Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Anesthesia & Clinical Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-6148

Research Article - (2017) Volume 8, Issue 2

The Effect of a Preoperative Single Dose of Magnesium Sulfate versus Preoperative Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Analgesic Requirements in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Sur

Sabry Mohamed Amin* and Rabab Mohamed Mohamed
Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Sabry Mohamed Amin, Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt, Tel: 00201221793439 Email:

Abstract

Background: The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a peripheral nerve block, utilized to anesthetize the sensory nerves by local anesthetic injection in the neurovascular plane. Magnesium sulfate can prevent the induction of central sensitization from peripheral nociceptive stimuli at the spinal action site by blocking N-methyl-Daspartate (NMDA) receptors. The aim of our study is to compare the effect of preoperative single-dose of Magnesium sulfate versus preoperative ultrasound guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block on hemodynamics, and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing colorectal surgical operations. Patients and methods: This study was conducted on 40 adult patients ASA I and II scheduled for colorectal surgical operations under general anesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups as follow: Group I: Patients received magnesium sulfate 50 mg/kg IV as single-dose before induction of anesthesia. Group II: Bilaterally TAP block was performed before induction of anesthesia under ultrasound guidance. In both groups, general anesthesia was used. Measurements: HR and MABP, Intraoperative fentanyl, atracurium, and isoflurane consumption, operative time, postoperative analgesia, duration of anesthesia, and side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, and shivering. Results: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups as regards to age, weight, duration of surgery, and the duration of anesthesia. There were no significant differences in the time of the first analgesic request in both groups. Pain score was statistically insignificant between both groups. The incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting and shivering were more in group II than group I. Conclusion: Preoperative administration of a single dose of magnesium sulfate (50 mg/kg) versus preoperative ultrasound guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing colorectal surgery was associated in both groups with reduction in the analgesic requirements postoperatively, with less postoperative nausea, vomiting and shivering in the magnesium sulfate group.

Keywords: Preventive analgesia; TAP block; Perioperative magnesium

Introduction

Postoperative pain after colorectal surgeries results from surgical incision in addition to intense inflammatory response as a result of surgical trauma [1-3]. Postoperative pain can be associated with physiological and psychological derangements which may adversely affect perioperative outcome and sometimes may even cause mortality. Acute perioperative pain results in poor patient satisfaction, delays mobilization and if left unattended can lead to chronic pain [4,5].

Postoperative pain after colorectal surgeries may be visceral, or somatic which become worst with movement, visceral pain takes upper hand in the first 48 h postoperatively [6].

Proper and effective plane was needed for the treatment of postoperative pain to prevent its adverse effects. Prevention of this pain has been dubbed as the “holy grail of anesthesiology” [7].

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a peripheral nerve block, utilized to anesthetize the sensory nerves supplying the anterior abdominal wall by injection of local anesthetic in the neurovascular plane between internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle layers [8-9]. The triangle of Petit is a single entry point for performing transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block via description of the landmark technique to access a number of abdominal wall nerves and providing more widespread analgesia [10]. Ultrasound guided TAP block has been described, it helps us to locate the neurovascular plane between internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle layers easily and local anesthetic was deposited with accuracy [11].

Magnesium sulfate has been used as an anticonvulsant or antiarrhythmic drug. The interference with calcium channels and Nmethyl- D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors may be the mechanism of the its analgesic effect. Magnesium sulfate can prevent the induction of central sensitization from peripheral nociceptive stimuli at the spinal action site by blocking NMDA receptors in a voltage-dependent manner. Reduction of catecholamine release with decrease in sympathetic stimulation may be another mechanism which lead to decrease the stress response to the surgery. NMDA receptor antagonists like magnesium sulfate with low doses have an effect on pain threshold and could prevent pain perception [12-16]. Magnesium sulfate was used as an adjuvant agent to increase the analgesic effect of the other analgesic drugs. Magnesium sulfate was found to be effective in reducing the perioperative pain and analgesic consumption through block the somatic, autonomic and endocrinal response to painful stimulus [17,18].

The Hypothesis of this Study

• Preoperative administration of single dose magnesium sulfate will be effective as preincistional

• Sulfate TAP block in reducing anesthetic requirements.

• Preoperative administration of single dose magnesium will be effective as preincistional TAP block in reducing postoperative pain score, reduce the postoperative opioid consumption and prolong the time of first analgesic request.

• Preoperative administration of single dose magnesium sulfate will be associated with less postoperative nausea, vomiting, and shivering.

The aim of our study is to compare the effect of preoperative singledose of magnesium sulfate versus preincisional ultrasound guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block on hemodynamics, anesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing colorectal surgical operations. Primary outcomes of our study were reduction in opioid consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively and postoperative pain scores, while the secondary outcomes were the time to fist analgesic administration; and adverse events including, nausea, vomiting, and shivering.

Patients and Methods

This randomized double blinded study was carried out in Tanta University Hospital at the surgical Department on the time period from 3/2016 to 11/2016, after approval of the hospital ethical committee and obtaining verbal and written informed consent from each patient. All patients’ data were confidential with secret codes and was used for the current study only. Any unexpected risk appears during the course of the study was cleared to the patient and the ethical committee on time and the proper measures were taken to overcome these risks.

The approval code of ethical committee was 30822/3/16.

Exclusion criteria

Patients refusal to share in the study, liver disease, coagulopathy, patients on anticoagulant or thrombolytic therapy, Patients who had prior abdominal surgeries, allergy to Magnesium sulfate or local anesthetic drugs. Figure 1 shows the patients flow diagram.

anesthesia-clinical-research-Alveolar-Proteinosis

Figure 1: Patients flow diagram.

Randomization

The randomization was performed using sealed numbered envelopes indicating the group of each patient. A nurse blinded to study who did not participate in patients follow up, read the number and made group assignments. All operating room personals were blind to study.

The process of inclusion in the study went on until the required number of patients was reached. Infusion pumps and syringes which used for drugs administration were identical, covered, encoded Group I, and Group II by anesthesiologist and nurse blinded to study and did not participate in the study or data collection.

Preoperative preparation

All patients underwent preoperative assessment by history taking, physical examination and laboratory investigations which include complete blood count, liver function test, renal function test, prothrombin time, INR, ECG, blood group and chest X-ray.

Premedication

All patients received 150 mg ranitidine and 10 mg of metoclopramide one hour before anesthesia.

Intraoperative management

On arrival to operating room an intravenous line was inserted. All patients preloaded with 10 ml/kg ringers solution and were attached to monitor displaying the following: ECG, HR, NIBP, ETCO2 and O2 saturation.

The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups as follows:

Group I: Patients received magnesium sulfate 50 mg/kg in 250 ml of isotonic sodium chloride solution intravenously (IV) as single-dose before induction of anesthesia and placebo TAP block was considered where the needle was inserted and 200020ml of normal saline was injected bilaterally into the transversus abdominis neuro-fascial plane.

Group II: Bilateral TAP block was performed before induction of anesthesia under ultrasound guidance with the patient in the supine position, the ultrasound probe is placed in a transverse plane in a sterile manner between the lower costal margin and the iliac crest in the midaxillary line. Once the external oblique abdominis muscle, the internal oblique abdominis muscle, and the transversus abdominis muscles were visualized at the level of the anterior axillary line between the 12th rib and the iliac crest, the block was performed with a 20-G, 100 mm Facetted tip needle, the needle is advanced between the aponeurosis of the internal oblique abdominis muscle and the transversus abdominis muscle. Once the needle was placed in the space between the internal oblique abdominis muscle and transversus abdominis muscle, intermittent aspiration is done to exclude intravascular injection, 20 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine was deposited bilateral into the transversus abdominis neuro-fascial plane after negative aspiration. The drug was seen spreading in the TAP as a dark oval shape.

Also patients in group II received placebo 250 ml of normal saline intravenously before induction of anesthesia.

In both groups, general anesthesia was induced with intravenous injection of fentanyl 1 μg/kg, sodium thiopental 5 mg/kg, and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg. After intubation, anesthesia was maintained with 1-1.5% isoflurane in oxygen and top up doses of fentanyl and atracurium were given as needed. The tidal volume and respiratory rate were adjusted to achieve SpO2 ≥ 95% and end-tidal CO2 between 32 and 35 mmHg. Central venous catheter was inserted through right internal jugular vein for fluids, drugs infusion and measure the central venous pressure, urinary catheter was placed for monitoring of urine output and arterial line was inserted for blood sampling and blood gas analysis.

During skin closure, intravenous (IV) infusion of diclofenac sodium (75 mg diluted in 100 ml of normal saline), and 1gm of paracetamol were given intravenously combined with infiltration of wound with 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% in both groups. At the end of surgery metoclopramide 0.15 mg/kg and dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg were administered for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Ondansetron 0.1 mg/kg was administered for treatment of PONV. After completion of surgery, inhalational anesthesia was stopped and muscle relaxant was reversed with atropine and neostagmine and the patient allowed to breathe spontaneously. The ETT was removed when the patients fulfilled the criteria of extubation (spontaneous eye opening, purposeful movement, intact reflex) and the patients were transferred to postanesthesia care unit for further follow up.

The pain intensity was assessed by a person who was blind to study by using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with 10 cm length (starting from 0, no pain, to 10, worst pain) at 0, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after recovery. If Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) value more than 4, pethedine 0.5 mg/kg was given intravenously and can be repeated every 3 h till the NRS less than 4. The time to first dose of analgesia and total 24h of pethedine consumption postoperatively recorded in all patients.

Measurements

• Demographic data.

• HR and MABP as base line and every 5 min till end of surgery.

• Intraoperative fentanyl, atracurium, and isoflurane consumption was recorded

• Operative time was measured from skin incision to skin closure.

• The duration of anesthesia.

• Postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

• Time to first analgesic request.

• Total 24 h pethedine consumption.

• Side-effects such as nausea and vomiting, and shivering were noted.

Shivering scale

• Grade 0-no sign of shivering

• Grade 1-vasoconstriction, cyonosis and piloerection

• Grade 2-visible tremor only in one muscle group

• Grade 3-visible tremor in more than one muscle group

• Grade 4-intense shivering, tremor of the head and arms and piloerection

Patients were discharged postoperatively when they had no or mild pain (NRS<3), and had no bleeding and or nausea or vomiting.

Statistical analysis

The sample size was calculated using the following assumption: the reduction in opioid consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was the main response variable. Power analysis identified 20 patients per group, required to detect 20% reduction in postoperative opioid consumption between both groups with a power 80% and a significant level of 0.05.

Comparison of demographic data, time of surgery was done by Student's t-test. Two way analysis of variance with correction for repeated measurements was used for heart rate and blood pressure comparison. Pain score was analyzed with Mann-Whitney-U test nonparametric measurements (expressed as median (range).

Results

This study was carried out on 40 adult patients divided into two groups, 20 patients in each group. There were no statistically significant differences as regards to age, weight, duration of surgery, and the duration of anesthesia between both groups (Table 1).

Characters Group I=Magnesium sulfate group (n=20) Group II= Transversus Abdominis Plane Block group(n=20)
Age (years) 48 ± 5 52 ± 7
Weight (kg) 68 ± 8 72 ± 7
Duration of surgery (min) 160 ± 35 155 ± 32
Duration of anesthesia (min) 168 ± 5 165 ± 6
Male/Female 15/5 16/4
Time to first analgesic request (h) 4 ± 2 4 ± 1
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation), n= Numbers of the patients. No statistically significant differences between the 2 groups

Table 1: Demographic data, duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia and time to first analgesia.

There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline heart rates and mean arterial blood pressure in the patients in both groups. The HR and MABP were increased significantly in group II 5min, 10min, and 30 min after intubation and while it maintained stable in group I (Tables 2 and 3).

HR Group I= Magnesium sulfate group (n=20) Group II= Transversus Abdominis Plane Block group (n=20)
Base line 82±4 84 ±5
T1 88 ±7 98 ±5*
T2 86 ±5 100 ±7*
T3 88 ±7 96 ±6*
T4 80 ±6 82 ±8
T5 82 ±7 84 ±9
T6 84 ±6 82 ±8
At end of operation 86 ±7 84 ±9
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n= Numbers of the patients, T1=5 min after induction, T2=10 min after induction, T3=30 min after induction, T4=60 min after induction, T5=90 min after induction, T6=120 min after induction. *P<0.05 denotes statistically significance between the 2 groups( the heart rate was increased significantly in transversus abdominis plane blockgroup compared to magnesium sulfategroup).

Table 2: Heart rate (beats/minute) changes in both groups.

MABP Group I= Magnesium sulfate group (n=20) GroupII= Transversus Abdominis Plane Blockgroup(n=20)
Base line 85±9 84 ±8
T1 80± 7 96±8*
T2 84 ±8 100±10*
T3 86 ±7 96 ±8*
T4 86 ±8 88 ±7
T5 80 ±9 86 ±9
T6 82 ±8 90 ±7
At end of operation 85 ±9 88 ±8
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n= Numbers of the patients, T1=5 min after induction, T2=10 min after induction, T3=30 min after induction, T4=60 min after induction, T5=90 min after induction, T6=120 min after induction. *P<0.05 denotes statistically significance between the 2 groups(the mean arterial blood pressure was increased significantly in transversus abdominis plane blockgroup compared to magnesium sulfategroup).

Table 3: Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) changes in both groups.

There were no statistically significant differences in the time of the first analgesic request in both groups (Table 1). There were no statistically significant differences between both groups as regards to fentanyl, atracurium and isoflurane requirement during anesthesia (Table 4).

Variables Group I= Magnesium sulfate group (n=20)  Group II= Transversus Abdominis Plane Block group (n=20)
Intraoperative Fentanyl (µg/kg) 2± 0.6 2 ±0.5
Atracurium (mg/kg) 0.6±0.03 0.6±0.04
* Dial set of isoflurane (%) 1 1
24 hPethidine consumption (mg) 55±17 56 ±16
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n= Numbers of the patients, *Data are expressed as (%). No statistically significant differences between the 2 groups.

Table 4: Fentanyl, Atracurium, Isoflurane and 24 h Pethidine consumption in both groups.

Pain score was statistically insignificant between both groups at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, 18 h, and 24 h postoperatively (Table 5).

Variables Group I= Magnesium sulfate group (n=20)  Group II= Transversus Abdominis Plane Block group (n=20)
2h 2 2
4 h 3 4
6h 3 2
8 h 4 3
12 h 3 3
18h 5 4
24 h 2 2
Data are expressed as median, n=Numbers of the patients. No statistically significant differences between the 2 groups.

Table 5: Postoperative Numeric Rating Scale in both groups.

There were no statistically significant differences between both groups as regards to 24 h pethedine consumption (Table 5). The incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting and shivering were more in group II than group I (Table 6).

Characters Group I=Magnesium sulfate group (n=20) Group II=Transversus Abdominis Plane Block group(n=20)
Nausea and Vomiting 2(10%) 4(20) *
Shivering 1(5%) 6(30%)*
Data are expressed as number (%), n= Numbers of the patients. *P<0.05 denotes statistical significance between the 2 groups. The incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting and shivering were significantly higher in transversus abdominis plane block group compared to magnesium sulfate group.

Table 6: The incidence of postoperative adverse events.

Discussion

Our study demonstrated that, preoperative administration of single dose of magnesium sulfate 50 mg/kg or performing preoperative ultrasound guided bilateral TAP block was associated with stable hemodynamic, the time of first analgesic request was prolonged, and postoperative analgesic consumption was reduced in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

However, Magnesium sulfate administration preoperatively was associated with les postoperative nausea, vomiting and shivering.

Preemptive analgesia is a method in which the intervention was given before start of noxious stimulus so, prevents the central sensitization caused by tissue damage and inflammatory mediators which associated with decreased intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption and reduce the change of acute postoperative pain to chronic one. But there were conflicting results about the efficacy of preemptive analgesia in reducing the severity, and chronicity of acute postoperative pain and this could explained by the fact that, there are many factors affecting the postoperative pain as the presence of preoperative pain, genetic factors, painful intraoperative stimulations as retraction, skin incision, cutting viscera, muscle or tendon cutting and postoperative release of inflammatory mediators [19,20].

Preventive analgesia is appropriate term which utilize preemptive analgesia and multimodal techniques, began before operation and continued in the operative and postoperative time, it combines multiple analgesics regimen which reduce the dose of each drugs, reduce or eliminate the unwanted side effects, enhance recovery and reduce the hospital stay and associated with early discharge from hospital, increased duration of action of analgesic drugs to decrease long-term pain sensitivity at the peripheral and central levels [21-23].

Magnesium sulfate was considered the fourth most common cation in the body and plays an important role in many physiologic processes [24].

Our study demonstrated that, the preoperative administration of single dose magnesium sulfate was associated with prolonged time to first analgesic request and decreased the pethedine consumption postoperatively with less incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting and shivering.

Our study was in line with Seyhan et al. [25] they concluded that, preoperative magnesium sulfate infusion was associated with reduced the 24 h postoperative morphine consumption in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.

Additionally Gupta et al. [26] reported that, preoperative administration of magnesium sulfate in patients undergoing spinal surgeries was associated with stable hemodynamics.

Moreover, Taheri et al. [27] concluded that preoperative infusion of 50 mg/kg magnesium sulfate 15 min before surgery significantly decrease the postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia without any adverse effects.

Also Ryu et al. [28] reported that, preoperative magnesium sulfate 50 mg/kg was associated with significant decrease in the postoperative pain and decrease postoperative opioid consumption.

Asadollah et al. [29] found that, preoperative and continuous infusion of magnesium sulfate was associated with significant decrease in pain score postoperatively with reduced the need to opioid analgesia in patients undergoing lower abdominal laparotomy.

Postoperative shivering was associated with undesirable effects as it increases plasma catecholamine concentrations threefold, increase oxygen consumption and requirements which may precipitate myocardial ischemia in cardiac patients and also associated with less patient’s satisfaction, increase hospital cost, and were remembered as bad event and worst aspects of surgery [30].

Prevention of postoperative shivering is considered one of the most important functions of magnesium sulfate [31]. Administration of magnesium sulfate decreases the incidence of shivering by up to 70-90% [28,32].

Our study in agreement with previous studies [28,33] they concluded that intraoperative magnesium sulfate infusion was associated with less incidences of PONV and less postoperative shivering.

The main cause of this pain after colorectal surgeries was the abdominal wall incision. Injection of local anesthetics into the transversus abdominis plane will result in block the nerves of the anterior abdominal wall before they pierce the musculature to innervate the abdomen wall [4].

The transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block is a peripheral nerve block which was used to block the nerves supplying the anterior abdominal wall (T6 to L1). It reduces the severity and chronicity of perioperative pain, reduces the opioid consumption in the postoperative period and reduces the side effects of opioids as sedation and postoperative nausea and vomiting [34,35].

In our study, pre-incisional ultrasound guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block was associated with significant improved in postoperative pain score, reduced postoperative analgesic consumption, and increased in the time to first analgesic request with no reported complications.

This in agreements with Amr et al. [36] they concluded that a preincisional TAP was reported to be safe procedure, decrease acute postoperative pain, reduce the analgesic requirements, prolong the time to first analgesic administration with no recorded side effects.

Also, Belavy et al. [37] reported that TAP block reduced opioid consumption after cesarean section when used as a part of multimodal analgesic therapy.

Moreover, Peteren et al. [38] demonstrated that there is a clinically significant reductions of post-operative opioid requirements and pain, as well as some effects on opioid-related side effects (sedation and post-operative nausea and vomiting) in patients received TAP block.

In controversy to our study Costello et al. [39] concluded that, TAP block did not improve the quality of postoperative pain after cesarean section delivery.

Also Ghisi et al. [40] found that, TAP block did not reduce morphine consumption during the first postoperative 24 h after elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

The limitations of our study include the following: no control group, we did not measure the depth of anesthesia, the sample size may be small and postoperative magnesium sulfate and calcium levels were not measured.

Conclusion

Preoperative administration of a single dose of magnesium sulfate (50 mg/kg) versus preoperative ultrasound guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing colorectal surgery was associated in both groups with reduction in the analgesic requirements postoperatively, with less postoperative nausea, vomiting and shivering in the magnesium group.

References

  1. Soave PM, Conti G, Costa R, Arcangeli A (2009) Magnesium and anaesthesia. Curr Drug Targets 10: 734-743.
  2. Ng A, Swami A, Smith G, Davidson AC, Emembolu J (2002) The analgesic effects of intraperitoneal and incisional bupivacaine with epinephrine after total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 95: 158-162.
  3. Kim TK, Yoon JR (2010) Comparison of the neuroendocrine and inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol 59: 265-269.
  4. Ejlersen E, Andersen HB, Eliasen K, Mogensen T (1992) A comparison between preincisional and postincisional lidocaine infiltration and postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 74: 495-498.
  5. Woolf CJ (1989) Recent advances in the pathophysiology of acute pain. Br J Anaesth 63: 139-146.
  6. Leung CC, Chan YM, Ngai SW, Ng KF, Tsui SL (2000) Effect of pre-incision skin infiltration on post-hysterectomy pain--a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Anaesth Intensive Care 28: 510-516.
  7. Cohen SP, Raja SN (2013) Prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: the ongoing search for the holy grail of anesthesiology. Anesthesiology 118: 241-243.
  8. Shibata Y, Sato Y, Fujiwara Y, Komatsu T (2007) Transversus abdominis plane block. Anesth Analg 105: 883.
  9. Tran TM, Ivanusic JJ, Hebbard P, Barrington MJ (2009) Determination of spread of injectate after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric study. Br J Anaesth 102: 123-127.
  10. Rafi AN (2001) Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia 56: 1024-1026.
  11. Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C (2007) Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care 35: 616-617.
  12. Tramer MR, Schneider J, Marti RA, Rifat K (1996) Role of magnesium sulfate in postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 84: 340-347.
  13. Hwang JY, Na HS, Jeon YT, Ro YJ, Kim CS, et al. (2010) I.V. infusion of magnesium sulfate during spinal anaesthesia improves postoperative analgesia. Br J Anaesth 104: 89-93.
  14. Mostafa S, Baharestani B, Farsad BF, Hooman B, Touraj B, et al. (2011) Intraoperative magnesium sulfate can reduce narcotic requirement after coronary bypass surgery. The Iranian Journal of Cardiac Surgery 12: 32-35.
  15. Haryalchi K, Ghanaie MM, Yaghoubi Y, Milani F, Faraji R (2013) An assessment of changes in Magnesium level during gynecological abdominal surgeries. Journal of Basic and Clinical Reproductive Sciences 2: 98-102.
  16. Kara H, Sahin N, Ulusan V, Aydogdu T (2002) Magnesium infusion reduces perioperative pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol 19: 52-56.
  17. Koinig H, Wallner T, Marhofer P, Andel H, Horauf K, et al. (1998) Magnesium sulfate reduces intra- and postoperative analgesic requirements. Anesth Analg 87: 206-210.
  18. Levaux Ch, Bonhomme V, Dewandre PY, Brichant JF, Hans P (2003) Effect of intra-operative magnesium sulphate on pain relief and patient comfort after major lumbar orthopaedic surgery. Anaesthesia 58: 131-135.
  19. Katz J, Seltzer Z (2009) Transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain: risk factors and protective factors. Expert Rev Neurother 9: 723-744.
  20. Buvanendran A, Kroin JS (2009) Multimodal analgesia for controlling acute postoperative pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 22: 588-593.
  21. Møiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB (2002) A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology 96: 725-741.
  22. Katz J, McCartney CJ (2002) Current status of pre-emptive analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 15: 435-441.
  23. Fawcett WJ, Haxby EJ, Male DA (1999) Magnesium: physiology and pharmacology. Br J Anaesth 83: 302-320.
  24. Seyhan TO, Tugrul M, Sungur MO, Kayacan S, Telci L, et al. (2006) Effects of three different dose regimens of magnesium on propofol requirements, haemodynamic variables and postoperative pain relief in gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth 96: 247-252.
  25. Gupta K, Vohra V, Sood J (2006) The role of magnesium as an adjuvant during general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 61: 1058-1063.
  26. Taheri A, Haryalchi K, Ghanaie MM, Arejan NH (2015) Effect of Low-Dose (Single-Dose) Magnesium Sulfate on Postoperative Analgesia in Hysterectomy Patients Receiving Balanced General Anesthesia. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2015: 306145.
  27. Ryu JH, Kang MH, Park KS, Do SH (2008) Effects of magnesium sulfate on intraoperative anaesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesia in gynaecology patients receiving total intravenous anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 100: 397-403.
  28. Asadollah S, Vahdat M, Yazdkhasti P, Nikravan N (2015) The effect of magnesium sulfate on postoperative analgesia requirements in gynecological surgeries. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 1: 34-37.
  29. Frank SM, Higgins MS, Breslow MJ, Fleisher LA, Gorman RB, et al. (1995) The catecholamine, cortisol, and hemodynamic responses to mild perioperative hypothermia. A randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology 82: 83-93.
  30. Alfonsi P (2001) Postanaesthetic shivering: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and approaches to prevention and management. Drugs 61: 2193-2205.
  31. Tramer MR, Glynn CJ (2007) An evaluation of a single dose of magnesium to supplement analgesia after ambulatory surgery: randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 104: 1374-1379.
  32. Apfel CC, Kranke P, Katz MH, Goepfert C, Papenfuss T, et al. (2002) Volatile anaesthetics may be the main cause of early but not delayed postoperative vomiting: a randomized controlled trial of factorial design. Br J Anaesth 88: 659-68.
  33. McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, Benton A, Costello J, et al. (2008) The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 106: 186-191.
  34. Siddiqui MR, Sajid MS, Uncles DR, Cheek L, Baig MK (2011) A meta-analysis on the clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane block. J Clin Anesth 23: 7-14.
  35. Amr YM, Amin SM (2011) Comparative study between effect of pre- versus post-incisional transversus abdominis plane block on acute and chronic post-abdominal hysterectomy pain. Anesth Essays Res 5: 77-82.
  36. Belavy D, Cowlishaw PJ, Howes M, Phillips F (2009) Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 103: 726-730.
  37. Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Torup H, Dahl JB (2010) The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 54: 529-535.
  38. Costello JF, Moore AR, Wieczorek PM, Macarthur AJ, Balki M, et al. (2009) The transversus abdominis plane block, when used as part of a multimodal regimen inclusive of intrathecal morphine, does not improve analgesia after cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34: 586-589.
  39. Ghisi D, Fanelli A, Vianello F, Gardini M, Mensi G, et al. (2016) Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Observer-Blinded Trial. Anesth Analg 123: 488-492.
Citation: Amin SM, Mohamed RM (2017) The Effect of a Preoperative Single Dose of Magnesium Sulfate versus Preoperative Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Analgesic Requirements in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery. J Anesth Clin Res 8:703.

Copyright: © 2017 Amin SM, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top