Immunome Research

Immunome Research
Open Access

ISSN: 1745-7580

+44-77-2385-9429

Research Article - (2015) Volume 11, Issue 1

Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Opportunities and Challenges in Veterinary Sciences

Raguvaran R, Anju Manuja* and Balvinder Kumar Manuja
ICAR-National Research Centre on Equines, Sirsa road, Hisar, Haryana, India
*Corresponding Author: Anju Manuja, ICAR-National Research Centre on Equines, Hisar-125001, Haryana, India, Tel: +911662276748, Fax: +91 1662 276217 Email:

Abstract

Nanotechnology has opened up new vistas for applications in almost all the disciplines of veterinary and animal sciences. Zinc oxide (ZnO) has been used as an alternative to antibiotics in animal feed. It has also been widely used for wound healing and various skin disorders. Recently ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) have attracted attention owing to their unique features. There can be numerous applications of ZnO NPs due to their antibacterial, antineoplastic, wound healing, ultraviolet scattering and angiogenic properties. These have also been used to promote tissue repair, as a food preservative and as feed additive. This paper reviews the recent developments in ZnO NPs research and its potential for application in animal health and production.

<

Keywords: Nanotechnology; ZnO nanoparticles; Antitumor activity

Introduction

Nanotechnology has become the forefront of research and has the tremendous potential to revolutionize the livestock sector. With the advent of this emerging field, wide varieties of nanoparticles with exciting characteristics are being manufactured and used for a broad range of applications [1]. The amount of manufactured nanoparticles will rise sharply to 58,000 tons by 2020 [2]. The metal oxide nanoparticles are most commonly used in catalysis, sensors, environmental remediation and personal care products [3,4]. Zinc oxide (ZnO) among nanosized metal oxides has been extensively used due to its antimicrobial and antitumor activities [5]. ZnO is generally included in cosmetic lotions as it is known to possess UV absorbing and blocking properties [6]. ZnO has also been used as an astringent for eczema, excoriation, wounds and haemorrhoids in human medicine [7]. Recently ZnO NPs have attracted attention owing to their unique features. There can be numerous potential applications of ZnO NPs in veterinary sciences due to their antibacterial, antineoplastic, wound healing and angiogenic properties. ZnO NPs have been used in tissue repair, as food preservative and as feed additive (Figure 1). In animals, the treatment of meningitis, tumors and diseases caused by intracellular pathogens like viruses, bacteria (Brucella, Chlamydia, and Rickettsia etc.) and fungi (Histoplasma capsulatum, Cryptococcus neoformans) is really difficult due to inaccessibility of the drugs to the target site. To treat these affections the therapeutic agents have to penetrate inside cells and able to cross the blood brain barrier. This is not possible with existing macro molecular therapeutic substances, but the nanoparticles can act against intracellular pathogens and brain tumors due to their small size [8]. This review deals with the potential applications of ZnO NPs in veterinary sciences. Numerous conditions in animals where ZnO NPs may play role and the potential uses of ZnO NPs as food preservative and feed additive have also been described. Finally, the challenges in terms of the potential toxic effects of ZnO NPs have also been discussed.

immunome-research-Schematic-presentation-potential

Figure 1: Schematic presentation of potential applications of Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) in veterinary sciences due to their antibacterial, antineoplastic, wound healing and angiogenic properties. ZnO NPs have also been used in tissue repair, as food preservative and feed additive.

Antibacterial Property

Commonly used antibiotics have narrow therapeutic index and their continuous usage leads to antimicrobial resistance [9]. The novel substitutes especially inorganic nanoparticles have recently attracted attention. Metal oxide in the nano-range acquires distinctive properties that depend on size, chemical composition and surface chemistry. Among the metal oxide nanoparticles, the ZnO NPs have been commonly used for their antimicrobial properties. ZnO has been found to reduce the activity of wide range of bacteria [10,11]. With the use of NPs the antibacterial property increased significantly [12-14]. The precise mechanism of antibacterial action is not yet understood, but four mechanisms have been hypothesized as illustrated in Figure 2. Firstly, affinity between ZnO and bacterial cells [15]; Secondly, microbial cell injury caused by hydrogen peroxide generated from the surface of ZnO [12,16,17]. Thirdly, upon penetration into bacteria ZnO NPs cause bactericidal activity by interacting with phosphorus and sulphur containing compounds like DNA of bacteria [18-21]. Last but not the least, ZnO NPs arrest the cellular metabolism of bacteria by binding to the protein molecules and ultimately causing death of the microbes [22].

immunome-research-Zinc-oxide-nanoparticles

Figure 2: Diagrammatic presentation of possible mechanisms of antibacterial action of Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs). ZnO NPs bind to the bacterial cells. The hydrogen peroxide generated from the surface of ZnO cause microbial cell injury and nanoparticles penetrates into bacteria. ZnO NPs cause bactericidal activity by interacting with phosphorus and sulphur containing compounds like DNA of bacteria. ZnO NPs arrest the cellular metabolism of bacteria by binding to the protein molecules and ultimately causing death of the microbes.

ZnO NPs have more pronounced antibacterial property due to small size and high surface-to-volume ratio. The size of the nanoparticles may have greater impact on their activity due to more accumulation inside the cell membrane and the cytoplasm [23]. Comparative study on antibacterial effect of both micron and nano scale particles of ZnO revealed that ZnO NPs have a greater antibacterial effect [24]. ZnO NPs could be ideal for replacing some of the existing antibiotics [25-28].

ZnO NPs can have application in conditions like mastitis in animals, where they can reach the target organisms generally inaccessible to conventional antibiotics. Mastitis is a disease of high yielding animals commonly caused by Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and E. coli. Economic consequences of mastitis include reduced milk yield and increased use of drugs and veterinary services [29,30]. It is really very difficult to treat mastitis due to antibiotic resistance. Presence of biofilm inside the udder tissue makes the bacteria impervious to physical, chemical and even innate immune mechanism [31]. ZnO NPs have been found to be effective against S. aureus and E. coli [32-34]. The treatment of staphylococcal mastitis in animals is really challenging due to intra cellular tendency of the organism. As the nanoformulations are able to penetrate the cell, ZnO NPs can be employed for staphylococcal mastitis. Most of the times, the pH of mastitis milk is alkaline in nature. The antibacterial with higher concentration in alkaline medium will be right choice to tackle this situation. Antibacterial activity of ZnO NPs against S. aureus was found to be greater at basic pH [32].

E. coli is a gram negative bacterium responsible for coliform mastitis in ruminants, white scours in calves and coli granuloma in birds. ZnO NPs have strong antibacterial activity against E. coli [35-37]. Fowl typhoid is a vertically transmitted disease caused by Salmonella gallinarum in chicken all over the world [38]. ZnO NPs were found to be effective against Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus [34,39]. Listeriosis, also known as circling disease is caused by Listeria monocytogenes characterised by encephalitis, septicaemia and abortion in ruminants. ZnO NPs were effective against L. monocytogenes at various concentrations [40].

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a gram negative, rod shaped organism and prefers to reside in moist anatomic sites such as respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts in animals and human being [41,42]. It is intrinsically resistant to wide range of antimicrobials like β-lactam, tetracycline and chloramphenicol due to drug efflux mechanism and presence of porin [43,44]. Biofilm formed by this organism makes another obstacle to antimicrobials [45]. ZnO NPs were found to be effective against Pseudomonas [32].

Bacillus anthracis, a spore forming bacteria, causes anthrax in warm-blooded animals. On the other hand, Clostridium an anaerobic spore forming microbe is responsible for various diseases like tetanus, botulism, enterotoxaemia, black quarter and braxy in animals. The spores produced by these organisms remain viable in the environment for prolonged period and mature to vegetative bacilli under favourable condition. These spores are highly resistant to extreme temperature and pressure. ZnO NPs have been found to be effective against the bacterial spores [46].

ZnO NPs synthesized from plant source revealed enhanced antimicrobial activity against various pathogens as compared to chemical ZnO NPs. The activity increased with increased dose and treatment time [47].

Antineoplastic Property

Amongst the existing treatment strategies for cancer, the chemotherapeutic agents are the most commonly used in clinical patients. Currently existing antineoplastics are not highly effective in curing the patients due to lack of selective toxicity. Indiscriminate use of antineoplastics may leads to devastating adverse effects like bone marrow suppression, neurotoxicity and cardiomyopathy [48,49].

So, there is great emphasis to develop novel anti-cancer agents that can selectively target cancer cells while sparing normal cells. Nanotechnology has opened new vistas for the treatment and diagnosis of cancer [50-52]. Nanoparticles can be employed as vehicles for targeted delivery to tumour sites [53]. The prime benefit is that they can be taken up by specific cells and internalized to the nucleus according to their surface chemistry.

At appropriate concentration ZnO NPs induced the production of variety of proinflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL-12 in in vitro and in vivo (rat) pulmonary inhalation studies [54-57]. Cytokines induced by nanoparticles could also facilitate effective anti-cancer actions by eliciting a cytokine profile appropriate for directing the development of Th1-mediated immunity [58].

ZnO NPs have been shown to possess cell selective toxicity having preferential killing of cancer cells with minimal toxicity to normal primary immune cells [2,53,59]. ZnO NPs based diagnostic devices are useful in the detection of low level of biomarkers for cancer diagnosis [60,61]. These applications of ZnO NPs can easily be extrapolated for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in common neoplastic conditions of animals like lymphoma, cutaneous cancer, transmissible veneral tumor and equine sarcoids.

Neoplasm of integumentary system is the most commonly encountered neoplastic disorder in domestic animals [62,63]. The harmony between cutaneous cancer and ultraviolet radiation has been well established in domestic animals [64-66]. In canines, deeply penetrating ionizing radiations induce blood and lung cancer [67]. Among the haematopoietic tumours, canine lymphoma is the most common in dogs [68,69] and manifested as generalized lymphadenopathy [70]. Canine transmissible veneral tumor also called as sticker tumor is spread through abraded skin or mucosa during coitus and also by licking [71]. Apart from facial region, it can also occur in skin and anal mucosa [72-75]. Metastasis is rare with this tumor but, involvement of regional lymph nodes and vital organs has been reported [76-82]. Tumour of mammary gland is often noticed in intact bitch [83]. In equines, equine sarcoid is the most common fibroblastic skin tumour affecting horses, mules and donkeys [84-86]. The infection is highly correlated with bovine papilloma virus type 1 and 2 [87,88]. The use of ZnO NPs may be explored for diagnostic as well as therapeutic approaches in these conditions.

Wound Healing

A wound by true definition is a breakdown in the protective function of the skin; the loss of continuity of epithelium, along with or without loss of underlying connective tissues including muscle, bone and nerves [89]. The sequences of wound healing comprise inflammation, epithelization, granulation and tissue remodelling irrespective of the etiology [90]. Microbial contamination of wound leads to delayed healing process [90-93].

Dog bite wounds are very often contaminated by diversity of microorganisms from different sources [94,95]. In chronic wounds, bacteria persist in biofilm form and they induce chronic inflammation which delays healing and make them more resistant to antimicrobial therapy [96]. In case of burn injury, affected animals are highly prone to bacterial infection and ultimately lead to severe septicaemia and death. It is reported that around 75% of mortality following burn injuries is associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Interestingly, ZnO NPs were found to be effective against Pseudomonas and S. aureus and can be used for injuries infected with these organisms [32].

Topical application of antiseptic preparations is the best for wound treatment because of their direct action at wound site [97-99]. Topical application of zinc has been reported to improve re-epithelialization, reduce inflammation and bacterial growth in case of leg ulcers [100]. ZnO possesses both antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties and accelerates the healing of both acute and chronic wounds [36,101]. It has potential application in the treatment of various conditions like dermatitis, blisters and open skin sores [102-104]. ZnO NPs are superior to conventional ZnO powder in terms of antimicrobial activities especially against Gram-positive organisms [34].

Nervous Tissue Repair

Nerve guidance channel (NGC) is a type of implant placed around the damaged nervous tissue to promote the healing. It is a hollow tube into which two severed ends of nerve fibre bundles are inserted and sutured into place. NGC provides congenial milieu that promotes or accelerates tissue healing. Conductive and piezoelectric materials such as polyvinylidene fluoride have been used to enhance the neurite outgrowth and regeneration of axon without any external electrical stimulation [105-107]. Incorporation of nanoscale [108] and piezoelectric elements [105] into the NGC independently enhance the neural regeneration.

Regeneration of CNS after injury is inhibited mainly due to astrocytic glial scar formation. Implant placed outside of the CNS such as an orthopedic implant may attract fibroblast cells and compromise the osseointegration. Astrocyte activity was minimized by composites made of ZnO nanoparticles and polyurethane [109]. These properties of ZnO NPs can be exploited for diseases of CNS in animals.

Food Preservation

Microorganisms such as E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella sp are the most common food borne pathogens and continue to draw public attention. Each year around 22.8 million cases of salmonellosis and 37,600 mortalities have been estimated in South East Asia [39]. In the present scenario, the ready to eat food products are getting popular because of convenience. They are highly prone to moisture loss, browning and biofilm action by microbes [110]. Contamination with microbes like E. coli, Salmonella and Staphylococcus aureus has been reported regularly in food products [39,111]. To mitigate the growth potential of foodborne pathogens, implementation of food safety management system is essential [112]. As the incidence of food borne infections is increasing all over the world, the safety of livestock products is important. Preservatives play an important role in storage and transport of perishable livestock products. Antimicrobial compounds in food packaging system recently attracted attention due to consumer safety and prolonged shelf life of the product [111]. Currently the food industries are utilizing organic and inorganic substances for food preservation. The inorganic antibacterial agents can withstand high temperature and pressure better than organic substances [17]. High stability and safety makes ZnO a candidate for use in food preservation [15,25].

Apart from silver nanoparticles zinc, copper and titanium are also used in packaging industry. ZnO NPs have been used as an antimicrobial agent in food packaging [33]. Antibacterial activity of ZnO NPs coated polyvinyl chloride has been observed against E. coli and S. aureus [113].

Feed Additive

Feed additive can be defined as a substance not having a direct utilisation as a nutrient, but included at an optimum concentration in diet or in the drinking water to exert positive action on the animal health or on the dietary nutrient utilisation. As an alternative to existing feed additives antibiotics are used due to their low cost and uniform response. Use of antibiotics in diet of pigs increased the weight gain and reduced feed conversion ratio by 0.16 and 0.07 respectively [114]. But continuous use of antibiotics provokes retention in animal tissues and subsequent consumption of such animal product will certainly increase risk of antibiotic resistance in humans.

Post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) caused by enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) is a major health concern in weaner piglets. It is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality and decrease in growth rate during the weaning period [115]. The addition of zinc (zinc oxide) at the concentration of 2500 to 3500 ppm in feed modulated the microbial status of the digestive tract and reduced the incidence of post-weaning diarrhoea in piglets [116,117] and increased productive performances [118,119].

ZnO has been found to be effective against PWD at a concentration of 3 kg/ton of feed, but the major limitation was high concentrations of zinc in faeces [119,120]. Supplementation of 100 ppm microencapsulated ZnO was highly effective when compared to supplementation of 3,000 ppm ZnO for suppression of PWD in the first 2 weeks after weaning and also reduced plasma zinc concentration and faecal zinc excretion levels [121]. It is obvious that the same effect may be achieved with lesser quantities of ZnO nanoformulation in the feed.

Ultraviolet Scattering

Ultra violet rays UVA-1 (340-400 nm) and UVA-2 (320-340 nm) upon reaching our skin cause several biological and metabolic reactions [122,123]. The dermal part of the skin plays a vital role in the photo aging process. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by UV rays activate different matrix metalloproteinases that subsequently damage collagen and other dermal matrix proteins [124,125]. Long-term exposure leads to degenerative skin changes, actinic keratoses and skin cancer. UV-B causes cancer in animals similar to those observed in humans. Heavy coats and skin pigmentation of most animals provide protection from UV-B, but eyes and exposed parts of the body are considered at risk.

Inorganic materials have proven efficacy against UV induced skin damage. Benefits offered by sunscreens based on inorganic compounds include absence of skin irritation and sensitization, limited skin penetration and a broad spectrum protection. Sun screen lotion containing nanoparticles of Titanium dioxide (TiO2) and ZnO are transparent and this property provides the cosmetic acceptability not achievable with opaque formulations [126].

Angiogenesis

Ischaemia is defined as local deficiency of arterial blood supply to an organ. It is caused by several factors like alteration in the wall, external pressure from abscess, cyst, and haematoma and blockage of lumen. It is also noticed in valvular thrombi of heart in pigs caused by Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, mural thrombi of heart in cattle caused by Clostridium chauvoei, verminous aneurysm of anterior mesenteric artery in horse caused by Strongylus vulgaris, Spirocerca lupi infection of aorta in dog, Onchocerca armillata affection in the aorta of cattle and finally in the ergot poisoning. Persistent ischaemia leads to necrosis or atrophy of affected organ. So, it is important to restore the perfusion of affected organ.

Angiogenesis is the process of formation of new capillaries from pre-existing blood vessels, involving both pro- and anti-angiogenic factors. It plays an important role in embryonic development, wound repair, post-ischemic vascularisation of the myocardium, tumor growth and metastasis [127-129]. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and basic fibrobroblast growth factor (bFGF) are the pro angiogenic factors used for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, ischemia and wound healing [127,130-133]. But their limitation with usage is associated with pathological angiogenesis, thrombosis, fibrosis and/or the tumor cells proliferation [134]. So, there is a great emphasis to develop novel pro-angiogenic factors which will specifically promote angiogenesis in required area without affecting normal tissue. ZnO nanoflowers have exhibited significant angiogenic property both in vitro and in vivo in chick embryo [135].

Safety Concerns with ZnO NPs

The properties that offer promise for the development of new technologies also pose an unknown risk to animals and environmental health. FDA considered ZnO as a generally recognized as safe substance (GRAS). The GRAS designation mostly encompasses materials ranging from micron to larger size. So, conversion of these macro substances to nanoscale will attain distinctive properties including toxicity. ZnO NPs tend to dissociate and release ions when exposed to a biological environment resulting in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and cellular oxidative stress [136,137]. Zinc is an essential component of enzymes (e.g. carbonic anhydrase, alcohol dehydrogenase, matrix metalloproteinase) and transcription factor like zinc finger protein transcription factors. Alteration in cellular Zn homeostasis in in vitro systems leads to loss of viability, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction [138]. ZnO NPs rapidly dissolve in acidic milieu and produce a high local concentration of Zn2+ ions.

Zn2+ is an essential element in cell homeostasis and remains in the bound form inside cells because free Zn2+ is very reactive and cytotoxic [139]. The sudden elevation of free Zn2+ levels may damage lysosomes allowing the contents to release into the cytoplasm and ultimately causing cell death [140,141]. ZnO NPs exhibit protein adsorption property which might be responsible for their cytotoxicity [142]. The pH-triggered (acidic) intracellular release of Zn2+ is mainly responsible for the toxicity of ZnO nanowires [143].

The pathological changes induced by ZnO NPs mainly depend on size and dose [144]. ZnO NPs were found to be toxic to all human or rodent cells when the concentration was above 15 ppm [145]. ZnO NPs have been studied extensively and they affect different cell types and animal systems [146-151]. They are toxic to animals after intra tracheal instillation [152] inhalation [153] and after oral administration [150,154]. Comparative study on kinetic properties of ZnO NPs with simple ZnO powder revealed that single intraperitoneal administration of 100 nm sized ZnO NPs (2.5 g/kg b.wt) accumulated in liver, spleen, lung, kidney, and heart and the concentration was higher than the administration of similar amounts of 1 μm sized ZnO particles [155].

We have demonstrated that interaction of different concentrations of ZnO NPs with horse erythrocytes revealed the absence of hemolysis by spectrophotometric method. While, phase contrast microscopic examination revealed concentration dependent clustering of erythrocytes [156]. It warrants the detailed investigation of interaction of erythrocytes with ZnO NPs before their applications in animals. There are still many challenges to be faced in terms of the potential toxic effects. Incorporation of metal nanoparticles into polymeric hydrogel matrices reduce the toxicity and improve the efficacy because of sustained and controlled release. The effective delivery of ZnO NPs can be achieved by entrapping, attaching or encapsulating into the nanoparticle matrix to prevent undesirable effects. We have observed that nanoformulation of ZnO NPs using biocompatible polymers enhances the efficacy at lower doses with sustained release [157]. The toxicity of ZnO NPs-loaded nanohydrogels was substantially lower compared to ZnO NPs.

Conclusion

We described various animal diseases, where antibacterial, antineoplastic, and angiogenic properties of ZnO NPs can be exploited. These have also been used to promote tissue repair, as a food preservative and as feed additive. Conversion of these macro substances to nanoscale will attain distinctive properties including toxicity. A discussion regarding the advantages, approaches and limitations on the use of ZnO NPs for various applications and drug delivery has been presented. The understanding of challenges in terms of the potential toxic effects of ZnO NPs, the possible mechanisms and cellular consequences as a result of ZnO NPs interactions with host cells is necessary to provide better delivery options for ZnO NPs. The approaches discussed to improve their safety will further make them attractive for various applications in veterinary species.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi for providing financial support. Raguvaran is thankful to ICAR for providing the fellowship during his MVSc.

References

  1. Zhao J, Castranova V (2011) Toxicology of nanomaterials used in nanomedicine.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 14: 593-632.
  2. Wang H, Wingett D, Engelhard MH, Feris K, Reddy KM, et al. (2009) Fluorescent dye encapsulated ZnO particles with cell-specific toxicity for potential use in biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 20: 11-22.
  3. Kumar C (2006) Nanomaterials: Toxicity, Health and Environmental Issues: Nanotechnologies for the Life Sciences (1stedn.) Wiley-VHC, Weinheim, Germany.
  4. Sun T, Yan Y, Zhao Y, Guo F, Jiang C (2012) Copper oxide nanoparticles induce autophagic cell death in A549 cells. PLoS One 7: e43442.
  5. Petchthanasombat C, Tiensing T, Sunintaboon P (2012) Synthesis of zinc oxide-encapsulated poly(methyl methacrylate)-chitosan core-shell hybrid particles and their electrochemical property.J Colloid Interface Sci 369: 52-57.
  6. Becheri A, Durr M, Nostro PL, Baglioni P (2008) Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles: application to textiles as UV-absorbers. J Nanopart Res 10: 679-689.
  7. Sweetman SC (2005) The Complete Drug Reference (34thedn.) Pharmaceutical Press, London, UK.
  8. Manuja A, Kumar B, Singh RK (2012) Nanotechnology developments: opportunities for animal health and production. Nanotechnology Development 2: 17-25.
  9. Baquero F, Coque TM, de la Cruz F (2011) Ecology and evolution as targets: the need for novel eco-evo drugs and strategies to fight antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 3649-3660.
  10. Söderberg TA, Sunzel B, Holm S, Elmros T, Hallmans G, et al. (1990) Antibacterial effect of zinc oxide in vitro.Scand J PlastReconstr Surg Hand Surg 24: 193-197.
  11. Jin T, Sun D, Su JY, Zhang H, Sue HJ (2009) Antimicrobial efficacy of zinc oxide quantum dots against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7.J Food Sci 74:M46-52.
  12. Yamamoto O (2001) Influence of particle size on the antibacterial activity of zinc oxide. Int J Inorg Mater 3: 643-646.
  13. Dodd AC, McKinley AJ, Saunders M, Tsuzuki T (2006) Effect of particle size on the photocatalytic activity of nanoparticulate zinc oxide. J Nanopart Res 8: 43-51.
  14. Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Povey M, York D (2007) Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J Nanopart Res 9: 479-489.
  15. Stoimenov PK, Klinger RL, Marchin GL, Klabunde KJ (2002) Metal oxide nanoparticles as bactericidal agents. Langmuir 18: 6679-6686.
  16. Sawai J, Igarashi H, Hashimoto A, Kokugan T, Shimizu M (1996a) Effect of particle size and heating temperature of ceramic powders on antibacterial activity of their slurries. J Chem Eng Jpn 29: 251-256.
  17. Sawai J (2003) Quantitative evaluation of antibacterial activities of metallic oxide powders (ZnO, MgO and CaO) by conductimetric assay.J Microbiol Methods 54: 177-182.
  18. Kim YS, Seo JH, Cha HJ (2003) Enhancement of heterologous protein expression in Escherichia coli by co-expression of nonspeci?c DNA-binding stress protein, Dps. Enzyme Microb Technol 33: 460-465.
  19. Kirchner C, Liedl T, Kudera S, Pellegrino T, Muñoz Javier A, et al. (2005) Cytotoxicity of colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles.Nano Lett 5: 331-338.
  20. Moghaddam AB, Mohammadi A, Dinarvand R, Badraghi J, Atyabi F, et al. (2008) Bioelectrocatalysis of Methyldopa by Adsorbed Tyrosinase on the surface of modified glassy carbon with carbon nanotubes. Int J Electrochem Sci 3: 291.
  21. He YT, Wan J, Tokunaga T (2008) Kinetic stability of hematite nanoparticles: the effect of particle sizes. J Nanopart Res 10: 321-332.
  22. Clement JL, Jarrett PS (1994) Antibacterial silver.Met Based Drugs 1: 467-482.
  23. Jones N, Ray B, Ranjit KT, Manna AC (2008) Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 279: 71-76.
  24. Jiang J, Oberdörster G, Biswas P (2009) Characterization of size, surface charge and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J Nanopart Res 11: 77-89.
  25. Fu G, Vary PS, Lin CT (2005) Anatase TiO2 nanocomposites for antimicrobial coatings. J Phys Chem B 109: 8889-8898.
  26. Reddy KM, Feris K, Bell J, Wingett DG, Hanley C, et al. (2007) Selective toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. Appl Phys Lett 90: 2139021-2139023.
  27. Berube DM (2008) Rhetorical gamesmanship in the nano debates over sunscreens and nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 10: 23-27.
  28. Liu Y, He L, Mustapha A, Li H, Hu ZQ, et al. (2009) Antibacterial activities of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Appl Microbiol 107: 1193-1201.
  29. Erskine RJ, Wagner S, DeGraves FJ (2003) Mastitis therapy and pharmacology. Vet Clin North Am Food AnimPract 19: 109-138.
  30. Seegers H, Fourichon C, Beaudeau F (2003) Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Vet Res 34: 475-491.
  31. Olson ME, Ceri H, Morck DW, Buret AG, Read RR (2002) Biofilm bacteria: formation and comparative susceptibility to antibiotics.Can J Vet Res 66: 86-92.
  32. Jalal R, Saliani M, Goharshadi EK (2011) Effects of pH and concentration on antibacterial activity of ZnO nanofluids against Staphylococcus aureus. National Iranian New Chemistry Congress, Shiraz, Iran, pp. 885-890.
  33. Bajpai KS, Chand N, Chaurasia V (2012) Nano zinc oxide-loaded calcium alginate films with potential antibacterial properties. Food Bioprocess Techn 5: 1871-1881.
  34. Tayel AA, El-tras WF, Moussa S, El-baz AF, Mahrous H,et al. (2011) Antibacterial action of zinc oxide nanoparticles against foodborne pathogens. J Food Safety 31: 211-218.
  35. Brayner R, Ferrari-Iliou R, Brivois N, Djediat S, Benedetti MF, et al. (2006) Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Lett 6: 866-870.
  36. Padmavathy N, Vijayaraghavan R (2008) Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO nanoparticles - an antimicrobial study. Sci Technol Adv Mater 9: 1-7.
  37. Wang C, Liu LL, Zhang AT, Xie P, Lu JJ, et al. (2012) Antibacterial effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on Escherichia coli K88. Afr J Biotechnol 11: 10248-10254.
  38. Rajagopal R, Mini M (2013) Outbreaks of salmonellosis in three different poultry farms of Kerala, India. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 3: 496-500.
  39. Akbar A, Anal KA (2013) Zinc oxide nanoparticles loaded active packaging, a challenge study against Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus in ready to-eat poultry meat. Food Control 38: 88-95.
  40. Arabi F, Imandar M, Negahdary M, Imandar M, Noughabi MT, et al. (2012) Investigation of antibacterial effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles upon life of Listeria monocytogenes. Annals Bio Res 3: 3679-3685.
  41. Gales AC, Jones RN, Turnidge J, Rennie R, Ramphal R (2011) Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: occurence rates, antimicrobial susceptibilitypatterns and molecular typing in the global SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, 1997-1999. Clin Infect Dis 32: 146-155.
  42. Hillier A, Alcorn JR, Cole LK, Kowalski JJ (2006) Pyoderma caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in dogs: 20 cases. Vet Dermatol 17: 432-439.
  43. Li XZ, Livermore DM, Nikaido H (1994) Role of efflux pump(s) in intrinsic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and norfloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38: 1732-1741.
  44. Nikaido H (1994) Prevention of drug access to bacterial targets: permeability barriers and active efflux.Science 264: 382-388.
  45. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2004) Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2: 95-108.
  46. Rosi NL, Mirkin CA (2005) Nanostructures in biodiagnostics.Chem Rev 105: 1547-1562.
  47. Gunalan S, Sivaraj R, Rajendran V (2012) Green synthesized ZnO nanoparticles against bacterial and fungal pathogens. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 22: 693-700.
  48. Bosanquet AG, Bell PB (2004) Ex vivo therapeutic index by drug sensitivity assay using fresh human normal and tumor cells. J Exp Ther Oncol 4: 145-154.
  49. Nie S, Xing Y, Kim GJ, Simons JW (2007) Nanotechnology applications in cancer.Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9: 257-288.
  50. Alexis F, Basto P, Levy-Nissenbaum E, Radovic-Moreno AF, Zhang L, et al. (2008) HER-2-targeted nanoparticle-affibodybioconjugates for cancer therapy. ChemMedChem 3: 1839-1843.
  51. Mishra B, Patel BB, Tiwari S (2010) Colloidal nanocarriers: a review on formulation technology, types and applications toward targeted drug delivery. Nanomedicine 6: 9-24.
  52. Shapira A, Livney YD, Broxterman HJ, Assaraf YG (2011) Nanomedicine for targeted cancer therapy: towards the overcoming of drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat 14: 150-163.
  53. Rasmussen JW, Martinez E, Louka P, Wingett DG (2010) Zinc oxide nanoparticles for selective destruction of tumor cells and potential for drug delivery applications. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 7: 1063-1077.
  54. Gojova A, Guo B, Kota RS, Rutledge JC, Kennedy IM, et al. (2007) Induction of inflammation in vascular endothelial cells by metal oxide nanoparticles: effect of particle composition. Environ Health Perspect 115: 403-409.
  55. Sayes CM, Reed KL, Warheit DB (2007) Assessing toxicity of fine and nanoparticles: comparing in vitro measurements to in vivo pulmonary toxicity profiles. Toxicol Sci 97: 163-180.
  56. Beyerle A, Schulz H, Kissel T, Stoeger T (2009) Screening strategy to avoid toxicological hazards of inhaled nanoparticles for drug delivery: the use of alpha-quartz and nano zinc oxide particles as benchmark. Inhaled Particles 151: 1-9.
  57. Hanley C, Thurber A, Hanna C, Punnoose A, Zhang J, et al. (2009) The Influences of Cell Type and ZnO Nanoparticle Size on Immune Cell Cytotoxicity and Cytokine Induction.Nanoscale Res Lett 4: 1409-1420.
  58. Lappin MB, Campbell JD (2000) The Th1-Th2 classification of cellular immune responses: concepts, current thinking and applications in haematological malignancy. Blood Rev 14: 228-239.
  59. Hanley C, Layne J, Punnoose A, Reddy KM, Coombs I, et al. (2008) Preferential killing of cancer cells and activated human T cells using ZnO nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 19: 295103.
  60. Dorfman A, Parajuli O, Kumar N, Hahm JI (2008) Novel telomeric repeat elongation assay performed on zinc oxide nanorod array supports.J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8: 410-415.
  61. Shen W, Xiong H, Xu Y, Cai S, Lu H, et al. (2008) ZnO-poly(methyl methacrylate) nanobeads for enriching and desalting low-abundant proteins followed by directly MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Anal Chem 80: 6758-6763.
  62. Valentine BA (2004) Neoplasia: In: Fubini SL, Ducharme NG. Farm Animal Surgery. Saunders.
  63. Hassanein KMA, Mahmoud AZ (2009) Pathological studies on tumor incidence in farm animals. Alex J Vet Sci 28: 105-117.
  64. Nikula KJ, Benjamin SA, Angleton GM, Saunders WJ, Lee AC (1992) Ultraviolet radiation, solar dermatosis, and cutaneous neoplasia in beagle dogs. Radiat Res 129: 11-18.
  65. Strom SS, Yamamura Y (1997) Epidemiology of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Clin Plast Surg 24: 627-636.
  66. Valentine BA (2006) Survey of equine cutaneous neoplasia in the Pacific Northwest. J Vet Diagn Invest 18: 123-126.
  67. Madewell BR (1981) Neoplasms in domestic animals: a review of experimental and spontaneous carcinogenesis. Yale J Biol Med 54: 111-125.
  68. Teske E (1994) Canine malignant lymphoma: a review and comparison with human non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Vet Q 16: 209-219.
  69. Dobson JM, Samuel S, Milstein H, Rogers K, Wood JL (2002) Canine neoplasia in the UK: estimates of incidence rates from a population of insured dogs. J Small AnimPract 43: 240-246.
  70. Vezzali E, Parodi AL, Marcato PS, Bettini G (2010) Histopathologic classification of 171 cases of canine and feline non-Hodgkin lymphoma according to the WHO. Vet Comp Oncol 8: 38-49.
  71. Stubbs EL, Furth J (1934) Experimental Studies on Venereal Sarcoma of the Dog. Am J Pathol 10: 275-286.
  72. Nielsen SW, Kennedy PG (1990) Tumors of the genital system: In: MoultonJE (ed.) Tumors in Domestic Animal (3rdedn.) University of California press, Berkely.
  73. Calvert CA (1984) Canine viral and transmissible neoplasias: In: Greene CE (ed.)Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease of Dog and Cat. Saunders, Philadelphia.
  74. Hamir AN (1986) Neoplasms of dogs in Papua New Guinea.Aust Vet J 63: 342-343.
  75. Batamuzi EK, Bittegeko SB (1991) Anal and perianal transmissible venereal tumour in a bitch. Vet Rec 129: 556.
  76. Prier je, Brodeyrs (1963) Canine neoplasia. a prototype for human cancer study. Bull World Health Organ 29: 331-344.
  77. Adams EW, Slaughter LJ (1970) A canine venereal tumor with metastasis to the brain. Pathol Vet 7: 498-502.
  78. McLeod CG Jr, Lewis JE (1972) Transmissible venereal tumor with metastases in three dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 161: 199-200.
  79. Oduye OO, Ikede BO, Esuruoso GO, Akpokodje JU (1973) Metastatic transmissible venereal tumour in dogs. J Small AnimPract 14: 625-637.
  80. Yang TJ (1987) Metastatic transmissible venereal sarcoma in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 190: 555-556.
  81. Pérez J, Day MJ, Mozos E (1998) Immunohistochemical study of the local inflammatory infiltrate in spontaneous canine transmissible venereal tumour at different stages of growth. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 64: 133-147.
  82. Ferreira AJ, Jaggy A, Varejão AP, Ferreira ML, Correia JM, et al. (2000) Brain and ocular metastases from a transmissible venereal tumour in a dog.J Small AnimPract 41: 165-168.
  83. Brodey RS, Goldschmidt MH, Roszel JR (1983) Canine mammary gland neoplasms. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 19: 61-90.
  84. Marti E, Lazary S, Antczak DF, Gerber H (1993) Report of the first international workshop on equine sarcoid. Equine Vet J 25: 397-407.
  85. Borzacchiello G, Corteggio A (2009) Equine sarcoid: state of the art. Ippologia 20: 7-14.
  86. Carr EA, Théon AP, Madewell BR, Griffey SM, Hitchcock ME (2001) Bovine papillomavirus DNA in neoplastic and nonneoplastic tissues obtained from horses with and without sarcoids in the western United States. Am J Vet Res 62: 741-744.
  87. Martens A, De Moor A, Demeulemeester J, Peelman L (2001) Polymerase chain reaction analysis of the surgical margins of equine sarcoids for bovine papilloma virus DNA. Vet Surg 30: 460-467.
  88. Leaper DJ, Harding KG (1998) Wounds: Biology and Management. Oxford University Press.
  89. Priya KS, Gnanamani A, Radhakrishnan N, Babu M (2002) Healing potential of Datura alba on burn wounds in albino rats. J Ethnopharmacol 83: 193-199.
  90. Bowler PG (2002) Wound pathophysiology, infection and therapeutic options. Ann Med 34: 419-427.
  91. Landis SJ (2008) Chronic wound infection and antimicrobial use.Adv Skin Wound Care 21: 531-540.
  92. Siddiqui AR, Bernstein JM (2010) Chronic wound infection: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 28: 519-526.
  93. Griffin GM, Holt DE (2001) Dog-bite wounds: bacteriology and treatment outcome in 37 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 37: 453-460.
  94. Meyers B, Schoeman JP, Goddard A, Picard J (2008) The bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibility of infected and non-infected dog bite wounds: fifty cases.Vet Microbiol 127: 360-368.
  95. Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Percival SL (2008) Biofilms in wounds: management strategies. J Wound Care 17: 502-508.
  96. Winter GD (1962) Formation of the Scab and the Rate of Epithelization of Superficial Wounds in the Skin of the Young Domestic Pig. Nature 193: 293-294.
  97. Hinman CD, Maibach HI, Winter GD (1963) Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds. Nature 200: 377-378.
  98. Hutchinson JJ, McGuckin M (1990) Occlusive dressings: a microbiologic and clinical review. Am J Infect Control 18: 257-268.
  99. Agren MS1 (1990) Studies on zinc in wound healing.Acta DermVenereolSuppl (Stockh) 154: 1-36.
  100. Atmaca S, Gul K, Cicek R (1998) The Effect of Zinc on Microbial Growth. Tr J Medical Sciences 28: 595.
  101. Rajashri SK, Amruta B, Vrinda PB, Koyar SR (2011) Bactericidal action of N doped ZnO in sunlight. Biointerface. Res Appl Chem 1: 57
  102. Shalumon KT, Anulekha KH, Nair SV, Nair SV, Chennazhi KP, et al. (2011) Sodium alginate/poly(vinyl alcohol)/nano ZnO composite nanofibers for antibacterial wound dressings. Int J Biol Macromol 49: 247-254.
  103. Kumar PT, Lakshmanan VK, Anilkumar TV, Ramya C, Reshmi P, et al. (2012) Flexible and microporous chitosan hydrogel/nano ZnO composite bandages for wound dressing: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4: 2618-2629.
  104. Aebischer P, Valentini RF, Dario P, Domenici C, Galletti PM (1987) Piezoelectric guidance channels enhance regeneration in the mouse sciatic nerve after axotomy.Brain Res 436: 165-168.
  105. Schmidt CE, Shastri VR, Vacanti JP, Langer R (1997) Stimulation of neurite outgrowth using an electrically conducting polymer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 8948-8953.
  106. Zhang Z, Rouabhia M, Wang Z, Roberge C, Shi G, et al. (2007) Electrically conductive biodegradable polymer composite for nerve regeneration: electricity-stimulated neurite outgrowth and axon regeneration. Artif Organs 31: 13-22.
  107. Webster TJ, Waid MC, McKenzie JL. Price RL, Ejiofor JU (2004) Nano-biotechnology: Carbon nanofibres as improved neural and orthopaedic implants. Nanotechnol 15: 48-54.
  108. Seil JT, Webster TJ (2008) Decreased astroglial cell adhesion and proliferation on zinc oxide nanoparticle polyurethane composites. Int J Nanomedicine 3: 523-531.
  109. Donlan RM (2002) Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis 8: 881-890.
  110. Cho IJ, Lee HS, Lim SJ, Koh JY, Kwak SH, et al. (2011) Detection and distribution of food-borne bacteria in ready-to-eat foods in Korea. Food Sci Biotech 20: 525-529.
  111. Luning PA, Bango L, Kussaga J, Rovira J, Marcelis WJ (2008)Comprehensive analysis and differentiated assessment of food safety control systems: a diagnostic instrument. Trends Food Sci Tech 19: 522-534.
  112. Li X, Xing, Y, Jiang, Y Ding, Y, Li, W (2009) Antimicrobial activities of ZnO powder-coated PVC film to inactivate food pathogens. Int J Food Sci Tech 44: 2161 - 2168.
  113. Cromwell GL (1991) Antimicriobial agents. In: Miller ER, Ullrey DE, Lewis AJ (eds.) Swine nutrition.CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  114. Hampson DJ, Pluske JR, Pethick DW (2001) Dietary manipulation of enteric disease: Proceedings of the VIIIth International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pig. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
  115. Jensen-Waern M, Melin, L, Lindberg R, Johanisson A, Peterson L, et al. (1998) Dietary zinc oxide in weaned pigs-effects on performance, tissue concentrations, morphology, neutrophil functions and faecal microflora. Res Vet Sci 64: 225-231.
  116. Broom LJ, Miller HM, Kerr KG, Knapp JS (2006) Effects of zinc oxide and Enterococcus faecium SF68 dietary supplementation on the performance, intestinal microbiota and immune status of weaned piglets. Res Vet Sci 80: 45-54.
  117. Hill GM, Cromwell GL, Crenshaw TD, Dove CR, Ewan RC, et al. (2000) Growth promotion effects and plasma changes from feeding high dietary concentrations of zinc and copper to weanling pigs (regional study). J Anim Sci 78: 1010-1016.
  118. Case CL, Carlson MS (2002) Effect of feeding organic and inorganic sources of additional zinc on growth performance and zinc balance in nursery pigs. J Anim Sci 80: 1917-1924.
  119. Poulsen HD (1995) Zinc oxide for weanling piglets. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section A-Animal Science 45: 159-167.
  120. Kim JC, Hansen CF, Pluske JR, Mullan BP (2010) Evaluating the replacement of zinc oxide with an encapsulated zinc oxide product as a means of controlling post-weaning diarrhoea in piglets. Report prepared for the Co-operative Research Centre for an Internationally Competitive Pork Industry Project 2C-114.
  121. Polderman MCA (2006) New applications of UVA-1 cold light therapy. Doctoral thesis, Leiden University.
  122. Norval M, Lucas RM, Cullen AP, de Gruijl FR, Longstreth J, et al. (2011) The human health effects of ozone depletion and interactions with climate change. PhotochemPhotobiol Sci 10: 199-225.
  123. de Gruijl FR (1998) Adverse effects of sunlight on the skin.Ned TijdschrGeneeskd 142: 620-625.
  124. Diffey BL, Grice J (1997) The influence of sunscreen type on photoprotection. Br J Dermatol 137: 103-105.
  125. Folkman J (1995) Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis.N Engl J Med 333: 1757-1763.
  126. Ware JA, Simons M (1997) Angiogenesis in ischemic heart disease.Nat Med 3: 158-164.
  127. Isner JM, Losordo DW (1999) Therapeutic angiogenesis for heart failure.Nat Med 5: 491-492.
  128. Dvorak HF (2002) Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor: a critical cytokine in tumor angiogenesis and a potential target for diagnosis and therapy.J Clin Oncol 20: 4368-4380.
  129. Lawler J (2002) Thrombospondin-1 as an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth.J Cell Mol Med 6: 1-12.
  130. Fried LE, Arbiser JL (2008) Application of angiogenesis to clinical dermatology.Adv Dermatol 24: 89-103.
  131. Claffey KP, Brown LF, del Aguila LF, Tognazzi K, Yeo KT, et al. (1996) Expression of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor by melanoma cells increases tumor growth, angiogenesis, and experimental metastasis. Cancer Res 56: 172-181.
  132. Barui AK, Veeriah V, Mukherjee S, Manna J, Patel AK, et al. (2012) Zinc oxide nanoflowers make new blood vessels.Nanoscale 4: 7861-7869.
  133. Donaldson K, Stone V (2003) Current hypotheses on the mechanisms of toxicity of ultrafine particles. Ann Ist Super Sanita 39: 405-410.
  134. Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Mercer R, Murray AR, Johnson VJ, et al. (2005) Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 289: L698-708.
  135. Kao YY, Chen YC, Cheng TJ, Chiung YM, Liu PS (2012) Zinc oxide nanoparticles interfere with zinc ion homeostasis to cause cytotoxicity. Toxicol Sci 125: 462-472.
  136. Maret W, Jacob C, Vallee BL, Fischer EH (1999) Inhibitory sites in enzymes: zinc removal and reactivation by thionein.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 1936-1940.
  137. Lee SJ, Cho KS, Koh JY (2009) Oxidative injury triggers autophagy in astrocytes: the role of endogenous zinc. Glia 57: 1351-1361.
  138. Cheng WY, Tong H, Miller EW, Chang CJ, Remington J, et al. (2010) An integrated imaging approach to the study of oxidative stress generation by mitochondrial dysfunction in living cells. Environ Health Perspect 118: 902-908.
  139. Horie M, Nishio K, Fujita K, Endoh S, Miyauchi A, et al. (2009) Protein adsorption of ultrafine metal oxide and its influence on cytotoxicity toward cultured cells.Chem Res Toxicol 22: 543-553.
  140. Müller KH, Kulkarni J, Motskin M, Goode A, Winship P, et al. (2010) pH-dependent toxicity of high aspect ratio ZnO nanowires in macrophages due to intracellular dissolution.ACS Nano 4: 6767-6779.
  141. Wang B, Feng W, Wang M, Wang T, Gu Y, et al. (2008) Acute toxicological impact of nano-and submicron-scaled zinc oxide powder healthy adult mice. J Nanopart Res 10: 263-276.
  142. Brunner TJ, Wick P, Manser P, Spohn P, Grass RN, et al. (2006) In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility.Environ Sci Technol 40: 4374-4381.
  143. De Berardis B, Civitelli G, Condello M, Lista P, Pozzi R, et al. (2010) Exposure to ZnO nanoparticles induces oxidative stress and cytotoxicity in human colon carcinoma cells.Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 246: 116-127.
  144. Osman IF, Baumgartner A, Cemeli E, Fletcher JN, Anderson D (2010) Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide in HEp-2 cells.Nanomedicine (Lond) 5: 1193-1203.
  145. Wahab R, Kaushik NK, Verma AK, Mishra A, Hwang IH, et al. (2011) Fabrication and growth mechanism of ZnO nanostructures and their cytotoxic effect on human brain tumor U87, cervical cancer HeLa, and normal HEK cells. J Biol Inorg Chem 16: 431-442.
  146. Chiang HM, Xia Q, Zou X, Wang C, Wang S, et al. (2012) Nanoscale ZnO induces cytotoxicity and DNA damage in human cell lines and rat primary neuronal cells.J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12: 2126-2135.
  147. Sharma V, Singh P, Pandey AK, Dhawan A (2012) Induction of oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis in mouse liver after sub-acute oral exposure to zinc oxide nanoparticles. Mutat Res 745: 84-91.
  148. Sharma V, Anderson D, Dhawan A (2012) Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce oxidative DNA damage and ROS-triggered mitochondria mediated apoptosis in human liver cells (HepG2).Apoptosis 17: 852-870.
  149. Fukui H, Horie M, Endoh S, Kato H, Fujita K, et al. (2012) Association of zinc ion release and oxidative stress induced by intratracheal instillation of ZnO nanoparticles to rat lung. Chem Biol Interact 198: 29-37.
  150. Wang L, Wang L, Ding W, Zhang F (2010) Acute toxicity of ferric oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in rats. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10: 8617-8624.
  151. Pasupuleti S, Alapati S, Ganapathy S, Anumolu G, Pully NR, et al. (2012) Toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles through oral route.Toxicol Ind Health 28: 675-686.
  152. Li CH, Shen CC, Cheng YW, Huang SH, Wu CC, et al. (2012) Organ biodistribution, clearance, and genotoxicity of orally administered zinc oxide nanoparticles in mice. Nanotoxicology 6: 746-756.
  153. Raguvaran R, Manuja A, Singh S, Chopra M, Manuja BK, et al. (2015) Zinc oxide nanoparticles induced haemolytic cytotoxicity in horse red blood cells. Int J Pharm Sci Res 6: 1166-1169.
  154. Chopra M, Bernela M, Kaur P, Manuja A, Kumar B, et al. (2015) Alginate/gum acacia bipolymericnanohydrogels-Promising carrier for Zinc oxide nanoparticles. International Journal of biological macromolecules 72:827-833.
Citation: Raguvaran R, Manuja A, Manuja BK (2015) Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Opportunities and Challenges in Veterinary Sciences. Immunome Res 11:095.

Copyright: © 2015 Manuja, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top