Gynecology & Obstetrics
Open Access

The Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection with Fresh and Cryopreserved Ejaculated Sperm: A Comparative Study at the Yaounde Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproductive Teaching Hospital

Belinga E^1*, Noa Ndoua CC¹, Edimo WN¹, Voundi E², Toukam M², Massi N³, Jimenezd C⁴ and Kasia^{1 *}Correspondence: Belinga E, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Yaounde I, Cameroon, Email:

Author info »

Introduction

Since the introduction in 1953 and 1954 of a simple "Dry Ice" sperm cryopreservation method which maintained fertilizing capacity and resulted in normal progeny, the need of developing sperm banking has become paramount [1-10].

The role of this method of preserving fertility is to overcome the difficulty of having sperm available the day of oocyte retrieval in patients undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technique (ART) to treat infertility.

More than in only medical indications like azoospermia, the ability to cryopreserve sperm before undergoing ICSI allows more flexibility to the male partner. Also, it increases the range and number of therapeutic options available [3].

However, cryopreservation of sperm may decrease sperm parameters on motility and fertilizing capacity. It is responsible for some membrane distortion and possible DNA abnormalities [7,8].

Thus, using this process may impact on results of ART. Many studies throughout literature have compared ICSI outcome with the use of frozen-thawed and fresh sperm have shown a similar clinical outcome.

However, the spermatozoa used were surgically retrieved from the testis or from the epididymis in many of these studies [1].

In our center, we use ejaculated fresh or frozen-thawed sperm, irrespective of the spermogram being normal or having any abnormality. The choice of freezing the sperm is made in the event of difficulty in the timing of collection or availability of the male partner.

From the opening of our fertility center three years ago till date, no data is available on the effects and impact of cryopreserved ejaculated semen and ICSI. This study is the very first-ever, evaluating the outcome and impact of cryopreserved sperm in ICSI in the Yaoundé Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproductive Teaching hospital, in a sub-Saharan setting

Materials and Methods

We carried out an analytical cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection at the Yaounde Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery and Human Reproductive Teaching Hospital.

Our study extended over a period of 5 months, from December 1^st, 2017 to May 1^st, 2018.

The sampling was consecutive and exhaustive after institutional authorization, and ethical committee approval to carry out the study.

We included all patients who underwent an intracytoplasmic sperm injection after oocytes retrieval.

Patients who received fresh oocytes from a donor were also included. All the women were stimulated using an agonist protocol.

ICSI was carried out after egg decolonization. Evaluation of the injection was done eighteen hours later (Day 1) and zygotes could be observed and classified as 2PN when having 2 pronuclei, 3PN when having 3 pronuclei and non-cleaved for those which remained undivided.

The embryo was qualified based on the symmetry of blastomeres, the number, and the fragmentation rate.

Thus, high-quality embryos had 4 to 6 symmetrical blastomeres with less than 20% fragmentation rate. On day 3, high-quality embryos had 8 to 12 blastomeres with less than 20% fragmentation rate.

Lower quality Embryos were classified as intermediate quality or degenerated. The pregnancy rate was assessed 12 days after the transfer of the embryos.

We excluded patients who had incomplete clinical records and those in whom frozen oocytes were used during ICSI.

Data Collection

The data collection started by examining the records of all patients who had undergone Assisted Reproduction Therapy (ART) with Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection during the study period.

Then, the partners’ sperm and clinical data were collected.

Also, we recorded all data on the stimulation process, fertilization results, embryos quality at day 1, 2 and 3, the number transferred and the pregnancy test on day 12 after transfer or transvaginal ultrasound.

Statistical Analysis

The variables were compared using Chi-Square and Fischer’s exact tests. The error threshold was set at 5% as statistically significant for each variable studied.

The association between the variables was made using the Odds Ratio expressed with its confidence interval of 95%.

A logistic regression analysis was carried out to eliminate confounding factors. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 67 patients were included in the study with freshly ejaculated sperm being used in 42 patients using and cryopreserved ejaculated semen in 25 patients.

The mean ages were similar amongst women of groups I and II being 36.81 years ± 7.99years vs. 39.60 years ± 8.68 years respectively with p: 0.185 and for men being 42.61 years ± 7.95 years vs. 44.92 years ± 8.69 years; respectively with p: 0.273.

a) Comparison of fertilization rate between the fresh and the cryopreserved ejaculated sperm

When oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia (OATS) was present, the fertilization rate was higher in the fresh ejaculated sperm group 67.5% vs. 46,9%, than in the cryopreserved ejaculated group p=0,042 (Table 1).

Table 1: Distribution of the study population by fertilization rates.

b) Embryo quality in the fresh and the frozen-thawed ejaculated sperm

The quality of embryo was higher when freshly ejaculated sperm was used more specifically with total sperm and OATS.

Table 2: Quality of the embryos on day 1, day 2 and day 3.

As far as pregnancy rate was concerned, the freshly ejaculated sperm was shown to have a similar pregnancy rate with the frozen-thawed ejaculated sperm regardless of the quality of Sperm used.

c) Pregnancy rates in the fresh and the frozen-thawed ejaculated sperm groups after ICSI

The pregnancy rate was similar in the fresh and the frozenthawed ejaculated sperm as highlighted in Table 3, in total sperm as well as in the normal parameters and OATS subgroups of sperm.

Table 3: Distribution of the study population by the pregnancy rates.

Discussion

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of sperm cryopreservation on fertilization rate, embryo quality and pregnancy rate in patients undergoing ICSI using either fresh or cryopreserved ejaculated sperm. Prior studies showed higher fertilization rates in ICSI after using freshly ejaculated sperm compared with cryopreserved sperm [6]. When evaluating the pregnancy rate, no significant difference was observed [1,9]. Recent studies showed no difference in terms of fertilization rate and embryo quality after ICSI with either fresh or cryopreserved ejaculated sperm used [1].

However, some of the studies published evaluated the effect of cryopreservation on sperm surgically retrieved from testis or epididymis compared with ejaculated sperm. The cryopreservation procedure has been shown to decrease sperm quality without affecting fertilization capacity and thus qualified as a reliable and favorable method with the same outcome as fresh semen.

Our results highlight that when the sperm sample had normal characteristics; the fertilization rate was similar to freshly ejaculated sperm and cryopreserved sperm. However, the fertilization rate was higher in a fresh ejaculated group when OATS was present. Our study also demonstrated higher quality embryo on day 3 in the fresh ejaculated group when OATS was present. In spite of these differences, the pregnancy rates were similar in the freshly ejaculated sperm and the frozen-thawed ejaculated sperm groups.

Our findings correlate with the idea that the cryopreservation procedure worsens damages present in OATS patients than in patients with fresh semen. Thus, we postulate that the frozenthawed procedure worsens sperm parameters when OATS is already present before the procedure. But in the case of fertilization, this effect persists, impacting the quality of the embryo but doesn’t affect the pregnancy rate. Probably because the embryos that were transferred had already survived under the deleterious effect of cryopreservation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, semen with OATS may be more susceptible to sperm cryopreservation damage, resulting in lower fertilization rate and embryo quality. However, the pregnancy rate was similar in the fresh and frozen-thawed ejaculated sperm group is it with the use of total sperm or in patients with normal or OATS sperm.

References

1. Alfaraj S, Alshwaiaer S, Ahmed AE. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction Pregnancy outcomes of using ICSI with frozen-thawed spermatozoa in Riyadh , Saudi Arabia’, Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction. Elsevier. 2016;2:123-127.
2. Braun G, Potashnik G. Effect of cryopreservation on quality and fertilization capacity of human sperm. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;116:63-66.
3. Donnelly ET, McClure N, Lewis SEM. Cryopreservation of human semen and prepared sperm: Effects on motility parameters and DNA integrity. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:892-900.
4. Jr EB. Fertilization and pregnancy outcome after intracytoplasmic injection with fresh or cryopreserved ejaculated spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:5.
5. Kuczynski W. The outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of fresh and cryopreserved ejaculated spermatozoa-a prospective randomized study. Human Reproduction. 2001;16:2109-2113.
6. Moce E, Fajardo AJ, Graham JK. Human sperm cryopreservation. EMJ. 2016:86-91.
7. Santo MDi. Human sperm cryopreservation : Update on techniques, effect on DNA integrity, and implications for ART. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:854837.
8. Schachter-safrai N. Does cryopreservation of sperm affect fertilization in nonconstructive azoospermia or cryptozoospermia? Fertility and sterility. Elsevier Inc. 2017;107:1148-1152.
9. Sherman JK. Synopsis of the use of frozen human semen since 1964: State of the art of human semen banking’, fertility and sterility. Elsevier Masson SAS. 1973;24:5.