Medicinal & Aromatic Plants

Medicinal & Aromatic Plants
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0412

+44 1300 500008

Review Article - (2014) Volume 3, Issue 4

Tagetes minuta Linnaeus (Asteraceae) as a Potential New Alternative for the Mitigation of Tick Infestation

Renato Andreotti*, Marcos Valério Garcia, Jaqueline Matias, Jacqueline Cavalcante Barros and Rodrigo Casquero Cunha
EMBRAPA Beef Cattle, Avenida Radio Maia, 830-Vila Popular, Caixa - 154, CEP79106-550, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
*Corresponding Author: Renato Andreotti, EMBRAPA Beef Cattle, Avenida Radio Maia, 830-Vila Popular, Caixa - 154, CEP79106-550, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil, Tel: 5-67-33682173 Email:

Abstract

Ticks are hematophagous parasites of most vertebrate animals and can transmit various pathogens. After
mosquitoes, ticks are considered the most prevalent group of ectoparasitic arthropods to transmit pathogens to humans and rank first in the transmission of agents that cause disease in animals. The primary tool used to control these ectoparasites is the use of chemical products; however, resistance to several of these chemical compounds has already been reported in various locations worldwide. Considering this reality, several studies of plant extracts have been developed aiming to identify new compounds that are able to control ticks. In this context, the essential oil of Tagetes minuta may be a promising alternative in the control of some species of ticks. T. minuta is an annual herbaceous plant belonging to the family Asteraceae and is popularly known in Brazil as “cravo-de-defunto” or wild marigold. In this review, we highlight four species of ticks that are considered important for both animal and public health in Brazil. Here, we address the methods of tick control to provide a foundation for new studies and highlight the use of phytotherapeutic T. minuta as a promising alternative in the control of these ectoparasites.

Keywords: Control tick; Phytotherapeutics; Ectoparasites

Introduction

Ticks are hematophagous parasites [1] of most vertebrate animals and can transmit various pathogens [2]. After mosquitoes, ticks are considered the most prevalent group of ectoparasitic arthropods to transmit pathogens to humans and rank first in the transmission of agents that cause disease in animals [3,4]. Ticks belong to the Phylum Arthropoda, Class Arachnida, Order Acari and Suborder Ixodida and have a wide geographical distribution.

Currently, there are over 896 cataloged species of ticks that are divided into three families: Argasidae, Ixodidae and Nuttalliellidae (which has only one species) [5]. The Brazilian Ixodidae fauna is currently composed of 66 species [6] belonging to nine genera: Ornithodoros, Antricola, Argas, Carios, Amblyomma, Ixodes, Haemaphysalis, Rhipicephalus and Dermacentor [7].

The species of ticks that parasitize domestic animals are usually the ones that are most studied, with their biology, vector capacity and forms of control being the subject of many studies in the country [8]. However, the following ticks have the highest incidence in Brazil: Rhipicephalus microplus, R. sanguineus, Amblyomma cajennense and Dermacentor nitens.

The control of these ectoparasites is still performed through the use of chemicals. According to the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e do Abastecimento - MAPA), for new products to be registered as acaricides, they must present an efficacy of at least 95% [9]. The lack of a program to control these parasites allows the majority of producers to define the criteria for control. The emergence and selection of tick strains that are resistant to these compounds remains a major motivation to develop new antiparasitic products [10].

Considering this reality, several studies with plant extracts have been developed aiming to identify new compounds that are able to control ticks. The use of phytotherapeutics obtained from the essential oil of Tagetes minuta is a promising alternative [11,12], but there have been very few studies on it to date. T. minuta is an annual herbaceous plant belonging to the family Asteraceae. Its best-known common name in Brazil is “cravo-de-defunto” [13]. This plant is used in folk medicine and grows in temperate regions of South America [14].

The tick species discussed in this review are largely important for domestic and production animals and are immensely important to public health in Brazil. Difficulties related to the methods of control are discussed to encourage further research. The use of phytotherapeutic T. minuta is highlighted in this review as a promising alternative for controlling these ectoparasites.

Species of Ticks used in Tests with T. minuta in Brazil

Rhipicephalus microplus

R. microplus is known as “cattle tick” (carrapato-do-boi) in Brazil, and cattle are its main host, with preference for Bos taurus compared with B. indicus. Although this tick can parasitize other animals, domestic or otherwise, it is a monoxenous (one-host) tick.

This species was most likely introduced in Brazil during the early 18th century and is currently found in all regions of the country, with the intensity of infestation varying according to climatic conditions and cattle breeds [15]. This tick causes major losses in livestock worldwide, in addition to transmitting several pathogens, most importantly the pathogens that comprise two well-known diseases collectively known in Brazil as “tristeza parasitária bovina (TPB)” [16] babesiosis, which is caused by the protozoa Babesia bigemina and B. bovis, and anaplasmosis, which is caused by Anaplasma marginale [17].

R. sanguineus

R. sanguineus is a trioxenous (three-host) tick that feeds primarily on dogs and accidentally on other hosts, including humans [18]. Dogs are the only known primary hosts for the parasitic stages of this tick [19]. This tick is an important transmitter of pathogens and is considered the main vector of Ehrlichia canis in Brazil, which has been established as an important zoonotic disease since 1992 [20].

This ectoparasite can also transmit pathogens such as Babesia canis to dogs and Rickettsia conorii to humans [21]. In the American continent, this species of tick transmits other diseases such as Brazilian spotted fever (BSF), which is caused by Rickettsia rickettsii, and in Brazil, it is the main transmitter of Hepatozoon canis [22].

The tick R. sanguineus, which is also known as “brown dog tick” or “carrapato vermelho do cão” in Brazil, is a cosmopolitan species and most likely has a widespread geographical distribution [18,23]. This tick is originally from the African continent, where there are approximately 79 species of the genus Rhipicephalus [24].

Amblyomma cajennense

Commonly known as “cayenne tick” (“carrapato-estrela” or “carrapato-do-cavalo” in Brazil), A. cajennense has a three-host life cycle and low host specificity and, thus, is able to parasitize several species of domestic and wild animals [25].

It is believed that tapirs (Tapirus terrestris L.) and capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris Erxleb.) are the main primary hosts for A. cajennense in South America [26]. After the introduction of horses to Latin America during the European colonization, A. cajennense became a serious pest for these animals, which are also primary hosts for all stages of this ectoparasite [27].

This species is the main species that parasitizes humans in Central America and Brazil [26,28] and is one of the main vectors of Rickettsia rickettsii, which is the causative agent of BSF in humans [29,30].

Argas miniatus

Argas miniatus Kock (1844) is the only species of the genus Argas occurring in Brazil, and domestic birds are their host. In nature, this species is found in small flocks of Gallus gallus and causes productivity losses, anemia, spoliation and the transmission of pathogens. Borrelia anserina is an important pathogen transmitted by A. miniatus [31].

A. miniatus is a heteroxenous tick that feeds at night. During the feeding process, the larva remains, parasitizing the host for multiple days, while nymphs and adults feed on the blood for only a few minutes. During the free-living stage, these ticks are found in the shelters and nests of their hosts, which are the locations where molting and copulation occur [32].

Types of controls

To avoid losses due to the spoliation effect caused by ticks, there are some methods that seek to minimize this problem, such as the use of chemicals (acaricides), vaccines, phytotherapeutics, genetic selection and the preservation and/or use of natural enemies (biological control). These methods are even more effective when used in the form of “Integrated Management” and/or “Strategic Management”.

The constant exposure of ticks to acaricides, which is associated with a lack of proper management, accelerates the selection pressure for resistant individuals in the population, inevitably worsening the resistance problem, as already reported by several authors in various global locations [33-35].

The lack of new molecules adds an additional layer of complication to satisfactory tick control. These difficulties are directly related to the high costs of research and the lengthy process involved in the development of new chemical formulations.

Natural control is the spontaneous regulation by living organisms (antagonists) of populations of other species of animals with no human intervention [36]. The identification of natural control agents, so-called natural enemies, allows man to manipulate these organisms, producing them under controlled conditions for subsequent release in areas of interest.

This form of manipulated natural control, deemed biological control, includes artificial, classical and applied controls [37]. Although the use of acaricides remains the primary tool for control, other methods such as biological control methods have previously been studied and include options involving the use of microbial agents, such as fungi [38], and the action of natural predators, such as the cattle egret Egretta ibis, which prefers insects but also feeds on ticks [39] and on ants [40,41]. Although biological control is a much more attractive cost/benefit approach compared to other methods, it still does not have satisfactory applicability in the field.

Over the last few decades, studies involving the development of vaccines to control ticks have intensified because of the need to replace chemical controls. As previously mentioned, the residues of chemical controls cause damage to public health and to the environment, among other undesirable effects. Currently, only vaccines for R. microplus are available for import into Brazil. These vaccines were developed from a protein called Bm86, which confers partial protection to cattle against future infestations by reducing the number of ticks, egg production and fertility [42].

The Bm86 protein is a “hidden antigen” obtained from the intestine of ticks [43]. This protein is the basis of two commercial vaccines available on the market: the TickGARD vaccine, which was developed in Australia [44], and the Gavac vaccine, which was developed in Cuba [45]. Although they are an important control alternative, the protection levels provided by vaccines are not yet sufficient to replace the use of acaricides [46,47]. This reinforces the need for further research in the search for candidate antigens that may confer greater control efficiency.

Brazil has a large plant biodiversity with approximately 55,000 cataloged species; however, only 1% of these plants have been submitted to chemical and/or pharmacological studies. Medicinal plants are consumed by all social classes and make up a national market worth US$ 400 million. Moreover, their use is recommended by the United Nations (UN), which recognizes that two-thirds of the world’s population uses medicinal plants. Although the use of medicinal plants is often rejected by physicians, there are at least 300 medicinal plants that are part of the Brazilian popular therapeutic arsenal [48].

Several studies with plants extracts have been developed with the objective of using plant extracts as an alternative method to reduce or even replace the use of synthetic products. Currently, R. microplus and other tick species have been the subject of these studies due to the emergence and selection of strains that are increasingly resistant to various chemical groups that are used in different parts of the world [49]. Phytotherapeutics have some advantages over synthetic compounds, such as a slower development of resistance due to the presence of different compounds with different mechanisms of action [50-52].

Approximately 55 plant species belonging to 26 families have been tested against R. microplus; however, only a few compounds have been identified and proven to have acaricidal action [53]. The main challenge in the development of alternative acaricides is the difficulty of transposing the efficacy obtained in vitro to the field, which is partly due to the difficulty in stabilizing the various chemical compounds present in the extract [54] and also to the high volatility of natural products, which have low persistence in the environment [55].

Tagetes minuta

Tagetes is a genus of herbaceous plants and shrubs that includes some species of the composite family of plants. This genus is native to Central and South America and was naturalized in other tropical and subtropical regions. Tagetes spp. are commonly known as marigolds (“cravos”), and some species, such as T. erecta, T. tenuifolia and T. patula, are grown as ornamental plants. However, T. minuta Linnaeus can grow under natural conditions, and in some countries, such as Australia and South Africa, this plant has been classified as a noxious plant [56].

T. minuta was introduced in Brazil several years ago and is perfectly acclimatized, even becoming a sub-spontaneous plant [57]. T. minuta is classified as follows [58]:

• Family: Compositae or Asteraceae

• Subfamily: Asteroideae

• Tribe: Helenieae

• Genus: Tagetes

• Specie : Tagetes minuta Linnaeus

This plant is commonly known as the southern cone marigold, Mexican marigold, black mint, wild marigold or stinking Roger, while in Brazil, its common names include vara-de-rojão, rabo-de-foguete, cravo-de-defunto, cravo-de-urubu, chinchilho, coari, coari-bravo and estrondo. Its essential oil is used as an anthelmintic in folk medicine. T. minuta is a plant that reproduces by seeds that germinate in spring and summer; in southern Brazil, its cycle lasts 120 to 150 days until the formation of seeds. T. minuta received its name due to the size of its flowers and not the size of the plant, which can grow as high as 2 meters. The plant is found in dry terrains and develops better in cultivated areas, areas with good fertility and in burned areas [58].

Several species of this genus have been investigated as possible sources of different biological activities that can be used in industry and medicine. This possibility is due to the presence of secondary metabolisms that produce compounds that are not distributed in all parts of the plants and are not strictly necessary but that play an important role in the interaction between the plants and the environment. Terpenes (derived from mevalonic acid or pyruvate and 3-phosphoglycerate), phenolic compounds (derived from shikimic acid or mevalonic acid) and alkaloids (derived from aromatic amino acids) are the three major groups of secondary metabolites [59].

Several compounds are formed in the leaves, flowers or fruits and then accumulate in specific organs of Tagetes spp. in the form of essential oils that possess insecticidal and antimicrobial properties [60,61]. For example, flavonoids have antioxidant properties [62], and carotenoids, especially lutein esters that are found only in the flower’s petals, are used in pharmaceutical preparations [63,64] and as food additives and colorants [65]; they are also known for their anticancer effects [66].

An analysis of the essential oil of Tagetes minuta L. flowers from the northwest Himalayas identified and characterized the following components: (Z)-β-ocimene (39.44%), dihydrotagetone (15.43%), (Z)-tagetone (8.78%), (E)-ocimenone (14.83%) and (Z)-ocimenone (9.15%), in addition to demonstrating that ocimenone has a larvicidal activity against mosquitoes [67].

Later, Moghaddam [68] and Garcia [11] corroborated these results when they demonstrated that the major components of T. minuta oil are α-terpineol, (Z)-β-ocimene, dihydrotagetone, (E)-ocimenone, (Z)- tagetone and (Z)-ocimenone. The composition of the essential oil of T. minuta varies according to the different parts of the plant and its stage of growth/maturation; however, the composition does not differ in relation to the geographic origin [69].

T. minuta is a very common plant throughout Brazil [70]. This species is the subject of studies that have shown promising results, with the species being effective against microbial agents, such as fungi [71], viruses [72] and bacteria [73]. Recently, an in vitro study conducted by Garcia [11] tested the essential oil of T. minuta in the control of four species of ticks: R. microplus, R. sanguineus, A. cajennense and A. miniatus. In that study, at a concentration of 20%, the authors observed efficacies higher than 95% for all of the species analyzed and concluded that T. minuta has acaricidal potential for controlling both the larvae and adults of these species. Nchu [74,75] had previously suggested an acaricide action for T. minuta when they tested its essential oil against Hyalomma rufipes and observed satisfactory results.

Another study using T. minuta from the same group conducted by Andreotti [12] observed the in vivo acaricidal potential of this oil in the control of R. microplus and concluded that at a concentration of 20%, its efficacy was greater than 95%, consistent with previous results reported by Garcia [11]. Both results suggest that T. minuta is a promising acaricide.

Final considerations

Given the information described above, limitations in the performance of these different tools have been observed that restrict their satisfactory control of ticks. The need for new compounds combined with directed public policies, ranging from oversight of the trade of these tick control products to the correct application of these products, are the main factors that decrease tick control efficiency and, consequently, influence the failure of control.

This information reaffirms the importance of studies involving the use of phytotherapeutics in the control of ticks and highlights the acaricidal potential of new species. In this context, the use of Tagetes minuta essential oils is promising for both the control of the species mentioned in the text and its potential action against other tick species from other geographical regions. Thus, further studies are needed to identify which species are sensitive to this physiotherapeutic agent.

References

  1. Freire JJ (1972) Reviso das espcies da famliaIxodidae.Revista de MedicinaVeterinria 8: 1-16.
  2. Estrada-Pea A, Jongejan F (1999) Ticks feeding on humans: a review of records on human-biting Ixodidae with special reference to pathogen transmission. ExpApplAcarol23: 685-715.
  3. Jongejan F, Uilenberg G (2004) The global importance of ticks. Parasitology 129 Suppl: S3-14.
  4. Ogrzewalska M, Pacheco RC, Uezu A, Richtzenhain LJ, Ferreira F, et al. (2009) Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting birds in an Atlantic rain forest region of Brazil. J Med Entomol 46: 1225-1229.
  5. Guglielmone AA, Robbins RG, Apanaskevich DA, Petney TN, Estrada-Pea A. et al. (2010) The Argasidae, Ixodidae and Nuttalliellidae (Acari: Ixodida) of the world: a list of valid species names. Zootaxa 2528: 1-28.
  6. Nava S, Beati L, Labruna MB, Cceres AG, Mangold AJ. et al. (2014) Reassessment of the taxonomic status of Amblyommacajennense ( Fabricius, 1787) with the description of three new species, Amblyommatonelliae n. sp., Amblyommainterandinum n. sp. and Amblyommapatinoi n. sp., and reinstatement of Amblyommamixtum Koch, 1844, and AmblyommasculptumBerlese, 1888 (Ixodida: Ixodidae). Ticks Tick Borne Dis 5: 252-276.
  7. Dantas-Torres F, Onofrio VC, Barros-Battesti DM (2009) The ticks (Acari: Ixodida: Argasidae, Ixodidae) of Brazil. Systematic Applied Acarology Society 14: 30-46.
  8. Veronez VA, Freitas BZ, Olegrio MM, Carvalho WM, Pascoli GV, et al. (2010) Ticks (acari: ixodidae) within various phytophysiognomies of a cerrado reserve in Uberlndia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. ExpApplAcarol 50: 169-179.
  9. Technical regulation for licensing and/or license renewal of antiparasitic products for veterinary use.
  10. Andreotti R, Guerrero FD, Soares MA, Barros JC, Miller RJ, et al. (2011) AcaricideAcaricide resistance of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in State of MatoGrosso do Sul, Brazil.Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 20: 127-133.
  11. Garcia MV, Matias J, Barros JC, De Lima DP, Lopes RDAS. et al. (2012) Chemical identification of Tagetesminuta Linnaeus (Asteraceae) essential oil and its acaricidal effect on ticks.Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 21: 405-411.
  12. Andreotti R, Garcia MV, Cunha RC, Barros JC (2013) Protective action of Tagetesminuta (Asteraceae) essential oil in the control of Rhipicephalusmicroplus (Canestrini, 1887) (Acari: Ixodidae) in a cattle pen trial. Vet Parasitol 197: 341-345.
  13. PrakasaRao EVS, Syamasundara KV, Gopinatha CT, Ramesh S (1999) Agronomical and chemical studies on Tagetesminuta grown in a red soil of a semiarid tropical region in India. Journal of Essential Oil Research 11: 259-261.
  14. Moyo B, Masika PJ (2009) Tick control methods used by resource-limited farmers and the effect of ticks in cattle in rural areas of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Tropical Animal Health and Production 41: 517-523.
  15. Gonzales, JC (1995) O controle do carrapato do boi. Porto Alegre: Edio do Autor.
  16. Guglielmone AA, Beati L, Barros-Battesti DM, Labruna MB, Nava S, et al. (2006) Ticks (Ixodidae) on humans in South America. ExpApplAcarol 40: 83-100.
  17. GuedesJnior DS, Arajo FR, Silva FJ, Rangel CP, Barbosa Neto JD. et al. (2008) Frequency of antibodies to Babesiabigemina, B. bovis, Anaplasmamarginale, Trypanosomavivax and Borreliaburgdorferi in cattle from the Northeastern region of the State of Par, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 17: 105-109.
  18. Walker JB, keirans JE, horak IG (2005) The genus Rhipicephalus (Acari: Ixodidae): a guide to the brown ticks of the world. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Szab MPJ, Mukai LS, Rosa PCS, Bechara GH (1995) Differences in the acquired resistance of dogs, hamsters, and guinea pigs to repeated infestations with adult ticks Rhipicephalussanguineus (Acari: Ixodidae). Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research Animal Science 32: 4350.
  20. Benenson AS (1992) Control of communicable diseases in man An Official Report of the American Public Health Association 115-117.
  21. Maroli M, Khoury C, Frusteri L, Manilla G (1996) [Distribution of dog ticks (RhipicephalussanguineusLatreille, 1806) in Italy: a public health problem]. Ann Ist Super Sanita 32: 387-397.
  22. Odwyer LHO, Massard CL (2001) General aspects of canine hepatozoonosis. ClnicaVeterinria 6: 34-39.
  23. Labruna MB (2004) Acarological Letter. RevistaBrasileira de ParasitologiaVeterinria23: 199-202.
  24. Bowman AS, Nuttall PA (2008) Ticks: biology, disease and control. New York: Cambridge, 23.
  25. Lopes CM, Leite RC, Labruna MB, de Oliveira PR, Borges LM, et al. (1998) Host specificity of Amblyommacajennense (Fabricius, 1787) (Acari: Ixodidae) with comments on the drop-off rhythm. MemInstOswaldo Cruz 93: 347-351.
  26. LabrunaMB, MCPereira(2001) Tickin dogsinBrazil.ClnicaVeterinria30: 24-32.
  27. Labruna MB, de Paula CD, Lima TF, Sana DA (2002) Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) on wild animals from the Porto-Primavera Hydroelectric power station area, Brazil. MemInstOswaldo Cruz 97: 1133-1136.
  28. Arago HB (1936) Ixodidasbrasileiros e de algunspaseslimtrofes. Memrias do InstitutoOswaldo Cruz 3: 759-843.
  29. Dias E, Martins AV, Ribeiro DJ (1937) Typhoexanthematico no Oeste de Minas Gerais. Reaces de Weil-Felix communicantes e de ces. BrasilMdico24: 652-655.
  30. Lemos ERS (1997) Febremaculosabrasileiraemumareaendêmica no municpio de Pedreira, So Paulo, Brasil. Revista da SociedadeBrasileira de Medicina Tropical 30: 261.
  31. Marchoux E, Salimbeni A (1903) La spirillose des poules. Annales de Institut Pasteur Lille 17: 569-580.
  32. Rohr CJ (1909) EstudosobreIxodidas do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Gomes, Irmo C.
  33. Freire, JJ (1953) Arseno e clororesistncia e emprego de tiofosfato de dietilparanitrofenila (Parathion) nalutaanticarrapatoBoophilusmicroplus (Canestrini, 1887). Boletim da diretoria de produo animal 9: 3-21.
  34. Crampton AL, Baxter GD, Barker SC (1999) Identification and characterization of a cytochrome P450 gene and processed pseudogene from an arachnid: the cattle tick, Boophilusmicroplus. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology29: 377-384.
  35. Crampton AL, Baxter GD, Barker SC (1999) A new family of cytochrome P450 genes (CYP41) from the cattle tick, Boophilusmicroplus. Insect BiochemMolBiol 29: 829-834.
  36. Gronvold J (1996) Induction of traps by Ostertagiaostertagi larvae, chlamydospore production and growth rate in the nematode-trapping fungus Duddingtoniaflagrans. Journal of Helminthology70: 291-297.
  37. Parra JRP. et al. (2002) Controlebiolgico: terminologia. So Paulo: Manole.
  38. Garcia MV, Monteiro AC, Mochi D, Simi LD, Szabo MPJ. et al. (2011) Effect of Metarhiziumanisopliae fungus on off-host Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from tick-infested pasture under cattle grazing in Brazil. Veterinary Parasitology 3: 10-16.
  39. Alves-Branci FP, Echevarria FAM, Siqueira AS (1983) GaravaqueiraEgretta ibis e o controlebiolgico do carrapatoBoophilusmicroplus. Campo Grande, MS: EmbrapaGado de Corte.
  40. Chagas ACS, Furlong J, Nascimento CB (2002) Predation of Boophilusmicroplus (Canestrini, 1887) (Acari: Ixodidae) tick engorged female by the ant Pachycondylastriata (Smith, 1858) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in pastures. Bioscience Journal 18: 77-8.
  41. Verissimo CJ (1995) Inimigosnaturais do carrapatoparasita dos bovinos. AgropecuriaCatarinense 8: 35-37.
  42. Rodrguez M, Massard CL, da Fonseca AH, Ramos NF, Machado H, et al. (1995) Effect of vaccination with a recombinant Bm86 antigen preparation on natural infestations of Boophilusmicroplus in grazing dairy and beef pure and cross-bred cattle in Brazil. Vaccine 13: 1804-1808.
  43. Willadsen P, Kemp DH (1988) Vaccination with 'concealed' antigens for tick control. Parasitol Today 4: 196-198.
  44. Willadsen P, Bird P, Cobon GS, Hungerford J (1995) Commercialisation of a recombinant vaccine against Boophilusmicroplus. Parasitology 110 Suppl: S43-50.
  45. de la Fuente J, Rodrguez M, Redondo M, Montero C, Garca-Garca JC, et al. (1998) Field studies and cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination with Gavac against the cattle tick Boophilusmicroplus. Vaccine 16: 366-373.
  46. Willadsen P, Smith D, Cobon G, McKenna RV (1996) Comparative vaccination of cattle against Boophilusmicroplus with recombinant antigen Bm86 alone or in combination with recombinant Bm91. Parasite Immunol 18: 241-246.
  47. Jonsson NN, Matschoss AL, Pepper P, Green PE, Albrecht MS, et al. (2000) Evaluation of tickGARD(PLUS), a novel vaccine against Boophilusmicroplus, in lactating Holstein-Friesian cows. Vet Parasitol 88: 275-285.
  48. Barata L (2005) Empirismo e cincia: fonte de novosfitomedicamentos. Cincia e Cultura 57: 4-5.
  49. FAO (2004) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Module 1. Ticks: acaricide resistance: diagnosis management and prevention. In: Guidelines resistance management and integrated parasite control in ruminants. Rome: FAO Animal Production and Health Division.
  50. Balandrin MF, Klocke JA, Wurtele ES, Bollinger WH (1985) Natural plant chemicals: sources of industrial and medicinal materials. Science 228: 1154-1160.
  51. Chagas ACS, Leite RC, Furlong J, Prates, HT, et al.(2003) Sensibilidade do carrapatoBoophilusmicroplus a solventes. Cincia Rural 33: 109-114.
  52. Olivo CJ, Heimerdinger AZ, Magnos F, Agnolin CA, Meinerz GR. et al. (2009) Extratoaquoso de fumoemcorda no controle do carrapato de bovinos.Cincia Rural, Santa Maria 39: 1131-1135.
  53. Borges LMF, Sousa LAD, Barbosa CS (2011) Perspectivaspara o uso de extratos de plantaspara o controle do carrapato de bovinosRhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. RevistaBrasileira de ParasitolologiaVeterinria 20: 89-96.
  54. Evans WC (1996) The plant and animal kingdoms as sources of drugs. In: SAUNDERS, W. B. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy.
  55. Mulla MS, Su T (1999) Activity and biological effects of neem products against arthropods of medical and veterinary importance. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 15: 133-152.
  56. Marotti M, Piccagliaa R, Biavatia B, Marotti I (2004) Characterization and yield evaluation of essential oils from different Tagetes species. Journal of Essential oil Research 16: 440-444.
  57. Moreira F (1996) Plantasquecuram: cuide da suasadeatravs da natureza. So Paulo: Hemus.
  58. Kissmann KG, Groth D (1992) Plantasinfestantes e nocivas. Ludwigshaven: BASF 2: 355-356.
  59. Garca AA, Carril E, Prez-Urria (2009) Metabolismosecundario de plantas. Reduca (Biologa). SerieFisiologa Vegetal 2: 119-145.
  60. Green MM, Singer JM, Sutherland DJ, Hibben CR (1991) Larvicidal activity of Tagetesminuta (marigold) toward Aedesaegypti. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, United States 7: 282-286.
  61. Piccaglia R. et al. (1997) Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Tageteserecta and Tagetespatula, in Essential Oils: Basic and Applied Research. FRANZ C, MTH , BUCHBAUER, G. eds. Allured Publishing, Carol Stream.
  62. Bors W, Saran M (1987) Radical scavenging by flavonoid antioxidants. Free Radic Res Commun 2: 289-294.
  63. Rivas JD (1989) Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of lutein and lutein fatty acid esters from marigold flower petal powder. J Chromatogr 464: 442-447.
  64. Gau W, Ploschke HJ, Wunsche C (1983) Mass spectrometry identification of xanthophyll fatty acid esters from marigold flowers (Tageteserecta) obtained by high performance liquid chromatography and Craig counter current distribution. Journal of Chromatography 262: 277-284.
  65. Timberlake CF, Henry BS (1986) Plant pigments as natural food colours. Endeavour 10: 31-36.
  66. Block G, Patterson B, Subar A (1992) Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Cancer 18: 1-29.
  67. Singh B, Sood RP, Singh V (1992) Chemical composition of Tagetesminuta L. oil from Himachal Pradesh (India). Journal of Essential Oil Research 4: 525-526.
  68. Moghaddam M, Omidbiagi R, Sefidkon F (2007) Chemical composition of the essential oil of Tagetesminuta L. Journal of Essential Oil Research 19: 3-4.
  69. Chamorro ER, Ballerinib G, Sequeiraa AF, Velascoa GA, Zalazara MF (2008) Chemical composition of essential oil from Tagetesminuta leaves and flowers. Journal of the Argentine Chemical Society 96: 80-86.
  70. Craveiro CC, Matos FJA, Machado MIL, Alencar JW (1988) Essential oils of Tagetesminuta from Brazil. Perfume and Flavors 13: 35-36.
  71. Bii CC,Siboe GM, Mibey RK (2000) Plant essential oils with promising antifungal activity. East Afr Med J 77: 319-322.
  72. Abad MJ, Bermejo P, Sanchez Palomino S, Chiriboga X, Carrasco L (1999) Antiviral activity of some South American medicinal plants. Phytother Res 13: 142-146.
  73. Tereschuk ML,Baigor MD, Abdala LR (2003) Antibacterial activity of Tagetesterniflora. Fitoterapia 74: 404-406.
  74. Nchu F,Magano SR, Eloff JN (2012) In vitro anti-tick properties of the essential oil of Tagetesminuta L. (Asteraceae) on Hyalommarufipes (Acari: Ixodidae). Onderstepoort J Vet Res 79: E1-5.
Citation: Andreotti R, Garcia MV, Matias J, Barros JC, Cunha RC (2014) Tagetes minuta Linnaeus (Asteraceae) as a Potential New Alternative for the Mitigation of Tick Infestation. Med Aromat Plants 3:168.

Copyright: © 2014 Andreotti R, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top