Sociology and Criminology-Open Access
Open Access

The Philosophical Underpinnings of Legal Systems: Schools of Jurisprudential Thought

Pinilla James^{* *}Correspondence: Pinilla James, Department of Law, Leeds Beckett University, Queen Square, UK, Email:

Author info »

Description

Jurisprudence, the study and theory of law, exhibits the essential ideas and precepts that support legal systems. It seeks to answer potential questions about the nature of law, its goals, as well as how it relates to justice, morality, and society. This study search into the various schools of thought within jurisprudence, the key issues it addresses, and its significance in shaping legal discourse and practice. Jurisprudence examines the nature of law by questioning its essence and characteristics. It addresses foundational issues such as what constitutes law, the sources of law, and how law differs from other systems of norms, such as moral or religious rules. Additionally, jurisprudence exhibiys the purpose of law, including its role in maintaining preserving social order, defending individual liberties, and advancing justice.

Schools of jurisprudential thought

According to the natural law idea, morality is the foundation of law. principles that are universal and immutable. According to this view, laws that contradict these moral principles are not true laws and lack legitimacy. Prominent natural law theorists include Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, and John Locke. Natural law theory has significantly influenced the development of human rights and constitutional law, emphasizing the idea that certain rights are inalienable and must be protected by legal systems.

According to legal positivism, laws are just a collection of guidelines created by human beings and is not necessarily linked to morality. According to positivists, law is valid if it is enacted by a recognized authority and follows prescribed procedures. H.L.A. Hart and John Austin are key points in legal positivism. Hart's concept of the "rule of recognition" highlights the importance of social conventions in determining what constitutes valid law. Legal positivism has been influential in promoting a clear separation between law and morality, emphasizing the importance of legal certainty and predictability. Legal realism challenges the formalist view of law as a system of logical rules, arguing that the actual practice of law is influenced by social, political, and economic factors. Realists contend that judges' their own experiences frequently influence their decisions, and biases rather than purely legal reasoning. Karl Llewellyn and Jerome Frank are notable legal realists. This school of thought has contributed to a more pragmatic understanding of law, highlighting the role of judicial discretion and the importance of considering the real-world impacts of legal decisions. A movement known as Critical Legal Studies (CLS) challenges conventional legal doctrines and institutions, arguing that they perpetuate social inequalities and power imbalances. CLS scholars draw on various intellectual traditions, including marxism, feminism, and postmodernism, to analyze how law serves the interests of dominant groups. Roberto unger and duncan kennedy are influential figures in CLS. This movement has brought attention to issues of social justice and has inspired various critical approaches to law, such as feminist legal theory and critical race theory.

Feminist jurisprudence examines how law perpetuates gender inequalities and seeks to reform legal systems to promote gender justice. It critiques traditional legal concepts and practices that marginalize women and advocates for a more inclusive and equitable legal framework. Catherine MacKinnon and Martha Fineman are prominent feminist legal theorists. Feminist jurisprudence has had a potential impact on various areas of law, including family law, criminal law, and employment law, by highlighting the need for legal reforms that address the specific needs and experiences of women. The law and economics school applies economic principles to the analysis of law, emphasizing efficiency and the allocation of resources. This approach evaluates legal rules based on their economic impact and argues for legal reforms that maximize social welfare. Richard posner and guido calabresi are key figures in the law and economics movement. This perspective has influenced areas such as contract law, property law, and tort law by promoting the idea that legal rules should be designed to achieve economically efficient outcomes.