Orthopedic & Muscular System: Current Research

Orthopedic & Muscular System: Current Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-0533

+44-77-2385-9429

Research Article - (2019) Volume 8, Issue 1

Study of Anterior Tibial Laxity Using GNRB® in Healthy Knees in Children Aged 8 to 15

Damien Marmouset*, Alves A, Laurent R, Kabbaj R, Vialle R and Bachy Razzouk M
Department of Orthopedic Pediatric Surgery, CHU Trousseau 26 Avenue du, Paris, France
*Corresponding Author: Damien Marmouset, Department of Orthopedic Pediatric Surgery, CHU Trousseau 26 Avenue Du, Paris, France, Tel: +33 649926079 Email:

Received Date: Feb 28, 2019 / Accepted Date: Mar 27, 2019 / Published Date: Apr 02, 2019

Abstract

Introduction: The ruptures of the anterior cross ligament are increasing in the child. The risk of minuscular injury and premature arthrosis degradation, therefore, explain the evolution of ligamentoplasty in the growing child. The GnRB device is used in clinical practice in the preoperative evaluation of anterior cross ligament ruptures in adults and in the postoperative assessment of ligamentoplasties. The child has an evolutionary intrinsic peripheral laxity with growth.

The objective of this study is to analyze anterior tibial translational physiology in a healthy population of children to obtain reference values and to assist in the analysis of the pre-or post-operative assessment of past cross ligament ruptures in a growing child.

Material and Methods: 60 children under the age of 15 were included in this monocentric prospective study conducted between November 2017 and April 2018. The inclusion criteria were: age between 8 and 15 years, no history of pathology or knee surgery, no muscular pathology. 30 girls and 30 boys, divided into three age groups 8-10 years, 10-12 years and >12-15 years were included on a voluntary basis during an orthopedic consultation.

A laximetry test by the GnrB device was carried out at various successive thrusts (134, 150 and 200 N). A Student test was used for statistical analysis

Results: The average age was of 11,21 years ± 2,14. The youngest children presented pains during the pushes of 200 N, leading to a stop of the test. The values of travel on the set of the children were respectively in 134 N, 150 N and 200 N of 7,01 mm ± 2,7 mm; 7,34 mm ± 2,59 mm and of 9,03 mm ± 2,57 mm. There was no significant difference between the left and right knees at each press (p=0, 09; 0,11 and 0,31). There was no significant difference between girls and boys. The values of three age groups for every push were compared. There is no significant difference in the travel neither between the groups >12-15 years old and 10-12 ans and 8-10 ans nor between the groups 10-12 ans and 8-10 ans.

Discussion: By comparing the results with the literature, the laxity at the child seems superior to the adult. The device GnRB is a technique for diagnosing rupture and postoperative evaluation of previous cruciate ligament rupture in adults with a valuable defined threshold. If the device GnRB is available for clinical practice in an 8-yearold child, the presence of physiological relaxation must be considered when interpreting the results.

Keywords: Pediatric; Anterior cross ligament; Gnrb

Introduction

In the past few years, the incidence of knee sprains, especially in children, has increased, mainly in exercise children [1]. These children develop important complications in adulthood such as instability, associated meniscal lesions, and gonarthrosis.

The diagnosis of rupture of the Anterior Cross Ligament (ACL) is mainly clinical by Lachman Tests and the pivot shift test [2-6]. However, these maneuvers are reviewer-dependent, imprecise, and not reproducible. The sensitivity of these tests for total breaks is excellent (96% for the Lachman and 86% for the pivot shift test, but poor for partial breaks (68% and 67%) [7,8]

Imaging examinations such as MRI have excellent sensitivity and specificity in children (97.9% and 98.6% for radiologists, 100% and 98.6% for orthopedists, respectively) in the diagnosis of LCA rupture. However, these examinations are costly and cannot be used for the measurement of anterior tibial laxity and for post-operative monitoring [9]. For these reasons, measurements objectifying the anterior tibial translation have been developed: Telos, KT-1000, Rollimeter and more recently GnrB. These devices are useful in adults for objectively quantifying anterior tibial translation in ACL rupture diagnosis and postoperative follow-up [3]. The GnRB system showed that it had a better intra and inter reviewer reproducibility compared to KT 1000 [4] and Telos [8], and was more efficient in diagnosis. Applied femoropatellar pressure can influence results.

However, there is limited data in children regarding GnRB measurements of normal 3 values of anterior tibial laxity. It would, therefore, be useful to obtain reproducible qualitative data in children using a validated adult measuring device. Knowledge of standard laxity would allow for an operative indication in case of clinical or radiological doubt, particularly for partial breaks. That would facilitate post-operative surveillance.

The main objective of this study is to collect physiological values in a normal knee of anterior tibial translation.

The secondary objectives are:

• Compare this translation by gender and age of children

• Locate these values in relation to adult data

Methods

This is a prospective monocentric study conducted from November 2017 to April 2018 at the Armand trousseau hospital-university center in Paris. Mandatory parental consent is signed for study participation.

The population of the study

60 children were included, 30 girls and 30 boys. The average age was 11.21 years ± 2.14. 3 age groups are formed: the first group of 8 to 10 years, the second group of 10 to 12 years, and the third group of 13 A15 years.

Each group contained 10 girls and 10 boys. The inclusion criteria were between 8 and 15 years of age and no prior pathology or knee surgery. Children with neuromotor disabilities were not included (Figure 1).

orthopedic-muscular-system-measurement

Figure 1: Measurement by GnrB.

The GNRB is a device used to diagnose total or partial ACL failures. The principle of the apparatus is to produce a push force on the calf using an articulated mechanical system and to record the movement of the tibia for each effort (from 0 to 300 N).

The test consists of three separate parts:

• The leg fastening on the device: The patient is in dorsal decubitus; the backrest incline must not be greater than 30° and placed in the GNRB axis. The body is released, the head rests on the examination table and the arms are extended. The knee must rest in the center of the support where the patella is tightened. The foot rests on the adjustable base of the heel. The knee is in neutral rotation so that the patella is in Zenith

• Patella and TTA positions are identified and marked. The hull is fastened to the patella in a horizontal position and centered on the patella. The foot is fastened to the support so that the heel stops on the pedestal, then the pedestal measure is lifted

• The displacement sensor is positioned on the TTA mark at 90° from the spin axis

• The data is saved and the test is launched

• The data are then analyzed and curved

• 4 measurements are made for both knees, at a push of 134 N, 150 N and two at 200 N, which makes 8 measurements for each child. The test is continued if it is painless. Significant pain causes the procedure to stop.

Pediatric specificities

The equipment must be adapted to the child’s corpulence. Two patellar fastening sizes were available and selected according to the child’s size. We would add a posterior reinforcement if necessary, to obtain sufficient clamping force (Figure 2).

orthopedic-muscular-system-Paediatric-specificities

Figure 2: Paediatric specificities.

Statistical analysis

Variables are distributed according to normal law. The Student test is used to show statistical differences between groups with a p<0.05

Results

• Four children of 8-10-year age group experienced pain at 200 N, forcing us to stop the measurements

• The average rotulian clamping forces were 35 for the 8-10-year group, 39 for the 10-12-year group and 46 for the 13-15-year group

• We made sure that there was no difference between the left and right knees (Table 1)

Knee Push (N) Displacement Slope
  (in mm) (µm/N)
Right 134 7,38 ± 2,92 45,38 ±
150 7,72 ± 2,77 16,47
200 9,2 ± 2,45  
Left 134 6,65 ± 2,45 41,59 ±
150 6,97 ± 2,35 14,48
200 8,86 ± 2,69  

Table 1: Comparative degree left and right knee.

• The overall displacement for the right knees was 8.35 mm, 2.78 mm with a slope of 45.38 μm/N, 16.47 μm/N. The displacement for the left knees was 7.82 mm, 2.74 mm with a slope 41.59 μm/N, 14.48 μm/N

There was no significant difference between the right and left knees at each push (p=0.09; 0.11 and 0.31). The displacement values for all children were 134 N, 150 N and 200 N, respectively 7,01 mm ± 2,7 mm; 7,34 mm ± 2,59 mm and 9,03 mm ± 2,57 mm.

The av erag e s lo p e o f t h e t o t al g r o u p was 43.47 μm/N, 15.60 μm/N. We analysed the values of boys in relation to the values of girls of all ages (Table 2 and Figures 1 and 2).

Sex Push Displacement Slope( µm/N)
  (N) (mm)  
M 134 6,58 ± 2,57 41,53 ±15,74
  150 7 ± 2,6  
  200 8,86 ± 2,73  
F 134 7,5 ± 2,75 45,34 ± 15,3
  150 7,68 ± 2,55  
  200 9,18 ± 2,43  

Table 2: Displacement values by sex.

There is no significantly greater displacement for girls on the different 134 N, 150 N and 200 N push (respectively p=0.052; 0.146 and 0.337). The slope is significantly higher for girls than boys (P=0.006).

Analysis by age group was also performed (Table 3 and Figures 3 and 4).

orthopedic-muscular-system-Displacement

Figure 3: Displacement according to the sex (in mm).

orthopedic-muscular-system-Slope-according

Figure 4: Slope according to the sex (in μm/N).

Age Push(N) Displacement (mm) Slope
      (µm/N)
10-Aug 134 7,22 ± 2,48 45,11 ±
  150 7,69 ± 2,3 15,26
  200 9,25 ± 2,48  
10- 134 7,07 ± 2,85 40,28 ±
12 150 7,43 ± 2,75 16,69
  200 8,94 ± 2,62  
13- 134 7,05 ± 2,81 40,28 ±
15 150 7,43 ± 2,75 16,69
  200 8,94 ± 2,62  

Table 3: Displacement values by age.

We compared the values found in these three age groups for each push

We found no significant difference in the movement between:

• Groups 13-15 years and 10-12 years (p=0.984; 0.627 and 0.564 for 134 N, 150 N and 200 N, p=0.933 on all three thrusts)

• Groups 13-15 and 8-10 years of age (p=0.775, 0661 and 0.437 for 134 N, 150 N and 200 N, p=0,476 on all three thrusts)

• Groups 8-10 and 10-12 years (p=0.796, 0.329 and 0, 849 for thrusts 134 N, 150 N and 200 N, p=0, on all three thrust)

We compared average slopes by age:

Grades 8-10 and 10-12 years of age are significantly higher than groups 13-15 years of age (p=0.007 and 0.006)

We found no difference between groups 8-10 and 10-12 years (p=0,700) (Figures 5 and 6).

orthopedic-muscular-system-age

Figure 5: Displacement according to the age (in mm).

orthopedic-muscular-system-Slope-according

Figure 6: Slope according to the age (in μm/N).

Discussion

Numerous studies of anterior tibial translation exist in adults, involving different measuring devices (GnRB, Telos, K-1000).

Our study addresses the specific problem of laxity in children with the GnrB device.

The first difficulty encountered is practical. The GnrB is designed for lower limbs of adult size. As a result, particularly in category 8-10, the child’s knee size is less appropriate, and it is more difficult to adjust the rotulian clamping force as well as to continue the study to completion. We made adjustments (foam reinforcements in the popliteal hollow) to obtain a satisfactory clamping force. Indeed, for a displacement of 200 N, it has happened in 4 children that the test is painful and that one is obliged to stop the measures, thus resulting in a loss of data for this age category.

If we want in common practice to use the GnrB on the child, the device should be adapted to its corpulence in order to reduce the pain and ensure more accurate measurements.

Another limitation of the study is the lack of control by a second reviewer. Although the measurement technique is relatively simple and proven, a single reviewer is a measurement bias in this study.

In the literature, the values of anterior tibial laxity found in adults are not uniform:

Jenny and Arnt found a laxity of 8.6 mm; 2.8 mm for a thrust of 250 N. Sheep and all found a laxity of 4,7 mm; 0,7 mm to 200 N in 2014 [11] and 5 mm; 1.3 mm in 216 [12].

Vauhnik [13] found higher values with 6 mm to 134 N and 9 MM to 250N. Bouguennec [8] found a translation ranging from 4.86 to 5.67 mm 134 N. Colette [14] found values between 2.5 mm and 3 mm at 134 N. Other studies using GnrB do not show their gross results. However, by appreciating the average curves, the values found for 134 N thrusts are 3.5 mm and 5 mm for 200 N thrusts [6,15].

We find values of 7 mm to 134 N and 9 MM to 200 N, Which appear to be higher than adult values in the literature. This confirms the greater anterior tibial laxity in the child with this measuring device. This greater laxity was already known by the Breighton score measure [5] for which 55% of children aged 4 to 14 have a score greater than or equal to 4 (corresponding to hypermobility in adults), and 71% for children under 8 [16-20].

This difference must be considered when comparing the relaxation values of previous cruciate ligament surgery. We have not been able to identify a significant difference between ages, although the trend is more laxity among younger groups than among pre-teens. It is logical to think that the more the child grows, the closer his laxity is to that of the adult. The same applies to sex. Girls seem to have a greater laxity, but no significant difference except on average slope. A significant difference should be shown with larger groups of subjects in subsequent studies.

It would also be interesting to reproduce in children comparative studies of healthy knee laxity and cross ligament rupture in adults [6,15,16] in order to diagnose and follow with the Gnrb the children who are victims of rupture of the anterior crusader ligament and who benefit from restorative surgery.

Conclusion

Our results tend to show a greater anterior tibial translation in children than adults. It also suggests a decrease in this translation with age. This information shall be taken into account in the treatment of ruptures of the anterior cross ligament.

References

  1. Parkkari J, Pasanen K, Mattila VM, Kannus P, Rimpela A (2008) The risk for a cruciate ligament injury of the knee in adolescents and young adults: a population-based cohort study of 46 500 people with a 9 year follow up. Br J Sports Med 42: 422-426.
  2. Solomon DH, Simel DL, Bates DW, Katz JN, Schaffer JL (2001) The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee: Value of the physical examination. JAMA 286: 1610-1620.
  3. Branch TP, Mayr HO, Browne JE, Campbell JC, Stoehr A, et al. (2010) Instrumented examination of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: minimizing flaws of the manual clinical examination. Arthroscopy 26: 997-1004
  4. Benvenuti JF, Vallotton JA, Meystre JL, Leyvraz PF (1998) Objective assessment of the anterior tibial translation in the Lachman test position. Comparison of three types of measurement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6: 215-219
  5. Beighton P, Paepe A, Steinmann B, Tsipouras P, Wenstrup RJ (1997) Ehlers Danlos syndromes: revised nosology, villefranche, ehlers danlos national foundation and ehlers danlos support group . Am J Med Genet 77: 31-37.
  6. Robert H, Nouveau S, Gageot S, Gagniere B (2009) A new knee arthrometer, the GNRB: experience in ACL complete and partial tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95: 171-176.
  7. Leblanc MC, Kowalczuk M, Andruszkiewicz N, Simunovic N, Farrokhyar F, et al. (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for anterior knee instability: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23: 2805-2813
  8. Bouguennec N, Odri GA, Graveleau N, Colombet P (2015) Comparative reproducibility of TELOS™ and GNRB® for instrumental measurement of anterior tibial translation in normal knees. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101: 301-305.
  9. Schub DL, Altahawi F, Meisel A, Winalski C, Parker RD, et al. (2012) Accuracy of 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of intra-articular knee injuries in children and teenagers. J Pediatr Orthop 32: 765-769
  10. Jenny JY, Arndt J (2013) Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery-France. Anterior knee laxity measurement using stress radiographs and the GNRB® system versus intraoperative navigation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99: 297-300.
  11. Mouton C, Seil R, Meyer T, Agostinis H, Theisen D (2015) Combined anterior and rotational laxity measurements allow characterizing personal knee laxity profiles in healthy individuals. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23: 3571-3577.
  12. Caroline M, Daniel T, Christian N, Dietrich P, Romain S (2016) Variability of anterior laxity of healthy unoperated knees during longitudinal follow-up of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Orthopedic and Traumatological Surg Review 102: 1877-20517.
  13. Vauhnik R, Morrissey MC, Perme MP, Sevsek F, Rugelj D (2014) Inter-rater reliability of the GNRB® knee arthrometer. Knee 21: 541-543
  14. Collette M, Courville J, Forton M, Gagniere B (2012) Objective evaluation of anterior knee laxity comparison of the KT 1000 and GNRB® arthrometers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20: 2233-2238.
  15. Lefevre N, Bohu Y, Naouri JF, Klouche S, Herman S (2014) Validity of GNRB® arthrometer compared to Telos™ in the assessment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22: 285-290.
  16. Mayr HO, Hoell A, Bernstein A, Hube R, Zeiler C, et al. (2011) Validation of a measurement device for instrumented quantification of anterior translation and rotational assessment of the knee. Arthroscopy 27: 1096-1104.
  17. Ryu SM, Na HD, Shon OJ (2018) Diagnostic tools for acute anterior cruciate ligament injury: GNRB, lachman test, and telos. Knee Surg Relat Res 30: 121-127
  18. Mouarbes D, Cavaignac E, Chiron P, Berard E, Murgier J (2018) Evaluation of reproducibility of robotic knee testing device on 60 healthy knees. J Orthop 15: 94-98.
  19. Beighton P, Paepe A, Steinmann B, Tsipouras P, Wenstrup RJ (1997) Ehlers Danlos syndromes: Revised nosology, Villefranche. Ehlers Danlos National Foundation and Ehlers Danlos Support Group. Am J Med Genet 77: 31-37.
  20. Arocena J, Ocana I, Ortiz L (2004) Joint hypermobility: Prevalence and relationship with musculoskeletal pain. An Pediatr 61: 162-166.
Citation: Marmouset D, Alves A, Laurent R, Kabbaj R, Vialle R, et al. (2019) Study of Anterior Tibial Laxity Using GNRB® in Healthy Knees in Children Aged 8 to 15. Orthop Muscular Syst 8: 269. doi:10.35248/2161-0533.19.8.269

Copyright: © 2019 Marmouset D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License; which permits unrestricted use; distribution; and reproduction in any medium; provided the original author and source are credited.
Top