Journal of Information Technology & Software Engineering
Open Access

Software-Defined Solutions are Transforming Telecommunications through the Evolution of Network Function Virtualization

Michael Jakob^{* *}Correspondence: Michael Jakob, Department of Computer Science, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, Email:

Author info »

Description

Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is an evolution in modern networking that allows for flexible, scalable, and economical deployment by separating network operations from proprietary hardware. The adoption of NFV has been driven by the needs for scalable and agile networking solutions as well as the exponential development in data traffic. In 2012, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) introduced Network Function Virtualization (NFV), which uses virtualization to combine network functions on common server hardware and revolutionize the deployment of network services. NFV is an innovative approach to networking and telecommunications that uses virtualized software programs operating on general-purpose hardware in place of specialized hardware appliances. It also improves flexibility, scalability, and cost-efficiency by separating network services like routers, load balancers, and firewalls from proprietary hardware. VNFs are software applications that can run on virtual machines or containers that provide common network tasks like firewalls, gateways, and DNS servers [1,2]. The physical hardware and software resources that serve as the basis for hosting VNFs are collectively referred to as NFV Infrastructure (NFVI). This covers networking, storage, and processing resources that are virtualized through the use of container runtimes or hypervisors.

The framework for managing and coordinating the VNF lifecycle, which includes deployment to scaling and monitoring, is known as Management and Orchestration (MANO) [3]. This guarantees that VNFs operate and integrate properly within the NFV environment. Through centralized administration and the use of general-purpose hardware, NFV drastically cuts Operating Expenses (OpEx) and Capital Expenditures (CapEx) related to specialist networking equipment. NFV speeds up innovation by facilitating the quick rollout of new services and features. By dynamically scaling resources in response to demand, service providers can enhance the availability and quality of their offerings. The management of intricate network systems is made easier by centralized management of VNFs, which enables administrators to make changes in real time with no interruption. By maximizing resource use and reducing idle hardware, consolidating network services on virtualized platforms lowers energy consumption. By virtualizing essential network services like routing and security, NFV improves performance across distributed networks and drives Software- Defined Wide Area Networks (SD-WAN) solutions [4-6]. NFV reduces reliance on hardware at client locations by using virtual Client Premises Equipment (vCPE), which operates on centralized platforms. As more businesses transition from physical hardware to virtualized and cloud computing resources, NFV helps them maintain control over their network infrastructure. Because of this, the publication Forbes names NFV as one of the top five technologies advancing telecom services, along with edge computing, computer vision, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Machine Learning (ML).

By virtualizing components like Evolved Packet Core (EPC) and enabling network segmentation for a variety of use cases, NFV facilitates the growth of mobile networks, including 4G LTE and 5G. By dynamically scaling resources in response to user demand, virtualized Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) solutions use NFV to optimize the distribution of multimedia content [7].

When compared to hardware-based alternatives, virtualization adds latency and resource overhead, which can affect how well important network operations operate. NFV will be essential in providing effective and scalable solutions as networks change to satisfy the expectations of 5G, edge computing, and the Internet of Things (IoT). The next stage of NFV is being shaped by new developments like Containerized Network Functions (CNFs) and integration with Artificial Intelligence (AI) for predictive analytics. It is anticipated that NFV would improve automation, predictive maintenance, and service optimization when combined with modern technologies like intent-based networking, machine learning, and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Furthermore, NFV's contribution to 6G and beyond will increase its significance even more [8]. An essential part of contemporary networking, NFV enables operators to satisfy the increasing demand for scalable, effective, and adaptable services. Realizing its full potential will require overcoming present limitations.

Viruses can spread more easily across virtual components that are all operating on the same virtual computer than it can between physically distinct or segregated hardware components. To run networking software and processes like load balancing and virtual computer routing, a hypervisor is necessary. NFV makes it feasible to decouple communication services from specialized hardware, such as firewalls and routers. As a result, there is no need to purchase new hardware, and network operations can provide new services as needed. Instead of taking months as with traditional networking, this allows network components to be deployed in just a couple of hours. Additionally, generic servers that are less expensive can run the virtualized services. Virtual machines can perform the same networking duties as traditional hardware by using software. The program manages firewall security, routing, and load balancing. With a hypervisor or software-defined networking controller, network engineers can program all of the virtual network's components and automate the provisioning process. These services can connect to one another through a technique known as "service chaining" when they are virtualized. Network managers can automate the provisioning of resources for each service on the network with the aid of service chaining [9,10]. A consolidated view of all operations reduces the risk of service interruptions by providing operators with improved network control and the ability to direct workloads and traffic to servers that are available.

Conclusion

NFV standards are currently being developed by a number of open source groups, such as Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF) (previously the Metro Ethernet Forum), Open Platform for NFV, Open Network Automation Platform, ETSI, and Open Source MANO. It has been difficult for service providers to become adjusted to virtualizing network services because there are so many distinct organizations with conflicting standards proposals. Despite this, its popularity is raising due to the rapidly increasing complexity and demands of today's enterprise networks.

References

1. Lin T, Zhou Z, Tornatore M, Mukherjee B. Demand-aware network function placement. J Lightwave Technol. 2016;34(11):2590-2600.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

2. Gharehchopogh FS. An improved Harris hawks optimization algorithm with multi-strategy for community detection in social network. J Bionic Eng. 2013;20(3):1175-1197.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]  

3. Qi D, Shen S, Wang G. Towards an efficient vnf placement in network function virtualization. Comput Commun. 2019;138:81-89.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

4. Chintapalli VR, Killi BR, Partani R, Tamma BR, Murthy CSR. Energy- and reliability-aware provisioning of parallelized service function chains with delay guarantees. IEEE Trans Green Commun Netw. 2023;8(1):205-223.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

5. Xu Y, Kafle VP. An availability-enhanced service function chain placement scheme in network function virtualization. J Sens Actuator Netw. 2019;8(2):34.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

6. Hei X, Zhang J, Bensaou B, Cheung C-C. Wavelength converter placement in least-load-routing-based optical networks using genetic algorithms. J Opt Netw. 2004;3(5):363-378.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

7. Shen G, Li Q, Jiang Y, Wu Y, Lv J. A four-stage adaptive scheduling scheme for service function chain in nfv. Comput Netw. 2020;175:107259.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

8. Nauss RM. An improved algorithm for the capacitated facility location problem. J Oper Res Soc. 1978;29(12):1195-1201.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

9. Piri J, Mohapatra P. An analytical study of modified multi-objective Harris hawk optimizer towards medical data feature selection. Comput Biol Med. 2021;135:104558.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

10. Liu J, Lu W, Zhou F, Lu P, Zhu Z. On dynamic service function chain deployment and readjustment. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag. 2017;14(3):543-553.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]