Clinical & Experimental Cardiology

Clinical & Experimental Cardiology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9880

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2017) Volume 8, Issue 6

The Effect of High-Dose Simvastatin Therapy on Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction

Xiaozhu Liu1*, Huankun Liang2, Kangyan Li2, Jiali Li2, Laiqing Li2 and Licheng Zhang3
1Guizhou Institute of Technology, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
2Guangzhou Youdi Biotechnology Company, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
3Cancer Center of The 88 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Tai’an, Shandong, China
*Corresponding Author: Xiaozhu Liu, Guizhou Institute of Technology, Guiyang, 550000, Guizhou, China, Tel: +862022056980 Email:

Abstract

Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) accounts for the major cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized countries. However, effects of high-dose simvastatin therapy on patients with acute cerebral infarction still unclear. In this study, the clinical efficacy of high-dose simvastatin on patients with cerebral infarction was investigated. A total of 180 patients with acute cerebral infarction were randomized divided into control group (n=60), high-dose simvastatin (HDS) group (n=60) and low-dose simvastatin (LDS) group (n=60). Control group, HDS group and LDS group received conventional treatment, conventional treatment together with simvastatin 80 mg/d and conventional treatment as well as simvastatin 40 mg/d respectively for 3 months. Biochemical indices, neurological deficit and plaque thickness and volume were assessed and recorded after treatment. After simvastatin treatment, the plasma levels of Triglyceride, Total cholesterol, Low-density lipoprotein were significantly decreased in HDS group and LDS group, and HDS were significantly increased in HDS group and LDS group. Also, simvastatin decreased levels of IL-6 and TNF-α, two major inflammatory factors in plasma. Furthermore, improved neurological deficit were found in simvastatin treatment groups. In addition, simvastatin treatment also improved plaque states include plaque thickness and volume in HDS group and LDS group. Therefore, simvastatin could improve acute cerebral infarction and high-dose of simvastatin treatment was better than low -dose of simvastatin treatment.

Keywords: High-dose; Simvastatin; Acute cerebral infarction

Introduction

Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) is the third most common cause of death worldwide [1,2]. CVD accounts for the major cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized countries and responsible for stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) [3,4]. There are about 500,000 new or recurrences stroke cases each year [5].

Simvastatin (epistatin), an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, acts by decreasing cholesterol synthesis and by increasing low density lipoprotein (LDL) catabolism via increased LDL receptor activity [6]. Simvastatin was beneficial in a lot of immunologic VCD [7]. Evidences indicated that simvastatin could stable plaque and improve the long-term prognosis of patients with CVD [8]. The common dose of simvastatin for CVD treatment was 10 mg/d to 40 mg/d [9]. No reports were reported on high-dose simvastatin therapy (e.g. 80 mg/d or 100 mg/d) for patients with acute cerebral infarction.

In this study, 80 mg/d simvastatin therapy was performed for CVD treatment. Biochemical indices, neurological deficit and adverse reactions were analyzed after treatment to assess the effect of high-dose simvastatin therapy on patients with acute cerebral infarction.

Methods

Study population

This prospective cohort study was performed from October 2015 to August 2016. A total of 180 patients with acute cerebral infarction were admitted to the neurology departments of the 88 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army during 72 hours of stroke (Table 1) were studied. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the 88 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army (Number: HPLA2167529), and all participants gave written informed consent.

All the patients with acute cerebral infarction received no any other lipid, hormones, anti-inflammatory or anti-oxidant drugs before treatment. Patients with malignant, hyperpyrexia, peripheral vascular disease, autoimmune disease, anemia, malnutrition were excluded from this study. Pregnant and lactating women were also removed from this study.

Treatments

Control group received conventional treatments including dehydration of intracraninal pressure, brain protection, circulation improvement, and symptomatic treatments. High-dose simvastatin (HDS) therapy group and low-dose simvastatin (LDS) therapy group received conventional treatment together with simvastatin 80 mg/d or 20 mg/d respectively. All the treatments were performed for 3 months.

Plasma lipid and inflammatory factors analysis

Blood for lipid and inflammatory factors analysis were collected from each group before and after treatments. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C and stored at -80. Levels of plasma total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), IL-6 and TNF-α were measured by automatic biochemistry analyzer.

Evaluation of neurological deficit

Neurological deficit were conducted in control group, HDS group and LDS group according to NIHSS criterion.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SD. Comparisons of patients’ clinical parameters and overall survival times between groups were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. A difference is considered significant if P<0.05. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software, version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Demographic and baseline characteristics

The clinical characteristics of the patients were summarized in Table 1. This study involved 180 patients (121 males, 59 females) aged 48-74 years (mean 62.0 ± 11.9 years) with ~52 culprit lesions. Hypertension was found in 119 patients (66.1%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus in 26 patients (14.4%). There were 99 patients (55.0%) were smokers and 26 patients (14.4%) were alcoholics. The mean systolic pressure was 157.1 ± 21.9, and the mean diastolic pressure was 87.4 ± 15.4. All the patients involved in this study were divided randomly into control group, HDS group and LDS group. There were no differences observed about baseline characteristics among three groups.

Characteristic Control group HDS group LDS group
(n=60) (n=60) (n=60)
Age, years 62.1 ± 11.9 61.6 ± 13.1 62.4 ± 10.8
Male, n (%) 42 (70.0) 39 (65.0) 40 (66.7)
Hypertension n (%) 40 (66.7) 41 (68.3) 38 (63.3)
Diabetes n (%) 9 (15.0) 7 (11.7) 10 (16.7)
Smoking n (%) 33 (55.0) 35 (58.3) 31 (51.7)
Drinking ?%? 8 (13.3) 10 (16.7) 8 (13.3)
Systolic pressure 157.1 ± 20.5 156.4 ± 21.1 157.9 ± 24.2
Diastolic pressure 87.3 ± 13. 3 86.9 ± 16.4 88.1 ± 16.5

Table 1: Baseline features of the study patients.

High-dose simvastatin regulated plasma lipids levels

Concentration of plasma TG, TC, LDL and HDL in control group, HDS group and LDS group were measured before and after treatment to determine the effect of high-dose of simvastatin on plasma lipids. Results indicated that both low-dose and high-dose simvastatin significantly decreased plasma lipid levels including cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL (Table 2). Furthermore, levels of cholesterol and triglycerides were decreased notably in HDS group compared with LDS group. In addition, the plasma HDL concentration was significantly increased in HDS group and LDS group. The HDL level was higher in HDS group than LDS group.

Group Control group HDS group LDS group
Before After Before After Before After
(mmol/L) (mmol/L) (mmol/L) (mmol/L) (mmol/L) (mmol/L)
TG 1.5 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 0.4 0.8 ± 0.3*? 1.8 ± 0.5 1.4 ± 0.3?
TC 5.5 ± 0.8 5.3 ± 0.8 5.0 ± 0.7 3.4 ± 0.3*? 5.1 ± 0.5 4.4 ± 0.4?
LDL 2.9 ± 0.8 3.1 ± 1.1 3.0 ± 1.0 2.2 ± 0.5* 3.2 ± 0.7 2.6 ± 0.6?
HDL 1.1 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.4*? 1.1 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.3?

Table 2: Plasma lipids levels of different groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD.*P<0.05 after treatment versus before treatment in HDS group; P<0.05 after treatment in HDS group versus after treatment in LDS group; P<0.05 after treatment versus before treatment in LDS group.

High-dose simvastatin regulated levels of IL-6 and TNF-α

To assess the effect of high-dose simvastatin on the inflammation, levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were determined of each group. Results showed that simvastatin significantly decreased both levels of IL-6 and TNF-α (Table 3). Furthermore, high-dose simvastatin has a better ability in improving inflammation because of levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were lower in HDL group.

Group Control group HDS group LDS group
Before After Before After Before After
(mmol/L) (mmol/L) (mmol/L) (mmol/L) (mmol/L) (mmol/L)
IL-6 277.5 ± 16.3 288.4 ± 15.1 284.9 ± 18.7 124.5 ± 8.9*? 281.2 ± 17.8 225.7 ± 13.3?
TNF-α 1.89 ± 0.24 1.91 ± 0.22 1.88 ± 0.21 0.92 ± 0.14*? 1.90 ± 0.23 1.48 ± 0.18?

Table 3: Levels of plasma IL-6 and TNF-α of different groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *P<0.05 after treatment versus before treatment in HDS group; P<0.05 after treatment in HDS group versus after treatment in LDS group; P<0.05 after treatment versus before treatment in LDS group.

High-dose simvastatin improved neurological deficit

Neurological deficit was evaluated and scored in control group, HDS group and LDS group before and after the treatment. As shown in table 4, both HDS and LDS groups got lower scores than control group. In addition, the neurological deficit score was lower in HDS group than LDS group.

Group Before After
Control group 11.29 ± 2.98 8.97 ± 0.95
HDS group 11.44 ± 3.22 7.32 ± 0.64*?
LDS group 11.33 ± 3.70 7.81 ± 0.56?

Table 4: Neurological deficit scores of different groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *P<0.05 after treatment versus before treatment in HDS group; P<0.05 after treatment in HDS group versus after treatment in LDS group; P<0.05 after treatment versus before treatment in LDS group.

High-dose simvastatin improved plaque thickness and volume

The plaque thickness and volume of patients of each group were measured to further determine the influence of high-dose of simvastatin on plaque. Data showed that simvastatin significantly decreased plaque thickness and volume. Furthermore, the plaque thickness and volume were lower in HDS group, compared with LDS group (Figure 1).

clinical-experimental-cardiology-Plaque-thickness

Figure 1: Plaque thickness and volume. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *P<0.05 after treatment versus before treatment in HDS group; P<0.05 after treatment in HDS group versus after treatment in LDS group; P<0.05 after treatment versus before treatment in LDS group.

Discussion

Simvastatin is a long-established hydroxy-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, first introduced in 1988 [10]. Simvastatin would also inhibit the biosynthesis of isoprenoid intermediates such as geranyl and farnesyl pyrophosphate, and then affect the posttranslational prenylation of several important cell-signaling proteins during immune responses [11]. Therefore, simvastatin has been shown to have antitumor potential in many different cell lines [12-14].

Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease with high level of lipid and responsible for major clinical events, such as stroke and acute cerebral infarction [15]. Atherosclerosis is the principal cause of death in the USA, Europe, and parts of Asia [16]. Simvastatin was an effective lipid-lower drug that was used extensively in many medical practices [17]. Simvastatin been shown to reduce the progression of coronary atherosclerosis and clinical trials indicated that treatment with simvastatin could reduce the morbidity and mortality of CVD [18]. In this study, we find that low-dose and high-dose of simvastatin regulated plasma lipids levels including significantly decreased cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL levels and dramatically increased HDL level. Moreover, high-dose of simvastatin could strengthen this effect compared with low-dose of simvastatin.

Clinical further studies demonstrated that simvastatin not only regulated plasma lipids concentrations, but also improved inflammation response, such as enhances anti-inflammation effect in CVD [19,20]. IL-6 and TNF-α, two major inflammation markers, were elevated significantly in simvastatin treated patients of this study. IL-6 and TNF-α levels were higher in HDS group than LDS group.

Additional studies shown that, besides the lipid-lower effect, simvastatin could also stabilized the atherosclerotic plaque and have beneficial effects on cerebral circulation and brain parenchyma during ischemic stroke and reperfusion [21]. We measured the plaque thickness and volume of patients in three groups and found that simvastatin could significantly decreased plaque thickness and volume. Furthermore, the plaque thickness and volume were lower in HDS group, compared with LDS group.

The common dose of simvastatin for CVD treatments was 10 mg/d to 40 mg/d. However, very few reports were found on high-dose (e.g. 80 mg/d) simvastatin therapy for patients with acute cerebral infarction. In this study, 80 mg/d simvastatin was used to assess its effect on CVD. We found that high-dose of simvastatin could significantly improve plasma lipids levels, enhances anti-inflammation effect and decreased plaque thickness and volume than low-dose of simvastatin. In addition, the adverse effects in HDS group were mild and transient.

In conclusion, this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that treatment with 80 mg of simvastatin per day has a better therapeutical effect on patients with acute cerebral infarction than 20 mg of simvastatin one day. These results support the initiation of simvastatin treatment after a stroke or TIA.

Acknowledgments

Thanks for the the 88 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army for supplying clinical samples and normal controls, and Guangdong province science and technology plan projects (20150119).

Declaration of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Thompson R, Sills D, Roberts FG, et al. (2011) Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD002137.
  2. Lee MS, Shlofmitz E, Kaplan B (2016) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Severely Calcified Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Initial Experience with Orbital Atherectomy. J Invasive Cardiol 28: 147-150.
  3. BlancoColio LM, MartinVentura JL, Teresa E, Csaba F, Farsang C et al. (2007) Elevated ICAM-1 and MCP-1 plasma levels in subjects at high cardiovascular risk are diminished by atorvastatin treatment. Atorvastatin on Inflammatory Markers study: a substudy of Achieve Cholesterol Targets Fast with Atorvastatin Stratified Titration. Am Heart J 153: 881-889.
  4. Chen MH, Colan SD, Diller L (2011) Cardiovascular Disease Cause of Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancers. Circulation Research 108: 619-628.
  5. O'Donnell CJ, Nabel EG (2011) Genomics of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 365: 2098-2109.
  6. Ndumele CE, Matsushita K, Lazo M, Bello N, Blumenthal RS, et al. (2016) Obesity and Subtypes of Incident Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Heart Assoc 5.
  7. Parkin L, Paul C, Herbison GP2 (2014) Simvastatin dose and risk of rhabdomyolysis: nested case-control study based on national health and drug dispensing data. Int J Cardiol 174: 83-89.
  8. Baigent C, Landray MJ, Reith C, Emberson J, Wheeler DC, et al. (2011) The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet 377: 2181-2192.
  9. Zeb I, Li D, Nasir K, Malpeso J, Batool A, et al. (2013) Effect of statin treatment on coronary plaque progression - a serial coronary CT angiography study. Atherosclerosis 231: 198-204.
  10. Bittencourt MS, Cerci R (2015) Statin effects on atherosclerotic plaques: regression or healing? BMC Medicine 13: 260-260.
  11. Banach M, Serban C, Sahebkar A, Mikhailidis DP, Ursoniu S, et al. (2015) Impact of statin therapy on coronary plaque composition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of virtual histology intravascular ultrasound studies. BMC Medicine 13: 229-229.
  12. Segatto M, Manduca A, Lecis C, Rosso P, Jozwiak A, et al. (2014) Simvastatin treatment highlights a new role for the isoprenoid/cholesterol biosynthetic pathway in the modulation of emotional reactivity and cognitive performance in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 39: 841-854.
  13. Yusuf SW, Cipolla C, Durand JB, Lenihan DJ (2011) Cancer and cardiovascular disease. Cardiol Res Pract 2011: 943748.
  14. Altwairgi AK (2015) Statins are potential anticancerous agents (review). Oncol Rep 33: 1019-1039.
  15. Weber C, Noels H (2011) Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Nature Medicine 17: 1410-1422.
  16. Wang JC, Bennett MR (2012) Aging and Atherosclerosis Mechanisms, Functional Consequences, and Potential Therapeutics for Cellular Senescence. Circulation Research 2: 245-259.
  17. Vasic D, Radmili O, Davidovic L (2012) Simvastatin influence on carotid atherosclerotic disease regression. Srpski Arhiv Za Celokupno Lekarstvo: 164-167.
  18. Perreault S, Ellia L, Dragomir A, Côté R, Blais L, et al. (2009) Effect of statin adherence on cerebrovascular disease in primary prevention. Am J Med 122: 647-655.
  19. Liu JN, Suh DH, Yang EM, Lee SI, Park HS, et al. (2014) Attenuation of airway inflammation by simvastatin and the implications for asthma treatment: is the jury still out? Exp Mol Med 46: e113.
  20. Liu M, Yu Y, Jiang H, Zhang L, Zhang PP, et al. (2013) Simvastatin suppresses vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis in ApoE(-/-) mice by downregulating the HMGB1-RAGE axis. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 34: 830-836.
  21. Tahara N, Kai H, Ishibashi M, Nakaura H, Kaida H, et al. (2006) Simvastatin attenuates plaque inflammation : evaluation by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 48: 1825-1831.
Citation: Liu X, Liang H, Li K, Li J, Li L, et al. (2017) The Effect of High-Dose Simvastatin Therapy on Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction. J Clin Exp Cardiolog 8:527.

Copyright: © 2017 Liu X, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top