Chemotherapy: Open Access

Chemotherapy: Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-7700

Short Communication - (2016) Volume 5, Issue 2

SFK Inhibitors as New Strategy for RMS Treatment

Luigi Bagella1,2* and Irene Marchesi1
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, and National Institute of Biostructures and Biosystems, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
2Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA
*Corresponding Author: Luigi Bagella, Adjunct Associate Professor, Sbarro Health Research Organization Center of Biotechnology, Deptartment of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, BioLife Science Building, Philadelphia, USA, Tel: 215-204-9524, Fax: 215-204-9522 Email:

Abstract

A new study investigates about the activity of a new SFK inhibitor in RMS. SI221 is a pyrazolo [3,4-d] pyrimidine derivative able to reduce both apoptosis and differentiation in eRMS and aRMS. SFKs are frequently overexpressed in RMS and their inhibition can be a good strategy for RMS treatment. Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) represents approximately half of the total pediatric soft tissue sarcoma (STS), slightly more frequent in males but equally distributed across racial groups [1]. RMS is characterized by the expression of genes involved in the early myogenesis which fail to complete differentiation and cell cycle arrest [2]. It can be divided into 2 major histological subtypes: embryonal (eRMS), mostly found in childhood, and alveolar (aRMS) common in both children and adults [1].

Introduction

A new study investigates about the activity of a new SFK inhibitor in RMS. SI221 is a pyrazolo [3,4-d] pyrimidine derivative able to reduce both apoptosis and differentiation in eRMS and aRMS. SFKs are frequently overexpressed in RMS and their inhibition can be a good strategy for RMS treatment.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) represents approximately half of the total pediatric soft tissue sarcoma (STS), slightly more frequent in males but equally distributed across racial groups [1].

RMS is characterized by the expression of genes involved in the early myogenesis which fail to complete differentiation and cell cycle arrest [2]. It can be divided into 2 major histological subtypes: embryonal (eRMS), mostly found in childhood, and alveolar (aRMS) common in both children and adults [1].

The outcome of RMS patients is improved in the last decades (5- year survival rates of ~70%), however, patients with tumor relapse after treatment or with metastasis at diagnosis are rarely cured [3,4]. Moreover, frequent toxicity and long-term side effects associated with the therapy, dramatically affect the quality of life [1]. Consequently, new specific therapeutic strategies, able to reduce toxicity and side effects, are required for the treatment of RMS. The induction of differentiation and/or cell death through the inhibition of specific enzyme involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression can be a promising strategy for RMS patients. For instance, several studies focus on the role of epigenetic changes in RMS with the purpose to investigate if the modulation of the activity of some epigenetic enzyme can help to induce apoptosis or differentiation in RMS cells [5-8].

Recently, Casini and coworkers analyzed effects of a new SRC family kinase (SFK) inhibitor in RMS. This molecule called SI221 is a pyrazolo [3,4-d] pyrimidine derivative that showed an antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic activity in several tumors [9-11]. Casini et al., demonstrated that SI221 specifically inhibited SFKs and in particular YES, a SKK member that have an oncogenic role in eRMS and aRMS (described below) [12]. SI221 was able to induce apoptosis, to reduce cell migration and invasion with low cytotoxic effects on normal cells. Moreover, treated cells showed a partial rescue of muscular phenotype and an increase of myogenic markers. These effects were dependent by the activation of p38 pathway [13].

SFK is a family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases that includes c- SRC, FYN, YES, BLK, YRK, FGR, HCK, LCK and LYN. These enzymes are involved in several biological processes as cell proliferation, adhesion, invasion and motility; their expression or activity is frequently altered in cancer [14]. SKFs modulate adhesion, invasion and cell motility mainly through the disruption of adherents and focal junctions.

Adherent junctions are responsible for cell–cell adhesion and they are composed by E-cadherin homodimers of adjacent cells connected to the actin cytoskeleton through the complex α-catenin-β-catenin and p120 catenin. c-SRC activated by protein tyrosine phosphatase 1Bdependent de-phosphorylation, associates to this complex promoting the disassembly of adherents junction. Focal adhesions are responsible for the binding of cells to the extracellular matrix through heterodimers α- and β-integrin. A cytoplasmic complex connects integrins to the cytoskeleton. SFKs activate focal-adhesion kinase (FAK) that in turn phosphorylate several component of the junctions promoting cytoskeleton changes and focal adhesion disruption (reviewed in [14]). Furthermore, c-SRC induces tyrosine phosphorylation of RRAS, suppressing integrin activity, cell-matrix adhesion and disrupting focal adhesion [15]

Moreover, SFKs induce phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and endocytosis of E-cadherin, promoting the release of cells from the matrix and from each other [16].

Several papers explore the role of SFK and associated pathways in sarcomas.

A first screening showed that SRC is activated in human sarcomas and sarcoma cell lines [17]. Moreover, global tyrosine phosphorylation analysis in sarcoma cell lines and human tumor samples showed an increase of the expression and phosphorylation of tyrosine kinases including several members of SFKs as, for instance, c-SRC, LYN, and FAK [18]. Furthermore, the treatment of several sarcoma cell lines with Dasatinib, a SFK inhibitor, blocks SRC downstream pathways inhibiting FAK and p130cas signaling. Dasatinib inhibited cell motility and invasion, indicating SFKs as good targets for sarcoma treatment [17] (Table 1).

    Clinical phase (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Dasatinibib eRMS, aRMS Phase 1/2 for several tumors, also in combination with other drugs
PP2 eRMS, aRMS Preclinical
Saracatinib eRMS, aRMS Phase 2/3 for several tumors Phase 2 for RMS (Adult)
SI221 eRMS, aRMS Preclinical

Table 1: SFK inhibitors tested in RMS.

For what concern specifically RMS, it has been shown that SFKs have a role in both eRMS and aRMS. For instance, SFC increases oncogenic activity of Caveolin-1 through its phosphorylation (pCav-1), indeed high levels of pCAv-1 augment cell proliferation, migration, invasiveness and chemoresistance of RMS cells. On the contrary, treatment with PP2, a SFK inhibitor, decreases cell proliferation [19].

Interestingly, aRMS SFKs are also involved in acquired resistance to the PDGFRA inhibitors. Indeed treating the resistant cell cultures with a combination of PDGFRA and inhibitors has a synergic effect on cancer cell viability. Moreover, treatment with Sorafenib, targeting both PDGFRA and Raf (downstream in the SFKs signaling), inhibits cell growth and tumor progression in vitro and in vivo [20].

Similar mechanism happens also when RMS cells are treated with insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) inhibitors. After treatment with BMS-754807, eRMS and aRMS cells develop resistance to IGF-1R blockage, a small molecular inhibitor of IGF-1R/insulin receptor or with an antibody against IGF-1R (R1507). This process is mediated by an increased activation of SFKs. Indeed the combination of IGF-1R inhibition with the SFK inhibitor Dasatinib rescues antitumoral activity of drugs [21].

In 2013, Yeung and coworkers performed a loss-of-function screening in eRMS and aRMS identifying the CRLK-YES as a crucial pathways for tumor growth [12]. CRKL is a member of the Crk adapter proteins, a protein family involved in intracellular signaling pathways able to transduce signals downstream of several receptor tyrosine kinases. In this study, the authors demonstrated that CRKL signaling is associated with the activity of YES kinase. Indeed loss of CRKL decreased specifically level of phosphorylated YES in both eRMS and aRMS. In addition, the treatment with SFK inhibitors, Dasatinib and Saracatinib, decreased phosphorylation of CRKL and SFK confirming the hypothesis of a functional relationship between SFK and CRKL in RMS. The treatment with both SFK inhibitor suppressed RMS cell growth in vitro and in vivo [12].

The important role of YES in RMS induced scientist to find molecules more specific for this tyrosine kinase. For instance, Patel and coworkers performed an assay to combine high throughput screening with a biochemical assay for Yes kinase in order to identify new and specific inhibitors [22].

SI221 is a new specific inhibitor of SFK and its ability to inhibit specifically YES and to induce both apoptosis and differentiation makes it a promising molecule for the treatment of RMS.

References

  1. Saab R, Spunt SL, Skapek SX (2011) Myogenesis and rhabdomyosarcoma the Jekyll and Hyde of skeletal muscle. Curr Top Dev Biol 94: 197-234.
  2. Sebire NJ, Malone M (2003) Myogenin and MyoD1 expression in paediatric rhabdomyosarcomas. J Clin Pathol 56: 412-416.
  3. Mazzoleni S, Bisogno G, Garaventa A, Cecchetto G, Ferrari A, et al. (2005) Outcomes and prognostic factors after recurrence in children and adolescents with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer 104: 183–90.
  4. Oberlin O, Rey A, Lyden E, Bisogno G, Stevens MC, et al. (2008) Prognostic factors in metastatic rhabdomyosarcomas: results of a pooled analysis from United States and European cooperative groups. J Clin Oncol 26: 2384-2389.
  5. Marchesi I, Fiorentino FP, Rizzolio F, Giordano A, Bagella L (2012) The ablation of EZH2 uncovers its crucial role in rhabdomyosarcoma formation. Cell Cycle 11: 3828-3836.
  6. Mahoney SE, Yao Z, Keyes CC, Tapscott SJ, Diede SJ (2012) Genome-wide DNA methylation studies suggest distinct DNA methylation patterns in pediatric embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas. Epigenetics 7: 400–8.
  7. Marchesi I, Giordano A, Bagella L (2014) Roles of enhancer of zeste homolog 2: from skeletal muscle differentiation to rhabdomyosarcoma carcinogenesis. Cell Cycle 13: 516-527.
  8. Vleeshouwer-Neumann T, Phelps M, Bammler TK, MacDonald JW, Jenkins I, et al. (2015) Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Antagonize Distinct Pathways to Suppress Tumorigenesis of Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma. PLoS ONE 10: e0144320.
  9. Indovina P, Giorgi F, Rizzo V, Khadang B, Schenone S, et al. (2012) New pyrazolo[3,4-d] pyrimidine SRC inhibitors induce apoptosis in mesothelioma cell lines through p27 nuclear stabilization. Oncogene 31: 929–38.
  10. Cozzi M, Giorgi F, Marcelli E, Pentimalli F, Forte IM, et al. (2012) Antitumor activity of new pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine SRC kinase inhibitors in Burkitt lymphoma cell lines and its enhancement by WEE1 inhibition. Cell Cycle 11: 1029-1039.
  11. Ceccherini E, Indovina P, Zamperini C, Dreassi E, Casini N, et al. (2015) SRC family kinase inhibition through a new pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine derivative as a feasible approach for glioblastoma treatment. J Cell Biochem 116: 856-863.
  12. Yeung CL, Ngo VN, Grohar PJ, Arnaldez FI, Asante A, et al. (2013) Loss-of-function screen in rhabdomyosarcoma identifies CRKL-YES as a critical signal for tumor growth. Oncogene 32: 5429-5438.
  13. Casini N, Forte IM, Mastrogiovanni G, Pentimalli F, Angelucci A, et al. (2015) SRC family kinase (SFK) inhibition reduces rhabdomyosarcoma cell growth in vitro and in vivo and triggers p38 MAP kinase-mediated differentiation. Oncotarget 6: 12421-12435.
  14. Zou JX, Liu Y, Pasquale EB, Ruoslahti E (2002) Activated SRC oncogene phosphorylates R-ras and suppresses integrin activity. J Biol Chem 277: 1824-1827.
  15. Fujita Y, Krause G, Scheffner M, Zechner D, Leddy HE, et al. (2002) Hakai, a c-Cbl-like protein, ubiquitinates and induces endocytosis of the E-cadherin complex. Nat Cell Biol 4: 222-231.
  16. Shor AC, Keschman EA, Lee FY, Muro-Cacho C, Letson GD, et al. (2007) Dasatinib Inhibits Migration and Invasion in Diverse Human Sarcoma Cell Lines and Induces Apoptosis in Bone Sarcoma Cells Dependent on Src Kinase for Survival. Cancer Research 67: 2800-8.
  17. Bai Y, Li J, Fang B, Edwards A, Zhang G, et al. (2012) Phosphoproteomics identifies driver tyrosine kinases in sarcoma cell lines and tumors. Cancer Res 72: 2501-2511.
  18. Faggi F, Mitola S, Sorci G, Riuzzi F, Donato R, et al. (2014) Phosphocaveolin-1 enforces tumor growth and chemoresistance in rhabdomyosarcoma. PLoS One 9: e84618.
  19. Abraham J, Chua YX, Glover JM, Tyner JW, Loriaux MM, et al. (2012) An adaptive Src-PDGFRA-Raf axis in rhabdomyosarcoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 426: 363-368.
  20. Wan X, Yeung C, Heske C, Mendoza A, Helman LJ (2015) IGF-1R Inhibition Activates a YES/SFK Bypass Resistance Pathway: Rational Basis for Co-Targeting IGF-1R and Yes/SFK Kinase in Rhabdomyosarcoma. Neoplasia. Elsevier 17: 358-66.
  21. Patel PR, Sun H, Li SQ, Shen M, Khan J, et al. (2013) Identification of potent Yes1 kinase inhibitors using a library screening approach. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 23: 4398-403.
Citation: Bagella L, Marchesi I (2016) SFK Inhibitors as New Strategy for RMS Treatment. Chemo Open Access 5:189.

Copyright: © 2016 Bagella L, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top