Journal of Molecular Imaging & Dynamics

Journal of Molecular Imaging & Dynamics
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9937

Research Article - (2018) Volume 8, Issue 1

Verification of Endotracheal Intubation with Ultrasonography in Emergency Medicine Clinic

Mustafa K1, Gokhan Y2*, Suha S3, Bahadır C4# and Ismet P5#
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Buca Public Hospital, ?zmir, Turkey
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
3Department of Emergency Medicine, Ural Public Hospital, Ural, Turkey
4Department of Emergency Medicine, Elazig Training and Research Hospital, Elazig, Turkey
5Department of Emergency Medicine, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, ?zmir, Turkey
#Contributed equally to this work
*Corresponding Author: Gokhan Y, M.D, Emergency Medicine Specialist, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey, Tel: +905077866282 Email:

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: Endotracheal intubation (EI) is vital in emergency medicine where airway management is critical. In literature haven't got any gold standard method for endotracheal tube (ET) confirmation. Aim of our study is to compare sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography (USG) that has become widespread in emergency medicine, in confirmation of ET with other methods. Materials and Methods: This study is a clinical observational prospective single-centered and conducted at Emergency Department of Ä°zmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital in September – November 2014. All the patient above 18 years old who had been intubated because of medical indications and cardiac arrest are included. End-tidal waveform capnograph and oscultation were used. We used Ultrasonography (USG) just after incubation for confirmation of tube placement. During ventilation, both hemithorax and epigastric area were auscultated. Simultaneously, we used USG for lung sliding bilaterally. After six ventilations, we recorded value of partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) on capnograph and whether waveform was present, or not. Results: 37 patients were included to the study. 19 (51.4%) were men. 21 (56.8%) of the patient were intubated due to cardiac arrest, 2 (5.4%) of them due to low Glasgow coma scale (GCS), 12 (32.4%) of them too difficult intubation, 1 (2.7%) of them due to low partial pressure of oxygen (pO2), 1 (2.7%) of them to change ET. Sensitivity of USG for confirmation of tube placement is 100% (CI 95%; 40.23-100%), specificity is 96.97% (95%CI; 84.18-99.49%), positive predictive value (PPV) 80% (CI 95%; 28.81-96.70%), negative predictive value (NPV) 100% (CI 95%; 89.01-100%). Kappa value of USG is 0,87. Conclusion: USG is being largely used in emergency departments and shows high sensitivity and specificity to confirm ET placement. USG can be used to confirm endotracheal tube placement; so, complications of esophageal intubation can be avoided.

Keywords: Endotracheal intubation; Ultrasonography; EmergencyDepartment

Introduction

Airway management is the most important step in critical illness [1]. The correct placement of the ET provides the absolute continuity of the airway. Especially in emergency medical clinics, incorrect tube placement that can't be identified increases mortality and morbidity. In the studies performed, the defined incidence of esophageal intubation varied between 6-16% [2]. Location of ET; should be verified immediately after intubation with both clinical evaluation and assistive devices. In the literature, in addition to clinical evaluation, the most reliable method for confirming and monitoring the location of the ET is the continuous wave capnography [3]. The use of USG is expanding in emergency departments, intensive care and anesthesia departments due to its advantages such as safe, fast, reproducible, wide use and simultaneous imaging and maximum benefit in airway management [4]. USG, bilateral diaphragm movements, pulmonary atrophy associated with pleural movement of the lung, imaging of the tracheal tube, and ET were used to confirm the location [5]. In our study, we compared USG with auscultation and waveform capnography to confirm ET site in emergency medicine clinic; it is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of USG in airline safety.

Materials and Methods

Approval was granted by the Local Ethics Committee before beginning the study. It was designed as a prospective, single-center, clinical observational study. Emergency medical specialists and assistants who USG training were included in the study. These specialists and assistants were trained in lung and trachea sonography. All patients over 18 years of age who were admitted to the emergency service with arrested or intubated for medical reasons (airway safety, low GCS, elevated PCO2, low PO2) were included in the study. Patients under 18 years of age, known pneumothorax and open wound on the spine, patients with impaired neck integrity and tracheostomy were not included in the study. Verification of intubation location; in accordance with current international guidelines, under the supervision of an emergency medical specialist who manages the operation, through clinical evaluation and waveform capnography. In the clinical evaluation, the right and left hemithorax and epigastric region were auscultated. In the auscultation, right and/or left breathing sound was accepted as Endotracheal intubation. Breathing sound from the epigastric region was considered as stomach intubation. USG, after intubation, suprasternal area, S6 model device of Sonoscape brand was performed with 4.5-11 MHz superficial probe. Horizontal plane; single lumen imaging endotracheal intubation, double luminal imaging esophageal intubation. When the patient is ventilated for clinical confirmation of intubation; right and left hemithorax, midclavicular line, on the nipple, and the pleural shear motion with the superficial tissue probe on the vertical plane. Simultaneous right ventricular and/or left pleural gliding movement was interpreted in favor of endotracheal intubation. The absence of simultaneous bilateral pleural shift with ventilation was interpreted in favor of esophageal intubation. Entidal CO2 was measured by means of a wave-form capnograph with Masimo Emma. It was accepted that EI was present if the value after at least five ventilations was greater than 4 mmHg in waveform capnography and if characteristic waveform was present. Statistical analysis of the data obtained in the study was made using SPSS statistical software version 15.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated as mean ± standard deviation, median (minimum, maximum, frequency and percentage). The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of the comparative methods (in NPV, PPV, respectively) were calculated. Statistical significance was accepted as p < 0.05 for all analyzes.

Results

112 patients were admitted to the Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital Emergency Medicine Clinic. Thirty-seven of these patients met the inclusion criteria (Figure 1).

molecular-imaging-dynamics-Flow-chart

Figure 1: Flow chart of study.

21 patients of them arrest, 2 patients were admitted due to low GCS, 12 patients for airway safety, 1 patient for low PO2 and 1 patient for intubation tube replacement (Table 1). Of the 37 patients included in the study, 18 (48.6%) were female. The mean age of the patients was 71.86 ± 14.74. EtCO2 values were recorded after 37 patients were consented. The mean value of the measured values was 22.35 ± 13.34 mmHg (Table 2).

Variables Number (n) Percent (% )
Traumatic arrest 2 5.4
Non-traumatic arrest 19 51.4
Low GKS 2 5.4
Airway safety 12 32.4
Low pO2 1 2.7
Other 1 2.7
Total 37 100.0

Table 1: Reasons for intubation of the patients studied.

Age mean ± SD. year 71.86 ± 14.74
Sex, n (%)
 Woman 18 (48.6%)
 Male 19 (51.4%)
EtCO2. mean ± SD. mmHg 22.35 ± 13.34

Table 2: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients studied.

In our study, we observed that augmented auscultation, which is used as a gold standard for waveform capnography and clinical evaluation, shows high correlation. (Pearson Correlation Sign: 0.881, p and lt; 0.05)

During the study, 37 patients were enrolled. 33 intubations were determined to be tracheal in the first attempt. Tracheal USG identified 32 of these intubations as tracheal intubation. The tracheal USG identified 1 of these 33 tracheal intubations as esophageal intubation (False positive). No false negatives were detected (Table 3).

Variables Capnograph Esophagus, n (%) Capnograph Trachea, n (%) Total,
n (%)
USG esophagus, n (%) 4 (10.8) 1 (2.7) 5 (13.5)
USG trachea, n (%) 0 32 (86.5) 32 (86.5)
Total, n (%) 4 (10.8) 33 (89.2) 37 (100)

Table 3: Recognition of esophageal intubation with tracheal USG.

Sensitivity and specificity of tracheal USG; sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 40.23-100%), specificity was 96.97% (95% CI, 84.18-99.49%), positive predictive value (PPV) was higher than waveform capnography as the gold standard) was found to be 80% (95% CI, 28.81% to 96.70%) and negative predictive value (NPV) to 100% (95% CI, 89.01% to 100%). The kappa value for this evaluation was calculated as 0.87. This indicates a high level of coincidence (Table 4).

Variables Tracheal USG
Sensitivity (95% CI) 100% (40.23 - 100%)
Specificity (95% CI) 96.97% (84.18 – 99.49%)
PPV (95% CI) 80% (28.81- 96.70%)
NPV (95% CI) 100% (89.01 - 100%)
Kappa 0.87
CI: Confidence Interval; PPV: Positive Predictive Value; NPV: Negative Predictive Value.

Table 4: Sensitivity and specificity of tracheal USG according to capnography with detection of esophageal intubation.

Intubation was evaluated by pleural shear motion with USG. Pleural shear motion, 33 tracheal intubations; 32 as tracheal intubation and 1 as false positive esophageal intubation. 4 esophageal intubations, 3 as esophageal intubation. 1 esophageal intubation as false negative as tracheal intubation (Table 5).

Variables Capnograph esophagus, n (%) Capnograph trachea, n (%) Total,
n (%)
Pleural œsophages, n (%) 3 (8.10) 1 (2.7) 4 (10.8)
Pleural trachea, n (%) 1 (2.7) 32 (86.5) 33 (89.2)
Total, n (%) 4 (10.8) 33 (89.2) 37 (100)

Table 5: Recognition of esophageal intubation by pleural slip image.

Sensitivity and specificity of pleural shift movement assessed by USG; when compared to waveform capnography as the gold standard; sensitivity 75% (95% CI, 20.34% to 95.88%), specificity 96.97% (95% CI, 84.18% to 99.49%), positive predictive value (PPV) 75% (95% CI, 20.34% to 95.88%) and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 96.97% (95% CI: 84.18% - 99.49%). In this evaluation, the kappa value was calculated as 0.72 (Table 6).

Variables Pleural layer
Sensitivity (CI 95%) 75% (20.34% - 95.88%)
Specificity (CI 95%) 96.97% (84.18% - 99.49%)
PPV (CI 95%) 75% (20.34% - 95.88%)
NPV (CI 95%) 96.97% (84.18% - 99.49%)
Kappa 0.72
CI: Confidence Interval; PPV: Positive Predictive Value; NPV: Negative Predictive Value

Table 6: Sensitivity and specificity of pleural deposits according to capnography in determining esophageal intubation.

Discussion

Observation of auscultation and chest wall movements in confirming tracheal intubation is the most commonly used method, but these methods require chest compressions to be stopped during CPR. Waveform capnography is accepted as the gold standard. But; waveform capnography requires ventilation and pulmonary blood flow. Patients with a full stomach with false positive results due to gastric CO2 production; airway obstruction, pulmonary edema, etc. [6-8].

USG is portable, reproducible, low cost, emergency medicine clinics, intensive care, and even in the field is a method that is widespread, makes use of USG in airline management a remarkable method. In addition, USG images are not affected by low pulmonary flow. The USG can determine that the tube is esophagus, without ventilating the patient, and avoid unwanted effects [2]. If the USG is proven to be as sensitive and specific as the waveform capnograph in ETT site validation, it can be used where there is no capnography.

In our study, tracheal USG incorrectly defined tracheal intubation in a patient as esophageal intubation (false positive). In the work Abbasi and his friends have done; it has been reported that this condition may be due to anatomic factors such as thyroid calcification, and that some of the erroneous findings may be corrected by experience, even if not under the control of the user [9].

Comparing the pleural shear motion seen with USG and waveform capnography in confirming the tube location; sensitivity was 75% (95% CI, 20.34% to 95.88%) and specificity was 96.97% (95% CI, 84.18% to 99.49%). Pleural shear motion with USG was not as effective as tracheal USG in confirming ETT location. This is because; the pleural shear motion may be imitated by the physiological condition called the lung pulse. Pulmonary pulse, heart beat occurs at the end of the pleural effect. It moves vertically in a manner compatible with the pleural heartbeat. The lung pulse can be used to identify atelectasis or to exclude the pneumothorax. The lung pulse is more prominent when there is no pleural shift. When there is no pleural shift movement, the pulmonary pulse may mimic pleural shift. USG users should pay attention to this situation [10].

In this prospective study in emergency medicine clinic, waveguide capnograph was encountered in the USG with the USG in confirming the location of the ETT and in the auscultation methods and in the existing guidelines for advanced life support. In our study, the sensitivity of tracheal USG to detecting esophageal intubation was found to be 100% (95% CI, 40.23% - 100%) and 96.97% (95% CI, 84.18% - 99.49%) of specificity. The auscultation, which is the clinical method that we used to determine the location of the tube, was highly correlated with the waveform capnography. In these findings, tracheal USG may be an effective method of confirming ETT location. Like our study, we compared the rapid tracheal ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) and quantitative waveform capnography in a prospective observational study by Chou et al. USG has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity in tube site fixation. In the same study, Chou and colleagues found that real-time USG performed during CPR was an adequate method of confirming the tube location and resulted in a break in the chest press [2].

Because of our current studies and our work, it can be said that the use of USG in the tube location verification at EI is reliable. However, there is a need for further work in this regard (Figures 2-6).

molecular-imaging-dynamics-USG-image

Figure 2: (A) USG image taken with superficial tissue probe from suprasternal notch level. The superficial tissue defect is transverse. (B): The blue line shows the inner face of the trachea gyrus. The red line shows the carotid artery.

molecular-imaging-dynamics-cricothyroid-membrane

Figure 3: USG image taken with superficial tissue probe at the cricothyroid membrane levelof the endotracheal placement tube.

molecular-imaging-dynamics-suprasternal-notch

Figure 4: USG image taken with superficial tissue at the suprasternal notch level of the endotracheal placement tube.

molecular-imaging-dynamics-Tranverse-USG

Figure 5: Tranverse USG image in the suprasternal region - Esophagus intubation. The green line shows the trachea. The red line shows the image that the ETT produces as esophagus.

molecular-imaging-dynamics-pleural-shear

Figure 6: Midclavicular pleural shear motion and M mode image. The blue line shows the Echogenicity of the pleura. The orange circle shows the image of the costume and the artifact behind it.

Limitations

Our work has some limitations. Our study was carried out in a single-center emergency medical clinic. For this reason, the number of patients and the number of esophageal intubations is low. USG has not been able to assess the reliability of out-of-hospital areas from potential use areas for airway management purposes.

We also could not get enough information about the reliability of the USG in confirming the tube location in this age group because we do not take our patients under 18 years of age. Patients physical characteristics such as weight, body mass index, subcutaneous fat tissue may affect the accuracy of USG. However, we did not evaluate these criteria in our study. Variations in neck anatomy also affect imaging quality and accuracy. While USG users have basic training, USG is user-dependent. For this reason, the difference in interpersonal skills affects the results.

Conclusion

We concluded that USG made with suprasternal notch level line probe had high sensitivity and specificity in determining esophageal intubation. Verification of USG as a supportive method in confirming the location of endotracheal intubation can help early detection of esophageal intubation and prevention of complications. However, more work needs to be done on the USG's tube location verification.

Acknowledgements

The author declares that there was no financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity. There is no funding resource supporting the work submitted.

References

  1. Blanda M, Gallo UE (2003) Emergency airway management. Emerg Med Clin N Am 21: 1-26.
  2. Chou HC, Tseng WP, Wang CH, Ma MHM, Wang HP, et al. (2011) Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) for confirming ETT placement during emergency intubation. Resuscitation 82: 1279-1284.
  3. American Heart Association. (2006) 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) of Pediatric and Neonatal Patients: Pediatric Advanced Life Support. Journal Article in Pediatrics 117: e1005 to e1028.
  4. Kristensen MS (2011) Ultrasonography in the management of the airway. Review article. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 55: 1155-1173.
  5. Kundra P, Mishra SK, Ramesh A (2011) Ultrasound of the airway. Review article. Indian J Anaesth 55: 456-461.
  6. Sayah AJ, Peacock WF, Overton DT (1990) End-tidal CO2 measurement in the detection of esophageal intubation during cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 19: 857–860
  7. Takeda T, Tanigawa K, Tanaka H, Hayashi Y, Goto E, et al. (2003) Нe assessment of three methods to verify tracheal tube placement in the emergency setting. Resuscitation 56: 153–157.
  8. Levine RL, Wayne MA, Miller CC (1997) End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 337: 301–306.
  9. Abbasi S, Farsi D, Zare MA, Hajimohammadi M, Rezai M, et al. (2015) Direct ultrasound methods: a confirmatory technique for proper endotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 22: 10-16.
  10. Sim SS, Lien WC, Chou HC, Chong KM, Liu SH, et al. (2012) Ultrasonographic lung sliding sign in confirming proper endotracheal intubation during emergency intubation. Resuscitation 83: 307–312.
Citation: Mustafa K, Gokhan Y, Suha S, Bahadir C, Ismet P (2018) Verification of Endotracheal Intubation with Ultrasonography in Emergency Medicine Clinic. J Mol Imaging Dynam 8: 141.

Copyright: © Gökhan Yilmaz, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top