Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Anesthesia & Clinical Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-6148

Short Communication - (2021)Volume 12, Issue 6

The Need for Improved Airway Management Techniques in Deep MAC

Roxanne McMurray*
 
*Correspondence: Roxanne McMurray, Department of Anesthesia, Union University, Tennessee, USA, Email:

Author info »

Description

The use of deep Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) has increased significantly with the advent of propofol and the expansion of procedures outside hospital-based operating rooms [1]. During deep MAC, the goal is to provide sedation while preserving spontaneous ventilation and avoiding apnea [2,3]. Maintaining a patent airway is essential for mitigating adverse outcomes from inadequate ventilation and oxygenationrespiratory events being the most prevalent source of reported MAC anesthesia closed claims [4,5].

While heightened vigilance, preoxygenation, and improved monitoring techniques (e.g. capnography and bispectral index) have contributed to MAC safety [6,7]. The availability of airway devices optimized for deep MAC has lagged [2]. Oropharyngeal airways (OPAs) often cannot reach the redundant distal pharyngeal tissue within the upper airway near the epiglottis to stent it open [8]. A recent survey of anesthesia professionals indicated that 88% use jaw thrust and chin lift maneuvers in conjunction with OPAs to maintain patency [8]. These maneuvers can result in post-operative jaw and chin pain for patients, as well as hand pain for clinicians [8,9]. Additionally, this occupies the providers’ hands, limiting their ability to address other tasks. OPA-related adverse effects include coughing, gagging, swelling, damage to teeth intraoral structures, and postoperative sore throat [10-13]. Nasopharyngeal airways may cause epistaxis or increased cardiovascular response, can be difficult to place in patients with nasal abnormalities, and should be avoided in anticoagulated patients [14,15].

Because of the paucity of airways optimized for MAC, clinical workarounds-including use of nasal airways in the oral cavityhave emerged. Smaller-diameter, flexible nasal airways inserted through the mouth are easier to position than hard plastic OPAs, decrease the need for jaw thrust and chin lift maneuvers, and may also reduce postoperative sore throat [10]. In a survey of 293 U.S. anesthesia professionals, more than half (52.8%) have used a nasal airway orally [10]. Despite these perceived benefits, nasal airways are not designed for this purpose and can pose patient safety risks including dislodgement into the airway and airway occlusion, which poses patient safety and liability issues [10].

A New Device

To reduce this off-label practice and provide a much-needed solution, a newer hybrid airway device combines the flexibility and longer tubing length of the nasal airway with the structural integrity of existing rigid oral devices. The additional tubing length stents open the pharyngeal tissue that current airways are unable to reach. Smaller diameter tubing also eases insertion and mitigates potential oral injury associated with hard airways. One such hybrid airway includes additional patient safety components such as an integrated cushioned bite block to aid in placement and decrease dental trauma, as well as an optional connector that connects to an anesthesia circuit or manual resuscitator. As recent nasal cannulas and masks have been developed to improve oxygenation under deep MAC, the McMurray Enhanced Airway or MEA opens the airway to help improve ventilation (Figure 1) [16].

anesthesia-clinical-Pharyngeal

Figure 1: A Distal Pharyngeal Airway Device (DPA)

Conclusion

As the use of deep MAC grows, anesthesia providers need safe, intuitive, effective, and easy-to-place tools designed to reduce apnea and improve oxygenation and ventilation, resulting in improved patient outcomes and patient safety.

References

  1. Sohn HM, Ryu JH. Monitored Anesthesia Care in and Outside the Operating Room. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2016;69(4):310-319.
  2. Smith I, Skues MA, Philip BK. Ambulatory Outpatient Anesthesia. Miller's Anesthesia. 2015;15(5):2610-2619.
  3. Riphaus A, Gstettenbauer T, Frenz MB, Wehrmann T. Quality of Psychomotor Recovery After Propofol Sedation For Routine Endoscopy: A Randomized and Controlled Study. Endoscopy. 2006;38(7):677-683.
  4. Mora JC, Kaye AD, Romankowski ML, Delahoussaye PJ, Urman RD, Przkora R. Trends in Anesthesia-Related Liability and Lessons Learned. Advances in anesthesia. 2018;36(1):231-249.
  5. Larson S, Matthews R, Jordan L, Hirsch M. Improving Patient Outcomes Claims Analysis: Salient Characteristics and Patterns Associated With Respiratory Events. AANA J. 2018;86(3):201-208.
  6. Sirian R, Wills J. Physiology of apnoea and the benefits of preoxygenation. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain. 2009;9(4):105-108
  7. Vakil E, Sarkiss M, Ost D, Vial MR, Casal RF, Eapen GA, et al. Safety of monitored anesthesia care using Propofol-based sedation for Pleuroscopy. Respiration. 2018;95(1):1-7.
  8. Isono S. One Hand, Two Hands, or No Hands for Maximizing Airway Maneuvers?. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2008;109(4):576-577.
  9. Solorzano M (2015)  Faust’s Anesthesiology Review. Elsevier Saunders Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  10. Roxanne McMurray DN, Logan Becker DN, McMurray M. Airway management for deep sedation: Current practice, limitations, and needs as identified by clinical observation and survey results. AANA journal. 2020;88(2):123-129
  11. Castro D, Freeman L (2018) oropharyngeal Airway. StatPearls  NCBI Bookshelf. USA.
  12. Hagberg C, Georgi R, Krier C. Complications of managing the airway. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2005;19(4):641-659.
  13. Barash P, Cullen B, Stoelting R. Clinical management of the airway. Clinical Anesthesia Fundamentals. 2015;15(5):374-394.
  14. Atanelov Z, Rebstock S (2019) Airway, nasopharyngeal. In: StatPearls Treasure Island. Stat Pearls Press
  15. Tong JL, Smith JE. Cardiovascular changes following insertion of oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal airways. British journal of anaesthesia. 2004 ;93(3):339-342.
  16. McMurray RR, Gordan L. A Survey of Provider Satisfaction of a New, Flexible Extended-Length Pharyngeal Airway to Relieve Upper Airway Obstruction During Deep Sedation. medRxiv. 2020;23(5)1-05.

Author Info

Roxanne McMurray*
 
Department of Anesthesia, Union University, Tennessee, USA
 

Citation: McMurray R (2021) The Need for Improved Airway Management Techniques in Deep MAC. J Anesth Clin Res. 12:1018

Received: 09-Jul-2021 Accepted: 23-Jul-2021 Published: 30-Jul-2021 , DOI: 10.35248/2155-6148.21.12.1018

Copyright: © 2021 McMurray R. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top