Journal of Plant Biochemistry & Physiology
Open Access

Study and Classification of Angiosperm

Pamela Ryan^{* *}Correspondence: Pamela Ryan, Department of Environment, Earth and Ecosystems, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK, Email:

Author info »

Description

Paul Hermann developed the botanical term "angiosperm" in the form "Angiospermae" in 1690 as the name of one of his fundamental divisions of the plant kingdom, derived from the Greek terms angeon (v 'bottle, vessel') and spérma ('seed'). This comprised flowering plants with seeds in capsules, as opposed to his Gymnospermae, or flowering plants with achenial or schizocarpic fruits, with the complete fruit or each of its components viewed as a seed and naked. Carl Linnaeus used the term and its antonym in the names of the orders of his class Didynamia with the same meaning but with limited use. It was only in 1827, when Robert Brown discovered totally naked ovules in the Cycadeae and Coniferae and gave them the name Gymnosperms, that it could be used with any approach to its present breadth. As long as these Gymnosperms were counted as dicotyledonous flowering plants, the term Angiosperm was employed antithetically by botanical writers as a group-name for other dicotyledonous plants, with different breadth, from that time forward.

Hofmeister discovered the modifications that occur in blooming plants' embryo-sacs in 1851, and determined their right links to the Cryptogamia. This established Gymnosperms as a separate class from Dicotyledons, and the word Angiosperm was eventually adopted as the appropriate classification for all blooming plants other than Gymnosperms, including the classes of Dicotyledons and Monocotyledons. This is how the term is currently understood.

Flowering plants are classified as a unified group in most taxonomies. Angiospermae has been the most popular descriptive name, with Anthophyta (lit. 'flower-plants') coming in second (both unranked). They were treated as a subdivision in the Wettstein and Engler systems (Angiospermae). They were also classified as a subdivision ( Manoliophytina ) in the Reveal system, but it was later separated into Magnoliopsida, Liliopsida, and Rosopsida. They are treated as a division in the Takhtajan and Cronquist systems ( Manoliophyta ). They are treated as a classin the Dahlgren and Thorne systems (1992). (Magnoliopsida). Flowering plants are treated as an unranked clade without a formal Latin name in the APG system of 1998, as well as later updates in 2003 and 2009. (angiosperms). Along with the 2009 revision, a formal categorization was issued, with flowering plants being classified as a subclass (Magnoliida).

This group's internal classification has experienced significant changes. The Cronquist system, created by Arthur Cronquist in 1968 and published in its entirety in 1981, is still extensively used, however it is no longer thought to depict phylogeny accurately. Through the work of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG), which published an influential reclassification of the angiosperms in 1998, an agreement regarding how blooming plants should be ordered has lately begun to emerge. The APG II system was published in 2003, the APG III system in 2009, and the APG IV system in 2016. Updates incorporating more recent research were published as the APG II system in 2003, the APG III system in 2009, and the APG IV system in 2016.

The Cronquist method assigns the groups Magnoliopsida (from "Manoliaceae ) and Liliopsida to the Monocotyledoneae o r Liliopsida (from " iliaceae "). Dicotyledones or Dicotyledoneae , and Monocotyledones or Monocotyledoneae , which have a long history of use, are two other descriptive terms allowed under Article 16 of the ICBN. Their members are known as "dicotyledons ("dicots") and "monocotyledons". ("monocotyledons") ("monocots"). The Latin in these names refers to the fact that dicots typically have two cotyledons, or embryonic leaves, in each seed. Monocots normally have only one, however this isn't a hard and fast rule. The number of cotyledons is neither a very useful nor a trustworthy attribute in terms of broad diagnostics.

Recent research, such as that conducted by the APG, has revealed that monocots comprise a monophyletic clade, whereas dicots are paraphyletic. Nonetheless, the bulk of dicot species belong to the eudicots or tricolpates clade, while the majority of the rest belong to the magnoliids, a group with about 9,000 species. The rest are the Ceratophyllaceae and Chloranthaceae families, as well as a paraphyletic cluster of early branching taxa known as the basal angiosperms.