Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology

Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9899

Research Article - (2016) Volume 7, Issue 3

The Clinical Significance of Both IgM and IgG Anticardiolipin Antibodies in Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma

Manal Mohamed Saber*
Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Manal Mohamed Saber, Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of medicine, Minia University, Egypt, Tel: 00201060906673 Email:

Abstract

Background: Anticardiolipin (ACL) antibodies are associated with a wide variety of disorders including malignancies. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and prognostic implication of ACL antibodies in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL).
Methods: Sixty-four patients with NHL were included in this study. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits were used to measure the concentrations of all IgM and IgG antibodies.
Results: Antibodies (IgM, IgG) were found in 35.9% and 84.3% of patients respectively. The presence of elevated aCl IgM was correlated with relapse in NHL (P<0.001). Pretreatment serum levels of aCL IgG were significantly higher in patients with NHL (P<0.001), and significantly normalized in complete remission. Positive ACL IgG was also found in patients with relapse. A negative correlation was found between aCL antibodies (IgM, IgG) positivity and CD23 (P=0.037, P=0.003) respectively.
Conclusion: Anticardiolipin antibodies are associated with lymphomas. Their determination is useful to predict treatment outcome or disease prognosis.

Keywords: Anticardiolipin antibody; Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Introduction

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a histologically, etiologically, and clinically heterogeneous group of malignant diseases of the lymphocytes [1]. Current classification systems include the Revised European-American Lymphoma (REAL) classification and the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasms [2]. The most common types of NHL are diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, which accounts for 30-40% of lymphomas, and follicular lymphoma, which accounts for approximately 20-30% [3]. The distribution of NHL types varies internationally [4]. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), contributes about 7% of B- and T/ natural killer (NK) cell lymphoma cases. Marginal zone B-cell, peripheral T-cell, mantle cell, and a variety of other B-, T- and NK-cell lymphomas constitute the remaining types, with distribution varying by geographic region. Subclinical immune dysfunction is the most consistent risk factor in NHL [5-8]. The disease accounts for approximately 3.4% of all cancer deaths [9].

Anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies are a heterogeneous group of antibodies against phospholipid-binding proteins [10]. The isotype and the titres of aCL antibodies are important criteria for assessing the risk of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which is characterized by venous and arterial thrombosis, miscarriages [11]. Patients with malignancies have an increased incidence and prevalence of aCL [12-14]. Endler et al. [15] found in a large cohort of patients with positive anticardiolipin antibodies that the risk of cancer-related mortality was increased 2.6-fold. These antibodies are associated with many disorders, including autoimmune disease and malignancy [16-18].

The presence of aCL antibodies has been described in patients with NHL [19-22]. aCL antibodies are related to NHL, this is supported by the theory indicated that aCL antibodies are produced by the lymphoma cells [20]. An approximately 30% prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies in patients suffering from non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas has been reported [23]. Apparently, the presence of these antibodies at diagnosis and their persistence during follow-up was associated with resistance to treatment [24].

In this study, we measured the serum aCL IgM and IgG levels in patients with NHL and determined if these antibodies correlated with disease characteristics and final outcome.

Subjects and Methods

Patients and controls

Patients were chosen from the outpatient clinic of Minia Oncology Center, Minia University hospital. This group consists of 64 patients with NHL. They were separated into four groups according to the response to treatment: Group my including patients newly diagnosed with no treatment, Group II with complete remission (CR), group III with partial remission (PR) and group IV with relapse. The diagnosis of NHL was confirmed by immunophenotyping and histopathology.

CR was defined as the absence of clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, or disease-related symptoms. Partial remission was defined as the decrease of 50% in tumour mass [25]. The controls were thirty, apparently healthy subjects. Their ages ranged from 21 to 70 years and this group included 15 males and 15 females.

Laboratory investigations

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), renal function tests (serum creatinine and blood urea), and liver enzymes: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were determined by using Vitros 350 dry chemistry (Ortho clinical diagnostics, Johnson-Johnson company; USA) and ACE automated quantitative multistation chemistry Analyzer (Schiapparelli Biosystems. INC; USA). Complete blood count (CBC) was determined by automated cell counter Cell Dyn 1700 (USA).

Measurement of anticardiolipin antibodies

Anticardiolipin IgG and IgM antibodies were measured in all patients with a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Sunred Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai). Results were expressed as GPL and MPL units, according to Harris et al. [26]. Values exceeding 18 GPL or MPL units were regarded as positive.

Statistical method and data analysis

The collected data were coded, tabulated, and statistically analysed using SPSS program (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software version 20. Non-parametric quantitative data are transformed into the logarithm before analysis (WBCs, Platelets, ALT, AST). Analyses were done between more than two groups using one-way ANOVA test for quantitative data between groups, followed by post-HOC Tukey’s correction between each two groups Analyses were done between the two groups using the independent sample t-test for quantitative data, Chi-square test was used for qualitative data between groups. The correlation between two quantitative variables was performed by using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and non-parametric Spearman’s correlation coefficient.

Results

Patient characteristics

The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The median age of the group was 46.64 ± 15.11 years (range 13-75 yr). 52 patients had B-cell lymphoma (10 follicular centre lymphoma, 23 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 14 chronic lymphocytic lymphomas, 1 patient with small cell lymphoma, 4 other lymphomas) and 12 patients with T-cell lymphoma.

Clinico-pathological features of NHL patients Descriptive statistics
Age
Range (13-75)
Mean ± SD 46.64 ± 15.11
Sex
Male 38 (59.4%)
Female 26 (40.6%)
Response to treatment
No treatment 23 (35.9%)
Complete remission 9 (14.1%)
Partial remission 10 (15.6%)
Relapse 22 (34.4%)
NHL histologic subtype
B 52 (81.3%)
T 12 (18.8%)
B-NHL histologic subtype
FCL 10 (19.2%)
DLCL 23 (44.2%)
CLL 14 (26.9%)
SCL 1 (1.9%)
others 4 (7.7%)
Hepatomegally
No 28 (43.8%)
Yes 36 (56.2%)
Spleenomegally
No 23 (35.9%)
Yes 41 (64.1%)
LN enlargement
No 0 (0%)
Yes 64 (100%)
NHL: Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma; FCL: Follicular Cell Lymphoma; DLCL:Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma; CLL:Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia; SCL:Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma; LN:Lymph Node

Table 1: Clinical characteristics of the patients.

For 23 patients (35.9%), blood samples were obtained at initial diagnosis of the lymphoma with no treatment. In the other patients, remission status of the disease at the time of blood sampling was noted (Table 1). 9 patients (14.1%) were in complete remission of the lymphoma at the time of blood sampling. 10 patients (15.6%) experienced a partial remission and 22 patients (34.4%) in relapse.

aCL IgM in NHL

Patients with NHL had significantly higher serum levels of aCL IgM than controls (P<0.001). The mean aCA IgM level was 13.65 ± 9.23 MPL in the patient group and 4 ± 1.44 MPL (1.6-6.4) in the control group (Figure 1A).

clinical-cellular-immunology-healthy-controls

Figure 1: aCA IgM levels in NHL patients. (A) Serum aCA IgM level was measured and compared in NHL patients (n=64) and controls (n=30). Serum level of aCA IgM was significantly higher in NHL patients than in healthy controls (** P<0.001). (B) Serum aCA IgM levels in different groups of NHL patients. aCA IgM levels were significantly higher in the group with relapse compared to other groups (** P<0.001). NHL: Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma; aCA: Anticardiolipin Antibodies; Pre: Pretreatment; CR: Complete Remission; PR: Partial Remission.

Serum aCA IgM levels were compared in different groups of patients. The newly diagnosed patients showed serum aCA IgM levels ranging from 3-30 MPL with a mean of 8.43 ± 5.15 MPL. Patients with CR had aCA IgM values ranging from 3 to 25 MPL with a mean of 8.11 ± 6.84 MPL. Patients with partial remission had Aca IgM levels ranging from 4-27 MPL with a mean of 10.7 ± 7.84 MPL. Samples of patients who were in relapse were also analysed. Their aCA IgM values ranged from 8-45 MPL with a mean of 22.72 ± 7.09 MPL (Figure 1B).

Taking 18 units as the cutoff for a positive ACA IgM. IgM Antibodies were found in 23 of 64 patients with NHL (35.9%). Among aCL antibody-positive patients, complete remission occurred in 1 of 23 patients (4.3%); 1 patient with no treatment (4.3%); and 2 patients with partial remission (8.7%). Relapse occurred in 19 of 23 patients with positive aCA IgM (82.6%). A significant positive correlation was found between relapse and aCA IgM antibodies (P<0.001). No correlation was found between aCL antibodies and clinical or laboratory parameters (Table 2).

  ACA IgM P value
Negative ACA Positive ACA
(n=41) (n=23)
Age
Range (14-75) (13-70) 0.588
Mean ± SD 47.41 ± 15.37 45.26 ± 14.88
Sex
Male 25 (61%) 13 (56.5%) 0.728
Female 16 (39%) 10 (43.5%)
Treatment outcome
No treatment 22 (53.7%) 1 (4.3%) <0.001**
complete remission 8 (19.5%) 1 (4.3%)
partial remission 8 (19.5%) 2 (8.7%)
relapse 3 (7.3%) 19 (82.6%)
B-NHL histologic subtype
FCL 4 (11.1%) 6 (37.5%) 0.127
DLCL 17 (47.2%) 6 (37.5%)
CLL 12 (33.3%) 2 (12.5%)
SCL 1 (2.8%) 0 (0%)
others 2 (5.6%) 2 (12.5%)
NHL histologic subtype
B 36 (87.8%) 16 (69.6%) 0.073
T 5 (12.2%) 7 (30.4%)
Hb
Range (7.4-14.1) (7.4-15.8) 0.766
Mean ± SD 11.6 ± 1.82 11.75 ± 2.17
WBCs
Range (1.5-20) (2.1-11.1) 0.204
Mean ± SD 7.15 ± 4.36 5.65 ± 2.63
Platelets
Range (50-651) (62-541) 0.909
Mean ± SD 232.9 ± 128.77 226.47 ± 115.91
AST
Range (13-566) (14-241) 0.309
Mean ± SD 56.14 ± 89.41 55.95 ± 48.01
ALT
Range (11-232) (2.5-170) 0.787
Mean ± SD 51.46 ± 50.82 52.63 ± 38.69
LDH
Range (268-1416) (277-910) 0.055
Mean ± SD 633.04 ± 269.82 531.04 ± 147.05
Urea
Range (14-65) (18.7-62) 0.819
Mean ± SD 30.85 ± 11.11 31.51 ±10.77
Creatinine
Range (0.5-2.7) (0.5-1.2) 0.603
Mean ± SD 0.85 ± 0.38 0.81 ± 0.21
Hepatomegally
No 17 (41.5%) 11 (47.8%) 0.622
Yes 24 (58.5%) 12 (52.2%)
Spleenomegally
No 15 (36.6%) 8 (34.8%) 0.885
Yes 26 (63.4%) 15 (65.2%)
LN. enlargement
No 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1
Yes 41 (100%) 23 (100%)
Negative aCA IgM was <18 MPL; high, ≥ 18 MPL. Highly statistically significant differences (PË?0.001) are indicated with asterisks (**).NHL: Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma; N: Number; aCA: Anticardiolipin Antibodies; FCL: Follicular Cell Lymphoma; DLCL: Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma; CLL: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia; SCL: Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma; Hb: Haemoglobin; WBCs: White Blood Cells; AST: Asparatate Aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine Aminotransferase; LDH: Lactate Dehydrogenase; LN: Lymph Node.

Table 2: Correlation of positive aCA IgM level with features in NHL patients.

Significant negative correlation was found between CD23 and positive aCL IgM antibody titre (P=0.037) but not with other immunophenotyping markers (Table 3).

  ACA IgM P value
Negative ACA (n=41) Positive ACA(n=23)
CD 20
-Ve 6 (14.6%) 6 (26.1%) 0.26
+Ve 35 (85.4%) 17 (73.9%)
CD 5
-Ve 24 (58.5%) 16 (69.6%) 0.382
+Ve 17 (41.5%) 7 (30.4%)
CD 23
-Ve 28 (68.3%) 21 (91.3%) 0.037*
+Ve 13 (31.7%) 2 (8.7%)
CD 10
-Ve 24 (58.5%) 12 (52.2%) 0.622
+Ve 17 (41.5%) 11 (47.8%)
CD 3
-Ve 34 (82.9%) 17 (73.9%) 0.39
+Ve 7 (17.1%) 6 (26.1%)
CD 15
-Ve 41 (100%) 22 (95.7%) 0.178
+Ve 0 (0%) 1 (4.3%)
TdT
-Ve 40 (97.6%) 22 (95.7%) 0.674
+Ve 1 (2.4%) 1 (4.3%)
LCA
-Ve 39 (95.1%) 20 (87%) 0.243
+Ve 2 (4.9%) 3 (13%)
c-myc
-Ve 39 (95.1%) 21 (91.3%) 0.545
+Ve 2 (4.9%) 2 (8.7%)
CD 99
-Ve 40 (97.6%) 23 (100%) 0.45
+Ve 1 (2.4%) 0 (0%)
CD 30
-Ve 40 (97.6%) 22 (95.7%) 0.674
+Ve 1 (2.4%) 1 (4.3%)
CD 68
-Ve 40 (97.6%) 23 (100%) 0.45
+Ve 1 (2.4%) 0 (0%)
CD79a
-Ve 40 (97.6%) 21 (91.3%) 0.256
+Ve 1 (2.4%) 2 (8.7%)
CD 22
-Ve 28 (68.3%) 17 (73.9%) 0.637
+Ve 13 (31.7%) 6 (26.1%)
CD 19
-Ve 28 (68.3%) 17 (73.9%) 0.637
+Ve 13 (31.7%) 6 (26.1%)
Bcl2
-Ve 31 (75.6%) 16 (69.6%) 0.599
+Ve 10 (24.4%) 7 (30.4%)
Bcl6
-Ve 36 (87.8%) 17 (73.9%) 0.158
+Ve 5 (12.2%) 6 (26.1%)
Negative aCA IgM was<18 MPL; high, ≥ 18 MPL. Statistically significant differences (PË?0.05) are indicated with an asterisk (*).NHL: Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma; N: Number; aCA: Anticardiolipin Antibodies

Table 3: Correlation of positive aCA IgM levels with immunophenotyping markers in NHL patients.

aCL IgG in NHL

Patients with NHL had significantly higher serum levels of aCL IgG than controls (P<0.001). The mean aCA IgG level was 28.91 ± 13.67 GPL (2-75) in the patient group and 3.41 ± 1.52 GPL (1.1- 6.0) in the control group (Figure 2A).

clinical-cellular-immunology-significantly-higher

Figure 2: aCA IgG levels in NHL patients. (A): Serum aCA IgG level was measured and compared in NHL patients (n=64) and controls (n=30). Serum level of aCA IgG was significantly higher in NHL patients than in healthy controls (** P<0.001). (B): Serum aCA IgG levels in different groups of NHL patients. aCA IgG levels were significantly higher in patients with no treatment, in partial remission, relapse compared to complete remission (** P<0.001). NHL: Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; aCA: Anticardiolipin Antibodies; Pre: Pretreatment; CR: Complete Remission; PR: Partial Remission.

The newly diagnosed patients showed serum aCA IgG levels ranging from 7-55 GPL with a mean of 33.52 ± 10.62 GPL. Patients with CR had aCA IgG values ranging from 2 to 45 GPL with a mean of 11 ± 13.05 GPL. Patients with partial remission had aCA IgG levels ranging from 7-50 GPL with a mean of 26.2 ± 11.84 GPL. Patients in relapse had values ranged from 19–75 GPL with a mean of 32.63 ± 11.76 GPL (Figure 2B).

IgG Antibodies were found in 54 of 64 patients with NHL (84.3%). Among aCL antibody-positive patients, complete remission occurred in 1 of 54 (1.9%); 22 patients with no treatment (40.7%); and 9 patients with partial remission (16.7%). Relapse occurred in 22 of 54 patients with positive aCA IgG (40.7%). Significant positive correlation was found between newly diagnosed patients with no treatment, patients in relapse and aCL IgG positivity (P<0.001). Significant negative correlation was found between aCL IgG antibodies and white blood cells (WBCs) (P=0.035). There was an association between the positivity of aCL IgG and histology of lymphoma (P=0.033) (Table 4).

  ACA IgG P value
Negative ACA  (n=10) Positive ACA (n=54)
Age
Range (20-65) (13-75) 0.384
Mean ± SD 50.5 ± 14.15 45.92 ± 15.3
Sex
Male 5 (50%) 33 (61.1%) 0.511
Female 5 (50%) 21 (38.9%)
Treatment outcome
No treatment 1 (10%) 22 (40.7%) <0.001**
complete remission 8 (80%) 1 (1.9%)
partial remission 1 (10%) 9 (16.7%)
relapse 0 (0%) 22 (40.7%)
Diagnosis 1
FCL 1 (11.1%) 9 (20.9%) 0.033*
DLCL 2 (22.2%) 21 (48.8%)
CLL 5 (55.6%) 9 (20.9%)
SCL 1 (11.1%) 0 (0%)
others 0 (0%) 4 (9.3%)
Diagnosis 2
B 9 (90%) 43 (79.6%) 0.44
T 1 (10%) 11 (20.4%)
Hb
Range (2.8-20) (1.5-18.9) 0.840*
Mean ± SD 9.16±5.22 6.14±3.43
WBCs
Range (2.8-20) (1.5-18.9) 0.035*
Mean ± SD 9.16 ± 5.22 6.14 ± 3.43
Platelets
Range (60-347) (50-651) 0.552
Mean ± SD 207.5 ± 103.81 234.87 ± 127.1
AST
Range (17-163) (13-566) 0.527
Mean ± SD 43.7 ± 43.38 58.37 ± 81.46
ALT
Range (12-217) (2.5-232) 0.585
Mean ± SD 49.3 ± 62.28 52.36 ± 43.71
LDH
Range (300-648) (268-1416) 0.066
Mean ± SD 469.8 ± 129.9 619.83 ± 245.69
Urea
Range (22-38) (14-65) 0.903
Mean ± SD 30.7 ± 5.79 31.16 ± 11.65
Creatinine
Range (0.6-1.1) (0.5-2.7) 0.381
Mean ± SD 0.75 ± 0.17 0.85 ± 0.35
Hepatomegally
No 6 (60%) 22 (40.7%) 0.259
Yes 4 (40%) 32 (59.3%)
Spleenomegally
No 4 (40%) 19 (35.2%) 0.771
Yes 6 (60%) 35 (64.8%)
LN enlargement
No 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1
Yes 10 (100%) 54 (100%)
Negative aCA IgG was <18 GPL; high, ≥ 18 GPL. Statistically significant differences (PË?0.05) are indicated with an asterisk (*). Highly statistically significant differences (PË?0.001) are indicated with asterisks (**). NHL: Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma; N:Number; aCA:Anticardiolipin Antibodies; FCL: Follicular Cell Lymphoma; DLCL: Diffuse Large B - Cell Lymphoma; CLL: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia; SCL:Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma ; Hb:Haemoglobin; WBCs: White Blood Cells; AST:Asparatate Aminotransferase; ALT:Alanine Aminotransferase; LDH:Lactate Dehydrogenase; LN:Lymph Node.

Table 4: Correlation of positive aCA IgG level with features in NHL patients.

Significant negative correlation was found between CD23 and positive aCL IgG antibody titre (P=0.003) but not with other immunophenotyping markers (Table 5).

  ACA IgG P value
Negative ACA  Positive ACA 
 (n=10)  (n=54)
CD 20
-Ve 1 (10%) 11 (20.4%) 0.44
+Ve 9 (90%) 43 (79.6%)
CD 5
-Ve 4 (40%) 36 (66.7%) 0.11
+Ve 6 (60%) 18 (33.3%)
CD 23
-Ve 4 (40%) 45 (83.3%) 0.003*
+Ve 6 (60%) 9 (16.7%)
CD 10
-Ve 7 (70%) 29 (53.7%) 0.34
+Ve 3 (30%) 25 (46.3%)
CD 3
-Ve 9 (90%) 42 (77.8%) 0.378
+Ve 1 (10%) 12 (22.2%)
CD 15
-Ve 10 (100%) 53 (98.1%) 0.664
+Ve 0 (0%) 1 (1.9%)
TdT
-Ve 10 (100%) 52 (96.3%) 0.536
+Ve 0 (0%) 2 (3.7%)
LCA
-Ve 10 (100%) 49 (90.7%) 0.316
+Ve 0 (0%) 5 (9.3%)
c-myc
-Ve 9 (90%) 51 (94.4%) 0.594
+Ve 1 (10%) 3 (5.6%)
CD 99
-Ve 10 (100%) 53 (98.1%) 0.664
+Ve 0 (0%) 1 (1.9%)
CD 30
-Ve 10 (100%) 52 (96.3%) 0.536
+Ve 0 (0%) 2 (3.7%)
CD 68
-Ve 10 (100%) 53 (98.1%) 0.664
+Ve 0 (0%) 1 (1.9%)
CD 79a
-Ve 9 (90%) 52 (96.3%) 0.387
+Ve 1 (10%) 2 (3.7%)
CD 22
-Ve 9 (90%) 36 (66.7%) 0.138
+Ve 1 (10%) 18 (33.3%)
CD 19
-Ve 9 (90%) 36 (66.7%) 0.138
+Ve 1 (10%) 18(33.3%)
Bcl2
-Ve 9 (90%) 38 (70.4%) 0.197
+Ve 1 (10%) 16 (29.6%)
Bcl6
-Ve 9 (90%) 44 (81.5%) 0.512
+Ve 1 (10%) 10 (18.5%)
Negative aCA IgG was <18 GPL; high, ≥ 18 GPL. Statistically significant differences (PË?0.05) are indicated with an asterisk (*). NHL: Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; N: Number; ACA: Anticardiolipin Antibodies

Table 5: Correlation of positive aCA IgG levels with immunophenotyping markers in NHL patients.

Discussion

A number of studies have focused on the association between anticardiolipin antibodies and hematological malignancies. These antibodies have been found in association with many malignancies, particularly hematological malignancies including lymphomas, acute myeloid leukaemia, chronic myelocytic leukemia and lymphoproliferative disorders [16,27].

This study showed elevated aCL antibodies, confirming that the prevalence of aCL antibodies in NHL patients is higher than in healthy subjects. In this study, aCl IgM and aCL IgG antibodies were detected in 35.9% and 84.3% respectively in NHL patients, which is higher to the previous reports. Stasi et al. [24] reported a prevalence of 35.7% aCL in NHL, whereas Genvresse et al. [28] and Zukerman et al. [17] reported a prevalence of 26.6% and 39% of aCL respectively.

The present study showed elevated serum levels of ACA IgM in (35.9%) of the patients with NHL. In previous reports, aCA IgM antibodies were found in only one patient [29]. In one study of 38 patients with NHL, aCA IgM could be detected in 5% of the patients [30]. This may be explained by detecting aCA IgM levels at the time of diagnosis of NHL.

When correlated with several other established clinical, laboratory and immunophenotyping markers, positive aCA (IgM, IgG) levels were negatively associated with CD23. CD23 antigen is expressed in lowgrade NHL but is rarely present in high grade lesion [31,32]. Consequently, Anticardiolipin antibody-positive patients had more advanced disease in comparison with negative patients, thus high anticardiolipin antibody at advanced stage may support its use as a poor prognostic marker. This is supported by a study indicated that aCA levels are prognostic variables in aggressive NHL [33]. No studies analysed the serum levels aCA IgM with reference to the phenotypic characteristics.

Furthermore, positive aCA IgM levels showed a significant correlation with the failure of response to therapy. It would be of interest to determine whether serial monitoring of aCA IgM levels after remission could be useful for the early prediction of relapse. Various mechanisms have been suggested for the production of aCA IgM antibodies in relapse in the NHL including; production of ACL antibodies directly by malignant cells, production of autoantibodies by the immune system cells that activated against lymphoma cell phospholipid antigens and production of monoclonal antibodies with all antibody activities [34,35]. Normal levels of gamma globulins in patients ruled out the possibility of a nonspecific binding in the aCLELISA test as the main cause of the positivity for aCL IgM antibodies.

In the present study, serum levels of aCL IgG have been frequently elevated in patients with NHL at diagnosis, when compared with the levels in healthy controls, and after treatment, those levels decreased substantially. Their measurement, hence, was useful to predict treatment outcome and disease prognosis. It has been shown that anticardiolipin antibody-positive patients had the most advanced disease in comparison with negative patients [11,30].

Clinical and laboratory correlates of aCL IgG levels in NHL have been previously studied with some controversial results [36]. The present study verified a negative association between higher aCA IgG levels and white blood cells. This may be explained by the fact that cell recovery after treatment is affected. Additionally, patients with higher ACA IgG levels associated with lymphoma histology which may help in NHL diagnosis and treatment plan.

The patients were treated with CHOP chemotherapy [37] regimens in this study. While NHL is responsive to treatment, a continuous rate of relapse is usually seen in advanced stages. Previous studies have shown that histone methyltransferases G9a and GLP plays a key role in the regulation of embryonic stem cell differentiation [38] and maintenance of imprinted DNA methylation [39]. Since the enzymatic activity of G9a/GLP complex is also essential for the growth and differentiation of leukaemia cells, inhibition of G9a and its partner protein GLP has been found to prevent the deterioration of leukaemia [40]. In addition, since the inhibitor of EZH2, a component involved in PRC2 complex, also plays a role in the treatment of lymphoma [41], prevent the function of epigenetic modifiers might facilitate the treatment of lymphoma and generation the inhibitors of these enzymes might be the new strategies for the cure of human blood carcinomas. Therefore, it would be important to further evaluate whether the prognostic value of serum aCL levels in NHL patients receiving these new strategies.

In conclusion, anticardiolipin antibodies are associated with lymphomas. Their determination is useful to predict treatment outcome and disease prognosis.

References

  1. Turner JJ, Morton LM, Linet MS, Clarke CA, Kadin ME, et al. (2010) InterLymph hierarchical classification of lymphoid neoplasms for epidemiologic research based on the WHO classification (2008): update and future directions. Blood 116: e90-98.
  2. Müller AM, Ihorst G, Mertelsmann R, Engelhardt M (2005) Epidemiology of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): trends, geographic distribution, and etiology. Ann Hematol 84: 1-12.
  3. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW (2001) Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
  4. Anderson JR, Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD (1998) Epidemiology of the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: distributions of the major subtypes differ by geographic locations. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. Ann Oncol 9: 717-720.
  5. Grulich AE, Vajdic CM, Cozen W (2007) Altered immunity as a risk factor for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16: 405-408.
  6. Zintzaras E, Voulgarelis M, Moutsopoulos HM (2005) The risk of lymphoma development in autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 165: 2337-2344.
  7. Ekström Smedby K, Vajdic CM, Falster M, Engels EA, Martínez-Maza O, et al. (2008) Autoimmune disorders and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes: a pooled analysis within the InterLymph Consortium. Blood 111: 4029-4038.
  8. Vendrame E, Martínez-Maza O (2011) Assessment of pre-diagnosis biomarkers of immune activation and inflammation: insights on the etiology of lymphoma. J Proteome Res 10: 113-119.
  9. Nahleh ZA (2006) Hormonal therapy for male breast cancer: A different approach for a different disease. Cancer Treat Rev 32: 101-105.
  10. Cervera R, Piette JC, Font J, Khamashta MA, Shoenfeld Y, et al. (2002) Antiphospholipid syndrome: clinical and immunologic manifestations and patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Arthritis Rheum 46:1019-1027.
  11. Levine SR, Salowich-Palm L, Sawaya KL, Perry M, Spencer HJ (1997) IgG anticardiolipin antibody titer >40 GPL and the risk of subsequent thromboocclusive events and death. A prospective cohort study. Stroke 28: 1660-1665.
  12. Schved JF, Dupuy-Fons C, Biron C, Quére I, Janbon C (1994) A prospective epidemiological study on the occurrence of antiphospholipid antibody: the Montpellier Antiphospholipid (MAP) Study. Haemostasis 24: 175-182.
  13. Ozguroglu M, Arun B, Erzin Y, Demir G, Demirelli F, et al. (1999) Serum cardiolipin antibodies in cancer patients with thromboembolic events. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 5: 181-184.
  14. Armas JB, Dantas J, Mendonça D, Farto R, Ribeiro M, et al. (2000) Anticardiolipin and antinuclear antibodies in cancer patients--a case control study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 18: 227-232.
  15. Endler G, Marsik C, Jilma B, Schickbauer T, Vormittag R, et al. (2006) Anti-cardiolipin antibodies and overall survival in a large cohort: preliminary report. Clin Chem 52: 1040-1044.
  16. Gómez-Puerta JA, Cervera R, Espinosa G, Aguiló S, Bucciarelli S, et al. (2006) Antiphospholipid antibodies associated with malignancies: clinical and pathological characteristics of 120 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35: 322-332.
  17. Zuckerman E, Toubi E, Golan TD, Rosenvald-Zuckerman T, Sabo E, et al. (1995) Increased thromboembolic incidence in anti-cardiolipin-positive patients with malignancy. Br J Cancer 72: 447-451.
  18. Lim W, Crowther MA, Eikelboom JW (2006) Management of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: a systematic review. JAMA 295: 1050-1057.
  19. Ciaudo M, Horellou MH, Audouin J, De Carbonnieres C, Conard J, et al. (1991) Lupus anticoagulant associated with primary malignant lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma of the spleen: a report of four patients. Am J Hematol 38: 271-276.
  20. Sawamura M, Yamaguchi S, Murakami H, Amagai H, Matsushima T, et al. (1994) Multiple autoantibody production in a patient with splenic lymphoma. Ann Hematol 68: 251-254.
  21. Keung YK, Cobos E, Meyerrose GE, Roberson GH (1996) Progressive thrombosis after treatment of diffuse large cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and concomitant lupus anticoagulant. Leuk Lymph 20: 341-345.
  22. Onida P, Tresoldi M, Rugarli C (1997) Anti-phospholipid-antibody syndrome associated with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Am J Hematol 55: 167-168.
  23. Asherson RA (2000) Antiphospholipid antibodies, malignancies and paraproteinemias. J Autoimmun 15: 117-122.
  24. Stasi S, Stipa E, Masi M, Oliva F, Sciarra A, et al. (1993) Antiphospholipid antibodies: prevalence, clinical significance and correlation to cytokine levels in acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Thromb Haemost 70: 568-572.
  25. Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, Shipp MA, Fisher RI, et al. (1999) Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol 17: 1244.
  26. Harris EN, Gharavi AE, Hughes GRV (1991) The anticardiolipin assay. In: Harris EN, Exner T, Hughes GRV, Asherson RA (eds). Phospholipid-Binding Antibodies. CRC Press: Boca Ratonpp 175-187.
  27. Reinstein E, Shoenfeld Y (2007) Antiphospholipid syndrome and cancer. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 32: 184-187.
  28. Genvresse I, Luftner D, Späth-Schwalbe E, Buttgereit F (2002) Prevalence and clinical significance of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein-I antibodies in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 68: 84-90.
  29. Pusterla S, Previtali S, Marziali S, Cortelazzo S, Rossi A, et al. (2004) Antiphospholipid antibodies in lymphoma: prevalence and clinical significance. Hematol J 5: 341-346.
  30. Uskudar Teke H, Gulbas Z, Bal C (2014) Serum levels of cytokines and prevalence of autoantibodies in lymphoma patients and their prognostic value. J BUON 19: 191-197.
  31. Murray PG, Janmohamed RM, Crocker J (1994) CD23 expression in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: immunohistochemical demonbstration on BU38 on paraffin sections. J Pathol. 165:125-128.
  32. Barna G, Reiniger L, Tátrai P, Kopper L, Matolcsy A (2008) The cut-off levels of CD23 expression in the differential diagnosis of MCL and CLL. Hematol Oncol 26: 167-170.
  33. Bairey O, Blickstein D, Monselise Y, Lahav J, Stark P, et al. (2006) Antiphospholipid antibodies may be a new prognostic parameter in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 76: 384-391.
  34. Al-Abdulla NA, Thompson JT, LaBorwit SE (2001) Simultaneous bilateral central retinal vein occlusion associated with anticardiolipin antibodies in leukemia. Am J Ophthalmol 132: 266-268.
  35. Miesbach W, Scharrer I, Asherson R (2006) Thrombotic manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome in patients with malignancies. Clin Rheumatol 25: 840-844.
  36. Zaidah AW, Liza D, Madhavan R, Hassan R, Ganech AAZ (2006) Antiphospholipid Antibodies and its Clinical Association with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Haema 4: 511-518.
  37. McKelvey EM, Gottlieb JA, Wilson HE, Haut A, Talley RW, et al. (1976) Hydroxyldaunomycin (Adriamycin) combination chemotherapy in malignant lymphoma. Cancer 38: 1484-1493.
  38. Wen B, Wu H, Shinkai Y, Irizarry RA, Feinberg AP (2009) Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 41: 246-250.
  39. Zhang T, Termanis A, Ozkan B, Bao XX, Culley J, et al. (2016) G9a/GLP Complex Maintains Imprinted DNA Methylation in Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell Rep 15: 77-85.
  40. Pappano WN, Guo J, He Y, Ferguson D, Jagadeeswaran S, et al. (2015) The Histone Methyltransferase Inhibitor A-366 Uncovers a Role for G9a/GLP in the Epigenetics of Leukemia. PLoS One 10: e0131716.
  41. McCabe MT, Ott HM, Ganji G, Korenchuk S, Thompson C, et al. (2012) EZH2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for lymphoma with EZH2-activating mutations. Nature 492: 108-112.
Citation: Saber MM (2016) The Clinical Significance of Both IgM and IgG Anticardiolipin Antibodies in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. J Clin Cell Immunol 7:436.

Copyright: © 2016 Saber MM. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top