Clinical Pediatrics: Open Access
Open Access

The Multidisciplinary Approach and Recent Innovations of Clinical Pediatric Surgery by Using 3D Printing Technology

Venu Ratnam^*, Samuel Jordson, Steve Johnson and Ken Smart ^*Correspondence: Venu Ratnam, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ohio Wesleyan, Ohio, USA, Email:

Author info »

Description

Evaluation of pediatric surgery

The history of pediatric surgery is marked by the relentless pursuit of improving the quality of care for children facing surgical interventions. In the early years, surgical options were limited and the mortality rates were high. With time, pioneering surgeons began to focus specifically on pediatric patients, leading to the establishment of pediatric surgery as a distinct specialty [1].

One of the key milestones in pediatric surgery was the development of anesthesia and aseptic techniques, allowing for safer and more precise surgical procedures. As technology advanced, so did the ability to diagnose and treat a myriad of pediatric conditions, including congenital anomalies, tumors and trauma [2].

Technological advancements

In recent years, technological advancements have revolutionized the field of pediatric surgery, providing surgeons with tools that enhance precision, reduce invasiveness and improve postoperative outcomes. Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS), including laparoscopy and thoracoscopy, has become increasingly common in pediatric cases. These techniques involve smaller incisions, resulting in less pain, faster recovery and reduced scarring for young patients.

Additionally, robotic-assisted surgery has gained popularity in pediatric cases, enabling surgeons to perform intricate procedures with enhanced dexterity and precision. The robotic systems allow for greater maneuverability in tight spaces, making them particularly useful in pediatric surgeries where delicate structures need to be addressed [3].

3D printing technology

In pediatric orthopedics, 3D-printed models of Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans can reproduce a replica of anatomical parts that allows surgeons to preoperatively plan and rehearse complicated procedures and determine the size of the implant that can be used intraoperatively. In transplant surgery, the use of 3D printed models of living donor and recipient vascular and biliary tract anatomy in pre-operative planning has been efficacious. Using 3D printed models to plan for operations involving rare or abnormal anatomy has also been used in orthopedic surgery [4].

Interdisciplinary collaboration

Clinical pediatric surgery often involves collaboration with various medical disciplines to provide comprehensive care for young patients. Pediatric surgeons work closely with pediatricians, neonatologists, radiologists, anesthesiologists and other specialists to ensure a holistic approach to diagnosis, treatment and postoperative care [5,6].

This multidisciplinary collaboration is particularly evident in complex cases such as congenital heart defects, where pediatric cardiac surgeons, cardiologists and other specialists collaborate to address the intricate challenges presented by these conditions. The integration of different expertise ensures that the unique needs of pediatric patients are met with a comprehensive and coordinated effort.

Challenges in pediatric surgery

While advancements have significantly improved the landscape of pediatric surgery, challenges persist. One major challenge is the inherent variability in the size and anatomy of pediatric patients. Surgical interventions must be tailored to the specific needs of each child, requiring a high level of skill and adaptability from the surgical team [7].

Another challenge is the emotional and psychological impact of surgery on both the young patients and their families. Pediatric surgeons often work closely with child life specialists and psychologists to support children and their families through the surgical journey, addressing fears and anxieties associated with the procedure [8].

Ethical considerations also play a crucial role in pediatric surgery, especially in cases where the child may be unable to express their preferences. Balancing the best interests of the child with parental consent and medical necessity requires careful ethical deliberation [9].

The approach to pediatric surgery

Looking ahead, the field of clinical pediatric surgery continues to evolve with ongoing research and technological innovations. Genetic and molecular advancements may offer new insights into the underlying causes of pediatric conditions, paving the way for more targeted and personalized treatment approaches.

Advancements in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering hold promise for creating solutions that can replace or repair damaged tissues in pediatric patients. This could revolutionize the treatment of congenital anomalies and traumatic injuries, providing innovative options for improved long-term outcomes [10].

Conclusion

Clinical pediatric surgery has come a long way, with advancements in technology, interdisciplinary collaboration and a focus on patient-centered care. As we continue to navigate the challenges inherent in treating young patients, the future of pediatric surgery looks promising. With ongoing study, technological innovations and a commitment to ethical and compassionate care, pediatric surgeons are well-positioned to provide the best possible outcomes for the next generation of patients. Pediatric surgery has been revolutionized by 3D printing, introducing cutting-edge surgical planning, patienttailored implants, and innovative avenues for educating both patients and providers. Looking ahead, 3D printing holds the potential for customized treatments, enhanced outcomes, and ongoing evolution.

References

1. Wu W, Sabharwal S, Bunker M, Sabharwal S. 3D Printing technology in pediatric orthopedics: A primer for the clinician. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023;16(9):398-409.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Johnson KN, Vacek J, Carter S. Applications for ultrasound in pediatric surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2024;33(1):151383

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Godeke J, Muensterer O, Rohleder S. Artificial intelligence in pediatric surgery: Present and future. Chirurg. 2020;91(3):222-228.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Klazura G, Stephens C, Musinguzi E, Mugarura R, Nyonyintono J, Laverde R, et al. Pediatric emergency surgery course in uganda: Long-term follow-up and insights from further dissemination. J Surg Res. 2024;295:837-845.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Ramos-Gonzalez G, Williams S, Miller A, Mosha M, Irby I, Chang HL, et al. Language differences by race on letters of recommendation for the pediatric surgery match. J Surg Educ. 2023;80(12):1789-1798.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

6. Lotakis DM, Spencer BL, Aboumourad N, Hoff L, Gingrich D, Vaishnav A, et al. Implementation of standardized educational material in outpatient pediatric surgery: A pilot study. J Surg Res. 2024;294:9-15.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Naluyimbazi R, Nimanya S, Kisa P. Anatomy and lessons of partnerships in global pediatric surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2023;32(6):151353.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Bhatia MB, Anderson CM, Hussein AN, Opondo B, Aruwa N, Okumu O, et al. Bilateral exchange: Enteral nutrition clinical decision making in pediatric surgery patients. J Surg Res. 2024;295:139-147.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. AlFraih Y, AlGhamdi M, AlShehri A, AlTokhais T. Social media in pediatric surgery: Patient perceptions and utilization. J Pediatr Surg. 2023;58(11):2192-2195.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

10. Mansfield SA, Morrison Z, Utria AF, Reyes C, Garcia AV, Stallion A, et al. Improving pathways to eliminate underrepresentation in the pediatric surgery workforce: A call to action. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57(7):1309-1314.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]