tetraspis at 5°C is physiologically relevant and may be an artifact of increased thermodynamic stability and increased protein interactions at these temperature extremes.

The data displayed in Figure 2 show the prototypical sigmoidal kinetic curves that are indicative of positive cooperativity in enzyme systems [37]. This cooperative enzyme action of serum complement enzymes has been reported in other vertebrates [38]. Although the sera from both species catalyze the hemolysis of SRBCs to the same extent (maximum activity), the activity of the Osteolaemus tetraspis serum occurs much more rapidly. This is probably due to a higher degree of cooperativity between the complement enzymes in the serum of Osteolaemus tetraspis relative to that of Mecistops cataphractus, which may also be a result of the aforementioned ecological and behavior differences related to thermoregulation between these two species.

Both Osteolaemus tetraspis and Mecistops cataphractus serum complement exhibit high sensitivity to EDTA (Figure 4). Divalent metal ions, specifically Ca2+ and Mg2+, are known to be important for serum complement activity in mammalians [39], birds [40], reptilians [13], amphibians [38], and fish [26]. Since EDTA efficiently binds divalent metal ions and sequesters them away from complement proteins, it is a potent inhibitor of serum complement activity at low concentrations [39]. The threshold for inhibition of serum complement activity in both Osteolaemus tetraspis and Mecistops cataphractus was between 0.5 and 1.0 mM EDTA (Figure 4); however, the inhibitory effects of EDTA can be overcome by the addition of excess Mg2+ or Ca2+ (Figure 5). Further, EDTA-mediated inhibition of complement activity is not affected by other Periodic Group I metals (Ba2+) or transition divalent metal ions (Fe2+ and Cu2+). This specificity has also been reported in other crocodilians [13,29]. In contrast, human serum complement requires both Ca2+ or Mg2+ for functionality [40].

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Gabon’s Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (N°AR0024/09/MENESRI/CENAREST/CG/CST/ CSAR) and the Agence National des Parcs Nationaux for permission to collect samples in Loango and Moukalaba-Doudou National Parks. We thank the Gamba Program of WWF-Gabon, and especially Bas Huijbregts and Bas Verhage, for support and logistical assistance, and the tireless effort of our field guide, Anselme Mounguengui. Samples were exported with permission from the Direction de la Faune et Chasse (CITES permit #01019) and imported with CITES permit 09US164015/9. Sampling and animal handling methods were reviewed and approved by IFAS ARC at the University of Florida (approval # 011-09WEC). This project was supported by an NSF Research Commercialization/Educational Enhancement Plan grant awarded by the Louisiana Board of Regents. In addition, this work was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA08NOS4630474) and Natural Resources Conservation Service grant (68- 7217-10-006).

References

  1. Nonaka M, Yoshizaki F (2004) Evolution of the complement system. Mol Immunol 40: 897-902.
  2. Sunyer JO, Boshra H, Lorenzo G, Parra D, Freedman B, et al. (2003) Evolution of complement as an effector system in innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol Res 27: 549-564.
  3. Hoffmann JA, Kafatos FC, Janeway CA, Ezekowitz RA (1999) Phylogenetic perspectives in innate immunity. Science 284: 1313-1318.
  4. Figueroa JE, Densen P (1991) Infectious diseases associated with complement deficiencies. Clin Microbiol Rev 4: 359-395.
  5. Song WC, Sarrias MR, Lambris JD (2000) Complement and innate immunity. Immunopharmacology 49: 187-198.
  6. Hugli TE (1975) Human anaphylatoxin (C3a) from the third component of complement. Primary structure. J Biol Chem 250: 8293-8301.
  7. Timmis KN, Boulnois GJ, Bitter-Suermann D, Cabello FC (1985) Surface components of Escherichia coli that mediate resistance to the bactericidal activities of serum and phagocytes. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 118: 197-218.
  8. Solomkin JS, Jenkins MK, Nelson RD, Chenoweth D, Simmons RL (1981) Neutrophil dysfunction in sepsis. II. Evidence for the role of complement activation products in cellular deactivation. Surgery 90: 319-327.
  9. Vegh Z, Kew RR, Gruber BL, Ghebrehiwet B (2006) Chemotaxis of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells to complement component C1q is mediated by the receptors gC1qR and cC1qR. Mol Immunol 43: 1402-1407.
  10. Frank MM, Fries LF (1991) The role of complement in inflammation and phagocytosis. Immunol Today 12: 322-326.
  11. Guo RF, Ward PA (2005) Role of C5a in inflammatory responses. Annu Rev Immunol 23: 821-852.
  12. Merchant M, Heard R, Monroe C (2009) Characterization of phospholipase A(2) activity in serum of the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol 311: 662-666.
  13. Merchant ME, Roche CM, Thibodeaux D, Elsey RM (2005) Identification of alternative pathway serum complement activity in the blood of the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 141: 281-288.
  14. Merchant M, Sanders P, Dronette J, Mills K, Berken J (2007) Iron withholding as an innate immune mechanism in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol 307: 406-410.
  15. Siroski P, Merchant M, ParachĂș MV, Pina C, Ortega H (2010) Characterization of serum complement activity of the broad snouted caiman (Caiman latirostris, Crocodilia: Alligatoridae). Zool. Studies 49: 64-70.
  16. Webb GJW, Messel H (1977) Crocodile capture techniques. J. Wildl. Manag 41: 572-575.
  17. Olson GA, Hessler JR, Faith RE (1975) Technics for blood collection and intravascular infusion of reptiles. Lab Anim Sci 25: 783-786.
  18. Zippel KC, Lillywhite HB, Mladinich CR (2003) Anatomy of the crocodilian spinal vein. J Morphol 258: 327-335.
  19. Kirk RE (1995) Experimental design: procedures from the behavioral scientists, 3rd ed. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA 197-198.
  20. Medzhitov R, Janeway CA Jr (1997) Innate immunity: the virtues of a nonclonal system of recognition. Cell 91: 295-298.
  21. Nielsen CH, Fischer EM, Leslie RG (2000) The role of complement in the acquired immune response. Immunology 100: 4-12.
  22. Merchant M, Juneau K, Gemillion J, Falconi R, Doucet A, et al. (2011) Characterization of serum phospholipase a(2) activity in three diverse species of west african crocodiles. Biochem Res Int 2011: 925012.
  23. Siroski PA, Merchant ME, Poletta GL, Larriera A, Ortega HH (2013) Detection and characterization of phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)) in Caiman latirostris and Caiman yacare plasma. Zoolog Sci 30: 35-41.
  24. Merchant M, Williams S, Hardy R (2009) Production of superoxide ions by leukocytes of the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 152: 67-71.
  25. Cuchens MA, Clem LW (1979) Phylogeny of lymphocyte heterogeneity. IV. Evidence for T-like and B-like cells in reptiles. Dev Comp Immunol 3: 465-475.
  26. Holland MC, Lambris JD (2002) The complement system in teleosts. Fish Shellfish Immunol 12: 399-420.
  27. Merchant ME, Verret B, Elsey RM (2005) Role of divalent metal ions in serum complement activity of the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 141: 289-293.
  28. Merchant M, McFatter J, Mead S, McAdon C, Wasilewski J (2010) Identification and characterization of serum complement activity in the American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus). Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol 133: 165-169.
  29. Merchant M, Britton A (2006) Characterization of serum complement activity of saltwater (Crocodylus porosus) and freshwater (Crocodylus johnstoni) crocodiles. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 143: 488-493.
  30. Hekkala E, Shirley MH, Amato G, Austin JD, Charter S, et al. (2011) An ancient icon reveals new mysteries: mummy DNA resurrects a cryptic species within the Nile crocodile. Mol Ecol 20: 4199-4215.
  31. Oaks JR (2011) A time-calibrated species tree of Crocodylia reveals a recent radiation of the true crocodiles. Evolution 65: 3285-3297.
  32. Shirley MH, KA Vliet, AN Carr, JD Austin. In Review. Rigorous approaches to species delimitation have significant implications for African crocodilian systematics and conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biology
  33. Eaton MJ (2010) Dwarf Crocodile Osteolaemus tetraspis. In Crocodiles. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, Third Edition, ed. by S.C. Manolis and C. Stevenson. Crocodile Specialist Group: Darwin, 127-132.
  34. Shirley MH (2010) Slender-snouted Crocodile Crocodylus cataphractus. In Crocodiles. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, Third Edition, ed. by S.C. Manolis and C. Stevenson. Crocodile Specialist Group: Darwin, 54-58.
  35. Seebacher F, Grigg GC, Beard LA (1999) Crocodiles as dinosaurs: behavioural thermoregulation in very large ectotherms leads to high and stable body temperatures J Exp Biol 202: 77-86.
  36. Merchant M, Williams S, Trosclair PL 3rd, Elsey RM, Mills K (2007) Febrile response to infection in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 148: 921-925.
  37. Koshland DE Jr, Hamadani K (2002) Proteomics and models for enzyme cooperativity. J Biol Chem 277: 46841-46844.
  38. Major SR, Fontenot CL Jr, Pojman JA Sr, Pojman JA Jr, Merchant ME (2011) Serum complement activity in the three-toed amphiuma (Amphiuma tridactylum). Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 34: 115-121.
  39. LEVINE L, OSLER AG, MAYER MM (1953) Studies on the role of Ca++ and Mg++ in complement fixation and immune hemolysis. III. The respective roles of Ca++ and Mg++ in immune hemolysis. J Immunol 71: 374-379.
  40. Koppenheffer TL, Chan SW, Higgins DA (1999) The complement system of the duck. Avian Pathol 28: 17-25.
Citation: Merchant M, Determan C, Falconi R, Shirley M (2013) Serum Complement Activity in Two Species of Divergent Central African Crocodiles 2:110.

Copyright: © 2013 Merchant M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top