Journal of Glycomics & Lipidomics

Journal of Glycomics & Lipidomics
Open Access

ISSN: 2153-0637

+44 1223 790975

Research Article - (2011) Volume 1, Issue 1

Study on the Preparation and Increasing Production Mechanism of a Novel Environmentally Friendly Cotton Seed Coating Agent

Defang Zeng, Wu Shan* and Qin Xiao
School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, P.R. China
*Corresponding Author: Wu Shan, School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, P.R. China Email:

Abstract

A novel environmentally friendly cotton seed coating agent was prepared from natural polysaccharide, fertilizer and microelement etc, which coating of cotton achieved good effect on increasing and the obvious antifeedant effect. The results showed that the yield of cotton treated with environmentally friendly cotton seed coating agent was enhanced by 9.47%, its cost was decreased by 35% and it was much more safer and environmentally friendly, when compared to the traditional cotton seed coating agent. So it has three characteristics of high yield, less cost and friendly environment.

<

Keywords: Environmentally friendly material; Cotton seed coating agent; Antifeedant; Germination energy (GE); Germination rate (GR)

Introduction

Cotton seeds treated with seed coating agent can effectively prevent cotton from seedling state diseases, promote seedling growth and improve cotton yield [1]. Cotton seed coating agent is the main approach to prevent cotton from seedling rhizoctonia solani [2]. But most of the currently used cotton seed coating agents have serious poison and pollution to the human body and the environment [3], the valid components preventing cotton from rhizoctonia solani in cotton seed agents are deleterious and harmful contamination, such as phorate, carbofuran, carbendazim etc [4]. Therefore, how to develop a novel environmentally friendly cotton seed coating agent has become an important project being waiting for solution urgently in the current agriculture and the environmental protection field [5]. After a lot of researches, we finally develop a novel environmental protection type cotton seed coating agent composed by taking natural macromolecular material as main material, accompanying with film-forming agent, dispersant, trace fertilizer and microelement. Compared with the traditional cotton seed coating agents, the results showed that the yield of cotton treated with environmental friendly cotton seed coating agents has enhanced by 13.1%, the cost of seed coating agent is decreased by 29%, when compared to the traditional cotton seed coating agent. So it has the obvious antifeedant effect and it is safe, innocuous and noncontaminative, having obvious economic and environmental benefits.

Materials and Methods

Main experimental apparatus

Constant temperature and humidity incubator (WS-01, Hubei huangshi hengfeng medical apparatus limited company), electronic scales(FA2004, Shanghai yuefeng apparatus limited company), highpressure steam sterilization pot (YXQ-SG46-48 SA, Shanghai bosun shiye limited company), temperature psychrometer (STH950, SUMMIT Corporation), electronic constant speed blender (GS28B, Shanghai anting electronic apparatus factory in), germination box (30cm×12cm, Hubei Agriculture Office).

Main experimental reagents

Natural polysaccharide, sodium hydroxide, borax, glycol, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, bluestone, zinc sulfate etc (all these experimental reagents are analytically pure, Wuhan changjiang chemical plant), pigment (Guangdong Shantou Mingde food additives limited company), cotton seeds (Hubei provincial seed group company), traditional seed coating agent Celest (Switzerland Xianzhengda Crop Protection Limited company).

Experiment Methods

Designing principle of formulas of cotton seed coating agent

The formulas of the cotton seed coating agent are designed according to the three greatest principles which are low price, environmental protection and high yield. The formulas of cotton seed coating agent are designed under the precondition that the material cost of cotton seed coating agent is lower than that of traditional seed coating agent selling on the market (about 20yuan·kg-1). And then these novel seed coating agents are compared with traditional ones in various performance parameters in the same conditions. If certain formulas are found that main performance parameters are better than traditional ones, they are picked out primarily, and then optimized, finally the best formulas of seed coating agents are confirmed whose performance price ratio and environmental friendship are better than traditional ones.

Preparation of seed coating agents

The aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, bluestone, zinc sulfate and other elements were blended with natural polysaccharide and other components in certain proportion and mixed round in the electronic constant speed blender for two hours with a speed of 1000 r/min, and then we got the finished product of the novel and environmentally friendly cotton seed coating agents.

glycomics-lipidomics-technique-route

Figure 1: The experiment programs and technique route.

Comparative experiment of the cotton seed coating agent in the laboratory: Comparative experiment of the cotton seed coating agent in the laboratory is as follows: the same cotton seeds were treated by coating with environmentally friendly seed coating agents and conventional ones respectively, and then put in the constant temperature and humidity incubator under the same condition. Experimental result of the germination energy and germination rate should be observed and compared every day. Concrete process is as follows:

1. Preparation of coating seed

Acid-delinted seeds were treated with the environmentally friendly cotton seed coating agents and traditional ones respectively with a proportion of 1:50, airing for 20 minutes under the room temperature, and then they can be sowed. In addition, untreated seeds were used as control.

2. Germination experiment

The sand and water was mixed evenly with a certain proportion, the sand was filled in the germination box, and the thickness of the sand was a half height of the germination box. The treated seeds were sown in the sand evenly. All germination experiments were carried out using four replicates of 50 seeds each. Seeds were away from the surface of sand about 1 cm. The germination boxes were placed in the Constant temperature and humidity incubator setting the temperature for (28±1)°C, humidity for 85%RH. Germination circumstance should be investigated every 24 hours. According to national seed examination rules (ISTA 2004), the cotton growth period of germination energy is 4 day, the ultimate germination rate of seeds is 12 days, germination energy and germination rate should be observed and jotted down every day. The germination energy and germination rate were calculated from the two equations:

Equation

Equation

Where X is the number of germinating seed in the beginning of germinating period (4days) Y is the number of germinating seed in the end of germinating period (12days), N is the total number of experimental seeds.

The germination energy and germination rate were reckoned through above two calculation formulas, among them the formula of seed coating agent which two indexes preponderating over traditional one and attaining the max is considered as the best formula of comparative experiment in the laboratory.

The antifeedant experiments

According to the biological pesticide indoor experiment standards of pesticides, using artificial feed mixing method of medicine. The methods are as follows:

Weigh the new production of artificial feed,and according to per 100 grams feed mix seed coating as 8mg, 10mg and 13.3 mg .All treatments were mixed with artificial diet been weighed in the weight ratio of 1:20. When the treated diet curdled, it will be cut into smaller pieces. The fractions were placed in an insect plate with 24 1.5cm ×1.5 cm holes, respectively. The plates, each containing fourth-instar larvae, were covered with lid and placed in an incubator at dark at temperature of 25±1°C and 75%-85%. The remaining diets (control and treated) were not going to be weighted until 48h later.Three replicates were maintained for each treatment. The test was valid only the mortality of larvae within 5%. To evaluate the feeding behavior a “feeding deterrence index” was calculated as follow:

Equation

Where C and T represent the amounts eaten of control and treated diets, respectively.

Field trials

Field trials was carried out to test whether the efficacy of abovementioned several better formulas obtained in the laboratory were better than traditional one and their effect on the yield. The cotton seeds for examination were coated with the better formulas obtained in the laboratory and traditional one in the proportion of 1:50 (w/w), and then dried by airing to prepare for use. The experiment was conducted at the e’zhou experimental station, Hubei Provincial Seed Group Company. The treatments were arranged in a randomized block design with three replicates of each treatment.

Results and Discussion

Primary experiment results in the laboratory

CK was uncoated seed as control, Celest was the traditional cotton seed coating agent, A1-A8 were environmentally friendly cotton seed coating agents prepared by ourselves. The primary purpose was to select better environmentally friendly cotton seed coating agent preponderating over traditional Celest in performance price ratio. Primary experiment results in the laboratory were showed in Table 1.

Number of Seed coating agent GE/% GR/%
A1 78.07e 92.13d
A2 89.4a 96.03a
A3 74.83g 87.8f
A4 79.8d 89.4e
A5 85.47b 92.7bc
A6 83.2c 93.13b
A7 85.07b 92.5cd
A8 76.13f 87.1g
CK 72.3i 80.73i
Celest 74.17h 83h
Averages in column separated by Duncan’s new multiple range test, 5% level

Table 1: Primary experiment results in the laboratory.

It can be seen from Table 1, that the main indexes of seed coating agents A2, A5, A7 exceeded over traditional Celest. A2 was the best among them, its germination energy and germination rate was enhanced by 15.23%, 13.03% respectively when compared to Celest, but its cost decreased by 32.4%. So A2 was considered as the primary best seed coating agent in the laboratory.

Optimization experiment in the laboratory

Based on the formula of seed coating agent A2, by changing two main impact factors such as pH and the concentration of natural polysaccharide in the formula to optimize A2 and find out several better formulas of seed coating agent which performance price ratio surpassed traditional one in the laboratory.

Influence of pH value on main parameters of seed coating agent

Influence of pH value on main parameters of seed coating agent was shown in Table 2.

pH GE/% GR/%
4 67.43g 80.7g
4.5 75.07e 83.46f
5 77.5d 90.23d
5.5 80.07b 93.36b
6 82.43a 95.73a
6.5 79.73c 91.9c
7 72.4f 85.13e
Averages in column separated by Duncan’s new multiple range test,5% level

Table 2: Effect of pH value on main parameters of seed coating agent.

As can be seen in Table 2, the effect was the best when pH value was 6. In the pH value range from 4 to 6, the higher the pH value is, the higher germination energy and germination rate shows. The germination energy and germination rate reached the maximum at pH 6.When pH was above 6, with the increasing of the pH value, germination energy and germination rate declined. Therefore the best pH value of cotton seed coating agent was 6. The reason was that when the pH value was 6, the protective film made by seed coating agent at the surface of the seeds combined with seed coat more tightly and did not change various functions of seed inner, so when the pH value was 6, the film had better permeability, it can make sure supply ample oxygen and water when seed was sprouting, providing a beneficial condition for the better growth of seed.

Influence of the concentration of natural polysaccharide on the main parameters of seed coating agent

Influence of the concentration of natural polysaccharide on the main parameters of seed coating agent was test by adjusting the concentration of natural polysaccharide and keeping other components and dosage unchanged on the base of seed coating agent A2 in the above formula (pH = 6, the concentration of natural polysaccharide = 1%). The result of the effect on the main parameters can be seen in Table 3.

concentration of natural polysaccharide GE/% GR/%
0.1 67.47f 77.53f
0.2 72.4e 86.53e
0.5 82.5c 87.76d
1 86.9a 97.07a
1.5 84.36b 92.33b
2 80.4d 89.93c
Averages in column separated by Duncan’s new multiple range test, 5% level

Table 3: Effect of concentration of natural polysaccharide on the main parameters of seed coating agent.

It can be seen from Table 3, the concentration of natural polysaccharide had obvious influence on the germination energy and germination rate, when the concentration of natural polysaccharide ranged from 0.1% to 1%, the germination energy and germination rate increased with the increasing of the concentration, and reached the maximum when the concentration of natural polysaccharide was 1%. While the concentration of natural polysaccharide was above 1%, the two indexes began to decline. So, the best concentration of natural polysaccharide was 1%. This was because that the natural polysaccharide solution had a film forming ability. In the process of film-forming, the concentration of natural polysaccharide solution was too high, the liquidity of film isn’t good, the film made was asymmetric; The concentration was too low, the bore structure of the film was loose, separating efficiency was low, having an influence on the film function.

The comparative result of optimization formula B2–1, CK and Celest

The comparative result of the optimization formula B2-1, uncoated (CK) and traditional seed coating agent (Celest) is shown in Table 4.

Seed coating agent GE/% GR/%
B2-1 89.3a 97.8a
CK 70.23c 82.07c
Celest 75.4b 92.27b
Averages in column separated by Duncan’s new multiple range test, 5% level

Table 4: Result of Optimization experiment and comparison with CK and Celest.

It can be seen from Table 4, the germination energy and germination rate of the formula B2-1 after optimization had increased by 19.07%, 25.63% respectively when compared to CK; Comparing with traditional cotton seed coating agent Celest , the two main indexes had increased by 13.9%, 5.53% respectively, while the cost had decreased by 31.2%, so it had obvious high cost-performance.

Antifeedant effect of seed coatings

Anitifeedant activity of seed coatings is presented in Table 5. As shown in Figure 2 and Table 5, the antifeeding rate of artificial feed contains13.3mg, 10mg, 8mg is 81.42%, 64.71%, 50.44%. It showed that antifeedant effect can be seen obviously, in which antifeeding 13.3 mg makes antifeeding effect most obviously.

Potions name Every 100 grams of artificial feed contains Number of insect Amounts of diet eaten(g) FDI(%)
Seed Coatings 13.3mg 24 0.42d 81.42a
10mg 24 0.79c 64.71b
8mg 24 1.12b 50.44c
white space handling 24 2.26a
Averages in column separated by Duncan’s new multiple range test, 5% level

Table 5: Antifeedant effect of seed coatings treated diet by fourth-instar Agrotis ypsilon Rottemberg over 48 hours.

glycomics-lipidomics-seed-coatings-treated

Figure 2: HPLC chromatogram of the nine reference compounds in 50% aqueous methanol, measured at 370nm. Retention times for rutin, sutherlandin A, sutherlandin B, kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside, sutherlandin C, sutherlandin D, quercitrin, quercetin and kaempferol were 11.9, 12.7, 13.8, 15.3, 16.2, 17.0, 18.0, 26.2 and 28.1 minutes, respectively.

The comparative result of field trials

Field trials was carried out with formulas (including B2-1)whose price ratio was better than the traditional seed coating agent Celest, adjusting the better formula further on the base of field experiment and finally getting the best formula of field test B2-2. The comparative result was shown in Table 6.

Seed coating agent GE/% Per mu yield/kg Cost of seed coating agent/$
B2-2 98.17a 266 2.34
CK 82.33c 228
Celest 92.17b 243 3.6
Averages in column separated by Duncan’s new multiple range test, 5% level

Table 6: The comparison results of field experiment.

It can be seen from the Table 6, the germination rate and per mu yield of the best formula of field test B2-2 had increased by 15.84%and 16.7%respectively when compared to the uncoated cotton seed (CK), and had enhanced by 6%and 9.47%respectively comparing with the traditional seed coating agent Celest, while the cost had declined by 35%. It had indicated that the germination energy and germination rate in the laboratory were consistent with the trend of increasing yield in field experiment.

The discussion of the mechanism of antifeedant effect

Main ingredients of seed coatings is natural polymer polysaccharide, which can improve plant pest and disease resistance capability, and promote plant’s growth, crop yield and quality, it’s through inducing plants and immune resistance has enhance immunity, promote the growth and friendly to environment, safety, and no residue [6,7]. natural polymer polysaccharide can combining with protein receptors which on the plant cell membrane, when the receptor proteins in the membrane once receives of plant activate protein signal, stimulate resistance signal molecules such as Ca2+, H2O2, jasmonic acid, etc. Through the signal transduction, stimulate resistance gene expression, resistant material such as plant antitoxin, chitinase, phenylalanine solution ammonia enzyme, polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase, catalase, while activate the immune to plant disease process of salicylic acid and jasmonic acid etc, all of those can achieve a antifeedant effect.

Antifeedants effects might have direct influence on animal’s taste, then transfer to taste sensors of the central nervous system; finally feeding centers stop the animal’s feeding behavior. It also may directly affects the animal’s nervous system, causing the nervous system, abnormal discharge from animals to get correct taste of information, in order to make them not to eat properly.

The discussion of the mechanism of increasing yield

Firstly, the natural polysaccharide used in the seed coating agent is of good film-forming ability. When cotton seeds are treated with seed coating agent, they can form a dense seed protective film on the surface of the seed. The protective film is a kind of semi permeable membrane and it can not only keep the humidity of the seed but also absorb the humidity of earth in the soil, providing adequate necessary humidity for seed pullulating, accordingly improving seed of germination and seedling [8].

Secondly, because the film of natural polysaccharide has good permeability, it can keep O2 from getting into film inner, restrict CO2 going outside of the film, keep the CO2 of higher concentration inside the film, restrain the respiration of seed and make the internal nutrient consumption of seeds fell to the lowest.

Thirdly, the beneficial microelements of the plant growth are appended in the seed coating agent, those beneficial microelements are especially beneficial to the growth of the plant. They can provide nutritionfor the plant growth [9]. Drug, fertilizer released slowly, providing ample nutrition and medicine protection for seed and seedling in the certain growth period. Plant growth regulator and fertilizer contained in the seed coating agent can promote seed and seedling to grow healthily, raising seed germination rate, increasing seedling quality, enhancing seedling anti-adversity, at last having react on keeping and increasing yield.

Conclusion

A novel environmentally friendly cotton seed coating agent was made by using the natural polysaccharide as the main ingredient, and complemented by fertilizer and trace elements. In the process of preparation of the seed coating agent, the best effect of increasing yield can be obtained when the pH value was 6 and the concentration of natural polysaccharide was 1%. Comparing with the traditional cotton seed coating agent, the yield was enhanced by 9.47%, while its cost was decreased by 35% and it was much safer and more environmentally friendly. And it used enhancing immune function and the antifeeding method to control pests, comparing to the traditional cuke seed coating agent. So it has obvious economic and environmental benefits, having an important expansion application value throughout the world.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Hubei Provincisal Seed Group Company for their field experiment, and express our thanks to Wuhan University of Technology for financial support.

References

  1. Gyimah A (2000) Effect of pretreatment methods on germination of Garcinia kola Heckel seeds. Ghana J Forestry 9: 39-44.
  2. Elad Y, Kalfon A, Chet I (1982) Control of Rhizoctonia solani in cotton by seedcoating with Trichoderma spp. spores. Plant and Soil 66: 279-281.
  3. Kannan M, Uthamasamy S, Mohan S (2004) Impact of insecticides on sucking pests and natural enemy complex of transgenic cotton. Curr Sci 86: 726-729.
  4. Duraimurugan P, Regupathy A (2005) Influence of Trap crops and application of neem seed kernel extract on the occurrence of natural enemies in cotton ecosystem. Resist Pest Man New (fall) 15:7-9.
  5. Pereira L, Bastos C, Tzanov T, Cavaco-Paulo, Guebitz GM (2005) Environmentally friendly bleaching of cotton using laccases. Environ Chem Lett 3: 66-69.
  6. Zhang HQ (2002) Studies and developing prospects of rice seed coating agent. Crop Research, 16: 350-353.
  7. Xiong YF, Zou YB, Wen ZY, Jiang JA, Xiong HR, et al. (2004) Effects of rice seed coating agent on seedling growth, enzyme activities and internal hormanes of rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinicu 37: 1611-1615.
  8. Zhang S, Cothren JT, Lorenz EJ (1990) Mepiquat Chloride Seed Treatment and Germination Temperature Effects on Cotton Growth, Nutrient Partitioning, and Water Use Efficiency. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 9: 195-199.
  9. Patil BC, Patil SB, Vdikeri SS, Khadi BM (2003) Effect of imidacloprid seed treatment on growth, yield, seedling vigour and biophysical parameters in cotton (Gossypium spp.) genotypes.In: Proceedings of the world cotton research conference-3, Cape Town, 9-13 March 2003.
  10. Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998) Seeds: ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San Diego, 666 p.
  11. Kumar B, Pandey DM, Goswami CL, Jain S (2001) Effect of growth regulators on photosynthesis, transpiration and related parameters in water stressed cotton. Biologia Plantarum 44: 475-478.
  12. Cheng QW, Shen DL (2000) The brief description of development of seed coating agents. Guang dong Chemical Industv 27: 49- 50.
  13. Du GL, Chi GT (2002) The studies on seed coating agent and its development and application. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 18: 52-57.
  14. ISTA (International Seed Testing Association) (2004) International rules for seed testing. Rules 2004, International Seed Testing Association, Zurich.
  15. Agyili J, Sacande M, Koffi E, Peprah T (2007) Improving the collection and germination of West African Garcinia kola Heckel seeds. New Forests 34: 269- 279.
  16. Indira GP, Gunasekaran K, Sa T (2006) Neem oil as a potential seed dresser for managing Homopterous sucking pests of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) J Pest Sci 79: 103-111.
  17. Tompsett PB, Pritchard HW (1998) The effect of chilling and moisture status on the germination, desiccation tolerance and longevity of Aesculus hippocastanum L. seed. Ann Bot 82: 249-261.
Citation: Zeng D, Shan W, Xiao Q (2011) Study on the Preparation and Increasing Production Mechanism of a Novel Environmentally Friendly Cotton Seed Coating Agent. J Glycom Lipidom 1:102.

Copyright: © 2011 Zeng D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top