GET THE APP

Sociology and Criminology-Open Access

Sociology and Criminology-Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2375-4435

+44-20-4587-4809

Perspective - (2023)Volume 11, Issue 2

Social Networks and Bonding Social Capital

Kemji Tashiro*
 
*Correspondence: Kemji Tashiro, Department of Social Studies Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Email:

Author info »

About the Study

In today's digital age, social networks have become an integral part of our lives. These platforms connect individuals and communities, enabling them to interact, share information, and form relationships. Simultaneously, social capital refers to the resources and benefits derived from social connections and networks. The intricate relationship between social networks and social capital, delving into the ways social networks can influence and shape social capital. Social capital encompasses the value that individuals derive from their social connections, including trust, reciprocity, and shared norms. It contributes to the overall wellbeing of individuals and communities, facilitating cooperation, collective action, and access to resources. Robert Putnam, a prominent scholar, classifies social capital into two main forms: bonding social capital, which focuses on close relationships within homogenous groups, and bridging social capital, which emphasizes connections between diverse groups or individuals.

Social networks as platforms for social capital

Social networks, both online and offline serve as platforms for the creation and exchange of social capital. Online social networks, such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, have exponentially expanded the possibilities for social connections by transcending geographical boundaries. These platforms facilitate the formation of both bonding and bridging social capital.

Bonding

Online social networks provide opportunities for individuals with shared interests, backgrounds, or affiliations to come together, fostering bonding social capital. People can form online communities, such as hobby groups, professional networks, or support groups, where they can connect, share knowledge, and build relationships. These interactions contribute to the development of trust and mutual support among members, enhancing their well-being.

Bridging

Social networks also facilitate the formation of bridging social capital by connecting individuals from diverse backgrounds. They enable people to engage with individuals outside their immediate social circles, leading to exposure to different perspectives, cultures, and experiences. Online platforms provide a space for dialogue, collaboration, and collective problem-solving, strengthening social cohesion and promoting empathy. Bridging social capital helps foster understanding and reduces social divisions, leading to more inclusive and harmonious societies.

Impact of social networks on social capital

While social networks offer tremendous potential for the creation and exchange of social capital, their impact is multifaceted and can have both positive and negative consequences:

Positive impact: Social networks enable the rapid dissemination of information and the sharing of resources within communities. This ease of access enhances the collective knowledge, enabling individuals to make informed decisions and solve problems more efficiently. It also bridges the information gap and reduces inequalities by providing equal opportunities for resource distribution. Online social networks have emerged as powerful platforms for emotional support, especially during challenging times. They provide a space for individuals to seek advice, express concerns, and find solidarity with others facing similar situations. These support systems strengthen individuals' resilience and contribute to their well-being. Social networks have played a crucial role in mobilizing individuals around social causes. By connecting like-minded individuals, they facilitate collective action, raising awareness, and advocating for change. Social movements, online petitions, and fundraising campaigns are examples of how social networks can facilitate the creation of bridging social capital to address social issues.

Negative impact: Social networks can create echo chambers, where individuals are exposed only to information and viewpoints that align with their existing beliefs. This phenomenon can reinforce biases, limit exposure to diverse perspectives, and impede the formation of bridging social capital. It can further contribute to polarization and the spread of misinformation. Social networks raise concerns about privacy and data security. The vast amount of personal information shared on these platforms can be exploited by malicious actors for various purposes, including identity theft, cyberbullying, and manipulation. Such issues can erode trust and compromise the development of social capital. Paradoxically, despite the potential for connection, social networks can contribute to social isolation and loneliness. Overreliance on online interactions can replace face-to-face interactions, leading to a decline in the quality and depth of relationships. This can negatively impact individuals' well-being and the development of bonding social capital.

Social networks have significantly transformed the landscape of social capital. They provide platforms for individuals to connect, share resources, and build relationships, thereby enhancing both bonding and bridging social capital. However, it is crucial to recognize and address the potential negative consequences, such as echo chambers, privacy concerns, and social isolation.

By understanding the complex relationship between social networks and social capital, the potential of these platforms can be harnessed to foster inclusive communities, strengthen social cohesion, and create a more connected and prosperous society.

Author Info

Kemji Tashiro*
 
Department of Social Studies Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
 

Citation: Tashiro K (2023) Social Networks and Bonding Social Capital. Social and Crimonol. 11: 278

Received: 15-May-2023, Manuscript No. SCOA-23-25449; Editor assigned: 18-May-2023, Pre QC No. SCOA-23-25449 (PQ); Reviewed: 02-Jun-2023, QC No. SCOA-23-25449; Revised: 09-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. SCOA-23-25449 (R); Published: 16-Jun-2023 , DOI: 10.35248/2375-4435.23.11.278

Copyright: © 2023 Hutchinson M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top