Journal of Women's Health Care

Journal of Women's Health Care
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0420

Research Article - (2017) Volume 6, Issue 4

The Impact of Incarceration on Greek Female Prisoners’ Self-reported Health Status

Stella-Olga Milioni* and Mary Geitona
Department of Social and Educational Policy, University of Peloponnese, Damaskinou & Kolokotroni Str, 20100, Corinth, Greece
*Corresponding Author: Stella-Olga Milioni, Department of Social and Educational Policy, University of Peloponnese, Damaskinou & Kolokotroni Str, 20100, Corinth, Greece, Tel: +306946262150 Email:

Abstract

Objective: Studies attempting to investigate issues around detainees’ health status is limited in Greece and it is mainly focusing on specific prisons. The scope of this research was to investigate the impact of incarceration on health status of the Greek female prisoners’ population.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to both female correctional institutions existing in Greece during the years 2014 and 2015. A semi-structured questionnaire was given to incarcerated women who voluntarily accepted to take part. Data were collected via personal interviews and were anonymized. Statistical analysis was performed through descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis and multiple regression analysis with the use of SPSS 20.

Results: Out of 524 female prisoners, 397 met the inclusion criteria and participated in the study. 66.3% reported a moderate or poor health status, while the respective rate before detainment was 23.4%. Health status deterioration and poor mental health were referred by more than half of the participants. The access to health services and the quality of provided healthcare during imprisonment were considered as poor/very poor by 44.8% and 46.1% respectively. Almost half of the respondents expressed their dissatisfaction with the accommodation, the cleanliness, the nutrition as well as with the overall prison environment. Furthermore, the access to health services, the quality of provided healthcare and the experienced detention conditions affect female prisoners’ self-reported general and mental health status.

Conclusion: Female imprisonment impacts negatively prisoners’ self-reported health status. Our findings give a cue for additional explore with the specific end goal to meet the health needs of this vulnerable population as well as to improve everyday life in prison and life after release.

Keywords: Prisoners; Women health; Risk factors; Health services; Health care

Introduction

Prison population has increased by almost 20% in the last 15 years [1]. In 2015, more than 10.35 million people were incarcerated throughout the world, either as pre-trial prisoners or having been sentenced [1]. The female inmates have grown by 50% the same period, while the respective rate for the male prison population was 18% [1,2]. The expanding detainment rates directly affect inmates’ overall health status [3]. The high commonness of prisoners’ health related problems seems to be ascribed to various socio-economic characteristics for example destitution, low wage and low training level [4-7].

Additionally, previous studies uncover that inmates have difficulty in the access to health services and do not receive the appropriate care like people in the community [8-10]. The jail conditions are described by seclusion, mutual life, viciousness, uncertainty and congestion [10-12]. Imprisonment is for the most part connected with unhealthy lifestyle such as smoking, lack of physical activity and inappropriate nutrition that prompt the expanding rates of physical and mental ailments [10-12]. Health status is also worsening by unhealthy conditions of incarceration such as absence of clean facilities or means of personal hygiene [13]. Gender is considered to be an important factor in assessing the health status of the prison population [14-16].

Incarcerated women often come from an economically and socially disadvantaged environment, experience greater physical and mental health problems and have more needs in contrast to male detainees as well as to the general population [17-23]. Furthermore, women in prison have been found to be mostly dependent on alcohol or drugs [24], 10 times at greater risk of harming themselves than men [25] and three times more likely to have suffered physical or sexual abuse before their detainment in comparison with people in the community [26-29]. As far as sex and gender as a variable in healthcare utilization, it has been found that female prisoners report higher rates of demand health services than incarcerated men [30].

In Greece, research in the field of evaluating prisoners’ self-reported health status is limited with few existing studies focusing on male prison population and on male detention facilities [31-38]. Only three studies focusing on female incarceration conditions and self-reported health status have been published recently from the female prison in Attica that highlighted this issue in the country [39-41]. Against this background, a study focusing on the whole Greek female prison population was necessary, given that imprisonment effect prisoners’ overall health status, everyday life, as well as their future after release. Thus, the purpose of this study was to explore the influence of incarceration on Greek female prisoners’ self-reported health status in relation to the provided healthcare and the experienced detention conditions during incarceration.

Methodology

Study design and sample selection

Given that women in Greek penal institutions reach approximately 4.9% of the total prison population [2], there are only two female prisons in the country, one in the prefecture of Attica and one in Central Greece. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to both female detention centers between January 2014 and December 2015 by the University of Peloponnese which was given an entry permit by the Ministry of Justice [40,41]. The study was also approved by School of Social Sciences Ethics Committee [40,41].

Out of a total of 524 incarcerated women in the two female prisons existing in Greece, 397 met the inclusion criteria and accepted to participate in the study. Being in solitary confinement, suffering from serious psychiatric problems and inability to understand the Greek language constituted the exclusion criteria. Analytical information on the sampling design is presented in Figure 1.

womens-health-care-sampling-design

Figure 1: Flowchart of the sampling design.

The recruitment process was undertaken by prison’s social workers, specially trained for the purpose of the study by the university research team. The prisoners were informed on the study objectives and scope and asked if they wanted to take part after a verbal consent. The list of participants was subsequently given to the University research team and the interviews were scheduled.

Study instrument

A questionnaire was developed based on international literature review [42-44]. A pilot research was carried out in January 2014 on a convenience sample of 20 female prisoners from the target population in order to evaluate its clarity, comprehensiveness and content validity [45] and feedback was incorporated into the final version which included four sections. The first section consisted of questions regarding prisoners’ socio-demographic and detention characteristics. Self-reported health status and health risk behavior related questions were investigated in the second section. The third section included questions with regard to the access and utilization of health services as well as with the quality of the provided healthcare.

Questions relevant to the incarceration conditions such as accommodation, cleanliness, nutrition and the overall satisfaction with the prison environment were referred to the forth section. The questionnaire included several close-ended questions with a five-point scale, where responses ranged from "very poor" to "very good" in order to evaluate female prisoners’ general/ mental health status, their access to health services, the quality of provided healthcare and their satisfaction on the experienced detention conditions.

The rates of expressed negative feelings such as sadness, anxiety or discomfort and their affect in inmates’ everyday life were also investigated with a five-point scale from "very little" to "very much". Closed-ended questions were also included to explore the use of tobacco and drugs. Data collected via face to face interviews with the inmates in Greek language by a researcher of the University of Peloponnese, with more than five years’ experience in managing vulnerable population groups, without the prison’s personnel presence. All information received was anonymized to ensure confidentiality.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed through descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis. The results are presented as absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies for the nominal and ordinal variables and as mean values for the quantitative variables. The proportions of answers poor/ very poor or good/very good were presented as a cumulative result. When variables were not normally distributed, nonparametric tests were performed. In particular, in order to investigate the difference between general health status before and during detention, the Wilcoxon test was used.

Multiple regression analysis with backward method was also used to determine the factors which effect on self-reported general and mental health status, and then the proportion of total variation for general and mental health status were explained with the selected independent variables. The statistical analyses were conducted on S.P.S.S. 20 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences).

Results

Out of a total of 524 incarcerated women in Greece, 397 were met the inclusion criteria and accepted to participate in the survey, reaching a 75.8% response rate. The majority (76.1%) of the study population was Greek with a mean age of 44.3 years (Table 1). 33.8% was unmarried and 68.8% reported having children. 36.8% had secondary education and 68.5% was employed before their incarceration. The main reasons of imprisonment were financial reasons (33.3%), drug trafficking (31.7%) and theft/robbery (19.4%). The rates were lower for murders (7.6%) and other reasons (8%). It should also be noted that only 29.2% of the participants were pre-trial prisoners. For the vast majority (82.4%) of the respondents, this was the first time being in prison (Table 1).

Variables N %
Mean Age=44.3 (SD. 12.5)
Citizenship
Greek 302 76.1
Other 95 23.9
Marital status
Unmarried 134 33.8
Married 116 29.2
Divorced 96 24.2
Widow 51 12.8
Children    
Yes 273 68.8
Occupation before detention
Employee 272 68.5
Student 6 1.5
Unemployed 56 14.1
Pensioner 22 5.6
Housework 33 8.3
Other 8 2
Education level
Compulsory 125 31.5
Secondary 146 36.8
Tertiary 79 19.9
Postgraduate 47 11.8

Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of the sample.

Health status and high risk behavior

Health deterioration during imprisonment was reported by 68.3% of the participants. More specifically, female prisoners were asked about their general health as well as their mental health status (Table 2). About 66.3% described their current general health as moderate or poor/very poor, in contrast to the 23.4% before incarceration. 50.7% rated their mental health as poor/very poor. The latter is further supported by the fact that 74.1% reported that they have been feeling “much/very much” sadness, anxiety or discomfort during the detention. About 73.8% also mentioned that these feelings affected negatively their everyday life in prison (Table 2).

Health status General health Mental health
Good/very good 33.70% 20.60%
Moderate 37.30% 28.70%
Poor/very poor 29.00% 50.70%

Table 2: Self-reported general and mental health status during incarceration.

With regard to high risk behavior prior to and during their detention, 68.3% of the participants were smokers. 36.4% used to smoke more than 21 cigarettes per day before, whereas this percentage increased to 57.2% during detention. 27% and 10.6% of the participants admitted that they had used drugs or injected drugs before the entrance to prison. These rates decreased to 13.9% and 1% respectively during detention.

Access to and utilization of health services

Female prisoners were asked to assess their access to health services as well as the quality of the health care provided during their imprisonment. The access to health services both inside and outside the prison, as well as the quality of provided healthcare in prison were described as poor/ very poor by 44.8% and 46.1% of the sample, respectively (Figure 2). Furthermore, 45.5% stated that it was easy to reach a hospital in an emergency, 34.6% answered negatively, while 19.9% said that they did not know.

womens-health-care-Quality-health-services

Figure 2: Access to and Quality of health services during incarceration.

Detention conditions

As far as prison conditions, 48.6% and 47.1% reported the accommodation and nutrition during the detention was bad/ very bad respectively. Similar were the results about cleanliness in sanitary areas and cleanliness in communal areas and in cell, where 47.1% and 44.4% of the sample respectively was dissatisfied. The overall prison environment was described as bad/very bad (49.9%), moderate (37.3%) and only 12.8% of prisoners rated it as good/very good.

Multiple regression analysis

In order to determine which factors affect the self-reported general health status of female prisoners, a multiple linear regression analysis was performed (Table 3).

Variables Unstandardized Coefficients Sig. 95% Confidence Interval for B
B Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
Constant 2.14 0.233 0 0.682 2.598
Age -0.017 0.004 0 -0.024 -0.01
Self-reported mental health status 0.536 0.04 0 0.457 0.616
Smoking -0.283 0.098 0.004 -0.475 -0.092
Nutrition conditions during detention 0.148 0.051 0.004 0.049 0.248
Cleanliness in communal areas and in cell 0.16 0.048 0.001 -0.255 -0.065
Overall satisfaction on detention conditions 0.168 0.065 0.01 0.04 0.297

Table 3: Female prisoners’ self-reported general health.

The model showed that:

• If increase the age of prisoners by 1 year then the self-reported general health status will decrease by 0.017.

• If increase the score of self-reported mental health status, then the self-reported general health status will increase by 0.536.

• If prisoners are smokers, then the self-reported general health status will decrease by 0.283.

• If increase the score of nutrition conditions during detention then the self-reported general health status will increase by 0.148.

• If increase the score of cleanliness in communal areas and in cell, then the self-reported general health status will increase by 0.160.

• If increase the score of general satisfaction on detentions conditions, then the self-reported general health status will increase by 0.168.

Also a linear model was performed in order to determine the factors which affect the self-reported mental health status (Table 4).

Variables Unstandardized Coefficients Sig. 95% Confidence Interval for B
B Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
Constant 1.487 0.306 0 0.885 2.089
Age 0.009 0.003 0.007 0.003 0.016
Current self-reported general health status 0.506 0.039 0 0.429 0.584
Feelings of anxiety. sadness or discomfort -0.344 0.043 0 -0.429 -0.259
Access to health services 0.145 0.044 0.001 0.058 0.232
Accommodation conditions during detention 0.113 0.062 0.071 -0.01 0.235
Nutrition conditions during detention 0.145 0.055 0.008 -0.252 -0.037
Cleanliness in sanitary areas 0.094 0.045 0.036 0.006 0.182

Table 4: Female prisoners’ self-reported mental health status.

The model showed that:

• If increase the age of prisoners by 1 year then the self-reported mental health status will decrease by 0.009.

• If increase the score of current self-reported general health status, then the self-reported mental health status will increase by 0.506.

• If increase the feelings of sadness, anxiety or discomfort, then the self-reported mental health status will decrease by 0.344.

• If prisoners have access to health services, then the self-reported mental health status will increase by 0.145.

• If increase the score of accommodation conditions during detention, then the self-reported mental health status will increase by 0.113.

• If increase the score of nutrition conditions, then the self-reported mental health status will increase by 0.145.

• If increase the score of cleanliness in sanitary areas, then the selfreported mental health status will increase by 0.094.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge the studies attempting to assess the impact of incarceration on female prisoners’ self-reported health status are limited in Greece. Τhree studies have been carried out assessing inmates’ health status only in the female prison of Attica [39-41].

The present study focuses on the whole female prisoners’ population in Greece. Our results revealed that approximately 3 out of 10 inmates rated their general health status as poor compared to that before incarceration, while more than two-thirds reported that their health status worsened during detention. The vast majority expressed negative feelings which affect their everyday habits. Nearly half of the participants reported that the access to health services and the quality of provided healthcare in prison did not meet their needs. With regards to detention conditions, one out of two of the respondents was not satisfied with the accommodation, the nutrition, the cleanliness of the facilities and the whole prison environment. Also, our results revealed that inmates’ satisfaction on the detention conditions and on the access to and quality of healthcare seem to influence their self-reported general and mental health status.

Most of our findings are consistent with the international literature. In Greece and other European countries, the common reasons of female imprisonment are drug-trafficking, financial reasons and theft/ robbery, while the violent crimes and murders are observed more frequently in the male prison population or in women incarcerated in USA [11,31,35,46-54].

Prisoners’ poor health status as well as a high prevalence of mental disorders and mental health deprivation have been reported in various studies [3,5,8,55-59]. Furthermore, it is confirmed that prisoners report a deterioration of their health status during their detention [3,30,60-62]. The age constitutes an important factor. Older inmates report a lower level of general health compared to younger prison population [3,14,63-65]. On the contrary, younger prisoners report lower self-reported mental health status in contrast to older inmates [66]. Literature review with regard to the age-related data is consistent with our findings where it has been found that female prisoners’ selfreported general and mental health status is affected by the age.

Prisoners tend to use health services more frequently than the general population [14,67]. Our study findings regarding female prisoners’ views and opinions on the access to and quality of health services also seem to be consistent with other studies reporting that inmates are provided a low level of health care during incarceration, since they do not have a direct equivalent access to health services in the community and they cannot choose their health providers, compared to the general population, [13,30,32,37,59,68-71].

With regard to risk factors, two thirds of the participants said that they were using tobacco during their incarceration. Almost the same and higher rates of smokers have been reported in other Greek and international surveys [33,34,36,38,72-77]. According to the study results, women increased their smoking habits by 20.8% during their detention period, while in previous surveys conducted in two Greek male prisons the relevant increase rates were higher (37.7% and 43.4% respectively) [33,34].

Dissatisfaction with the detention conditions was also reported in a Greek study focused on male prisoners as well as in the international literature [61,78,79]. However, the results of a survey in a male prison in Crete were different as two out of three respondents stated that the detention conditions were good or tolerated [32]. In addition, in a Scottish Prison survey the majority of prisoners expressed positive views about prison cleanliness and was generally satisfied with the provided nutrition [44,77].

There are numerous strengths in our study. The most important is that our findings can be generalizable to the country since they come from both female prisons existing in Greece, focusing on the whole female prisoners’ population. Moreover, the questionnaire and was completed during face to face interviews without the presence of the prison’s social workers. Consequently, prisoners could not misreport their physical and mental health status in an attempt to avoid being stigmatized or to avoid the risk of being deprived of certain privileges such as being allowed to work in prison or being allowed to leave the prison on temporary license [36].

The lack of a standardized questionnaire for assessing prisoners’ health status, access to and quality of health services as well as detention conditions might be a potential limitation; however, the tool developed for data collection was based on international literature review, it was tested on a convenience sample and also it has been already used in other two published studies [40,41].

Conclusions

The findings suggest that female imprisonment is associated with deterioration of self-reported health status. Restrictions on the access to health services and bad incarceration conditions are aggravating factors. Our findings should be used for decision making purposes in order to prevent the effects of incarceration on prisoners’ health and to introduce more effective interventions aiming at meeting their health needs, improving everyday life in prison and also life after release.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Ministry of Justice and the Directorates of the detention centers for allowing us to conduct this study and providing us with useful information and data. We would also like to express our sincere thanks to prison staff for the cooperation, support and valuable advice. Finally, we thank all the female prisoners who accepted to participate in this study.

References

  1. Walmsley R (2016) World Prison Population List, 11th ed. Institute for criminal policy research, Birkbeck, University of London, London.
  2. Walmsley R (2015) World female imprisonment List, 3rd ed. Institute for criminal policy research, Birkbeck, University of London, London.
  3. Nobile CG, Flotta D, Nicotera G, Pileggi C, Angelillo IF (2011) Self-reported health status and access to health services in a sample of prisoners in Italy. BMC Public Health 11: 529.
  4. Galea S, Vlahov D (2002) Social determinants and the health of drug users: Socioeconomic status, homelessness, and incarceration. Public Health Rep 117: S135-S145.
  5. Butler T, Kariminia A, Levy M, Murphy M (2004) The self-reported health status of prisoners in New South Wales. Aust N Z J Public Health 28: 344-350.
  6. Kunst AE, Bos V, Lahelma E, Bartley M, Lissau I, et al. (2005) Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health in 10 European countries. Int J Epidemiol 34: 295-305.
  7. Greenberg GA, Rosenheck RA (2008) Jail incarceration, homelessness, and mental health: A national study. Psychiatr Serv 59: 170-177.
  8. Conklin TJ, Lincoln T, Tuthill RW (2000) Self-reported health and prior health behaviours of newly admitted correctional inmates. Am J Public Health 90(12): 1939-1941.
  9. Van den Bergh BJ, Gatherer A, Møller LF (2009) Women's health in prison: Urgent need for improvement in gender equity and social justice. Bull World Health Organ 87: 406.
  10. Fazel S, Baillargeon J (2011) The health of prisoners. Lancet 377: 956-965.
  11. Marshall T, Simpson S, Stevens A (2000) Health care in prisons: A health care needs assessment. University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
  12. Walmsley R (2009) World prison population list, 8th ed. International Centre for Prison Studies, London.
  13. World Health Organization (WHO) (2013) Good governance for prison health in the 21st century: A policy brief on the organization of prison health. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
  14. Lindquist CH, Lindquist CA (1999) Health behind bars: Utilization and evaluation of medical care among jail inmates. J Community Health 24: 285-303.
  15. Clow B, Pederson A, Haworth-Brockman M, Bernier J (2009) Rising to the challenge: Sex and gender based analysis for health planning, policy and research in Canada. Atlantic Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Halifax, NS.
  16. Moschetti K, Stadelmann P. (2015) Disease profiles of detainees in the Canton of Vaud in Switzerland: Gender and age differences in substance abuse, mental health and chronic health conditions. BMC Public Health 15: 872.
  17. Mooney M, Hannon F, Barry M, Friel S, Kelleher C (2002) Perceived quality of life and mental health status of Irish female prisoners. Ir Med J 95: 241-243.
  18. Gunter TD (2004) Incarcerated women and depression: A primer for the primary care provider. J Am Med Womens Assoc 59: 107-112.
  19. Plugge E, Fitzpatrick R (2005) Assessing the health of women in prison: A study from the United Kingdom. Health Care Women Int 26: 62-68.
  20. Young M, Waters B, Falconer T, O'Rourke P (2005) Opportunities for health promotion in the Queensland women's prison system. Aust N Z J Public Health 29: 324-327.
  21. Harris F, Hek G, Condon L (2007) Health needs of prisoners in England and Wales: The implications for prison healthcare of gender, age and ethnicity. Health Soc Care Community 15: 56-66.
  22. World Health Organization (WHO) (2009) Women’s health in prison: Correcting gender inequity in prison health. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
  23. Van den Bergh BJ, Gatherer A, Fraser A, Moller L (2011) Imprisonment and women’s health: Concerns about gender sensitivity, human rights and public health. Bull World Health Organ 89: 689-694.
  24. Fazel S, Bains P, Doll H (2006) Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: A systematic review. Addiction 101: 181-191.
  25. Hawton K, Linsell L, Adeniji T, Sariaslan A, Fazel S (2014) Self-harm in prisons in England and Wales: An epidemiological study of prevalence, risk factors, clustering, and subsequent suicide. Lancet 383: 1147-1154.
  26. Harlow CW (1999) Prior abuse reported by inmates and probationers. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
  27. Corston B (2007) A report of a review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system. Home Office, London.
  28. Social Exclusion Task Force (2009) Short study on women offenders. Cabinet Office, London.
  29. Prison Reform Trust (2012) Women in prison. Prison Reform Trust, London.
  30. Bernier J, MacLellan K (2011) Health status and health services use of female and male prisoners in provincial jail. Atlantic centre of excellence for women’s health, Halifax, NS.
  31. Fotiadou M, Livaditis M, Manou I, Kaniotou E, Xenitidis K (2006) Prevalence of mental disorders and deliberate self-harm in Greek male prisoners. Int J Law Psychiatry 29: 68-73.
  32. Dandoulaki M, Kosteri V, Milaki V (2008) The psychology of prisoners. The case of prison in New Alikarnasos. Thesis, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
  33. Papadodima SA, Sakelliadis EI, Sergentanis TN, Giotakos O, Sergentanis IN, et al. (2010) Smoking in prison: A hierarchical approach at the crossroad of personality and childhood events. Eur J Public Health 20: 470-474.
  34. Makris E, Gourgoulianis KI, Hatzoglou C (2012) Prisoners and cigarettes or 'imprisoned in cigarettes'? What helps prisoners quit smoking? BMC Public Health 12: 508.
  35. Babasikas KD (2013) Inmates in greek prisons and their behavior: The role of institutional, psychological and spatial environment. Doctoral thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  36. Togas C, Raikou M, Niakas D (2014) An assessment of health related quality of life in a male prison population in Greece associations with health related characteristics and characteristics of detention. BioMed Res Int p: 274804.
  37. Athanasopoulou P (2016) Provision of nursing care to prisoners. Thesis, Western Greece University of Applied Sciences, Patra, Greece.
  38. Bania EG, Daniil Z, Hatzoglou C, Alexopoulos EC, Mitsiki E, et al. (2016) COPD characteristics and socioeconomic burden in Hellenic correctional institutions. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 11: 341-349.
  39. Vasilopoulou V, Vezyraki D, Chatzaki M (2008) Study of mental health in Greek and immigrant prisoners in detention of Korydallos. E-Thesis: Institutional Repository, Heraklion, Greece.
  40. Geitona M, Milioni SO (2016) Health status and access to health services of female prisoners in Greece: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 16: 243.
  41. Geitona M, Milioni SO (2016) Female prisoners’ views and satisfaction on incarceration conditions: Findings of a cross-sectional survey in Greece. J Psychol Psychother 6: 284.
  42. Douglas N, Plugge E (2006) Health needs assessment for young women in young offender institutions. Youth Justice Board for England and Wales, London.
  43. Brooker C, Fox C, Callinan C (2009) Health needs assessment of short sentence prisoners. University of Lincoln, Lincoln.
  44. Carnie J, Broderick R (2011) Prison survey 2011. Scottish Prison Service, Falkirk.
  45. Rea LM, Parker RA (2005) Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide, 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Imprint pp: 30-32.
  46. Fickenscher A, Lapidus J, Walker P, Becker T (2001) Women behind bars: Health needs of inmates in a county jail. Public Health Rep 116: 191-196.
  47. Parke R, Clarke-Stewart A (2002) Effects of parental incarceration on young children. Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
  48. Maguire K, Pastore AL (2003) Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics-2002. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
  49. Taylor R (2004) Women in prison and children of imprisoned mothers: Preliminary research paper. Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva.
  50. Bloom B, Owen B, Covington S (2005) Gender-responsive strategies for women offenders: A summary of research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. National Institute of Corrections, Washington, DC.
  51. Quaker Council for European Affairs (QCEA) (2007) Women in Prison: A review of the conditions in member states of the council of Europe: Executive summary. Quaker Council for European Affairs, Bruxelles.
  52. Aebi MF, Delgrande N (2010) Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics. SPACE I: Survey 2008. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
  53. Harner HM, Riley S (2013) The impact of incarceration on women's mental health: Responses from women in a maximum-security prison. Qual Health Res 23: 26-42.
  54. Prison Reform Trust (2016) Bromley briefings prison factfile. Prison Reform Trust, London.
  55. Fazel S, Danesh J (2002) Serious mental disorder in 23000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet 359: 545-550.
  56. Andersen HS (2004) Mental health in prison populations. A review-with special emphasis on a study of Danish prisoners on remand. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 424: 5-59.
  57. Watson R, Stimpson A, Hostick T (2004) Prison health care: A review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 41: 119-128.
  58. Clarke JG, Hebert MR, Rosengard C, Rose JS, DaSilva KM, et al. (2006) Reproductive health care and family planning needs among incarcerated women. Am J Public Health 96: 834-839.
  59. Plugge E, Douglas N, Fitzpatrick R (2006) The health of women in prison study findings. University of Oxford, Oxford.
  60. Robert D, Frigon S, Belize S (2007) Women, the embodiment of health and carceral space. Int J Prison Health 3: 176-188.
  61. Douglas N, Plugge E, Fitzpatrick R (2009) The impact of imprisonment on health: What do women prisoners say? J Epidemiol Community Health 63: 749-754.
  62. Proctor J (2009) The impact imprisonment has on women's health and health care from the perspective of female inmates in Kansas. Women Crim Justice 19: 1-36.
  63. Colsher PL, Wallace RB, Loeffelholz PL, Sales M (1992) Health status of older male prisoners: A comprehensive survey. Am J Public Health 82: 881-884.
  64. Fazel S, Hope T, O'Donnell I, Piper M, Jacoby R (2001) Health of elderly male prisoners: Worse than the general population, worse than younger prisoners. Age Ageing 30: 403-407.
  65. Butler T, Belcher JM, Champion U, Kenny D, Allerton M, et al. (2008) The physical health status of young Australian offenders. Aust N Z J Public Health 32: 73-80.
  66. Marshall T, Simpson S, Stevens A (2001) Use of health services by prison inmates: Comparisons with the community. J Epidemiol Community Health 55: 364-365.
  67. James D, Glaze L (2006) Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Bureau of justice statistics, Washington, DC.
  68. Feron JM, Paulus D, Tonglet R, Lorant V, Pestiaux D (2005) Substantial use of primary health care by prisoners: Epidemiological description and possible explanations. J Epidemiol Community Health 59: 651-655.
  69. Lee J, Vlahov D, Freudenberg N (2006) Primary care and health insurance among women released from New York City jails. J Health Care Poor Underserved 17: 200-217.
  70. Bjørngaard JH, Rustad AB, Kjelsberg E (2009) The prisoner as patient: A health services satisfaction survey. BMC Health Serv Res 9: 176.
  71. Sarpong AA, Otupiri E, Yeboah-Awudzi K, Osei-Yeboah J, Berchie GO, et al. (2015) An assessment of female prisoners' perception of the accessibility of quality healthcare: A survey in the Kumasi Central Prisons, Ghana. Ann Med Health Sci Res 5: 179-184.
  72. Cropsey K, Eldridge GD, Ladner T (2004) Smoking among female prisoners: An ignored public health epidemic. Addict Behav 29: 425-431.
  73. Belcher JM, Butler T, Richmond RL, Wodak AD, Wilhelm K (2006) Smoking and its correlates in an Australian prisoner population. Drug Alcohol Rev 25: 343-348.
  74. Sieminska A, Jassem E, Konopa K (2006) Prisoners' attitudes towards cigarette smoking and smoking cessation: A questionnaire study in Poland. BMC Public Health 6: 181.
  75. Nijhawan AE, Salloway R, Nunn AS, Poshkus M, Clarke JG (2010) Preventive healthcare for underserved women: Results of a prison survey. J Womens Health 19: 17-22.
  76. Qadir M, Murad R, Qadir A, Mubeen SM (2014) Prisoners in Karachi: A health and nutritional perspective. Annals Abbasi Shaheed Hospital & Karachi Medical & Dental College 19: 67-72.
  77. Carnie J, Broderick R (2015) Prison Survey 2015. Scottish Prison Service Falkirk.
  78. Singh KVP (2010) Human rights of prisoners: A case study of central jail Amristar. Thesis, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
  79. Cheliotis L (2012) Suffering at the hands of the state: Conditions of imprisonment and prisoner health in contemporary Greece. Eur J of Criminol 9: 3-22.
Citation: Milioni SO, Geitona M (2017) The Impact of Incarceration on Greek Female Prisoners’ Self-reported Health Status. J Women's Health Care 6:386.

Copyright: © 2017 Milioni SO, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top